impact of incentives in bittorrent

Post on 09-Jan-2016

20 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Impact of Incentives in BitTorrent. By Jenny Liu and Seth Cooper. Peer to Peer Networks. Multiple independent peers connect to share resources with each other. Incentives. But what reason does one peer have to share its resources with another?. ?. Incentives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Impact of Incentives in BitTorrent

By Jenny Liu and Seth Cooper

Peer to Peer Networks

• Multiple independent peers connect to share resources with each other

Incentives

• But what reason does one peer have to share its resources with another?

Incentives

• Does a peer need something in return?

Incentives

• Or is simple altruism enough?

BitTorrent

• Torrent file directs peers to a tracker, which helps to coordinate peers

Torrent

Tracker

BitTorrent

• Initial peer, known as a “seed,” begins with the complete file.

Torrent

Tracker Seed

BitTorrent

• Peers trade pieces of the file amongst themselves, uploading pieces to the peers they are downloading the fastest from. When a peer finishes, it becomes a new seed.

Torrent

Tracker Seed

Motivation

• Other P2P networks (Napster, Kazaa) have become successful relying on altruism alone.

Motivation

• It is often claimed that freeloading on P2P networks is a problem, and many attempts have been made to find an effective incentive, but is one necessary?

Motivation

• How effective is BitTorrent? Are incentives necessary? How do greedy peers affect the network? Are incentives an unnecessary overheard?

System

• Modify BitTorrent source to remove incentives, and compare efficiency with unmodified BitTorrent

System

• Assign each peer a strategy: greedy or altruistic.

Metrics

• Client side: average download time

Metrics

• Server side: percent of unicast

Trials

• Measure data from several trials of one seed distributing a file to a set of peers. Start with a default network setting and vary parameters to see their effect on the two types of networks.

Seed

Trials

• We varied: delay between peer connections.

Trials

• We varied: minimum number of uploads for each peer.

Results

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 2 4 6 8 10

Tim

e to

com

plet

e do

wnl

oad

Delay coefficient

Effect of delay coefficient on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 2 4 6 8 10

Per

cent

of u

nica

st

Delay coefficient

Effect of delay coefficient on percent of unicast

vanillano incentive

ideal

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Ti

me

to c

ompl

ete

dow

nloa

dMinimum number of uploads

Effect of minimum number of uploads on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Per

cent

of u

nica

st

Minimum number of uploads

Effect of minimum number of uploads on percent of unicast

vanillano incentive

ideal

• Not much difference.

Trials

• We varied: total number of peers.

Results

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Tim

e to

com

plet

e do

wnl

oad

Number of peers

Effect of number of peers on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

• Number of peers has an effect on download time when the incentive is removed.

Trials

• We varied: percentage of greedy peers.

Results

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 20 40 60 80 100

Per

cent

of u

nica

st

Percentage of greedy peers

Effect of percentage of greedy peers on percent of unicast

vanillano incentive

ideal

• Percentage of greedy peers has an effect on both metrics when the incentive is removed.

0

50

100

150

200

0 20 40 60 80 100

Tim

e to

com

plet

e do

wnl

oad

Percentage of greedy peers

Effect of percentage of greedy peers on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

Trials

• We varied: size of network and tried different percentages of greedy hosts

Results

• As the network gets bigger, a larger percentage of greedy hosts can be supported

0

50

100

150

200

0 20 40 60 80 100

Tim

e to

com

plet

e do

wnl

oad

Percentage of greedy peers

Effect of percentage of greedy peers on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

0

50

100

150

200

0 20 40 60 80 100Ti

m to

com

plet

e do

wnl

oad

Percent of greedy peers

Effect of percent of greedy peers on time to complete download

vanillano incentive

10 Peers 20 Peers

Conclusions

• Q: How efficient is BitTorrent?

• A: Very.

Conclusions

• Q: Are incentives necessary?

• A: It depends.

Conclusions

• Q: How do greedy peers affect the network?

• A1: Not much. • A2: Not much up to a point. • A3: Quite a lot after that.

Conclusions

• Q: Are incentives an unnecessary overhead?

A: No!

Future Work

• Conduct experiments on more heterogeneous networks.

• Try UDP.

• Address other negative aspects of BitTorrent, such as content lifetime.

The End

top related