indian river county community development …dca identification number 10-cie1 dear mr. eubanks:...
Post on 07-Apr-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
November 10,2010
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1801 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 772-226-1237 I 772-978-1806 fax
www. ircgov. com
Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team Attn: Mr. Ray Eubanks 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
RE: Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Annual Update; Indian River County Ordinance 2010-024 (Adopted November 2, 2010); DCA Identification Number 10-CIE1
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1)(f), F.S., Subsection 163.3184, F.S., and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C., the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, on November 2, 2010, conducted a public hearing, notice of which was advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with state requirements, at which time the following ordinance modifying the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element was adopted:
CPTA 2010090039-65910 Ordinance 2010-024: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
That ordinance was adopted as the County's required annual update to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE), an exempt amendment pursuant to Section 163.3187(1)(f), Florida Statutes, and includes the following modifications:
1. All tables, charts, graphs and associated text were updated.
2. Appendix A, "Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements", was revised. a. A number of projects have had their time frames extended. None of the changes will
impact concurrency reservations. b. Planned revenue sources are anticipated in years 4 and 5 of the Five Year Schedule of
Capital Improvements. These planned revenues are reflected in the schedule.
Letter to Ray Eubanks from Robert M. Keating November 10, 2010 Page2 of4
c. The summary of revenues and expenditures at the end of Appendix A was revised and shows that, in fact, the County's Capital Improvements Program is financially feasible over a 5 year period.
3. Due to the depressed housing and financial markets, the County's Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is no longer necessary to maintain the County's adopted transportation level of service. This program has, therefore, been removed from the CIE. Although this program has been removed from the CIE, the projects from the program remain in the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
A summary of de minimis impact records has not been included in the CIE. This is because the County currently counts building permits for exempt residential units within its concurrency management system, subtracting the capacity that they utilize from available capacity within the concurrency management system.
Enclosed, for DCA's compliance review, please find the following documents pertaining to the aforesaid amendment:
• Three copies of the staff report from the November 2, 2010 Public Hearing for the adopted amendment to the Capital Improvements Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan, including supporting documents (1 hard copy of each and 2 CD's with the documents saved as Portable Document Format (PDF)).
• Three copies of the executed ordinance, with a clean copy ofthe updated CIE attached (1 hard copy of each and 2 CD's with the documents saved as a PDF).
• Three copies of a strike through and underline version of the CIE which shows specific changes to that document (1 hard copy and 2 CD's with the document saved as a PDF).
• Three copies of a DCA Courtesy Information list, which lists the names and contact information for those from the public that spoke at the adoption hearing and desire to receive courtesy information regarding the Department of Community Affairs Notice oflntent for the Comprehensive Plan amendment.
One copy of each of the above referenced documents have been sent to the following agencies (pursuant to Rule (9J-11.009(6), F.A.C. (Rule 9J-11.011(5)(a)3., F.A.C.):
• The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council; • The Florida Department of Environmental Protection; • The Florida Department of Transportation; • The St. Johns River Water Management District;
2
Letter to Ray Eubanks from Robert M. Keating November 10, 2010 Page 3 of4
• The Florida Department of State; • The Florida Department of Education; • The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and • The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
The enclosed plan amendment meets all applicable state and regional requirements. Consistent with Rule 91-11.011(5), F.A.C., DCA should publish the required Notice of Intent, pursuant to Subsection 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., in the Indian River Press Journal. Since the County maintains a website and is therefore required, pursuant to section 163.3184(8)( c)2., F.S., to post a copy of the state's Notice oflntent on the website within five days after the receipt ofthe mailed copy ofthe agency's notice item, we request that DCA provide an electronic version ofthis notice bye-mailing it to Bill Schutt (hschutt@ircgov.com).
Should you need additional documentation, or should you have any questions, comments or concerns, please contact:
Sincerely,
Bill Schutt, AICP Senior Economic Development Planner Indian River County Community Development Department 180127thStreet Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Telephone: (772) 226-1243 Facsimile: (772) 978-1806 E-mail: bschutt@ircgov.com
Robert M. Keating, AI Community Developm
Enclosures
cc: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Stan Boling, AICP, Planning Director Sasan Rohani, AICP, Long Range Planning Chief Bill Schutt, AICP, Senior Economic Development Planner Jim Quinn, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (w/enclosure) Terry L. Hess, AI CP, Planning Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (w/enclosure) Gerry O'Reilly, Florida Department of Transportation (w/enclosure) Wendy Evans, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (w/enclosure)
3
Letter to Ray Eubanks from Robert M. Keating November 10, 2010 Page4 of4
Mary Ann Poole, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (w/enclosure) Susan Harp, Florida Department of State (w/enclosure) Jeff Cole, St. Johns River Water Management District (w/enclosure) Tracy D. Suber, Florida Department of Education (w/enclosure) Mark Satterlee, Director, St Lucie Cotmty (w/enclosure) Nicki Van Vonno, Director, Martin Cotmty (w/enclosure) Robin Sobrina, Director, Brevard Cotmty (w/enclosure) Dave Tomek, Director, Oscelola Cotmty (w/enclosure) Timothy McGarry, Growth Management Director, City ofVero Beach (w/enclosure) Rebecca Grohall, Growth Management Director, City of Sebastian (w/enclosure) Jason R. Ntmemaker, City Manager, City of Fellsmere (w/enclosure) Richard Jefferson, Town Manager, Indian River Shores (w/enclosure) Richard Dunlop, Mayor Town of Orchid (w/enclosure)
F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan Amendments\CIE\20 1 0\DCA Transmittal Package\Compliance Review LETTER to DCA.doc
4
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP S: 4 Chief, Long-Range Planning
FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP ·~ $;-1 Senior Economic Development Planner, Long Range Planning
DATE: October 26, 2010
Public Hearing (Legislative)
RE: COUNTY INITIATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: CPTA 2010090039-65910
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of COtmty Commissioners at its regular meeting ofNovember 2, 2010.
BACKGROUND
On February 13, 1990, Indian River County adopted its comprehensive plan. As required by state law, all development activities must be consistent with the comprehensive plan, and all county activities must conform to plan policies. Occasionally, the plan must be updated to reflect the latest and best available information and to address changed conditions. Additionally, the plan must periodically be reviewed and revised in order to reflect the community's changing needs and desires.
While state law allows local governments to amend their comprehensive plans twice a year, there is no requirement that local governments do so, except for the Capital Improvements Element. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the plan is different from the other plan elements. Unlike the other elements, the CIE must be amended every year. This is required both by plan policy and by state regulations.
I
During the 2005 session, the legislature made various changes to state growth management rules, and some of the changes relate to Capital Improvements Element requirements. One of the changes brought about by enactment of Senate Bill360 (SB 360) was the establishment of separate processes for CIE amendments, different from the normal comprehensive plan amendment process.
Under the SB 360 provisions, corrections and modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedication may be adopted by ordinance without formally amending the CIE. Regular yearly updates and changes that eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any facility within the capital improvements plan must be made via comprehensive plan amendments. Unlike the standard comprehensive plan amendment process, however, amendments to the CIE require only one public hearing.
In addition to altering the process for making amendments to the CIE, SB 360 established a requirement for demonstrating CIE financial feasibility to the state. Specifically, SB 360 required that, by December I, 2007, all communities in the State were to annually adopt an amended CIE and prove to the state that the CIE is "financially feasible". To demonstrate financial feasibility, a community must use acceptable professional methods.
In 2007, the financial feasibility deadline was extended to December I, 2008 by House Bill (HB) 7203. Referred to as a "glitch package", HB 7203 corrected several implementation issues with SB 360.
The financial feasibility deadline was yet again extended in 2009. As part of a new SB 360, referred to as the "Community Renewal Act", the Florida Legislature extended the financial feasibility deadline to December 1, 2011. The "Community Renewal Act" covered a range of issues to encourage development and redevelopment within the state.
Even though the deadline for having a financially feasible capital improvements plan was extended, the County must still prepare an annual update of its Capital Improvements Element and submit that update to the state. Consistent with state requirements, County staff has prepared the annual update of the County's existing Capital Improvements Element. A copy of the draft updated CIE is attached.
Because this CIE update is a complete update of the capital improvements element in which all tables, charts, graphs and associated text were updated, strike t!J£eughs and underlines are limited to the text and tables of the CIE. Adding strike through and underlines to the charts, graphs, and entire appendices would have made the length of the document excessive and the resulting document confusing.
2
ANALYSIS
In revising the capital improvements element (CIE), staff used much the same methodology as it employed in preparing the original element. This involved coordinating with the budget and finance departments to obtain data on past revenues and expenditures as well as projected future revenue and expenditure amounts. Also, each county department was contacted to determine the status of its capital improvements program. For each department, information on completed projects, proposed projects, costs, revenues, prioritization, and other factors was collected. Projects were then reviewed by the budget department and revised as necessary to ensure financial feasibility. Based upon these data, planning staff revised the various tables and the text of the CIE. The result of these changes is an accurate and up-to-date capital improvements program with revisions having been made in the CIE generally to demonstrate internal consistency and financial feasibility.
Proposed Changes to the Capital Improvements Element
• Capital Improvements Program
Appendix A of the CIE (attachment three) is the County's proposed Capital Improvements Program (CIP). It lists all programmed capital improvements for fiscal years 20 I 0/11 through 2014/15. Each project within the list was selected based upon need and the County's financial ability to fund it. As shown within the CIP, the total cost for all of the projects for the next five fiscal years is $270,395,311. This is $35,429,179less than the previous year's five year CIP of $305,824,490.
As structured, the CIP is arranged into nine separate categories, with dedicated funding sources listed after each project. The nine separate categories are: conservation and aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement and corrections, recreation and open space, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, and transportation.
Listed in Appendix A of the CIE, the conservation capital projects focus on improvements to conservation lands and include funds programmed for environmental land acquisition. Planned improvements for acquired conservation lands include access improvements, stabilization/preservation ofhistoric structures, and acquisition of conservation easements. The total expenditure amount for projects within this category for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15 is $1,525,000, representing 0.74% of the overall CIP.
Emergency services capital projects proposed for the next five fiscal years total $9,237,882 and represent 4.51% ofthe overall CIP. Proposed projects within this category include an expansion of the existing 800 Mhz radio system, acquisition of four Med Units and one fire engine, replacement of one emergency services station, and construction of two new emergency services stations. Funding for these improvements comes from the one cent local option sales tax, impact fees, and emergency services district millage.
3
Capital improvement projects related to recreation and open space include improvements to existing recreation areas and the construction of a new recreation area in the west county. All of the recreation and open space projects identified in Appendix A will be paid for with one-cent local option sales tax revenue, grant funds, and impact fees. The expenditures planned for projects within this category for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15 total $14,929,300, representing 7.29% of the overall CIP.
General services capital improvement projects listed within Appendix A represent 2.21% of the overall CIP for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15, and total $4,529,508. General Services projects include improvements such as the expansion of the County's fiber optic network and the construction of new courtroom facilities. These projects will be funded through the use of various sources, including: one cent local option sales tax revenue and court facility surcharges.
Planned law enforcement and corrections capital improvement projects include construction of an evidence addition. This improvement will be funded by impact fees and one cent local option sales tax revenue. Not included in this year's CIP, but requested by the Sheriff, is a new administration building. The requested new building has not been included in this year's CIP because there is an ongoing space needs study for this building, and there are not adequate funds currently available to cover its cost. The total amount of expenditures planned for projects within this category for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15 is $2,458,960, representing 1.20% of the overall CIP.
Within the next five years, potable water and sanitary sewer capital improvement projects are planned throughout the entire unincorporated county as well as within those municipalities served by county utilities. Major projects planned for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15 include potable water line and wastewater line extensions in the north and south county and the addition of a South County Brine Disposal site. The potable water and wastewater projects will be funded through capacity charges and user fees. The sanitary sewer and potable water category accounts for 9.86% of the overall CIP, or $20,198,533, during the five year CIP time period.
Solid Waste capital improvement activities involve improvements to citizen convenience centers, and expansion and closure of segments of the landfill. These improvements total $20,739,802 during the five year CIP time period and account for 10.13% of the overall CIP. The projects will be funded primarily by assessments and user fees.
Capital improvement projects related to stormwater management include construction of canal treatment systems in the north and south relief canals. The stormwater management projects identified in Appendix A will be paid for with one-cent local option sales tax revenue, grant funds, and Municipal Service Taxing Unit funds. The expenditures planned for projects within this category for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15 total $10,419,000, representing 5.09% of the overall CIP.
Transportation capital improvements include intersection improvements, road widenings, and related projects throughout the county. Generally, capital improvements to county maintained roads are
4
funded by traffic impact fees and a portion of the CoWlty's one cent local option sales tax revenue. Some expenditures for roads are also funded by the State of Florida, developers, and other local governments. The transportation category expenditures represent over half (68.92%) of the entire five year CIP and total $186,357,326, an amoWltwhich is $13,078,8611ess than last year's five year transportation CIP of$199,436,187. This amoWlt reflects lower transportation revenues as well as a diminished need for road projects due to the downturn in the housing and financial markets.
Project Modifications
With the ongoing depressed housing market, challenges in the national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, coWlty revenue again decreased and is expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 2009/10 through 20 13/14). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 2009/10 through 2013/14 CIP have had their time frame extended.
None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations. Because of the depressed housing market, problems with the financial markets, and limited construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with most of these projects will not be needed Wltillater dates.
Two of the transportation projects that have had their construction dates extended involve improvements to roadways that are over capacity according to the CoWlty's concurrency management system. Listed in Table 6.10, these deficient links are C.R. 510 between 58th Avenue and U.S. Highway I and AlA from 17th Street to the south city limits of the City ofVero Beach. While the transportation projects designed to improve these deficient links are being rescheduled to later years of the CIP, there are several factors that are expected to increase available capacity in the short term. One such factor is that concurrency certificates for some development projects with vested trips will expire soon. At that time, the reserved trips reflected by those projects will be removed from the concurrency management system. Another factor is that recent traffic counts indicate that traffic volumes are continuing to decrease on most roadways. These new traffic coWlts will soon be reflected in the CoWlty's concurrency management system. At that time, the increased capacity and decreased demand will have the effect of increasing the available capacity on CoWlty roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the CoWlty's CIP.
By extending the time frame of transportation projects, the COWlty can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the COWlty needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary projects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element.
5
CR 510, 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes (1.6 miles)
17th Street/AlA Intersection
*Peak hour, directional trips
Financial Feasibility
2120W Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R. 1,960.00 1,202.30 757.70
Overall, the CIP includes a sununary of revenues and expenditures. The revenue and expenditure summary is included to demonstrate the financial feasibility of the CIP. In this case, the County has included this information to meet the State requirement to demonstrate the CIE' s financial feasibility, even though the deadline for demonstrating financial feasibility is not until December 20 II. That summary is included on pages 86 - 88 of the CIP and shows that, in fact, the County's Capital Improvements Program is financially feasible over a 5 year period.
Between Fiscal Years 2010/11 and 2014/15, total available capital project revenues and total expenditures will equal approximately $270,395,311.
• Existing Conditions and Analysis Sections
In addition to the changes made to Appendix A, all of the data in the existing conditions and analysis sections of the CIE have been updated to reflect current conditions. These data include past revenue and expenditure figures for county operations as well as projected revenue and expenditure figures for county operations.
• Concurrency Management Section
State law requires that communities maintain a record of building permits issued to owners of parcels/lots that are exempt from concurrency (those lots that existed prior to implementation of concurrency). Within Indian River County, these records are maintained as part if its concurrency management system. As permits are issued for exempt parcels/lots, the county enters the information on those lots into the concurrency management system and subtracts the public facility
6
capacity that they utilize from available capacities within the concurrency management system.
• Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program
The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As .allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity which these roadway improvement projects will produce as available now for development projects where the first building permit for the development project will be issued no later than three years after the specified start date of the roadway project. In this draft amended CIE, there is no priority transportation capital improvements program. As explained below, a priority transportation capital improvements program is no longer needed.
Of the four projects previously listed in the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program, two of those projects were removed because they will be under construction within the next six months. Those projects are: Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43'd Avenue, and Oslo Road from 43'd Avenue to 58th A venue. The other two projects were removed from the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program because the road capacity that those projects would add to the transportation system is no longer needed to maintain the current Level of Service ofE +20. Those projects and the available peak hour, directional trip capacity of the associated roadways are listed in Table 2. All of the roadways listed in that table currently have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments.
directional trips
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive plan amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the county code, the comprehensive plan may be amended only in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to section 163.3177(2).F.S.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
7
important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing plan amendment requests. Of particular applicability for this amendment request is the following policy:
• Future Land Use Policy 14.3
The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with the county's comprehensive plan is future land use element policy 14.3. This policy requires that one of four criteria be met in order to approve a comprehensive plan amendment request. These criteria are:
• • • •
a mistake in the approved plan; an oversight in the approved plan; a substantial change in circumstances affecting the subject property; or a swap or a reconfiguration ofland uses at separate sites .
In this case, the proposed amendment to the CIE meets the third criterion of policy 14.3 of the future land use element. Since the CIE was last revised, some capital improvements have been completed; others have been added; revenue projections have changed, and priorities have been modified. These circumstances warrant the amendment.
