ignition interlocks how to use them effectively to reduce drunk driving

Post on 21-Mar-2016

47 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving. Richard Roth, PhD. ICADTS at TRB Sunday January 12, 2014. My 10 Minutes. Interlocks work. ……………… are cost-effective. ……………… are perceived as a fair sanction. NHTSA urges IIDs for all DWI Offenders. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving

Richard Roth, PhD

ICADTS at TRBSunday January 12, 2014

My 10 Minutes1. Interlocks work.2. ……………… are cost-effective.3. ……………… are perceived as a fair sanction.4. NHTSA urges IIDs for all DWI Offenders.5. Only 25% of DWI offenders are installing IIDs6. State Laws have Loopholes 7. ………………………. Eligibility Prerequisites.8. We know what would get interlocks used.

Roth 10/23/2012 Region 5 Ignition Interlock Institute 2

Roth 10/23/2012 Region 5 Ignition Interlock Institute 3

1.A. Interlocks Reduce DWI Recidivism

1.B. Interlocks are Effective For First OffendersEven Those With Very Low BAC (.08 - .11)

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

1.C. 99.993% of Interlocked Days Are No-DWI Days

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

In NM, 48,274 DWI offenders were interlocked for 23,204,035 days.

They had 1538 DWI re-arrests. That’s one re-arrest per 41 years of interlocked driving.

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

1.D. Fewer Drunk Driving Re-Arrests, Crashes, Injuries, and Fatalities in NM

2. Evidence of Cost-Effectiveness

• Cost of interlocks is less than one third of the savings in the economic impact of the drunk driving crashes prevented. Benefit/Cost ~3.

• National Research that takes into account benefits other than DWI crashes shows an even greater Benefit to Cost Ratio.

• In a survey of 1513 Interlocked offenders, 70% agree or strongly agree that The

benefits of interlocks outweigh the costs.

Roth 10/23/2012 Region 5 Ignition Interlock Institute 7

3. Evidence of FairnessAnonymous Survey of 1513 Interlocked Offenders:80% responded agree or strongly agree to: “Interlocks are a fair sanction for convicted DWI.”

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Anonymous Survey of 15,641 Convicted Offenders while waiting for Victim Impact Panels to start: 81% responded Yes to the question: “Do you think that interlocks are a fair sanction for DWI?

Roth 10/23/2012 Region 5 Ignition Interlock Institute 8

4 NHTSA Model Guidelines for State Ignition Interlock Programs.

DOT HS 811 859 November 2013• “Require ignition interlocks for all individuals

convicted of or having their driving privileges suspended for alcohol-impaired driving including first time DWI offenders as a condition of license reinstatement.

• Eliminate or minimize eligibility requirements [Hoops] that prevent offenders from being able to participate in the ignition interlock program.

• Eliminate options [Loopholes] that allow offenders to avoid participation in the ignition interlock program.”

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

5. Only 25% of Offenders Install IIDs

• ~ 320,000 interlocks are installed each year.• ~1,400,000 DWI arrests per year

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

14

6. Close Loopholes in State Laws• Too many arrested but not convicted• Waiting out Revocation Period• No effective alternative for those who claim“No

Car” or “Not Driving” • Driving-while-revoked in a vehicle without an

interlock• Few warrants served for non-compliance• No immobilization or interlock between arrest

and adjudication.

Roth 4/14/13 2013 Lifesavers Conference

15

7. Eliminate Pre-requisites for Interlock Eligibility (Hoops)

• Period of Hard Revocation (No longer required)• Fines and Fees Paid• Outstanding legal obligations• Alcohol Screening and Assessment• Medical Evaluation• DWI School• Victim Impact Panel• Community Service

Roth 4/14/13 2013 Lifesavers Conference

Legislation To Achieve Goals

1. License Revocation on Arrest. 2. An interlock license that allows revoked

offenders to drive interlocked vehicles.3. On conviction mandate interlock installation

as a condition of probation.1yr for 1st , 2yr for 2nd…etc

4. Monthly Fee (~$80) for supervised probation of those who claim “no car” or “not driving”.

5. Extend license revocation until >=1 year with no recorded BAC above 0.04.

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

Roth 1/12/14 ICADTS

Richard Roth, PhDExecutive Director Impact DWIRichardRoth2300@msn.com

www.RothInterlock.orgwww.ImpactDWI.org

www.PEDAforTeens.org

Thank You!

top related