improving education for english learners: research-based approaches

Improving Education for English Learners:

Research-Based Approaches

English Learner and Support ServicesProfessional Learning SeriesFebruary 17, 2011

Chapter 5 (pp. 251-321)

Programs and Practices for

Effective Sheltered Content Instructionby

Jana Echevarría, CSU Long BeachDeborah Short, Center for Applied Linguistics

Based on a presentation by Magdalena Ruz Gonzalez, LACOEand Lizette Diaz, SBCSS

Today’s format• Pair discussions –

graphic organizer with focus questions

• Explore sections 1-5

• Briefly touch on sections 6-8

What’s on your mind?Timed-Pair-Share

One and a half minutes each

Chapter 5 OverviewEight Sections

6

1. Rationale for focus on Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) , pp. 251-252

2. Rationale and Components of SDAIE in providing ELs access to content subjects, pp. 253-262

3. Pedagogical Models of Sheltered Content Instruction with a focus on SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observational Protocol), pp. 262-264

4. Components and features of the SIOP model, pp. 264-271

Chapter 5 OverviewEight Sections (cont’d)

7

5. Application of the SIOP model, pp. 272-276

6. SIOP Research Syntheses, pp. 276-286

7. Program Models, pp. 287-297

8. SIOP Professional Development, pp. 297-301

Section 1Rationale for focus on SIOP

pp. 251 & 252

Partners A & B work together.Why is SIOP

the focus of this chapter?

Section 2Rationale and Components of SDAIE…

pp. 254-255

Partners A & B work together again!The authors offer a number of reasons for the

difficulty ELs experience in school. Which reason/s have you addressed at your

site/district?Which ones are priorities for you in the future?

Section 2

History of Sheltered Instructionp. 256 Figure 5.1

Section 2

The California Contextp. 257-258

“Unfortunately, the programs that offered bilingual and sheltered instruction for English learners tended to be generally inconsistent in design, quality, and effectiveness.”

1987 – law for bilingual education “sunseted”

Section 2

The California Contextp. 257-258

“The term SDAIE exists in the California Education Code as a legal construct, but the practices that are typically incorporated into SDAIE content classes have been based on theoretical models (Diaz-Rico and Weed 2006; Walqui, 2006). …no empirical research has shown that any particular model of SDAIE has a positive effect on student academic achievement.”

Section 2

The California Contextp. 257-258

1998 – Proposition 227 passes, instituting structured English immersion (SEI) as the new term for a program type that was intended to give students access to the core curriculum.

•SEI is not operationally defined.

•Wide variety of program types

Section 2

The California Contextp. 257-258

Primary Language Instruction

•1990s: 29%

•After 1998, <10%

Section 2Goals of Content-Based ELD

and Sheltered Content Instruction

p. 259, Figure 5.1Partner As work together. Partner Bs work together

What are the differences between the two types of instruction?

Section 2Academic Language Proficiency

pp. 260-262

…the development of academic English is a complicated endeavor that involves more than simply additional vocabulary development and grammar practice.

p. 260

Interaction ofLanguage-Content-Task

p. 261Figure 5.2

Section 3Pedagogical Models of Sheltered Content Instruction with a

focus on SIOP pp. 262-264

CALLA (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach) was created in the mid 1980s, (Chamot and O’Malley 1987,1994)–Focused on explicit instruction in metacognitive, cognitive and social/affective strategies –No empirical evidence to determine its effect on student achievement.

Section 3Pedagogical Models of Sheltered Content Instruction with a

focus on SIOP pp. 262-264

SDAIE

“…while valuable these (SDAIE techniques & strategies) are not sufficient to ensure success with grade-level content for English Learners.” p. 264

Sections 4 & 5The SIOP Model

pp. 264-276

Review p. 265-271Table TalkWhat makes SIOP an effective model of

sheltered instruction?

SIOPSNOWBALLS!

21

Sections 4 & 5The SIOP Model

pp. 272-276: SIOP in Action – two lessons: third grade & High School ESL Biology

pp. 314- 321: sample lesson plans, elementary, biology

Section 6Research Syntheses

pp. 276-278

All of the highlights listed on these pages have been mentioned in previous chapters.

Section 6SIOP Model Research

pp. 278-285

• Student Writing Assessment Study• Evaluation Research-Isaac School District in

Phoenix, AZ• Quasi-Experimental Research-New Jersey• Experimental Research-funded by US Dept of

Education for the National Center for Research an the Educational Achievement and Teaching of English Language Learners (CREATE)

Section 6Future Research on Sheltered Instruction

pp. 285-286

• Placement of ELs in sheltered courses• Instructional grouping configuration• Empirical research on other models of

sheltered instruction• Most effective instructional features• Instruction for beginning speakers and

underschooled students

Section 7

Program Models pp. 287-289

• Empirical evidence is not available to support whether EL students should be grouped homogeneously in sheltered courses or mixed with former ELs and EOs.

Section 7Program implementation should consider:

• Scheduling for students– Access to and completion of courses necessary to graduate

from HS– Flexible pathways into regular curriculum

• Explicit timeline and set of coursework that leads to graduation

• Extend students’ time for learning– Extension of the school day, before, after, or summer.

• Considerations for beginners– Additional time, primary language support, two years to

cover a one year course

pp. 287-289

Section 7Sheltered Instruction Programs

pp. 289-297

CASE STUDIES

• Lela Alston Elementary School, Phoenix, AZ • Hoover High School, San Diego, CA• Newcomer Programs: The International

Academy-LEAP, St. Paul, Minnesota• General Education classes: Hill Classical Middle

School, Long Beach, CA

Section 8Professional Development

pp. 297-301

Effective SIOP Professional Development includes:• PLC• Reflection on practices• Discussing the implementation• Coaching with knowledgeable trainers• Modeling of lessons• Refining lesson plans based on student assessment• Agreed upon strategies implemented school-wide

Conclusion

•A to Z Review