• Capital Improvements Element Policies 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.10, and 1.11
Capital improvements element policies 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.10 and 1.11 require the County to maintain and implement a capital improvements program which is evaluated and updated periodically. These policies also describe how the county will evaluate and prioritize capital improvements. By updating the capital improvements program in accordance with these requirements, the proposed amendment is consistent with these policies.
• Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.9
Capital improvements element policy 1.9 states that the county shall include all capital expenditures in excess of$25,000 in its schedule of improvements. With the draft amended CIE, the threshold is proposed to be increased from $25,000 to $100,000. This change makes the County's threshold consistent with how many other communities throughout the state define a capital improvement. The higher value also accounts for increased costs of capital facilities and better reflects the types of projects and items that have a longer life span. Accordingly, the proposed amendment identifies all capital expenditures in excess of $100,000. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with the revised capital improvements element Policy 1.9.
While the referenced policies are particularly applicable to this request, other comprehensive plan policies and objectives also have relevance. For that reason, staff evaluated the proposed amendment for consistency with all applicable plan policies and objectives. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
8
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis conducted, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the comprehensive plan text amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) by adopting the attached ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
l.) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Application 2.) Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Adoption Ordinance 3.) CIE
Approved Agenda Item Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin.
By: ______________________ __ Legal {0·2..8-( Budget
For: Dept. RiskMgr. '
F:\CommunityDevelopment\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan Arnendments\CIE\2010\BCC Adoption Item- 2010 CIE Update. doc
9
APPLICATION FORM \~ 20 (1 ?( COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT (CPTA) .z_.,"0-\~ ~ ?.lq
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY "::.> S£, "*" <;r ~ ,pof;;l•P :?oro
Planning Division accepts Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment applica ]ns-1mJi;lf#tiil,lllp the months of January and July of each year (except that Capital Impro ~ents Eiemep1~r !/f Amendments may be initiated by the County once anytime during the yea 8\ accordance -~
with Florida Statutes, Section 163.3187(1)(t)). Each application must be c · .. ~et,e ~w,!l!1P .. t '\ submitted and must include all required attachments. An incomplete applicatJ ~ be processed and will be returned to the applicant.
Assigned Project Number: CPTA- ilbl D Of?JD3f- (p 57 to Capital Improvements Element Amendment
Current Owner/ Applicant Agent Name: Indian River County Board of County Community Development
Commissioners Department Staff Complete Mailing 1801 27m Street, Vero Beach, FL Same Address: 32960-3365 Phone # (including area (772) 226- 1243 Same code) Fax# (including area code) (772) 978 - 1806 Same E-Mail: Contact Person: Bill Schutt
Signature of Owner or Agent: __ ]=';;;;·o~O;._~==::_!_ ____________ _ Please attach the following items to this application. Do not ignore any of the following items. Indicate "NI A" if an item is not applicable.
I. What is the proposed amendment's citation in the Comprehensive Plan? Include the element or sub-element, page number, and if applicable, the objective and policy number(s).
Capita/Improvements Element- various changes to entire element for annual update.
2. What is the exact language proposed to be added and/or deleted from the plan?
Numerous changes for annual update.
3. What is the purpose of the request?
Annual update.
4. What is the justification for the request?
Change in conditions.
5. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's consistency with all applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. NA
6. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's impact on public facilities and services. NA
7. Provide an analysis of the proposed amendment's environmental impacts. NA
8. Provide a check, money order or cash in the amount of $NA , made payable to Indian River County. THE APPLICANT MUST ATTEND A PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE WITH LONG-RANGE PLANNING SECTION STAFF PRIOR TO APPLYING.
F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan Arnendments\CIE\2010\CPTA FORM.doc
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-__
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River
County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b)l requires an annual review and update of the
County's Capital Improvements Element; and
WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3187(l)(f) allows the County, by ordinance, to amend its
capital improvements element once per year outside of the standard twice a year
amendment limitation threshold and do so through only one adoption public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
advertised for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the
Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to F.S.
163.3184(15)(b)(l) and (c); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held
an Adoption Public Hearing on November 2, 2010, at which parties in interest and
citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and remaining reviewing agenc1es.
SECTION 2. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Amended Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A)
I of3 Attachment 2
ORDINANCE NO. 2010- __
SECTION 3. Financial Feasibility
The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible.
SECTION 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 5. Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining proVISIOnS.
SECTION 6. Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance and, therefore, this plan amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance with Section 163.3184(l)(b), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming their effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing Team.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 18th day of October, 2010, for a public hearing held on the 2nd day ofNovember, 2010, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote:
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler, Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner
2 of3
ORDINANCE NO. 2010- __
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY:. ______________________ __ ________________ , Chairman
ATTEST BY: _________ __ Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: ______ _
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPian Amendments\CIE\2010\0rdinance- CIE 2010.doc
3 of3
Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6 Capital Improvements Element Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Attachment 3
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 2 Financial Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 Expenditures .......................................................................................................................... 19 Existing Outstanding Debt... .................................................................................................. 23 Local Policies and Practices .................................................................................................. 24
Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements ............................................ 28 Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................. 36 Fiscal Assessment .................................................................................................................. 38 Fiscal Assessment Surmnary ................................................................................................. 44
Concurrency Management Plan .................................................................................................... 44 Project Applicability ............................................................................................................. .45 Service Standards ................................................................................................................. .45 Demand .................................................................................................................................. 46 A vail ability of Capacity ........................................................................................................ .48 Regulation .............................................................................................................................. 51 Monitoring System ................................................................................................................ 51 Applicability .......................................................................................................................... 53
Goal, Objectives and Policies ....................................................................................................... 54
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring ............................................................................... 63
Implementation .......................................................................................................................... 63
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures ..................................................................................... 65
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ............................... 68
APPE,VD!XB: PRIORITY TRANSPORTAT!Ol>i CAPFTAL !},/PROVEMENT5; PROGRAM. ...... 89
APPENDIX Gil.: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........................................................ 90
APPENDIX !)C: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT(i SCHEDULE .................................................................................................... 93
APPENDIX ED: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE ............................................................................................................... 95
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ i
Comprehensive Plan
List of Figures
~ 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8
Title Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Enterprise Fund Revenue User Fees and Charges Special Assessment Revenue Impact Fee Revenue Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Tourist Development Tax Local Option Fuel Tax Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue Half-Cent Local Government Sales Tax County Revenue Sharing Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds County Fuel Tax Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Mobile Home License Tax Distribution of Revenue by Category General Expenditures by Function
Capital Improvements Element
Page 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 9
6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures
11 14 14 15 16 16 17 19 21 38
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November----> 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ ii
Comprehensive Plan
List of Tables
Table 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16
6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22
Capital Improvements Element
Title Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 07 /08) Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities Local Fuel Tax Rates Indian River General Revenues by Source Indian River County Expenditures by Function Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt Overall General Revenue Projection Summary Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects with Deficient Links Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation Projects Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County Indian River County General Expenditures Projection Summary Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without Public Vote Indian River County Bond Schedule Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities Monitoring System Design Monitoring System Tasks Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix
Page 2 8 10 18 19 23 30 31 32
33
35
36 39 39 40 41
42 46 52 53 64 66
Community Development Department Indian River County
iii Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Introduction
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to be funded. This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements based on the level of need and the availability of funds.
For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level-ofservice standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan.
Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the concurrency management section, while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element.
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 1
I
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Conditions
Financial Resources
One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2008/09. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources.
Table 6.1: Indian River Connty Revenne Sonrces (FY 200+~082)
I ,' <: ' :::; - - < ~~~k~ ' StateSources ~ '--~ Amount %ofTotal Amount %of Total ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue
I Various $12.859
5.48~6,.89-% Local Government $7.00~8 2.99%£:-~
Grants ~ Half-Cent Sales Tax %
I Total S12.859
5 .48o/ofr..&9% County Revenue $2558~ 1.09%-l-:-%
Federal ~ Sharing %
I Constitutional Fuel $1.:57:5~ 0.67%9-:eQ
Tax %
I $690$Hil 0.29o/~
County Fuel Tax %
I Alcoholic Beverage t\Q$49 0.02%~
License Tax %
I Pari-Mutuel Tax li111$44+ 0.19o/oQ..,...l.+
%
I Mobile Home $108$Wf 0.05?/o(h(M.
License Tax %
I Various Grants $8633~ 3.68%B:-@
g %
I Total State $2l.061Q9,6 8. 98 o/o-W-:-9
1)9 9%
I I I I
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Amount %of Total ($1,000) Revenue
$2.1,397$ 40.26o/~ Ad Valorem Taxes 99,!Q+
$41.531$ 17. 7 J %-l-6-:·.§..9% Enterprise Funds 44#7+
User Fees and $16.853$ 7.19o/~
Charges lS,fr/9
Special Assessments $487~ 0.21%~
$2054~ 0. 8 8 ~-ObQ2.% Impact Fees 'ill
Local Discretionary $13 023$ ~_,55o/~
Sales Surtax -l+,'7M
Tourist Development $1 294$-l, 0.55%~
~ Tax
Local Option Fuel Tax
Franchise Tax
Interest Income
Other
Total Local
Total All Sources
$3 200$;!, 1.36%·±-:·H% 00
$9 670$9, 4.12o/~ 44:>
$9 7881» 4.l7%6-:G6%
6ilU $8.278$-+. - 3 .53 o/o£.:.9J..%
85.53%8k++%
$234.495 IOO.OO'Y0-1-00%
~
Indian River County 2
Comprehensive Plan
Local Sources
Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. These local sources are shown in table 6.1, and are described in further detail below.
• Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)
Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is I 0 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 2001ll/0&.2, Indian River County applied an aggregate millage rate of 5.1726 5.1628. +he Beard of County Cemmissioners'According to County policy±es, allow revenue frem ad valorem taxes temay be used for both operating and capital project expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 200+8/0&9, Indian River County collected approximately $99,827,00094,397,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes represented 37.0640.26% of all revenues collected by Indian River County in FY 200+810+9.
Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. GvefDuring that time period, ad valorem tax revenue increased ~34.60%.
Community Development Department
Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
13 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
I!J Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ Indian River County
3
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Enterprise Funds
Within governmental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title "enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprises.
Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented ~17.71% of Indian River County's total source of funds for FY 200-7~0&2. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. GverDuring that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased ~2.68%.
• User Fees and Charges
User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. User fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriffs Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In FY 200-7~0&2, user fees and charges represented~ 7.19% of all funds collected by Indian River County.
Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. GverDuring that time
Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges
$20,000 .---f,.-;;;}1 $18,000 1------"" $16,000 1\014,28''1 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007
l!l Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2008 2009
period, revenue from user fees and charges has-varied, but overall increased~ 17.99%.
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 4
Comprehensive Plan
• Special Assessments
Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services; the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment.
Special Assessment funds represented 0.291% of county funds for FY 2001§/0&.2 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years.
• Impact Fees
An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition efissuanee of subdivision or site plan approval, issuanee ef a building permit issuance, appreval ef a certificate of occupancy issuance, or other development or construction approval when any pertiea ef the revenues collected isare intended to fund any pertiea ef the costs of capital improvements for
Community Development Department
Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
li!l Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue
$40,000 ~---r==l----------
$35,000 +----$30,000 j---
$25,000 +----$20,000 +----$15,000 ~~~
$10,000
$5,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007
lil Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
any public
2008 2009
facilities.
Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ Indian River County
5
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine e\lffeHt impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings.
On March 3. 2009. the Board of Com1ty Conm1issioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion. the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees are: emergency services. correctional facilities. public buildings. law enforcement. and solid waste. On September 22.2009 and again on March 16.2010 the Board of Countv Conrmissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. The cunent suspension of impact fees will expire on March 3 I. 2011.
Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing economy and the suspension of five of the impact fees.
• Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
Pursuant to s. 212.055. F.S. blocal governments are authorized to levy numerous types oflocal discretionary sales surtaxes. pmsl!ant to s. 212.055, f.S. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000.
Under this category, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Goverrunent Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or
Community Development Department
Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
$18,000
$16,000
$14,000
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
li!l Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ 6
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax.
According to state law, t+he Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initialed by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection.
Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.®55% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2001)V0&2. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by ~ 1.35% over that period.
Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population.
Currently. =I1wenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax, while Martin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%, which is another local discretionary sales surtax.
• Tourist Development Tax
Any county in the state may, subject to a vole of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax.
Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two
Community Development Department
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$-
Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ Indian River County
7
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax as well as an additional one percent tax. Sixty Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty counties, fortythreewe counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax.
Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie Counties have the highest tourist tax levy ofthe six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of 4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy.
Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00%
Martin 2.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00%
Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% 5.00% 3.00%
Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax
Source: on Intergovernmental Relations, Government Handbook. AHg~~s! ;!9990ctober 20 l 0.
The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes:
(1) . Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed;
(2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State ofFlorida;
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 8
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
(3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county;
( 4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access;
( 5) Construct, improve, maintain, and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000);
( 6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations.
Figure 6. 7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. GvefDuring that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of~l9.59%.
• Local Option Fuel Tax
Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form ofthree separate levies. These levies are:
Jo. a one to six cent local option fuel tax; a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and a ninth cent fuel tax.
Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county-wide
$3,300
$3,200
$3,100
$3,000
$2,900
$2,800
Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2009
referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented -l-±3-1.36% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 200F/0&_2. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has decreased overall by ~3. 73% from what it was in Fiscal Year 20m:±. Even though local
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 20IO, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 9
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
option fuel tax revenues were less in fiscal year 200&2 than what they were in fiscal year 2003::1:, the county received a significant increase in local option fuel tax revenue in fiscal years 20042_ through 2007. This was largely associated with the building boom.
All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax.
Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, emit does not currently levy eitherthe tax. Forty nineAt this time, fifty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the NinthCent Fuel Tax. while twentv-four of the sixty-seven Florida com1ties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax.
Brevard $0.06 $0.06
Indian River $0.06 $0.06
Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Intergovernmental Financial
As shovtn in taele 6.3, fellf emmties in the region, Martin County, Okeeehoeee Coanty, Palm Beaeh Ceanty, and St. Lueie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Loeal Option Fuel tall. This seeond loeal Oj'ltion fuel talc is a one to five eent levy UfJOn every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a eeunty. Indian River County ean levy this seeond tal( through an ordinanee adoj'lted ey a majority ph1s one vote of the Board of Com1ty Commissioners or ey voter <lflflFOYal in a eount)".vide referendum, eut does not eurrently levy the talL Twenty one of the siJcty sevea Florida eounties im.pose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Loeal Oj'Jtion Fuel Tall.
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 10
Comprehensive Plan
• Franchise Fee/Tax
Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises.
Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented :k3+4.l2% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2001jl/0&2.. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 51.7743.90%.
• Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
$10,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
1111 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented ~3.53% of ail funds collected in FY 2001jl/0&2..
• Borrowing
As needed, t+he county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Currently, B.Qorrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or longterm financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market.
Tile eeuntyAccording to slate law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is anon-ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum.
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Indian River County 11
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance.
Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non-ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations.
In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. In addition. R):evenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to lle!p-finance the provision of more low-income housing units in the county. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay offthe debt.
Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum.
Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid-offby assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal.
The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes.
• Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources
Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ 12
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax.
Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads.
The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less, within Indian River County. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility.
State Sources
Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below.
• Local Govermnent Half-Cent Sales Tax
The Local Govermnent Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; this account is the Local Govermnent Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of these monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received for the county. In FY 200+V0&2.,
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#___; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_ 13
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County received $7,588,QQQ$7.000.000 through the half-cent sales tax. As shown in table 6.1, that amount represented ~2. 99% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2007jl/082. fiscal year.
Figure 6.1 0 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half-cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County's half-cent sales tax revenue ffidecreased ~7.46%.
Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs.
• County Revenue Sharing
The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These sources include 2. 90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there arc some statutory limitations regarding these funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness.
To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria:
Community Development Department
Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue
$10,000
$9,000
$8,000
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
11!1 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
1!11 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
14
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
(I) That law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements;
(2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue;
(3) That the county's most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided.
Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented -h%1.09% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 200+l!J0&2. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall ifldecreased by~11.61%.
• Constitutional Fuel Tax
Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel. Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler.
FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue
$1,800
$1,750
$1,700
$1,650
$1,600
$1,550
$1,500
In its current form, the constitutional fuel $1,450 tax is a state-shared revenue source for 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to 1!!1 Revenue (in ti1ousands)
counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of Source: Indian River County Finance Department
holders ofbonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body.
Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented \Mi90.67% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 200+l!J0%2. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County ifldecreased -h%5.35%.
• County Fuel Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
15
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes.
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented ~0.29% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 200-7lY0&2.. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased ()A.J7.01 %.
• Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local
Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax $800
$780
$760
$740
$720
$700
$680
$660
$640 2004 2005 2006
llll Revenue (in thousands)
2007
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2008 2009
governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department ofBusiness and Professional Regulation.
Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation.
Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $49,000$50.000 from this tax in FY 200-7.li/0&2., 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same.
Community Development Department
Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
1!!1 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
16
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Pari-Mutuel Tax
Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented Q...I.;1.0.19% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2001_[/082.. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners.
• Mobile Home License Tax
An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth-wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law.
