hyperanalytic wavelet packets

Hyperanalytic Wavelet Packets

Ioana Firoiu, Dorina Isar, Jean-Marc Boucher, Alexandru Isar

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary

Introduction

Wavelet techniques based on the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)

• Advantages– Sparsity of coefficients

• Disadvantages– Shift-sensitivity (input signal shift → unpredictable

change in the output coefficients)– Poor directional selectivity

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 2

Wavelet Packets

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 3

2D-DWT and 2D-DWPT implementations.

Shift-Invariant Wavelet Packets Transforms

• One-Dimensional DWPT (1D - DWPT)– Shift Invariant Wavelet Packets Transform

(SIWPT) – Non-decimated DWPT (NDWPT)– Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Packets

Transform (DT-CWPT)– Analytical Wavelet Packets Transform (AWPT)

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 4

Two-Dimensional DWT (2D - DWT)

– 2D-SIWPT – 2D-NDWPT

• Poor directional selectivity

– 2D-DT-CWPT• Reduced flexibility in choosing the mother wavelets

– Hyperanalytical Wavelet Packets Transform (HWPT)

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 5

DT-CWPT

• Advantages– Quasi shift-

invariant

– Good directional selectivity

• Disadvantages– Low flexibility in

choosing the mother wavelets

– Filters from the 2nd branch can be only approximated

Ilker Bayram and Ivan W. Selesnick, “On the Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Packet and M-Band Transforms”, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 56(6) : 2298-2310, June 2008.

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 6

AWT

DWT at whose entry we apply the analytical signal defined as:

xa=x+iH{x}

where H{x} denotes theHilbert transform of x.

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 7

AWPT

AWT AWPT

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 8

Simulation ResultsAWPT

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2 input

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 9

Best basis tree used

DWPT AWPT

HWT

, , , , .aHWT f x y f x y x y

, ,

, ,

,

, , , , .

x

y x

a a

HWT f x y DWT f x y

iDWT f x y jDWT f x y

kDWT f x y

f x y x y DWT f x y

yH H

H H

, , ,

, ,

x

y x y

x y x y i x y

j x y k x y

a H

H H H2 2 2 1, and i j k ij ji k

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 10

HWPT

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 11

HWPT’s Shift-Invariance

Best basis EnergDWPT EnergHWPT

1 3.6916 1.2390e+005 1.0469e+006

2 3.94033 5.9904e+005 1.5056e+006

3 3.94033 5.9904e+005 1.5056e+006

4 3.6916 1.2390e+005 1.0469e+006

5 3.6916 1.2390e+005 1.0469e+006

6 3.94033 5.9904e+005 1.5056e+006

7 3.94033 5.9904e+005 1.5056e+006

8 3.6916 1.2390e+005 1.0469e+006

Deg=1- /sd m

Deg2D-DWPT =0.3 DegHWPT =0.81.

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 12

DWPT’s Directional Selectivity

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 13

HWPT’s Directional Selectivity

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 14

Directional Selectivity Experiment

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 15

Simulation Results. Comparison with the 2D-DWPT

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 16

HWPT’s Direction Separation Capacity

WISP 2009, Budapest, Hungary 17

Conclusion

The hyperanalytic wavelet packets have:

• good frequency localization,

• quasi shift-invariance,

• quasi analyticity,

• quasi rotational invariance.