humanidades digitales por ryan shaw (university of north carolina at chapel hill, estados unidos)

Post on 20-Jun-2015

179 Views

Category:

Technology

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Ryan Shaw is an assistant professor in the School of Information and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In 2010 he received his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Information, where he wrote a dissertation on how events and periods function as concepts for organizing historical knowledge. He is also the author of the LODE (Linking Open Descriptions of Events) ontology, recently adopted by the UK Archives Hub for their Linked Data effort. In 2012 he received a three-year Early Career Development grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services to invent new tools for applying computational text processing techniques to organize large collections of civil rights histories. He is also a co-PI of the Editors' Notes project , a Mellon Foundation-funded effort to develop open, collaborative notebooks for humanists, and the PeriodO project, an NEH-funded gazetteer of scholarly assertions about the extents of historical, art-historical, and archaeological periods. In the past he has been involved in a number of digital humanities projects through his work with the Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative. In a previous life, he worked as a software engineer in Tokyo, Japan.

TRANSCRIPT

Editors’ Notes Managing Working Research Notes

Ryan Shaw School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

➡ What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

Our goal

is to provide a “medium by which much valuable information may become a sort of common property among those who can appreciate and use it”

Thoms, William J. 1849. “Notes and Queries.”

http://nq.oxfordjournals.org/content/s1-I/1/1.full.pdf+html

Documentary editing

Editors prepare collections of documents: letters, articles, diaries, essays, etc. !

Printed volumes provide context for better understanding subjects’ experiences and general milieu through footnotes, images, chronologies, articles

Documentary editing: workflow

1. Gather documents!

2. Contextualize select items!

3. Publish final product!

4. Repeat as funding allows

Example: !

Emma Goldman

Papers

Patrick— !Lenin: Had any of his family members beside his brother, been imprisoned? !What was the book he had written on ‘political economy’ that was used in Russian Universities? !New York (Evening?) Post, September 1918 editorial on IWW verdict for the huge IWW trial in Chicago.

Sources consulted, notes taken based on findings Notes stored in a Word document? Yellow notebook? Email? Negative conclusion reached to question, (but few will ever see this)

Working notes

… are relevant to source documents, but are not necessarily tied to any specific document (as annotations are)!

… may or may not become a formal finished product!

… critical to the functioning of scholarly projects at any scale

What are “working research notes”?!

➡ Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

ProblemsPublished volumes & necessary work are expensive!

Lack of space for all footnotes!

Much of research done is either glossed over in footnotes or not included at all!

Fact checking!

Falsification or dead ends!

Tangential biographical details!

Preservation & legacy

What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

➡ The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

http://editorsnotes.org/

NotesDescription

Status

Assigned users

Sections

Citation with optional notes

Stored as HTML

Revision history

Documents

Zotero for document metadata

High quality, zoomable scans

Transcripts in HTML with interface to annotate passages of text

Topics

Primary method of indexing items

Classified by type

Interface for clustering and merging

Design principles

Minimal amount of “friction” for researchers!

Flexibility for different work habits!

Consistency in data models!

Existing technology wherever possible!

Adherence to web standards

Open sourcehttps://github.com/editorsnotes

HTTP API built on Django web framework!

PostgreSQL database!

Haystack for full-text searching!

Zotero for document description!

Google Refine for duplicate detection!

Mozilla Persona for ID management

What has changed for researchers?

Implicit people, places, events

Explicit linkable entities

Free text Structured blocks

Filing cabinets Open access

BenefitsConnections linking topics are freed from the minds of editors & researchers and indexed for anyone to see!

Standardized records of work can easily be revisited from within a project or from outside!

New way of seeing the outer edges of humanities research!

Evidence of intense, often messy, scholarship behind concise, clean footnotes

What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

➡ Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

http://metadata.berkeley.edu/emma/

topic names statements

(triples)

candidate URIs

Lessons learnedPossible to automatically harvest relevant linked data from libraries and other institutions!

Editorial control over the harvested data needs to be better integrated into the note-taking process!

Did not adequately demonstrate the benefits of structured data !

Do not simply aggregate and edit linked data— need to usefully exploit it to researchers’ benefit.

What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

➡ Current efforts and where we’re going!

Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

In-process reconciliation

Editors create topics to label and index their notes; later reconciled to external identifiers in a separate batch process.

Old

Editors fluidly create, link to, and reconcile

topics within the note-taking process.

New

Backbone.js (client-side JavaScript app framework)

Indexed Database API

JSON-LD storage API

JSON document store

Existing Editors’ Notes API

client-side

server-side

Motivating structured data use

enabled storing and editing of structured data, but provided no incentive for editors to do this

Old

storing and editing structured data

immediately enables sorting and filtering and creating simple

visualizations

New

Sorting & filtering

Sorting & filteringFilter and sort notes not only using the dates of the cited documents (as they currently can), but also using:!

locations and birth and death dates of the people referenced in the notes!

locations and dates of existence of the organizations referenced!

locations and dates of the events referenced

Backbone.js (client-side JavaScript app framework)

Indexed Database API

JSON-LD storage API

JSON document store

Existing Editors’ Notes API

D3.js (data-driven visualization)

client-side

server-side

Visualizing notesA note on Dhanvanthi Rama Rau & the Fourth International Conference on Planned Parenthood can become viewable as: !

a map of specific locations in Stockholm and Bombay!

a timeline of dates associated with the conference!

a network of relationships among people and organizations.

Expected benefits

Working notes become repurposable!

Working notes become more discoverable!

Shift of focus from one-shot product to continuous data curation process

What are “working research notes”?!

Current tools for organizing editorial research!

The Editors’ Notes system!

Initial experiments with using Linked Data!

Current efforts and where we’re going!

➡ Parting thoughts on Library Linked Data

Bibliographic metadata

Currently we rely on Zotero for bibliographic metadata!

Professional cataloging ⇒ HTML pages ⇒ web scraping ⇒ manual editing!

This is madness: libraries (and archives) should be the premier source of high-quality, easy to use bibliographic metadata

obtain

New user task: reuse

find

identify

select

explore

contextualize

justify

FRBR

FRAD FRSAD

Thank YouWe are grateful for funding from:!

The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation!Coleman Fung!

!Ryan Shaw ryanshaw@unc.edu!Project information http://ecai.org/mellon2010/!Project site http://editorsnotes.org/!Source code https://github.com/editorsnotes

top related