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through
Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue
$160 or:-::-:-,--------------,
$140
$120
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
!iii Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
the mobile home license tax represented {),{)40.05% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2001Jl/OS2.. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last s*five fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County remained the same.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #___j Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
17
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Various Grants
Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 6,W5.48% of funds received by the county in FY 200+Jll0&2. State grant funds received by the county in FY 200+Jll0&2 originated from the State ofFloridaDepartment of Community Affairs, the Florida Housing Finance Agency, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of PloriEla Commission for the Transportation DisaElvantageEl, the State of PloriEla Department of Management Setviees, the State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the Department of Health, the Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Federal Sources
Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant.
During FY 200+Jl/0&.2., the county received approximately $18,56+,000$12,859.000 in federal funds. These funds represented &&95.48% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 200+l\10&.2..
Overall Revenue Sources
As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identif1es the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2007/08.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
18
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$119,91!,619 9G4;>9Q ~ 8,678,!11 ~ 18,186,926 $218,188,168 2008109 $95.675 370 $1033.394 lli:!87.093 $54 729.505 $1 508.786 $14 545 961 $218,980.109
Source: 'Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 200&2
Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years.
Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category
2004 43.69%
2007
44.98%
22.50%
• Taxes
23.51%
0 Charges for Ser..ices
Expenditures
2005 34.64%
22.78%
2008 43.78%
g Licenses & Permits
• Fines & Forfeitures
2006 39.50% 0.43%
22.55%
2009
o lntergo-emmental Rewnue
~ Miscellaneous Re-enues
In the previous sub-section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed. This sub-section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the county's needs. Table 6.5 presents the county's overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 200;c;?)200;!1 through 200+£/0&2.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
19
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Court Related $6,210,614 $5,630,734 $5,915,727 $6,649,724 $6,940,682 .$.6 .• 6.~Q.,8.J.Q
Debt Service $3,727,534 $3,495,500 $4,406,090 $8,126,643 $7,873,176 iB.Q@ • .7.~8
TOTAL 187 745 266$-1-4-l-, 205 503 543$-1-49,- $257 655 618 S332.037 .467 $300 843 J82 - m,448 $293,118,373 $277,:l99,:l13 $212,:l17,19§ .$.239 •. ~.&.U.62
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual FmancJal Report, 200&2
Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution oflndian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years.
General Government
A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $27,701,150$25.801,688 was spent on general government services in FY 2007-.S./0&2. Between fiscal years 200:6;2/0:;:!: and 2007-W0&2, general government expenditures inereased decreased by -14461!. 05%. General government services represented ~ 10.78% of all county expenses in FY 2007-W0&2. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail.
Public Safety
The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2007-W0&2, spent $74 ,038,252$74.813,!64 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 20061107-.S. and 2007-W0&2, public safety expenditures increased by -hMI.05%. Since FY 200:6;2/0~, public safety expenditures have increased by ~34.09%. Public safety represented 30.554 0.17% of all county expenses in FY 2007-W0&2.
Physical Environment
This classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $33,806,207$54.243.069 was spent on these activities in FY 2007-W0&2. Between fiscal years 20061/0+.S. and 2007-.S./0&2, physical environment expenditures decreased by ~37.30%. Since FY200:6;2/0~, physical environment expenditures have increased by &-h&%22.40%. Physical environment services represented ~22.6% of all county expenses in FY 2007-.S./0&2.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010·_
20
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Transportation
Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $53,489,116$40,84L272 on transportation facilities in FY 200-1-li/0&2.. Since FY 200:;?;;)/031, transportation expenditures have increased by 165.8477.28%. Transportation expenses represented n.w:21. 93% of all county expenses in FY 200-7.!1/0&2..
Economic Environment
Included in this category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $4,5-79,574$653,547 on economic enviromnent services in FY 200-7.!1/0&2.. Between fiscal years 2006/07 and 2007/08, economic enviromnent expenditures increased by 372.99%. Since FY 2002/03, economic enviromnent expenditures have increased by 684.38%. Economic enviromnent expenses represented 1.89% of all county expenses in FY 2007/08.
Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function
2007
8.4%
2004
1%
0.3%
B General Go\19mment
Ill Transportation
13 Culture/Recreation
2005
26.3% 10.9%
24.6% 2008
1111 Public Safety
• Economic Em.ironment
ID Court Related
Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
2006 26.0%
2.3% 7.8% 4.8% 0.4%
31.3%
3.
o Physical Em.ironment
B Human Serlices
!:i Debt Ser\ice
2009
21
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Human Services
Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the county spent $12,819,575$8,62 L 7 60 on human services in FY 2007Jil0&2. Between fiscal years 200611071 and 2007li/0&.2, human services expenditures decreased by &9731.68%. Since FY 200:6l/O~, human services expenditures have increased by lhh-9419.79%. Human services represented ~3.60% of all county expenses in FY 2007li/0&2..
Culture/Recreation
All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $21,299,783$19,624.278 on these services in FY 2007JY0&2.. Between fiscal years 200e7/07li and 2007li/0&.2, cultural/recreation expenditures decreased by .J4.4.718.49%. Since FY 200:61'0~, cultural/recreation expenditures have deereased increased by &41 0.07%. Culture/recreation expenses represented &798.20% of all county expenses in FY 2007li/0&.2.
Court Related
All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $8,940,882$6,620,830 in FY 2007Ji/0&2.. Between fiscal years 200e7/07li and 2007li/0&.2, Court Related expenditures ffidecreased by ~4.61 %. Beginning in FY 199711998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented ;&..8.82. 77% of all county expenses in FY 2007li/0&2..
Debt Service
Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total county debt service expenditures were $7,873,178$8.068,758 in FY 2007li/0&2.. Between fiscal years 200e1107li and 2007JY0&2, debt service expenditures Eleincreased by ~2.48%. Since FY 200:61'0~, debt service expenditures have increased by 74.-+6116.46%. Debt service expenses represented ~3.3 7% of all county expenses in FY 2007li/0&.2.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 201 0-_
22
I
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Outstanding Debt
At the end of FY 200&2/WlQ, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $117,510,0001 08,8!5,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took advantage of lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings. Enterprise Funds support ~8.73% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 44.1745.81%; and Golf Course -l+.-742.92%), leaving $57,160,00055.790,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 200 I, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as the Vero Beach Sports Complex). Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. Those bonds have since been paid off. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in2009. The County kept a portion of the !993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 20 II because it was more cost efficient than rollingJhe entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds.
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds:
$3,Q3Q,QQQ1 555.0 AAAIFGIC Water & Sewer 1993 A Series $47,190,000 Q!)
5.76% 2011 (Insured) Revenues
$~1l0021.92 3.94% 2022 AAAIFGIC Water & Sewer
2005 Series $27,675,000 5.000 (Insured) Revenues
Recreation Revenue Bonds
2001 Series Spring AAAIFGIC State Funds, Y2 Cent $16,810,000 $1;!,89S,QQQlUJ. 4.87% 2031
Training Facility 0.000
(Insured) Sales Tax, Tourist Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
23
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Golf Course Net 2003 Series Income, Fronton Refunding
$6,455,000 3.65% 2016 AAA/AMAC Revenue and Recreational $l,s8>,GGG.1175.o (Insured) Subordinate Lien on Revenue 00 One Half Cent Sales
Tax
Voted G.O. Bonds
Environmental AAA/FSA
Lands Acquisition $11,000,000 $§,9§§,QQQ5,21 0.0 3.89% 2016 (Insured) General Obligation 2001 Series 00
Em4F6nntenttd AAA/.AMAG
Lands Ae!J_uisition $7,8QQ,QQQ $!,21Q,QQQ ~ :wHl ~
GeReFal OBligatieR lOOJ 8eFies
Environmental AAAIMBIA
Lands Acquisition $48,600,000 $H,04S,00038,27 4.22% 2021 General Obligation 2006 Series 0.000
(Insured)
Total Bonds Outstanding $117,§!0,QQQI08.
815.0ilJl
County Budget 20G91Q/.Wll.
Local Policies and Practices
As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level-ofservice standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts.
Existing Level-of-Service Standards
Level-of-service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level-of-service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility.
Level-of-service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level-of-service standards for capital facilities as follows:
~ · Correctional Facilities (Countywide)
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
24
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• 4.5 beds per I ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per I ,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal
population
Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Schools (School Service Area): • 1 00 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school
type (elementary, middle, and high).
Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population per year
Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall
event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
25
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads
• All drainage basins will meet the following level-of-service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event
Transportation (Roadways)
• Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus20%: • 27th Ave - South County Line to SR 60 • 43'd Ave- Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
Transit • One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes
Level-of-service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan Element.
Capital Improvements Program
A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax.
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, time frames, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
26
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next fiVe years.
Impact Fees/Capacity Charges
Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses for implementing the CIE. Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings.
In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers.
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building department services, and utility services as enterprise funds.
As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas.
Analysis
The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the county's fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development.
As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
27
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements
Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriffs office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements.
Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county's comprehensive plan, the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system.
Using the county's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the county's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development.
Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development.
If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
28
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Appendix A constitutes the county's five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service.
Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJR WMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE.
Projected Revenues
In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered. This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section.
'M1ile the During the past five years. there has been hlstorieal Elata show a salida gradual iRdecrease in most revenue sources in the most reeent five year period, _Eostimates going forward show a decrease in most revenue sources for the firstnext couple years followed by moderate increases. This is consistent with an antieipateElthe cunent economic recession slowdown in the near future followed by an anticipated moderate recovery thereafter.
Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 20IO, Ordinance 2010-_
29
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
As part of this capital improvements element, the county's general revenues have been projected for fiscal years 2 0991 01-W 11 through 2 0 1 ~/ 14 ~. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections.
• Overall Projected Revenues
Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected overall revenues for fiscal years 209910/191 through 201~/14~. These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6. 7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly everin the next few-fiscal years and increase by only 'h\}}3.22% by fiscal year 201~/14~. Overall, Ggeneral revenue is projected to increase from $320,680,892 278,508.044 inFY 209910/191 to $330,339,507287,466.627 in FY 201~/14~.
Licenses & Permits
Intergovernment
Cbargcs for Sen>ices
Fines & Forfeitures
Interest & Misc.
Otber Sources
TOTAL
18.692 000
60.009 228 60 009 000
18.494.670 J 8.495 000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
61 509 000
• Earmarked Projected Revenues
21.805 000 \06.936.2:56
96.309.686
63.047 000 64.623.000 309 197.228
I 608-DOO
!9 431.000 19 917Jl00
Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, and Solid Waste Sub-Element.
Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 209910/IGl through 201~1/14~. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked projected transportation
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
30
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
revenues are expected to increase by ~30.66% over the next five fiscal years, from $20,532,33719,025.710 in FY 20109/Hll to $28,077,000?4.859.880 in FY 201~/142.
Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY Q91 0/Hll to FY I :;:[/142, it is important to note that FY G91.Q/Hll transportation revenue is $34,258,36435.764,991less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present. Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2012-;J./1:;:[ and fiscal year 201:;:[/142 is from a planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In fiscal year 2013/14, the proposed additional6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county's current 6 cent per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a sigoificant revenue increase in FY 20 B:!/142.
For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by ,9;'7.69% over the next five fiscal years, from $41,3€)8,77927,333.363 in FY 20Q9lQ/Hll to $41,769,00029,434.000 in FY 201 ~/142. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by ,9&7.69% from $10,8€i9,50410.713.852 in FY 20G91.Q/Hll to $10,976,00011538,000 in FY 201:;:[/142.
2019111 3314000 1550.000 682.000 1 650.000 12.000.000 280 000 19.476 000 27 333.000 10.714 000
·~ ·I
201-l-1/1 689.000 280 000 20.438 196 28.016 000 10.982 000 2-J
201;!-J./1 6.237 971 280 000 24.003 971 28.716 000 11.257 000
"' 201J:!fl
4;: 6 300 000 1,598.000 12 923 000 280 000 24.859 880 29 434 000 11.538 000
of Management
• Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate
Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY 20B:!:/142. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
31
Comprehensive Plan
Source: Indian River County Office and Budget.
Capital Improvements Element
0.07179, 9'/Q
Q_.06999-:-
As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage.
Changes to the Capital Improvements Program
With the ongoing depressed housing market, challenges in the national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, county revenue again decreased and is expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 200&2/®lQ through 20 12,;3/1 "1). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 200&.2/091 0 through 20 l:tol/1 "1 CIP have either had their eosts modified, have l3een deferred, or ha-ve had their time frame extended.
None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations, and only a few chaRges to the tranSfJertatien seetien ef the CIP direetly illlj3aet e8j'laeities within the eeullty' s eeneurreney management system. Because of the devmtt~rn in thedepressed housing market, problems with the financial markets, and limited construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with most of these projects will not be needed until later dates.
The Sfleeifie eeneurreney related prejeets removed from the transportation seetion of the CIP are detailed in Tal3le 6.10 and inelt~de roadvcay segments only en 27th Ave!l<!e. Per these prejeets, funds ·.vere to eeme from the ee<l!lty's gas taJl, optional sales talE and impaet fues. Even thot~gh these prej eets are l3eing deleted, portions of27th Aveffile \viii stilll3e l3t~ilt with the Oslo Road illlj3rovement prejeets.
Ofthe prejeets l3eing deleted from last year's CIP and shoWR in Tal3le 6.1 0, none have had their added eapaeity relied <!JlOn fur vesting de'lelopment prejeets fur eonel!ffeney. On links that are assoeiated
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
32
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
vvith the deleted prejeets listed in Table 6.1Q, the available capacity ranges from 13 .4 5 available peak hellr, directional trips to almost 600 a-vailable peak hear, directional trips.
'Nhlle the Cellllty' s c\lffent Cenc\lffency Linlcs Report shews that eKisting available capacity en 271h Avenue is minimal, Two ofthe transportation projects that have had their constmction dates extended OW'!'efrtlv have deficient lillks in involve improvements to roadwavs that are over capacity according to the County's concurrency management system. The Sjlecific concurrency related Jlrojects that have deficiefrt links a-re !Listed in Table 6.10. these deficient links are C.R. 510 between 58'h Avenue and U.S. Highway I and AlA from 17'11 Street to the south city limits ofthe City ofVero Beach. Even the11gh these Jlrejects ha-ve Eleficiefrt links. tWhile the transportation projects designed to improve these deficient links will be addressed threHgh the transjlortatien imjlreveme!l.ts scheooled to be censtrHeteEI or to have construction commenced vvithin the ne)[t fuvi vea-rs are being rescheduled to later years of the CIP. there are several factors that are expected to increase available capacity in the short tenn. One such factor is that concurrency certificates for . Farther. it is el[jJOCteEl that the available capa-city vvill seen increase due to a number effaeters. With the depressedhe11sing ma-rket, there a-re some development projects that previet~sly hadwith-trips vested trips will fer concurrency, bHt bee&Hse of expir~ soon. eenAt that time. the currene:,· certificates will new have er will seen have their reserved trips reflected by those projects will be removed from the concurrency management system. AlseAnother factor is that recent, traffic counts cenooeted by the Ce11nty this year-indicate that a further reduction in traffic volumes are continuing to decrease on most roadways. These new traffic counts will als&soon be &dEled tereflected in the County's concurrency management system. At that time, Beth-the increased capacity and decreased demand will add &Eiditionalhave the effect of increasing the available capacity back to on County roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the County's CIP.
By deleting extending the time frame of the-transportation projects as shewn, the county can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the county needs to delete delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary projects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
33
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
*Peak hour. directional1Tins
*Peak hear, aireetieHal trips ** Capasity for these !iRks retleets the aaeptea level ef serviee staaeara ef E 129
Seveml neneenelfiTeney relatecl Jlrejeets ·Nitllin the varie<ts ether CIP eategeries have also either hacl their eests meclifiecl, have lleen clefurrecl, or have hacl their timeframe eJctenclecl. These prejeets inel<tcle: frrehie Smith Fish Ho<tse (Conservation ancl AEt<~ifur R~eharge eategof)0, 800 MHz Raclie Expansion (Emergeney Serviees eategef)'), l'lew Cemtroem Faeilities (General Serviees eategery), Oslo Boat Ran1J3 ancl Parking (Parks ancl Rilereatien eategory), ancl several eenvenienee eenter expansions (Solicl Waste eategef)0.
• Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appenclix B)
The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (AppencliK B) is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity vJlieh theseto be produced by these roadway improvement projects will JlrSEI<tee as being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development projects impacting a deficient link can proceed despite the deficient link where theQ
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
34
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project.
Because of lower demand on area roadways from the depressed housing market and the pending expiration of concurrency certificates for previously approved developments, the Priority Transpmiation Capital Improvements Program is no longer needed. Within the Therefore. this CIE no longer includes a Plioritv Transpmiation Capital Improvements Program.
Of the four projects previously listed in the Prioritv Transportation Capital Improvements Pro!.!tam. two Priority Transportation Capital ImproveHlellis Program, seven proj sets have been removed. Three of those projects were removed because they are O\iffernlywill be under construction or are now eompletedwithin the next six months. Those projects are: CR 512, from Sebastian Middle School to I 95; State Road 60, from West of I 95 to 82"" ,\vea~o~e (started militias reloeatioll); and 113!111-l-7'" Street, from 500' vfest of 14llt f,vefllole to west ofU.S. 1 Oslo Road fi·om 27'11 Avenue to 43'd Avenue. and Oslo Road fi·om 43'd Avenue to 581
h Avenue. The other fum-two projects were removed from the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program because they!he road capacity that those projects would add to the transpmiation system is no longer needed to maintain the current Level of Service ofE + 20. have had their eoastruetioa Elates moveElo~o~t to beyoaEl three years. Those projeets are: CR510, from CR512 to 75'" Court; CR 510, from 75llt Comito 61" Drive; CR 510, from 61 51
Drive to mdian River; ana 43.a Avea~o~e, from 12llt Street to Oslo Road. ill all eases, the added roaEl eapaeity from these projects is no longer necessary to maiataia eoaelolffSHey for previo~o~sly approved development projeets.
The four remaining proj eets within the Priority Transportatioa Capital Improvemerns Program have had their eoastructioa start dates modified. While eoastmetioa OH 4 3m Avenue, from 18!11 Street to ~!It Street, will start approllimately siJE moaths sooner thaH amieipated, eoastmetioa oa the three remaffiiag proj eets ·.vii! start approximately 1 to 1 \~ years later than previously amieipated. TheQse projects and their available peak hour, directional trip capacity of the associated roadwavs are listed in Table 6.ll.All of the transportation projeetsroadways listed in thethat table cunentlv have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments.
f,Jtering the start date of eonstruetion, therefore, Eloes aot impact already approveEI developmerns.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
35
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Needs Assessment
Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000100.000 and may be paid for in phases.
Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 201~/142 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, Jaw enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed Jist of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix &C. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service.
Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
Emergency Services
General Services
Law Enforcement & Corrections
Recreation & Open Space
Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
Solid Waste
Stormwater Management
Transportation
Total
$1.350.000
$3.426.177
$558.960
$4.069,300
$6.681.988
Community Development Department
$2,050.000 $3,485.000
$1.077.337 $4 497.450
Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
$3.000.000
$2.825.000 $2.500.000
$5.028.758
Indian River County
36
Comprehensive Plan
Facilities*
*The School District facilities.
Capital Improvements Element
the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school
Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $305,824,490270.395.311.
Within the first fiscal year, projects are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. For the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents oflocal option gas tax.
Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, anEI the comtty itself Eloes notbut are not ln!wthe fiscal responsibility for these systemsof the County. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the management of the IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county.
In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on generallocational criteria for public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the county by 201:t±/142 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
37
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures
$50,000,000 '
$40,000,000 ..
$30,000,000 J
$20,000,000 ..
$1 0,000,000 ··,
$0.
FY2010/11
!ill Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
B Law Enforcement & Corrections
• Solid Waste
Fiscal Assessment
FY2011/12 FY2012/13
r.i!l Emergency Services
Ia Recreation & Open Space
Em Stormwater Management
FY2013/14 FY2014/15
D General Services
• Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
lbJ Transportation
This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. For public school facilities listed in table 6.12, +!he School District oflndian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for publie sehssl faeilities listed in table 6.12. The School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvement~ Program" (Appendix ±:>C) and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix BD) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan.
Theis assessment process consists of projecting future revenue receipts sfrevem~es and comparing these-those receipts againstto anticipated expenditures. tJsiBg With this process, it is possible to quantifY annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs.
Projected Expenditures
Table 6.13 shows the county's projected expenditures for fiscal years 20®1 0/Hll through 201J:!:/14}. By frscal year 20B±f142, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
38
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$330,339,507287.466,627. In FY 201W14l, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Enterprise Fuads/OtherPublic Safely category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 2009101101 and ending in fiscal year 201Wl4l, the county's expenditures are projected to increase by~29.95%.
~----~ Physical Environment
Transportation
Economic Enviromnent
Human Services
CultureJRecreation
Debt Service
Ii:Et8Fj3Fise funds Other
"""' TQ.I&
~~T;OT~'~bri.fu~~~~~~~~;.rt,~~d~B~oo~g~ot.~~~--1J~~~~--L1~~~~_j~~~~~--~ Eannarked Projected Expenditures
Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise fimds for fiscal years 2009! 01101 through 20 I W14l. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year.
A±lAccording to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefits the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the ameunt ef revenues and expenditures amounts increases and decreases with development. For thisthat reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county minimums.
20109/IGl
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#___; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
39
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2010111-1-2 $27.333,000 $4G,§41,GGG $10,714,000 $1G,e§;l,GGG
201+2/1;13 $?8,0 16,000 $4G,94e,GGG $10,982,000 $1G,'7§9,GGG 201;13/1"14
$28,716.000 $H,3§§,GGG $11,257.000 $1G,8e'7,GGG 20134/14~
$29,434,000 $H,'I89,G99 $11.538.000 $1 9,9'18,999 Source. Indian RIVer County Office of Management and Budget.
In FY 201 ~/142,, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $41,769,00029,434,000. That is an increase of »17.69% from the 20109/1 01projected expenses of$41,368,77927,333,363. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 201~/142,, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $10,976,00011,538,000. That is an increase of ,987.69% from the 201091101 projected figure of$10,869,50410,713.852.
Operating Cost Projections
Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2009101101 through 201~1142,. In fiscal year 201~/142,, the county is projected to incur approximately $264,872,395189.485,892 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.15, the county's operating costs are projected to increase .J.&J-±.7.46% between 201091101 and 20B:!/142_.
Projected Debt Capacity
Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility.
Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bonds revenue without a public vote. +he That table identifies the county's bonding capacity is iEleatified for I 0, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.16 indicates, the county's available bonding capacity for the nexta-I 0 years issue is
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
40
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$152,000,000160.100,000, with an aElElitional pot_effiial-while its bonding capacity offor a 30 year issue is $293,000,000323,100,000.
Half Cent Sales Tax
Gas Taxes
Tourist Tax
First Guaranteed Entitlement
Second Guaranteed Entitlement
Sub-Total
Possible Pledge Sources
Franchise Fees
Road Impact Fees
·• Debt Service Obligations
$93,700,000
In table 6.17. +the county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are sununarized in tahle 6.17. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
41
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
42
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
T Interest $781,000 - $745,212 $473,450 $381,850 Principal $2,100,000 - $3,890,000 $1,930,000 $840,000 Total $2,881,000 - $4,635,212 $2,403,450 $1,221,850
2018 Balance $13,520,000 - $11,480,000 $8,685,000 $6,615,000 Interest $676,000 - $550,713 $376,950 $337,750
I Principal $2,205,000 - $4,085,000 $2,025,000 $890,000 Total $2,881,000 - $4,635,713 $2,401,950 $1,227,750
2019 Balance $11,315,000 - $7,395,000 $6,660,000 $5,725,000 Interest $565,750 - $346,462 $275,700 $291,025
I Principal $2,315,000 - $4,290,000 $2,130,000 $930,000 Total $2,880,750 $4,636,462 $2,405,700 $1,221,025
2020 Balance $9,000,000 - $3,105,000 $4,530,000 $4,795,000 Interest $450,000 - $131,963 $186,750 $242,200
I Principal $2,430,000 - $3,105,000 $2,220,000 $980,000 Total $2,880,000 - $3,236,963 $2,406,750 $1,222,200
2021 Balance $6,570,000 - $0 $2,310,000 $3,815,000 Interest $328,500 - $92,400 $190,750
I Principal $2,550,000 - $2,310,000 $305,000 Total $2,878,500 - $2,402,400 $495,750
2022 Balance $4,020,000 - $0 $3,510,000 Interest $201,000 - $175,500
I Principal $2,680,000 - $320,000 Total $2,881,000 - $495,500
2023 Balance $1,340,000 - $3,190,000 Interest $67,000 - $159,500
I Principal $1,340,000 - $340,000 Total $1,407,000 $499,500
2024 Balance $0 - $2,850,000 Interest - $142,500
I Principal - $355,000 Total - $497,500
2025 Balance $2,495,000
Interest $124,750
I Principal $375,000
Total - $499,750 2026 Balance - $2,120,000
Interest - $106,000
I Principal $390,000
Total $496,000
2027 Balance $1,730,000
Interest $86,500
I Principal - $410,000
112028
Total $496,500
Balance - $1,320,000
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
43
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
I Interest -Principal -Total -
2029 Balance -Interest -
I Principal
Total -2030 Balance -
Interest -Principal -I
112031
Total -Balance -
Fiscal Assessment Summary
This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 20()910/Wl and ending in FY 201 Wl42_. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 201Wl42_. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,572,981,6971.354.835.802 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 20G91Qilgl to fiscal year 201Wl42_. Sources of these funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,572,981,6971.354,835.802.
Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. The 1oeta1 estimated eest ef For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $305,824,4 90204.821.4 75 for the next five fiscal years. This is .J.9M 15.12% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period.
Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level-of-service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place whieh that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. ThisThat system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level-of-service standards.
While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
44
$66,000
$430,000
$496,000
$890,000
$44,500
$455,000
$499,500
$435,000
$21,750
$435,000
$456,750
$0
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the county's level-of-service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available.
Project Applicability
All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level-of-service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional impact (DRl) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan.
According to Section 163 .3180( 6), F .S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County shall "flPPyapplies the single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990. CWTently, all emmty maintained reads are SJ3erating llelew ilie adej3ted level sf serviee and have additienal eapaeity te aeeemmedate future grevith.
Service Standards
Level-of-service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements.
For each facility, level-of-service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is mea~ured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. These measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 201 0-_
45
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Tmnsportation Roadway Volume of cars Peak Season/Peak
Affected Roadways accommodated over time Direction/Peak Hour Trips
Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Treatment design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD)
Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment Design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD)
Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per Entire County yards) capita per year)
Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand Entire County population
Stormwater Management Drainage
Volume of water Volume of stormwater
Basin conveyances outfalling for design storm
Service Area
Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis.
Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roaev<ays roadways arewill be those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. fdl prejeets, rRegardless of size, all projects impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project are usuallv impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and fom or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or more peale hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadwaysthat gain 5% or more of the prejeet's traffie or 50 or more of the prejeet's genemtee trips, whiehever is less are inelueee.
Level of serviee staneards f.Eor transportation concurrency related facilities. level-ot:service standards are t&applyied to all impacted roadways.requests for eevelopment oreers ane permits. Those !Levelof-service standards are measlli'ements basee on peak hom trips ane basee on volume ranges or average travel speee for the peak hom range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips.
Demand
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
46
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level-of-service for the facility.
As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management.
Existing Demand
Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements.
Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity.
Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line.
Committed Demand
Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects.
Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
47
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element.
Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated.
Projected Demand
The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is noncommitted/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand.
Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on these lots.
The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand.
Availability of Capacity
Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number oflanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in-the-ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
48
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
According to Chapter 9J-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida Administrative Code, the capacity of existing, in-the-ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met:
~ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities:
1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or
· 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.]
For parks and recreation facilities:
1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or
2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired . by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and
a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
49
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.]
Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is:
I. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or
2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if:
a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or
b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies:
1. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion (fer IRElioo River County, this is ineluEleEl in poliey 5.11 of this element ana within AppenElilt B of this element).
u. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
50
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, A!!t the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or
4. The segment's new roadway capacity if, A£!t the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S.]
5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair-share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement.
For school facilities:
A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S.
Regulation
No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level-of-service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required.
Monitoring System
To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level-of-service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
51
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility.
Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modif'y capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed.
Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand.
Peak season/ peak Annual count (average) Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing Traffic Roadways direction/ peak hour (peak season/peak approved Development Demand) - (Committed
(LOS D) direction/peak hour) Orders (DO) Demand)
Sanitary Treatment Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Sewer Plants Design flows Existing flows
approved DO's Demand)- (Committed Demand)
Treatment Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Potable Water Plants
Design flows Existing flows approved DO's
Demand)- (Committed Demand)
Active cell design Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Solid Waste Landfill Active cell volume used Demand)- (Committed capacity approved DO's Demand)
(Acres per thousand per
(Total Capacity)- (Existing Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing
population) X (projected Demand)- (Committed
population) population for approved
Demand) DO"s)
Drainage Volume ofstormwater (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Drainage Volume Existing flows allowed to outfall for Demand)- (Committed conveyances approved DO's Demand)
Public Permanent Student Annual Enrollment Students estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Education Schools(K-12) Stations (FISH) Count (FTE) approved residential Demand)- (Committed Development Orders) Demand)
To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
52
Comprehensive Plan
Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand
Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes
IdentifY existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant
Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used
Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand
Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances
Enter data received from other departments into computer
Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand
Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO
Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated
Applicability
Capital Improvements Element
Engineering Annually
MPO Annually
Utilities Annually
Utilities Annually
Planning Annually
Engineering Annually
Planning Ongoing
School District Annually
Planning Ongoing
Planning Ongoing
The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level-ofservice measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
53
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Goal, Objectives and Policies
Goal
It is the goal oflndian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making.
Objectives and Policies
Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities
By 20142., the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth.
Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163 .3177(3)(b) F. S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained.
Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital hnprovements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, defer, or elimination will cause the level-of-service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital hnprovements Element shall be transmitted to DCA.
Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance.
> Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; > Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; > Elimination of existing deficiencies; > Maintenance of adopted level-of-service standards; > Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; > Protection of prior infrastructure investments; > Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; > Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands;
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
54
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
> Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction;
> Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas;
> Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; > Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; > Reduction of operating costs; > Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters.
Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub-elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems.
Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Storm water Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level-of-service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements.
Policy 1. 7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure.
Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%.
Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $25,000100.000:
Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities.
Policy 1.11 : The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
55
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 1.12: The county shall-hereby adopts the 2010-2011 through 2014- 2015 Indian River Countv School District Five-Year Facilities Work Plan "Scheel Distriet eflndian River Cetlfl!y Five Year Capital Imprevement SeheEffile" frem the Seheel District's adepted Five Year Capital Plan pursuant te Sectien 163.3177(3)(a)(5) F.S. The Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work PlanCapital Imprevemeffi Schedule withll be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River Countv School District Five-Year Facilities Work PlanSeheel Distriet' s Five Year Capital Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained.
Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas
Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane.
Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions.
Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed.
Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level-of-Service Standards
Through 203 0, adopted levels-of-service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
56
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level-of-service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level-of-service standard.
Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub-Elements.
Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels-of-service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval.
Policy 3 .4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability offacilities to maintain adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level-of-service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below:
~ Stormwater Management:
The county hereby adopts the following level-of-service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county:
~ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves.
Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre-development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre-development discharge.
By 201G2, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level-ofservice standards:
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November__, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
57
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Minimum road crown elevation for ex1stmg roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets.
>- The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a I 0 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads.
>- All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: By 2007 5-Y ear/24 Hour Storm Event By 2010 I 0-Y ear/24 Hour Storm Event
The county hereby adopts the following water quality level-of-service standard: >- As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite
discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law.
>- Potable Water
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
>- Countywide level-of-service standard of250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit.
>- Solid Waste
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
>- Countywide level-of-service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year.
>- Sanitarv Sewer
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
>- Countywide level-of-service standard of250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25.
>- Recreation & Open Space
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
58
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The county adopts the following recreation level-of-service standard: ' )> County wide level-of-service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/! ,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population.
)> Transportation
The county adopts traffic circulation level-of-service standards as follows: )> Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all
TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%.
• •
27th Ave- South County Line to SR 60 43'd Ave- Oslo Road to 161
h Street
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level-of-service standards for selected public facilities as follows:
)> Correctional Facilities
The county adopts the following correctional facilities level-of-service standard: )> County wide level-of-service standard of 4.5 beds/ I ,000 permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population
)> Fire/EMS
The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level-of-service standard: :)> County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level-of-service standard of .089
Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
)> Law Enforcement
The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level-of-service standard: )> Unincorporated County level-of-service standard of2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent
plus weighted peak seasonal population
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
59
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
} Libraries
The county adopts the following Libraries level-of-service standards: } County wide level-of-service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population );. County wide level-of-service standard of 3,200 library material items per I ,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population );. County wide level-of-service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population );. County wide level-of-service standard of0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
);. Public Buildings
The county adopts the following Public Buildings level-of-service standard: );. County wide level-of-service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population.
);. Schools
The county adopts the following Schools level-of-service standard:
Schools (School Service Areas):
);. I 00 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high).
);. Transit
The County adopts the following transit level-of-service standard: );. One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes.
Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs
Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level-of-service standards.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
60
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 4.2: The county shall conduct research to identifY new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects.
Objective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities
Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities.
Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element.
Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ~ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ~ Affordable housing projects ~ New development orders permitting redevelopment ~ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the
infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ~ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation
Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub-Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ~ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi-use
facilities; ~ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ~ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ~ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least-cost
manner; ~ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures.
Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement #_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 201 0-_
61
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non-enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources.
Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be fmanced by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non-debt revenue.
Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level-of-service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level-of-service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment.
Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: ~ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within
or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; ~ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent
availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or
~ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level-of-service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed.
Peliey 5.11: The eelffi!y herel3y aaeJ3!S ApJ3eREiiK B as the Celffi!y' s Prierity TFaRsj3ertatieR Caj'Jital ImprevemeR!s Sehedule. This sehedllie prevides the prejeet Eleserij'ltieR, estimated Elate ef eemmeReemeR! efaetual eeRstruetieR, estimated date efeempletieR, aad estimated eest fer J3rejeets that will increase reaaway Caj'Jaeity en J3Fierity faeilities.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
62
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring
Implementation
An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results.
For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure.
To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption ofland development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports.
Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifYing other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifYing other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities.
As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level-of-service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level-of-service standards are maintained.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
63
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
,'t;,.............. <::~~~~!/· ······;,,~· .·. ,n<r.:c· ~ ... ::-..· ... V·~F'\,/i: . ' ·.· ,, . ·> ;:./>•::.:, .•.•• : .; .·:·• ·····;:"''II <·.· .... · ............. · ·~ ,.··· .... · .... : .. ~.·.·········· ..
/".;.:.· . i.'. • •;• ''· ,:• ... .., Cj(;;~
u Maintain the CIP OMBIPD 2010-2014 No
1.2 Follow the CIP PD 2010-2014 No
1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMBIPD/SD Ongoing No
1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County
2010-2014 Yes Departments/SO
1.5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County
2010-2014 Yes Departments/SO
L6 Maintain previous commitments BCCIPWD/SD Ongoing No
L7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County
Ongoing No Departments/SO
L8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No
L9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No
LIO Capital Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No
Lll Capital Improvements Management OMB/SD Ongoing No
2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No
2.2 Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map PD Ongoing No
2.3 Budget management Appropriate County
Ongoing Yes Departments
2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County
Ongoing Yes Departments
2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No
2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County
Ongoing No Departments
3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No
3.2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Appropriate County
Ongoing No Elements Departments
3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No
3.4 Land use decisions BCC Ongoing No
3.5 Adopt LOS standards County Ongoing No
4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County
Ongoing Yes Departments
4.2 Conduct research OMBIPD Ongoing No
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
64
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
•.. ...... . .. ······••••··••••··.····· .c>···:c•·······;· ~~~:··.·:• .;·:· ... ••• ·;·· \i:~ft?'F/ .J;pfAci(P~ /"''" ''"' ···:' :'~'
.... •::•: :::> ~2: ·~.;:;;.~
4.3 Work with municipalities BCC/SD/Other Local
Ongoing NP Governments in IRC
5.1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can
BCC Ongoing NP support land use change
5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate Ongoing NP County Departments
5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County
Ongoing Np Departments
Appropriate County 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Departments/Other Ongoing Np
Government Agencies
5.5 Utilize enterprise funds OMB Ongoing NP
5.6 Finance non-enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing NP
5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD Ongoing Yes
5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County Ongoing NP Departments
5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/OMBIPD/SD Ongoing NP
5.10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2014 NP
5.11 Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements
BCCIPWD/MPO Ongoing NP Schedule
BCC =Board of County Commissioners DCA= Department of Community Affairs FOOT = Florida Department ofTransportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization O:MB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department PWD =Public Works Department SD = School District
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures
To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing tbe plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which tbe plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timefrarnes, tbe plan's objectives are tbe benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate tbe plan.
Table 6.22 identifies each oftbe objectives oftbe Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies tbe measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving tbese objectives. Most oftbese measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
65
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
the level-of-service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives.
The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level-of-service standards will be maintained.
Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 20142
2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2030
3 Level-of-service provided for county services 2030
4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2030
5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2030
While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element.
As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 91-5.005-(l)(a)(e), F.A.C.
The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports.
Community Development Department Indian River County Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
66
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level-of-service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments.
The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan.
As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element.
Community Development Department Indian River Couuty 67 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
==;;;;;=="""""'""'"""""''""""'="'"'""'""'==--I"'n"'d"'i"a"n River Connty Five Year Schedule of Improvements ''",~~'"''"'"·"-
Community Development Department Indian River County 68 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
800 MHz Radio
Dist.
Dist.
Community Development Department Indian River County 69 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
I Annual Balance I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I
Community Development Department Indian River County 70 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ -Evidence Addition $ 558,960 $ 700,000 $ - $ 1,258,960 ~ional Sales Tax
$ - $ -Evidence Addition $ - $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Total Expenditures $ 558,960 $ 1 900,000 $ - $ 2~960
Community Development Department Indian River County 71 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ -State Road 510 Fishing Pier $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ 1,400,000 Optional Sales Tax
$ -Land for Future Parks $ 1,575,000 $ 1,575,000 $ 1,175,000 $ 1,175,000 $ 5,500,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -West County Regional Park $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -North County Regional Park Restroom $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Gifford Park Restroom/Concession Bld_g $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -16th Street Ballfields Restroom $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Round Island Riverside Rpl Boardwalk $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000 Grant
$ - $ -North County Regional Park Lazy River $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Kiwanis Hobart Park Restroom $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Fairgrounds Campground $ 30,293 $ 200,000 $ - $ 230,293 hnpact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Fairgrounds Campground $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Optional Sales Tax Total Expenditures $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,929,300
Community Development Department Indian River County 72 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
I Total Revenue I $ 9,928,533 I $ 1,600,000 I $ 2,285,000 I $ 2,600,000 I $ 3,785,000 I $ 20,198,533 I
~ 'i-''i'cF:riiZ'Ii'fzi~~ ~ Mise Water Improvements $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,250,000 Impact Fees Mise Sewer Improvements $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 875 000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -77th West of Kings (Tuscannv Lakes) $ 112,237 $ 112,237 $ - $ 224,474 Impact Fees
$ - $ -12WM 17th St. SW from 27th Av to 43rd Av $ - $ - $ 610,000 $ 610,000 Impact Fees
Design FM and WM on 4th St from 82nd to 98th $ - $ -Ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main $ 85,000 $ - $ 85,000 Impact Fees
12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St $ - $ -SW (Madera Isles & Echo Lake $ - $ - $ 341,000 $ 341,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -South County Brine Disposal $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Hydromentia Pilot $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Grant Funding
58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th $ -St $ 50,000 $ 500,000 $ 450,000 $ 232,000 $ 1,232,000 Impact Fees
Svce Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of VB $ - $ - $ -Gardens $ - $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Impact Fees
Install Wells and Piping at North County RO $ - $ - $ -Plant $ 1,948,293 $ - $ 1,948,293 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant $ - $ 640,050 $ 574,358 $ 1,214,408 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -12" W.M. along 66th Av. from 16th to 20th St. $ 229,418 $ - $ 229,418 Impact Fees
16" WM from Kings Tank to College Ln. and $ - $ - $ -Loop to Club ofVero $ 115,450 $ - $ !15,450 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Insta\16" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Impact Fees
Insta1124" WM along 77th Stfrom 66th Ave to $ - $ -70th Ave then North to CR 510 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Imoact Fees N. Reg. Reuse Sto. & Repump Facility with $ - $ - $ -Transmission Mains to Barrier Island $ 1,512,490 $ - $ 1,512,490 Impact Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 73 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Brine line on 77th to CR5IO,Bridge conversion & $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ Assessments & User Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 74 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion $ - $ -and bnprovements $ - $ 1,920,000 $ - $ 1,920,000 Assessments & User Fees Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion $ - $ -and Improvements $ - $ 1,430,000 $ - $ 1,430,000 Assessments & User Fees Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and $ - $ - $ -Imorovements $ 2,500,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 Assessments & User Fees Transfer Tractorffransfer Trailers and Roll-off Truck/Containers $ - $ 400,000 $ 280,000 $ 320,000 $ 667,802 $ 1,667 802 Assessments & User Fees
Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill- Co Disposal (former 33 Acres for $ - $ - $ -C&D) $ 6,450,000 $ - $ 6,450,000 Assessments & User Fees
$ - $ - $ -Retrofit of MRF $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 Assessments & User Fees
Partial Closure of Cell I, C&D Landfill, Seg-1, $ - $ - $ -See:-2 and the Infill $ - $ 6,400,000 $ 6,400,000 Assessments & User Fees Total Expenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Community Development Department Indian River County 75 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
PC North- North Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ -System) $ - $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,000,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC North- North Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
PC South- South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ -Svstem) $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 300,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 IRC Utility Dept
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
$ - $ - $ -Rockridge Surge Protection Project $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Grant
$ - $ - $ -Rockridge Surge Protection Proiect $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 QQ!:ional Sales Tax Funds Vero Lake Estates Phase II and ill $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 MSTU Assessments
$ - $ -Vera Lake Estates Phase II and III $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Grant
Total Expenditures $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 76 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000
Grant $ 8,095,502 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 2,339,000 $ 15,134,502 Traffic Impact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497
Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,311 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,311
Traffic Impact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ 106,952
Optional Sales Tax $ 18,618,648 $ 3,360,000 $ 3,444,000 $ 3,530,240 $ 3,618,440 $ 32,571,328 $ -
Payback from FDOTM Optional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ 14,823,571 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Old Traffic Impact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ 1,140,009 $ - $ -
Developer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,600,000
Total Revenue $ 78,143,562 $ 13,522,000 $ 15,735,196 $ 18,620,111 $ 60,336,457 $ 186,357,326
Community Development Department Indian River County 77 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Grant
Gas Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 78 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two lanes
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two lanes
Community Development Department Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 79
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three
Community Development Department Indian River County 80 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 81 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 82 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 83 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Avenue to 58th Avenue, Four
Community Development Department Indian River County 84 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 85 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 86 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ - $ - $ -Water and Sewer Cash Forward $ 8,528,533 $ 8,528,533 Solid Waste Assessments & User Fees $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 MSTU Assessments $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000
$ - $ - $ -IRC Utilities Deoartment $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Gas Tax $ 10,297,507 $ 2,232,000 $ 2,255,000 $ 6,237,971 $ 6,237,971 $ 27,260,449
$ - $ - $ -Bonds Proceeds - Gas Tax $ - $ 44,805,166 $ 44,805,166
$ - $ - $ - $ -Payback from FOOT-Gas Tax $ 7,865,009 $ 7,865,009 Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000 Traffic Impact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497 Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,3ll $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,3ll Traffic Impact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532
$ - $ - $ - $ -Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ 106,952
$ - $ -Develooer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,600,000
$ -Payback from FOOT- Optional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ 14,823,571
$ - $ - $ - $ -Old Traffic Impact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ 1,140,009
TOTAL $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311
Community Development Department Indian River County 87 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Total Revenues All Categories $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311 Total Expenditures All Catee:ories $ 71,592,309 $ 39,232,424 $ 48,492,450 $ 50,780,758 $ 60,297,370 $ 270,395,311 Difference $36,117,731 -$15,333,719 -$19,227,254 -$13,608,647 $12,051,889 $0
Community Development Department Indian River County 88 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
- 00, 00 =
J, i ..
;., s l l -~ = = ~ 0 "' u - .. = .. .. s ~ ..
;>
= 0 .. .. "'" :0 s
= .... -;; -·a "' u
. I 0 .... 0 .... .. " = " = :0 .. 0 0
J J .... ; 0
~ .... ,., :g .I - .. = .. '"-" s s
; ~ ~ t: ~ .'1 " 0 frz ~ ~'0 - .. =-.. Q. s o = ,_'0 .. o< iS:
J J ~ ~ 1 -~1 ..
. <! ~ .. "' ~=
= .. ·- "
..., = s .. .. SJaafeJ:d = " Q.
=-s AJIIHO:) s "' 0 Q.
0
uri: u
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX GB: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has adopted its 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This plan prioritizes roadway improvements through a 20 year planning horizon. The table below lists these prioritized roadway improvements. Because the LRTP prioritizes long range roadway projects through 2030, or contains projects funded entirely by non-county sources, it includes some projects that are not in Appendix A, the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
2030 Roadwav Imurovement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transnortation Element) On Street From To Base Road Tvoe Future Road Tvne Total Cost
1-95 S. County Line N. County Line 4 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Freeway $109,919,000
~ SR60 98th Ave 1-95 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $2,543,842
SIS Total $112,462,842
SR60 1-95 82ndAve 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,119,445
SR60 6th Ave Indian River Blvd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $1,864,758 ~ ... US I S. County Line Oslo Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $12,064,823 ~ 0 ~ US I Aviation Blvd Old Dixie Hwy (N) 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $44,372,047 ~ - US I Roseland Rd ~- County Line 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $5,255,518 .fl
"' Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $10,000,000
Other State Roads Total $81,676,591
4th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $16,262,035
12th St 90th Ave 82ndAve 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781,786 ~
12th St 43rdAve 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,618 ... ~
~ 13th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,041,388 .e;.
13th St SW 43rd Ave 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,560,899 c = 0 13th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,684 u
13th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,922,225
17th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519
Community Development Department Indian River County 90 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transoortation Element) .,
On Street From To Base Road Tvoe Future Road Tyne Total Cost 26th St 66th Ave 43rd Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $13,006,154 26th St 82ndAve 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,850,481 Aviation Blvd 43rd Ave U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,537,828 27th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $9,560,909 27th Ave OsloRd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $12,330,699 43rd Ave S County Line OsloRd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $12,974,563 43rdAve Oslo Rd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $8,311,058 53rd St 82ndAve 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $9,599,620
58th Ave S County
Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $11,850,325 Line/Koblegard Rd
66th Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $8,562,423 66th Ave OsloRd 4th St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,887,466 66th Ave 4th St SR60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided $8,853,565
66th Ave SR60 C.R. 510 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,173,489
82ndAve S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $7,302,941
82ndAve 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided $28,174,165
Laconia St C.R. 510 C.R.512 00 2 Lane Undivided $2,679,879
Aviation Blvd Ext U.S. I Indian River Blvd 00 4 Lane Divided $14,387,771
C.R. 510 C.R. 512 U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,369,280
C.R. 510 U.S. I ICWW 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,718,539
C.R. 512 Fellsmere City Limits l-95 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $19,192,929
C.R. 512 1-95 C.R. 510 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $13,317,0!0
C.R. 512 C.R. 510 Roseland Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $6,674,370
8th St 82ndAve 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,955,196
Indian River Blvd Royal Palm 37th St 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,678,255
Oslo Rd 1-95 58th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $19,484,669
Roseland Rd C.R. 512 U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $12,847,897
Schumann Dr C.R. 510 Barber St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,974,335 ----
Community Development Department Indian River County 91 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transoortation Element) On Street From To Base Road Ty~e Future Road Ty[!e Total Cost
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $!0,000,000j
County Roads Total $381,057,970
~ Barber St Schumann Dr U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $3,621,587 Barber St C.R. 512 Schumann Dr 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $7,596,306 £
u City Roads Total $11,217,893
Total $576,415,2% Source: Indian River County :MPO
F,\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPIAN AMENDMENTS\CIE\2010\2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT· DRAFT IQ.26-10- REDLINED COPY.DOC
Community Development Department Indian River County 92 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX DC: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE·
Summary of Capital Improvement Program
Proiect New Construction
NeW _ConstructiOn and Additions Fellsmere Cafe. Exp'ah & Osrm Addn
Sebastian River HS Addni"on
Storm Grove Middle School
SupporfServices Complex
Tffiffic-lmprovement Projects
SubtOtal' New Construction and Additions
_SubtOtal New Construction
Comprehensive Needs ModernizatiOns.& Replacements Dodgertown Cafeteria & HVAC Replacement
Do"dgertOWirSchiJol HVAC
Osceola Ma'gn'et Replacement
VBHS- FreShman Leaming:ctr Ren·ov.
Vero BeaCh El Replacement
Vera· Beach Hi_gh School-Restoration
Wabasso School Renovation
.Subtotal Modernizations & Reolacements
Subtotal Compreh~·nsive _N_~~s
other Items Capital Mai_n'ten~n·c.e
CapitalMaintilnance (buyback)
Capital MaiJltc:mance/HIIh & Life Safety
1-NAQ Repair ar'ld Replace
Community Development Department
Prtorto FY2011. FY FY FY FY FY Total 2011 FY2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9;000,000 o . ··· •s.,M.o,ooo ~.000,000 11,noo,ooo 11,000,000
45,048,476 45,048,476
11,000,000 8;000,000 5,000,000 s,ooo;ooo 820,000 0 .820,000 820,000
80,868,476 66,048,478 14,820,000 14,820,000
80,888,476 88,048,476 14;~2§;~-~b-': 14,820,000
'
1,512,500 1,512,500 ',· ' •. ,
2,750,000 2,75o,ooo 2,750,000
20,000)000 0 2o,noo,ooo 20,000,000
1,150,000 1,150,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
20,174,852 5,174,852 •15,000,000 15,000,000
54,217,750 54,217,750
1,885,041 1,885,043 . . ( ,.
105,690,145 66,948,145 'ls,v:si.M9 1'8,75tr,troo 20,000,000.
10.5,690,145 66,940,145 ;#~;zW~9Q~: 18;750,000 20,000,000
I I I --1 11.001,010 I 15.631.180 17.170.8.50 1,474,170 3.474.170 3,474,170 1,474,170 1.474.170 21,984,256 15,084,256 6,900,000 1 ,500,000 900,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000
1,800,000 1,800,000
Indian Rjver County Public Schools Ill
Indian River County 93 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan
Proiec.t Total
Capital Improvements Element
Priorto FY2011-~ FY 2011 .FY20.15 20.11
•<''" '
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
Subtotal Capital Maintenance 56,787.~861 32,5.16A36 2~,27~,850. 4,974,170 4,374,170 4,874,170 4,974,170 5,074,170 Relocatables I I Relocatable leasing 24,239,158 19,464,158 4,775,000 775,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Relocatable Renova.ticin 1,476,450 1,476,450
Subtotal Relocatibles 25,715,608 20,940,608 4;775,000 775,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Educational Technology I Disrrlct Te·chnotogy 10;833,802 7,483,802 3,350,000 1,350,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
Subtotal Educational T~hnoloav 10,833,802 7,483,802 3,350,000 1,350,'000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Furniture & Equipment . I F,F&E Buyback 5,802,962 4,302,962 1,500,@0 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 School Bus.es.Nehicles 13,200,330 7,725,330 ' .5,475,000 325,000 1,500,000 650,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Subtotal Filmiture & Eauipment 19,003,292 12;028;292 6;975,000 625,000 1,800,000 950,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Reserves and Contingencies I other Projects DistriCtWide 18,866,409 4,126,172 14,740,237 1,557,403 1,470,949 3,023,591 4,035,969 4,652:32S
Subtotal Re'serves'.8.i1d,Contingencies 18,866,409 4,126,172 14;740;237. 1;557;403 1,470,~49 3,023,591 4,035,969 4,652,325
Subtotal otherlfl!flls 131,208,397 77,095,310 54,.11{{0~7.\ 9,281,573 9,145,119 10,347,761 12,310,139 13;026,495
Total Projects 1.07,68M87 42,851,573 29,145,119 10,347,761 12,310,139 13,026,495
Jnaian·Rrver9ounty PUblic Schools IV
Community Development Department Indian River County 94 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX ED: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010-2011 Work Plan
EducatjCXlal Distfict Techndogy $1,350,000 $500,000 $506,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3,350,000
Local Expenditure Totals-; $20,685,847 $22,066,479 $22,554,665 $24,282,929 $24,528,282 $114,128;202
Revenue
1.50 Mill R~vehUf:' Source 'Schedule ofEstirnated'Capilal Outlay Revenue-from each curr_ent.ly apprpved.sourc_ewhlch is estimated to be available for expenditures_ on the projects_ included in the tentatiVe district facilities work program. Alf'amounts are NET all:er considering:carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14-a:nd 1011.15 loans, etc. DistriCts cannot use 1.5-Mill fUnds fOr salaries except for those ·explicitly a:SSOciEited with maintenance/repair projects. (1011.71 (5), F.S.)
PECO -Reve·nue Source
The,ffgure in the rON designated "PECO Mainrenance" will be subtracted from funds-availi:lble-for new construction because:PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new-constructiOI'l.
·co & DS Revenue source Revenue' from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds.
Fair Share·Revenue-.Source
Page 4 of fs 91912010 10:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 95 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010- 2011 Work Plan
All legally binding commitmenls·.fa- proportionate fair-share mitigation fa- impacts on public school facilities-must be included in the 5-year district wa-k program.
Nothing reported for this section.
Sales· Surtax· Referendum
Specific infami:ltipn 8._b·out:any referendum for a 1-cen.tOr' %-c-ent surtax referer'ldum'r;lurin!;;J"Itle,_·previOUs·year.
Did the school dlstricfhold.a surtax referendum during tha-past fiscal year 2009- 2010.? No
Additional Revenue Source
My a,dditional revenue sources
Page5of18 9/9/201010:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 96 Supplement#_; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010-2011 Work Plan
Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 fi'~"Jm 1 .cent or 1/2 cent_Sates Surtax
Total Fund BalanCe Carried Forward $12,452,000 so so $0 $0 $12,452,000
General Capital O!Jtlay Obligated Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so Balance Carried Forward From Totat Fund Balance Carr'1ed Forward
Special Facilities Construction Account $0 ~0 $0 $0 '$0 •• One Cent.- 1/2 Cent Sales-Surtax Debt $0 $Q so $0 $0 $0 Service FrOm Total Fund Balance Carried FOrward
c·apital Ou_Uay Projects Funds-Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ·so Carried Forward From Total Fund Balaric·ecairie:d Forward
RAN PROCEEDS $5,000,000 so so $0 $0 $5,000,000
Subtotal $32,589,986 $20,139,293 $141,577 $144,801 $144,801 $53,16D,458
Total Revenue Summary
Project Schedules
C~padty Pr:oject ~ehedules A schedule.·of capital ouflay_projects_necessary to ensure'JIJe,allailability of satisfactay classroomsoJor:the projected student ·enrollment fn K~12 pro.grams.
Page6of18 91912010 10:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 97 Supplement#__; Adopted November_, 2010, Ordinance 2010-_
ORDINANCE NO. 20TO - 024
A TRUE COPY CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE J.K. BARTON, CLERK
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River
Coun!y Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b)1 requires an annual review and update of the
County's Capital Improvements Element; and
WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3187(1)(t) allows the County, by ordinance, to amend its
capital improvements element once per year outside of the standard twice a year
amendment limitation threshold and do so through only one adoption public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
advertised for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the
Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to F.S.
163.3184(15)(b)(l) and (c); and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held
an Adoption Public Hearing on November 2, 2010, at which parties in interest and
citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adoption and Transmittal
The amendment to the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan identified in Section 2 is hereby adopted, and three (3) copies are directed to be transmitted to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs and one (1) copy is directed to be transmitted to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and remaining reviewing agencies.
SECTION 2. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Amended Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A)
1 of3
ORDINANCE NO. 20ro--- 024
SECTION 3. Financial Feasibility
The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible.
SECTION 4. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 5. Severability
It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance or these Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Amendments is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.
SECTION 6. Effective Date
The effective date of this ordinance and, therefore, this plan amendment shall be the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance with Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption at a public meeting after public notice of a resolution affirming their effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning ~d Management, Plan Processing Team.
This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the 18th day of October, 2010, for a public hearing held on the 2nd day of November~ 2010, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Davis , seconded by Commissioner Fl esc her , and adopted by the following vote:
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler, Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner
2 of3
Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye
<JRDINA.NCEN0.-2Uru-~ ··024
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
t
BY: .b cQ3 ~==~~~==~==-=~~~~--
Peter D. O'Bryan ,C
This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: ___ _
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
A an S. Polackwich, ounty/Atto~ ~ { /
OVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS
F:\Community Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan Arnendments\CIE\2010\0rdinance- CIE 2010.doc
DATE I I - 3 - I 0
Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6 Capital Improvements Element Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-____
Attachment 3
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County i
TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii
List of Tables.................................................................................................................................. iii
Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................... 2 Financial Resources ................................................................................................................ 2 Expenditures ......................................................................................................................... 19 Existing Outstanding Debt.................................................................................................... 23 Local Policies and Practices ................................................................................................. 24
Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements........................................... 28 Needs Assessment................................................................................................................. 36 Fiscal Assessment ................................................................................................................. 38 Fiscal Assessment Summary................................................................................................. 44
Concurrency Management Plan ................................................................................................... 44 Project Applicability ............................................................................................................. 45 Service Standards.................................................................................................................. 45 Demand ................................................................................................................................. 47 Availability of Capacity........................................................................................................ 48 Regulation............................................................................................................................. 51 Monitoring System ............................................................................................................... 51 Applicability ......................................................................................................................... 53
Goal, Objectives and Policies....................................................................................................... 54
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring............................................................................... 62
Implementation ......................................................................................................................... 62
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures .................................................................................... 65
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS............................... 68
APPENDIX B: PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ...... 87
APPENDIX CB: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN........................................................ 88
APPENDIX DC: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE ................................................................................................... 91
APPENDIX ED: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE .............................................................................................................. 93
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County ii
List of Figures Figure Title Page 6.1 Ad Valorem Tax Revenue 3 6.2 Enterprise Fund Revenue 3 6.3 User Fees and Charges 4 6.4 Special Assessment Revenue 5 6.5 Impact Fee Revenue 5 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax 6 6.7 Tourist Development Tax 7 6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax 9 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue 11 6.10 Half-Cent Local Government Sales Tax 14 6.11 County Revenue Sharing 14 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds 15 6.13 County Fuel Tax 16 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax 16 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax 17 6.16 Distribution of Revenue by Category 19 6.17 General Expenditures by Function 21 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures 38
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County iii
List of Tables Table Title Page 6.1 Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 07/08) 2 6.2 Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities 8 6.3 Local Fuel Tax Rates 10 6.4 Indian River General Revenues by Source 18 6.5 Indian River County Expenditures by Function 19 6.6 Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt 23 6.7 Overall General Revenue Projection Summary 30 6.8 Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element 31 6.9 Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections 32 6.10 Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects with Deficient Links 33 6.11 Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation Projects 35 6.12 Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County 36 6.13 Indian River County General Expenditures Projection Summary 39 6.14 Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste 39 6.15 Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections 40 6.16 Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without 41
Public Vote 6.17 Indian River County Bond Schedule 42 6.18 Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities 46 6.19 Monitoring System Design 52 6.20 Monitoring System Tasks 53 6.21 Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix 64 6.22 Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix 66
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 1
Introduction The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to be funded. This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements based on the level of need and the availability of funds. For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards or to meet objectives identified in the county’s comprehensive plan. Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the concurrency management section, while the county’s overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 2
Existing Conditions
Financial Resources
One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2008/09. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources.
Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 20078/089)
Federal Sources
State Sources
Local Sources
Amount ($1,000)
% of Total Revenue
Amount ($1,000)
% of Total Revenue
Amount ($1,000)
% of Total Revenue
Various Grants
$12,859$18,567 5.48%6.89%
Local Government
Half-Cent Sales Tax
$7,000$7,588 2.99%2.82%
Ad Valorem Taxes
$94,397$99,827 40.26%37.06%
Total
Federal $12,859$18,567 5.48%6.89%
County Revenue
Sharing $2,558$2,850 1.09%1.06
%
Enterprise Funds $41,531$
44,677 17.71%16.59%
Constitutional Fuel
Tax $1,575$1,618 0.67%0.60
%
User Fees and
Charges $16,853$
18,679 7.19%6.93%
County Fuel Tax $690$710 0.29%0.26
%
Special Assessments $487$552 0.21%0.20%
Alcoholic Beverage
License Tax $50$49 0.02%0.02
%
Impact Fees $2,054$5,
432 0.88%2.02%
Pari-Mutuel Tax $447$447 0.19%0.17
%
Local Discretionary
Sales Surtax $13,023$
13,714 5.55%5.09%
Mobile Home License Tax
$108$107 0.05%0.04%
Tourist Development
Tax $1,294$1,
585 0.55%0.59%
Various Grants $8,633$16,24
0 3.68%6.03
%
Local Option Fuel
Tax $3,200$3,
043 1.36%1.13%
Total State $21,061$29,6
09 8.98%10.9
9%
Franchise Tax $9,670$9,
443 4.12%3.51%
Interest Income
$9,788$16,321 4.17%6.06%
Other
$8,278$7,901 3.53%2.93%
Total Local
$200,575$221,174 85.53%82.11%
Total All Sources
$234,495$269,350 100.00%100%
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 3
Local Sources Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. These local sources are shown in table 6.1, and are described in further detail below.
• Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)
Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as “property tax.” Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 20078/089, Indian River County applied an aggregate millage rate of 5.1726 5.1628. The Board of County Commissioners'According to County policyies, allow revenue from ad valorem taxes tomay be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 20078/089, Indian River County collected approximately $99,827,00094,397,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes represented 37.0640.26% of all revenues collected by Indian River County in FY 20078/079. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. OverDuring that time period, ad valorem tax revenue increased 59.2734.60%.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
$70,134$74,179
$84,914
$99,687 $99,827$94,397
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve
$40,447
$50,238 $49,824$46,114 $44,677
$41,531
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 4
• Enterprise Funds
Within governmental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title “enterprise funds,” must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprises. Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 16.5917.71% of Indian River County’s total source of funds for FY 20078/089. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. OverDuring that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 20.932.68%.
• User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. User fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector’s Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser’s Office, the Sheriff’s Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In FY 20078/089, user fees and charges represented 6.937.19% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. OverDuring that time period, revenue from user fees and charges has varied, but overall increased 36.5117.99%.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges
$14,283
$18,152 $18,205$18,998 $18,679
$16,853
$-$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000
$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000$18,000$20,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 5
• Special Assessments
Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services; the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment. Special Assessment funds represented 0.201% of county funds for FY 20078/089 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years.
• Impact Fees An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of issuance of subdivision or site plan approval, issuance of a building permit issuance, approval of a certificate of occupancy issuance, or other development or construction approval when any portion of the revenues collected isare intended to fund any portion of the costs of capital improvements for any public facilities.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue
$345$392 $377
$494
$552
$487
$-
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue
$10,410
$36,297
$24,634
$7,007$5,432
$2,054
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 6
Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine current impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county’s nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees are: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010 the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. The current suspension of impact fees will expire on March 31, 2011. Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing economy and the suspension of five of the impact fees. • Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, Llocal governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes. pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. Under this category, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Government
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
$12,850
$15,583 $15,736$14,550
$13,714$13,023
$-
$2,000$4,000
$6,000
$8,000$10,000
$12,000
$14,000$16,000
$18,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 7
Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. According to state law, tThe Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection. Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.0955% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 17.431.35% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Currently, Ttwenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County’s region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax, while Martin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%, which is another local discretionary sales surtax.
• Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue
$1,082
$1,676
$1,517$1,449
$1,585
$1,294
$-
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 8
Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax as well as an additional one percent tax. Sixty Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty counties, forty-threewo counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax. Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie Counties have the highest tourist tax levy of the six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of 4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy.
Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities
County
Original Tourist
Tax
Additional
Tax
Professional
Sports Franchise
Facility Tax
Additional
Professional Sports
Franchise Tax
Maximum Potential % Levy
Total %
Levy
Brevard
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
Indian River
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
----------
5.00%
4.00%
Martin
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
----------
5.00%
4.00%
Okeechobee
2.00%
1.00%
----------
----------
5.00%
3.00%
Palm Beach
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
St. Lucie
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. August 2009October 2010. The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: (1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated
convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed;
(2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida;
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 9
(3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county;
(4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and
restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (5) Construct, improve, maintain, and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers
which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000);
(6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county,
subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. OverDuring that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 23.1519.59%. • Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. These levies are:
a one to six cent local option fuel tax;
a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and
a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county-wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.131.36% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 20087/089. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has decreased overall by .523.73% from what it was in Fiscal Year 20034. Even though
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue
$3,324$3,367
$3,319$3,290
$3,043
$3,200
$2,800
$2,900
$3,000
$3,100
$3,200
$3,300
$3,400
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 10
local option fuel tax revenues were less in fiscal year 20089 than what they were in fiscal year 20034, the county received a significant increase in local option fuel tax revenue in fiscal years 20045 through 2007. This was largely associated with the building boom. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax. Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, butit does not currently levy eitherthe tax. Forty-nineAt this time, fifty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax, while twenty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax.
Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates
County
One to Six Cent
Local Option Fuel Tax
One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel
Tax
Ninth Cent Fuel Tax
Total Local Fuel Tax
Brevard
$0.06
--------
--------
$0.06
Indian River
$0.06
--------
--------
$0.06
Martin
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Okeechobee
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Palm Beach
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
St. Lucie
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. August 2009 October 2010. As shown in table 6.3, four counties in the region, Martin County, Okeechobee County, Palm Beach County, and St. Lucie County, levy the entire One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel tax. This second local option fuel tax is a one to five cent levy upon every net gallon of motor fuel sold in a county. Indian River County can levy this second tax through an ordinance adopted by a majority plus one vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, but does not currently levy the tax. Twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 11
• Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government’s rights-of-way to conduct the utility’s business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 3.514.12% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 51.7743.90%.
• Other Miscellaneous Revenue Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 2.933.53% of all funds collected in FY 20078/089.
• Borrowing As needed, tThe county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Currently, Bborrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. The countyAccording to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non-ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
$6,720
$7,941
$9,318$9,733 $9,443 $9,670
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 12
General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non-ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. In addition, Rrevenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to help finance the provision of more low-income housing units in the county. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid-off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes.
• Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 13
Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less, within Indian River County. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility.
State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below.
• Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax
The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; this account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
14
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
within the county. Distribution of these monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received for the county. In FY 20078/089, Indian River County received $7,588,000$7,000,000 through the half-cent sales tax. As shown in table 6.1, that amount represented 2.822.99% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 20078/089 fiscal year. Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half-cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County’s half-cent sales tax revenue indecreased 8.377.46%. Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs.
• County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These sources include 2.90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding these funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue
$7,564
$8,747 $8,777$8,123
$7,588$7,000
$-$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000$6,000$7,000$8,000$9,000
$10,000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing
$2,894 $2,835$3,118 $3,084
$2,850$2,558
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
15
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria: (1) That law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; (2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct
manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) That the county’s most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking
and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided. Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.061.09% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall indecreased by 16.2311.61%.
• Constitutional Fuel Tax
Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel. Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state-shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county’s surplus funds to its governing body. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.600.67% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County indecreased 1.065.35%.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue
$1,664
$1,763
$1,729$1,716
$1,618
$1,575
$1,450
$1,500
$1,550
$1,600
$1,650
$1,700
$1,750
$1,800
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
16
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
• County Fuel Tax
The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county’s reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.260.29% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased 0.427.01%.
• Alcoholic Beverage
License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $49,000$50,000 from this tax in FY 20078/089, 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax
$742
$779 $780
$757
$710
$690
$640
$660
$680
$700
$720
$740
$760
$780
$800
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
$50 $51
$44
$54$49 $50
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
17
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
received by Indian River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same.
• Pari-Mutuel Tax Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida’s sixty-seven counties, providing each county’s general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented 0.170.19% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. • Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth-wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented 0.040.05% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last sixfive fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County remained the same.
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue
$143
$101 $105 $105 $105 $105
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue (in thousands)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
18
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
• Various Grants Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 6.035.48% of funds received by the county in FY 20078/089. State grant funds received by the county in FY 20078/089 originated from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Housing Finance Agency, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged, the State of Florida Department of Management Services, the State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the Department of Health, the Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 20078/089, the county received approximately $18,567,000$12,859,000 in federal funds. These funds represented 6.895.48% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 20078/089. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2007/08.
Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source
Fiscal Year
Taxes
Licenses &
Permits
Intergovernmental
Revenue
Charges for
Services
Fines &
Forfeitures
Miscellaneous Revenues
Totals
2002/03 $95,675,370 $86,120,084
$1,033,394 $567,403
$51,487,093 $35,213,140
$54,729,505 $13,683,108
$1,508,786 $1,584,737
$14,545,961 $9,703,817
$218,980,109 $146,872,289
2003/04 $104,012,925 $95,675,370
$1,354,282 $1,033,394
$82,604,757 $26,588,303
$68,389,360 $14,282,587
$1,715,875 $1,508,786
$42,170,294 $14,545,961
$300,247,493 $153,634,401
2004/05 $116,088,548 $104,012,925
$1,274,638 $1,354,282
$66,278,020 $35,973,818
$68,028,618 $18,151,546
$2,069,593 $1,715,875
$40,182,777 $42,170,294
$293,922,194 $203,378,740
2005/06 $130,158,069 $116,088,548
$896,612 $1,274,638
$64,054,273 $38,261,489
$65,111,301 $18,204,600
$2,403,093 $2,069,593
$26,773,753 $40,182,777
$289,397,101 $216,081,645
2006/07 $119,915,640$130,158,069
$9,904,590$896,612
$60,086,565$54,252,074
$63,355,209$18,997,529
$2,137,413$2,403,093
$18,486,026$26,773,753
$273,885,443 $233,481,130
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
19
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
2007/08 $113,689,399$119,915,640
$12,433,598$9,904,590
$39,249,261$49,065,955
$58,384,013$18,678,544
$1,792,517$2,137,413
$8,946,401$18,486,026
$234,495,189 $218,188,168
2008/09 $95,675,370 $1,033,394 $51,487,093 $54,729,505 $1,508,786 $14,545,961 $218,980,109 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 20089
Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years.
Expenditures
In the previous sub-section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed. This sub-section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the county’s needs. Table 6.5 presents the county’s overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 20023/20034 through 20078/089.
Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function Fiscal Year 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 General Government $29,005,917
$26,473,300 $30,565,484 $26,797,183
$60,435,102 $56,232,514
$63,231,330 $59,527,672
$30,711,818 $27,701,150 $25,801,688
Public Safety $55,792,130 $57,161,390 $66,984,420 $73,275,110 $74,038,252 $74,813,164
Physical Environment $44,317,270 $3,305,670
53,990,669 $4,573,196
$54,445,121 $9,498,973
$82,894,477 $35,044,820
$86,515,929 $33,806,207 $54,243,069
Transportation $23,038,234 $22,369,128 $31,966,926 $55,039,978 $53,489,116 $40,841,272
Economic Environment $627,914 $712,517 $1,054,239 $968,227 $4,579,574 $653,547
Human Services $7,197,342 $7,279,582 $12,470,222 $13,862,463 $12,619,575 $8,621,760
Culture/Recreation $17,828,311 $15,022,196
$24,298,539 $21,359,218
$19,977,771 $16,919,464
$27,989,515 $24,904,678
$24,075,260 $21,299,763 $19,624,278
Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category
Taxes Licenses & Permits Intergovernmental RevenueCharges for Services Fines & Forfeitures Miscellaneous Revenues
200534.64%
27.51%14.05%
22.78%0.57%
0.45%
200639.50%
22.55%
0.70%
13.67%
23.15%
0.43%
2007
44.98%
0.31%
22.13%
22.50%
9.25%
0.83%
200843.78%
3.62%
21.94%
0.78%
6.75%
23.13%
200948.48%
24.90%
16.74%
5.30%
3.82%0.76%
200443.69%
24.99%23.51%
0.47%
6.64%
0.69%
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
20
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Court Related $6,210,614 $5,630,734 $5,915,727 $6,649,724 $6,940,682 $6,620,830
Debt Service $3,727,534 $3,495,500 $4,406,090 $8,126,643 $7,873,176 $8,068,758
TOTAL 187,745,266$141,394,934
205,503,543$149,378,448
$257,655,618 $205,448,575
$332,037,467 $277,399,315
$300,843,382 $242,347,495 $239,288,366
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 20089 Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county’s activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County’s general expenditures over the last six fiscal years.
General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $27,701,150 $25,801,688 was spent on general government services in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20023/034 and 20078/089, general government expenditures increased decreased by 16.4611.05%. General government services represented 11.4310.78% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail. Public Safety The Sheriff’s Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 20078/089, spent $74,038,252$74,813,164 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, public safety expenditures increased by 1.041.05%. Since FY 20023/034, public safety expenditures have increased by 55.6634.09%. Public safety represented 30.5540.17% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089.
Physical Environment This classification encompasses the county’s water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $33,806,207$54,243,069 was spent on these activities in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, physical environment expenditures decreased by 3.5337.30%. Since FY20023/034, physical environment expenditures have increased by 81.8822.40%. Physical environment services represented 13.9522.6% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
21
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Transportation Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county’s roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $53,489,116$40,841,272 on transportation facilities in FY 20078/089. Since FY 20023/034, transportation expenditures have increased by 165.8477.28%. Transportation expenses represented 22.0721.93% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089.
Economic Environment Included in this category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $4,579,574$653,547 on economic environment services in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 2006/07 and 2007/08, economic environment expenditures increased by 372.99%. Since FY 2002/03, economic environment expenditures have increased by 684.38%. Economic environment expenses represented 1.89% of all county expenses in FY 2007/08. Human Services
Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function
General Government Public Safety Physical EnvironmentTransportation Economic Environment Human ServicesCulture/Recreation Court Related Debt Service
2004
15.4%
29.7%
23.6%
12.3%
2.0% 3.3% 9.5% 3.8%0.3%
2005
27.8%
26.3%
11.8%
0.3%
14.9%3.5%
10.9%
2.7%1.7%
2006
23.5%
26.0%
21.1%
12.4%
0.4%1.7%
4.8%2.3% 7.8%
2007
19.0%
16.6%
22.1%
4.2%
0.3%
2.4%
2.0% 8.4%
25.0% 200824.6%28.8%
10.2%
17.8%
2.6%
4.2% 1.5%8.0%
2.3%
200931.3%
22.7%10.8%
2.8% 8.2%17.1%
3.4%
0.3%3.603%
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
22
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children’s Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the county spent $12,619,575$8,621,760 on human services in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, human services expenditures decreased by 8.9731.68%. Since FY 20023/034, human services expenditures have increased by 92.9419.79%. Human services represented 5.213.60% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089. Culture/Recreation All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $21,299,763$19,624,278 on these services in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, cultural/recreation expenditures decreased by 14.4718.49%. Since FY 20023/034, cultural/recreation expenditures have decreased increased by 8.410.07%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 8.798.20% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney’s Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $6,940,682$6,620,830 in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, Court Related expenditures indecreased by 4.384.61%. Beginning in FY 1997/1998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented 2.862.77% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089. Debt Service Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total county debt service expenditures were $7,873,176$8,068,758 in FY 20078/089. Between fiscal years 20067/078 and 20078/089, debt service expenditures deincreased by 3.122.48%. Since FY 20023/034, debt service expenditures have increased by 74.16116.46%. Debt service expenses represented 3.253.37% of all county expenses in FY 20078/089.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
23
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY 20089/0910, Indian River County’s outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $117,510,000108,815,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took advantage of lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings. Enterprise Funds support 57.948.73% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 44.1745.81%; and Golf Course 13.742.92%), leaving $57,160,00055,790,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as the Vero Beach Sports Complex). Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. Those bonds have since been paid off. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in 2009. The County kept a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds.
Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
Initial Amount
Amount
Remaining @09/30/082010
Average Interest
Rate
Final Maturity
Bond Rating
Security Pledge Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds:
1993 A Series
$47,190,000 $3,030,0001,555,0
00
5.76%
2011
AAA/FGIC
(Insured)
Water & Sewer Revenues
2005 Series $27,675,000
$23,320,00021,92
5,000
3.94%
2022
AAA/FGIC
(Insured)
Water & Sewer Revenues
2009 Series $26,370,000 $26,370,000 3.68% 2024 AA+/AA Water & Sewer Revenues
Recreation Revenue Bonds
2001 Series Spring Training Facility
$16,810,000
$12,895,00012,310,000
4.87%
2031
AAA/FGIC
(Insured)
State Funds, ½ Cent Sales Tax, Tourist Tax
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
24
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
Initial Amount
Amount
Remaining @09/30/082010
Average Interest
Rate
Final Maturity
Bond Rating
Security Pledge
2003 Series Refunding Recreational Revenue
$6,455,000
$3,685,0003,175,000
3.65%
2016
AAA/AMAC
(Insured)
Golf Course Net Income, Fronton Revenue and Subordinate Lien on One Half Cent Sales Tax
Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental Lands Acquisition 2001 Series
$11,000,000
$5,955,0005,210,000
3.89%
2016
AAA/FSA (Insured)
General Obligation
Environmental Lands Acquisition 2003 Series
$7,800,000
$1,210,000
2.05%
2010
AAA/AMAC
(Insured)
General Obligation
Environmental Lands Acquisition 2006 Series
$48,600,000
$41,045,00038,270,000
4.22% 2021 AAA/MBIA (Insured) General Obligation
Total Bonds Outstanding
$117,510,000108,815,000
Source: Indian River County Budget 200910/1011.
Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level-of-service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Existing Level-of-Service Standards Level-of-service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level-of-service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level-of-service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level-of-service standards for capital facilities as follows:
Correctional Facilities (Countywide)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
25
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
• 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Libraries (Countywide)
• 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal
population
Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Public Buildings (Countywide)
• 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area)
• 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Schools (School Service Area): • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school
type (elementary, middle, and high).
Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population per year
Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall
event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
26
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
• The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads
• All drainage basins will meet the following level-of-service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event
Transportation (Roadways)
• Level-of-Service “D” during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on
all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service “E” plus 20%: • 27th Ave – South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service “B” is adopted for rural areas, and level of service “C” is adopted for urban areas.
Transit
• One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level-of-service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan Element. Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with “committed” revenue sources. “Committed” revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through “planned” revenue sources. “Planned” revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
27
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Capacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses for implementing the CIE. Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In October 1999, the county’s water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building department services, and utility services as enterprise funds. As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the county’s fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
28
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff’s office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county’s comprehensive plan, the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Using the county’s official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the county’s water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development. Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
29
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Appendix A constitutes the county’s five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Projected Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered. This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. While the During the past five years, there has been historical data show a solida gradual indecrease in most revenue sources in the most recent five-year period,. Eestimates going forward show a decrease in most revenue sources for the firstnext couple years followed by moderate increases. This is consistent with an anticipatedthe current economic recession slowdown in the near future followed by an anticipated moderate recovery thereafter. Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
30
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
As part of this capital improvements element, the county's general revenues have been projected for fiscal years 200910/1011 through 20134/145. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections.
• Overall Projected Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected overall revenues for fiscal years 200910/101 through 20134/145. These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly overin the next few fiscal years and increase by only 3.013.22% by fiscal year 20134/145. Overall, Ggeneral revenue is projected to increase from $320,680,692 278,508,044 in FY 200910/101 to $330,339,507287,466,627 in FY 20134/145.
Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary
FY 200910/1011 20101/112 20112/123 20123/134 20134/145 TOTAL
Taxes
96,290,805 $107,466,450
100,034,202 $100,034,202
100,034,000 $100,034,000
105,392,971 $105,211,000
108,028,000 $154,026,137
509,779,978 $566,771,789
Licenses & Permits
20,754,256 $23,278,151
20,754,000 $21,416,000
21,273,000 $21,416,000
21,805,000 $21,951,000
22,350,000 $22,500,000
106,936,256 $110,561,151
Intergovern-ment
18,691,686 $17,169,945
18,692,000 $15,796,000
19,159,000 $23,546,000
19,638,000 $24,135,000
20,129,000 $24,738,000
96,309,686 $105,384,945
Charges for Services
60,009,228 $79,890,835
60,009,000 $77,126,877
61,509,000 $82,001,239
63,047,000 $89,401,400
64,623,000 $100,283,000
309,197,228 $428,703,351
Fines & Forfeitures
312,000 $358,000 312,000 $329,000
320,000 $329,000
328,000 $337,000
336,000 $345,000
1,608,000 $1,698,000
Interest & Misc.
18,494,670 $26,130,217
18,495,000 $24,040,000
18,957,000 $24,040,000
19,431,000 $24,641,000
19,917,000 $25,257,000
95,294,670 $124,108,217
Other Sources
63,955,399 $66,387,094
32,653,315 $46,414,474
43,795,823 $53,248,311
43,221,820 $66,513,995
52,083,627 $3,190,370
235,709,984 $235,754,244
TOTAL
278,508,044 $320,680,692
250,949,517 $285,156,553
265,047,823 $304,614,550
272,863,791 $332,190,395
287,466,627 $330,339,507
1,354,835,802 $1,572,981,697
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, and Solid Waste Sub-Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 200910/101 through 20134/145. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked projected transportation
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
31
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
revenues are expected to increase by 36.7530.66% over the next five fiscal years, from $20,532,33719,025,710 in FY 20109/101 to $28,077,00024,859,880 in FY 20134/145. Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 0910/101 to FY 134/145, it is important to note that FY 0910/101 transportation revenue is $34,258,36435,764,991 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present. Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 20123/134 and fiscal year 20134/145 is from a planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In fiscal year 2013/14, the proposed additional 6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county’s current 6 cent per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a significant revenue increase in FY 20134/145. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by .977.69% over the next five fiscal years, from $41,368,77927,333,363 in FY 200910/101 to $41,769,00029,434,000 in FY 20134/145. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by .987.69% from $10,869,50410,713,852 in FY 200910/101 to $10,976,00011538,000 in FY 20134/145.
Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element
Transportation Fiscal Year
Local
Option Gas Tax
Constitutional
Gas Tax
County Gas Tax
Traffic
Impact Fee
1 cent
optional sales tax
Interest on Gas Tax
Total
Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
200910/
101 3,313,710
$3,012,000 1,550,000
$1,514,477 682,000 $667,860
1,200,000 $1,600,000
12,000,000 $13,323,000
280,000 $415,000
19,025,710 $20,532,337
27,333,363 $41,368,779
10,713,852 $10,869,504
20101/1
12 3,314,000
$2,952,000 1,550,000
$1,484,000 682,000 $655,000
1,650,000 $2,200,000
12,000,000 $12,657,000
280,000 $500,000
19,476,000 $20,448,000
27,333,000 $40,541,000
10,714,000 $10,652,000
20112/1
23 3,347,000
$2,982,000 1,566,000
$1,499,000 689,000 $662,000
2,256,196 $3,500,000
12,300,000 $12,657,000
280,000 $500,000
20,438,196 $21,800,000
28,016,000 $40,946,000
10,982,000 $10,759,000
20123/134 6,237,971
$5,658,000 1,582,000
$1,514,000 696,000 $669,000
2,600,000 $5,000,000
12,608,000 $12,657,000
280,000 $500,000
24,003,971 $25,998,000
28,716,000 $41,355,000
11,257,000 $10,867,000
20134/145
6,300,000 $5,715,000
1,598,000 $1,529,000
703,000 $676,000
3,055,880 $7,000,000
12,923,000 $12,657,000
280,000 $500,000
24,859,880 $28,077,000
29,434,000 $41,769,000
11,538,000 $10,976,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate
Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY 20134/145. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
32
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections
General Fund
M.S.T.U.
Emergency Services District
Environmental Land
Acquisition Fiscal Year
Tax Base Millage
Tax Base
Millage
Tax Base
Millage
Tax Base
Millage
20109/1
01 $14,147,906,804 $15,917,623,940
3.08923.0892
$7,820,732,737 $9,038,817,998
1.07331.0774
$11,640,087,880 $13,391,098,415
1.71481.7148
$14,147,906,804 $15,917,623,940
0.06810.0725
20101/112
$13,016,074,260 $14,644,214,025
3.08923.0892
$7,195,074,118 $8,315,712,558
1.07331.0774
$10,708,880,850 $12,319,810,542
1.71481.7148
$13,016,074,260 $14,644,214,025
0.07350.0783
20112/123
$13,016,074,260 $14,644,214,025
3.08923.0892
$7,195,074,118 $8,315,712,558
1.07331.0774
$10,708,880,850 $12,319,810,542
1.71481.7148
$13,016,074,260 $14,644,214,025
0.07350.0783
20123/134
$13,341,476,117 $15,010,319,376
3.08923.0892
$7,374,950,971 $8,523,605,372
1.07331.0774
$10,976,602,871 $12,627,805,806
1.71481.7148
$13,341,476,117 $15,010,319,376
0.07170.0763
20134/145
$13,675,013,020 $15,385,577,360
3.08923.0892
$7,559,324,745 $8,736,695,506
1.07331.0774
$11,251,017,943 $12,943,500,951
1.71481.7148
$13,675,013,020 $15,385,577,360
0.06990.0744
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program With the ongoing depressed housing market, challenges in the national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, county revenue again decreased and is expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year’s Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 20089/0910 through 20123/134). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 20089/0910 through 20123/134 CIP have either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their time frame extended. None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations, and only a few changes to the transportation section of the CIP directly impact capacities within the county’s concurrency management system. Because of the downturn in thedepressed housing market, problems with the financial markets, and limited construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with most of these projects will not be needed until later dates. The specific concurrency related projects removed from the transportation section of the CIP are detailed in Table 6.10 and include roadway segments only on 27th Avenue. For these projects, funds were to come from the county’s gas tax, optional sales tax and impact fees. Even though these projects are being deleted, portions of 27th Avenue will still be built with the Oslo Road improvement projects. Of the projects being deleted from last year’s CIP and shown in Table 6.10, none have had their added capacity relied upon for vesting development projects for concurrency. On links that are
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
33
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
associated with the deleted projects listed in Table 6.10, the available capacity ranges from 13.45 available peak hour, directional trips to almost 600 available peak hour, directional trips. While the County’s current Concurrency Links Report shows that existing available capacity on 27th Avenue is minimal, Two of the transportation projects that have had their construction dates extended currently have deficient links in involve improvements to roadways that are over capacity according to the County’s concurrency management system. The specific concurrency related projects that have deficient links are lListed in Table 6.10, these deficient links are C.R. 510 between 58th Avenue and U.S. Highway 1 and A1A from 17th Street to the south city limits of the City of Vero Beach. Even though these projects have deficient links, tWhile the transportation projects designed to improve these deficient links will be addressed through the transportation improvements scheduled to be constructed or to have construction commenced within the next few years are being rescheduled to later years of the CIP, there are several factors that are expected to increase available capacity in the short term. One such factor is that concurrency certificates for . Further, it is expected that the available capacity will soon increase due to a number of factors. With the depressed housing market, there are some development projects that previously hadwith trips vested trips will for concurrency, but because of expiringe soon. conAt that time, the currency certificates will now have or will soon have their reserved trips reflected by those projects will be removed from the concurrency management system. AlsoAnother factor is that recent, traffic counts conducted by the County this year indicate that a further reduction in traffic volumes are continuing to decrease on most roadways. These new traffic counts will also soon be added toreflected in the County’s concurrency management system. At that time, Both the increased capacity and decreased demand will add additionalhave the effect of increasing the available capacity back toon County roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the County’s CIP. By deleting extending the time frame of the transportation projects as shown, the county can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the county needs to delete delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary projects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element.
Table 6.10: Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects with deficient links Transportation Project With Deficient Link
Link # Link Description Capacity* Total Demand*
Available*
1830E C.R. 510, 58th Avenue to U.S. 1 810.00 707.26 102.74 1830W C.R. 510, 58th Avenue to U.S. 1 810.00 874.76 -64.76 1840E C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. A1A 2,049.00 715.66 1,333.34
CR 510, 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes (1.6 miles)
1840W C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. A1A 2,049.00 775.48 1,273.52 1020N S.R. A1A, Southern Vero Beach City Limits
to 17th Street 930.00 1,081.37 -151.37
1020S S.R. A1A, Southern Vero Beach City Limits to 17th Street
930.00 1,058.13 -128.13
17th Street/A1A Intersection
1030N S.R. A1A, 17th Street to S.R. 60 924.00 707.00 217.00
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
34
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.10: Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects with deficient links Transportation Project With Deficient Link
Link # Link Description Capacity* Total Demand*
Available*
1030S S.R. A1A, 17th Street to S.R. 60 924.00 832.00 92.00 2120E 17th Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R.
A1A 1,960.00 1,017.77 942.23
2120W 17th Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R. A1A
1,960.00 1,202.30 757.70
*Peak hour, directional trips
Table 6.10: Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects Removed from the 5 Year CIP Transportation Project Removed from CIP
Link # Link Description Capacity* Total Demand*
Available*
2420N 27th Avenue, Oslo Rd. to 4th Street 1,268.00 691.76 376.24 2420S 27th Avenue, Oslo Rd. to 4th Street 1,268.00 926.04 341.96 2430N 27th Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 1,032.00 580.36 451.64 2430S 27th Avenue, 4th Street to 8th Street 1,032.00 958.48 73.52 2440N 27th Avenue, 8th Street to 12th Street 1,032.00 532.56 499.44
27th Avenue, 12th Street to 5th St. SW, four lanes (2 miles)**
2440S 27th Avenue, 8th Street to 12th Street 1,032.00 916.24 115.76 2450N 27th Avenue, 12th Street to S. VB City Limits 1,032.00 887.86 144.14 2450S 27th Avenue, 12th Street to S. VB City Limits 1,032.00 887.07 144.93 2460N 27th Avenue, S. VB City Limits to 16th Street 1,032.00 883.17 148.83 2460S 27th Avenue, S. VB City Limits to 16th Street 1,032.00 884.41 147.59 2470N 27th Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,032.00 454.29 577.71
27th Avenue- 12th Street to SR 60**
2470S 27th Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,032.00 769.87 262.13 2410N 27th Avenue, S. County Line to Oslo Road 1,268.00 835.43 232.57 2410S 27th Avenue, S. County Line to Oslo Road 1,268.00 1,254.55 13.45 2420N 27th Avenue, Oslo Rd. to 4th Street 1,268.00 691.76 376.24
27th Ave, 5th ST SW to 13th St SW (four lanes (2 miles)**
2420S 27th Avenue, Oslo Rd. to 4th Street 1,268.00 926.04 341.96 *Peak hour, directional trips ** Capacity for these links reflects the adopted level of service standard of E+20
Several nonconcurrency related projects within the various other CIP categories have also either had their costs modified, have been deferred, or have had their timeframe extended. These projects include: Archie Smith Fish House (Conservation and Aquifer Recharge category), 800 MHz Radio Expansion (Emergency Services category), New Courtroom Facilities (General Services category), Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking (Parks and Recreation category), and several convenience center expansions (Solid Waste category).
• Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B)
The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B) is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity which theseto be produced by these roadway improvement projects will produce as being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development projects impacting a deficient link can proceed despite the deficient link where thea
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
35
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project. Because of lower demand on area roadways from the depressed housing market and the pending expiration of concurrency certificates for previously approved developments, the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is no longer needed. Within the Therefore, this CIE no longer includes a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program. Of the four projects previously listed in the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program, two Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program, seven projects have been removed. Three of those projects were removed because they are currentlywill be under construction or are now completedwithin the next six months. Those projects are: CR 512, from Sebastian Middle School to I-95; State Road 60, from West of I-95 to 82nd Avenue (started utilities relocation); and 16th/17th Street, from 500’ west of 14th Avenue to west of U.S. 1 Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and Oslo Road from 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue. The other four two projects were removed from the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program because theythe road capacity that those projects would add to the transportation system is no longer needed to maintain the current Level of Service of E +20. have had their construction dates moved out to beyond three years. Those projects are: CR510, from CR512 to 75th Court; CR 510, from 75th Court to 61st Drive; CR 510, from 61st Drive to Indian River; and 43rd Avenue, from 12th Street to Oslo Road. In all cases, the added road capacity from these projects is no longer necessary to maintain concurrency for previously approved development projects. The four remaining projects within the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program have had their construction start dates modified. While construction on 43rd Avenue, from 18th Street to 26th Street, will start approximately six months sooner than anticipated, construction on the three remaining projects will start approximately 1 to 1 ½ years later than previously anticipated. Theose projects and their available peak hour, directional trip capacity of the associated roadways are listed in Table 6.11.All of the transportation projectsroadways listed in thethat table currently have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments. Altering the start date of construction, therefore, does not impact already approved developments.
Table 6.11: Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation Projects with Construction Start Date Extended
Transportation Project Description Listed in CIP
Link # Link Description Capacity with Project*
Total Demand*
Available*
2925N 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 1,960.001,071.00 535.11555.95 1,424.89515.05 2925S 43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 1,960.001,071.00 775.62728.95 1,184.38342.05 2930N 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,960.001,071.00 591.97665.40 1,368.03405.60
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, four lanes (1 mile)
2930S 43rd Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,960.001,071.00 820.25704.56 1,139.75366.44 2935N 43rd Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26th Street 1,796.001,796.00 462.93532.73 1,333.071,263.27 43rd Avenue,18th Street to 26th Street,
four lanes 2935S 43rd Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26th Street 1,796.001,796.00 608.91525.31 1,187.091,270.69
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
36
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
*Peak hour, directional trips Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $25,000100,000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 20134/145 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix DC. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service.
Table 6.12: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &
Indian River County School District Element or Category
200910/101
20101/112
20112/123 20123/134 20134/145
Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
$1,350,000 $925,000
$75,000 $400,000
$ - $100,000 $100,000 $0
$ - $0
Emergency Services $3,426,177
$5,386,705 $2,361,705 $0 $450,000 $ 0 $3,000,000 $2,200,000
$ - $0
General Services
$189,508 $300,000 $60,000 $0
$4,160,000 $4,100,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0
Law Enforcement & Corrections
$558,960 $1,483,060 $1,900,000 $0
$ - $0
$ - $4,320,400
$ - $740,800
Recreation & Open Space
$4,069,300 $4,193,545
$2,050,000 $2,205,000
$3,485,000 $4,975,000
$2,825,000 $4,375,000
$2,500,000 $1,575,000
Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
$6,681,988 $11,128,277
$1,077,337 $3,246,877
$4,497,450 $3,394,239
$5,028,758 $3,305,400
$2,913,000 $1,925,000
Solid Waste
$9,075,000 $6,882,000
$1,830,000 $380,000
$2,200,000 $1,480,000
$6,967,000 $2,045,000
$667,802 $6,722,000
Stormwater Management $969,000
$1,050,000 $500,000 $650,000
$950,000 $8,300,000
$3,000,000 $10,050,000
$5,000,000 $8,550,000
Transportation
$45,272,376 $46,287,000
$29,378,382 $31,604,843
$32,750,000 $29,458,888
$29,800,000 $46,800,262
$49,156,568 $45,285,194
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
37
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.12: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &
Indian River County School District Element or Category
200910/101
20101/112
20112/123 20123/134 20134/145
Total
$71,592,309 $77,635,587
$39,232,424 $38,486,720
$48,492,450 $51,808,127
$50,780,758 $73,096,062
$60,297,370 $64,797,994
Public School Facilities*
$42,851,573 $34,281,614
$29,145,119 $9,862,021
$10,347,761 $28,962,000
$12,310,139 $9,466,996
$13,026,495 $27,472,089
*The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $305,824,490270,395,311. Within the first fiscal year, projects are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. For the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with “committed” revenue sources. “Committed” revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through “planned” revenue sources. “Planned” revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, and the county itself does notbut are not havethe fiscal responsibility for these systemsof the County. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the management of the IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county’s comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on general locational criteria for public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the county by 20134/145 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
38
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
Conservation & Aquifer Recharge Emergency Services General Services
Law Enforcement & Corrections Recreation & Open Space Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
Solid Waste Stormwater Management Transportation
Fiscal Assessment This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. For public school facilities listed in table 6.12, Tthe School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements for public school facilities listed in table 6.12. The School District’s adopted “Summary of Capital Improvements Program” (Appendix DC) and “Summary of Estimated Revenue” (Appendix ED) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District’s Five Year Capital Plan. Theis assessment process consists of projecting future revenue receipts of revenues and comparing these those receipts againstto anticipated expenditures. UsingWith this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs. Projected Expenditures Table 6.13 shows the county's projected expenditures for fiscal years 200910/101 through 20134/145. By fiscal year 20134/145, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
39
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
$330,339,507287,466,627. In FY 20134/145, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Enterprise Funds/OtherPublic Safety category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 200910/101 and ending in fiscal year 20134/145, the county's expenditures are projected to increase by 3.0129.95%.
Table 6.13: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary
FY 200910/101 20101/112 20112/123 20123/134 20134/145
General Gov’t. Services
16,980,605 $26,242,373
17,271,000 $26,332,000
21,801,000 $31,090,000
18,142,000 $27,665,000
18,594,000 $28,357,000
Public Safety
72,041,547 $72,529,735
74,019,705 $66,645,000
71,952,000 $68,311,000
76,290,000 $76,539,400
75,122,000 $72,509,800
Physical Environment
68,145,494 $2,238,838
54,803,337 $1,318,000
59,966,450 $8,675,000
69,014,758 $10,332,000
63,562,802 $8,839,000
Transportation
57,843,301 $48,216,910
42,263,382 $33,563,843
45,957,000 $31,466,888
43,337,000 $48,858,262
63,031,568 $47,394,194
Economic Environment 499,847 $499,543 512,000 $507,000
525,000 $520,000
538,000 $533,000 551,000 $546,000
Human Services
7,597,176 $7,000,722
7,787,000 $7,106,000
7,982,000 $7,284,000
8,182,000 $7,466,000
8,387,000 $7,653,000
Culture/Recreation
17,785,732 $26,052,173
16,109,000 $24,392,000
17,895,000 $27,717,000
17,595,000 $27,686,000
17,639,000 $25,469,000
Debt Service
7,024,509 $1,242,233
6,829,093 $1,238,833
6,830,373 $1,238,423
6,823,033 $1,236,333
6,813,257 $1,237,513
Enterprise Funds Other
30,589,833 $99,473,523
31,355,000 $86,311,877
32,139,000 $89,626,239
32,942,000 $92,221,400
33,766,000 $97,690,000
Other TOTAL
278,508,044 $37,184,642
250,949,517 $37,742,000
265,047,823 $38,686,000
272,863,791 $39,653,000
287,466,627 $40,644,000
TOTAL $320,680,692 $285,156,553 $304,614,550 $332,190,395 $330,339,507 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Earmarked Projected Expenditures
Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 200910/101 through 20134/145. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. AllAccording to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefits the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the amount of revenues and expenditures amounts increases and decreases with development. For thisthat reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county minimums.
Table 6.14: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste
Fiscal Year
Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
20109/101 $27,333,363 $41,368,779 $10,713,852 $10,869,504
$27,333,000 $40,541,000 $10,714,000 $10,652,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
40
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
20101/112
20112/123 $28,016,000 $40,946,000 $10,982,000 $10,759,000 20123/134
$28,716,000 $41,355,000 $11,257,000 $10,867,000 20134/145
$29,434,000 $41,769,000 $11,538,000 $10,976,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
In FY 20134/145, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $41,769,00029,434,000. That is an increase of .977.69% from the 20109/101 projected expenses of $41,368,77927,333,363. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 20134/145, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $10,976,00011,538,000. That is an increase of .987.69% from the 20109/101 projected figure of $10,869,50410,713,852. Operating Cost Projections Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 200910/101 through 20134/145. In fiscal year 20134/145, the county is projected to incur approximately $264,872,395189,485,892 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.15, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 18.317.46% between 20109/101 and 20134/145.
Table 6.15: Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections Fiscal Year Total Operating Costs 200910/101 $176,325,902 $223,870,740
20101/112 $230,937,606 $212,554,710
20112/123 $71,402,801 $218,994,662 20123/134 $152,510,296 $224,791,733 20134/145 $189,485,892 $233,544,513
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Projected Debt Capacity Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bonds revenue without a public vote. TheThat table identifies the county's bonding capacity is identified for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.16 indicates, the county's available bonding capacity for the nexta 10 years issue is
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
41
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
$152,000,000160,100,000, with an additional pot entialwhile its bonding capacity offor a 30 year issue is $293,000,000323,100,000.
Table 6.16: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote
Pledge Sources
Ten Years (Bond Interest Rate @
2.952.54%)
Twenty Years (Bond Interest Rate @
3.993.80%)
Thirty Years (Bond Interest Rate @
4.374.11%) Half Cent Sales Tax
$47,300,000 $44,800,000
$80,300,000 $76,300,000
$102,800,000 $92,500,000
Gas Taxes
$49,800,000 $45,900,000
$78,900,000 $73,100,000
$97,300,000 $85,800,000
Tourist Tax $9,500,000 $9,300,000
$15,000,000 $14,800,000
$18,500,000 $17,400,000
First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $2,800,000 $2,800,000 $3,500,000 $3,300,000 Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,700,000 $3,600,000 $5,900,000 $5,800,000 $7,300,000 $6,800,000 Sub-Total
$112,100,000 $105,400,000
$182,900,000 $172,800,000
$229,400,000 $205,800,000
Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees
$40,100,000 $38,300,000
$63,500,000 $60,900,000
$78,300,000 $71,600,000
Road Impact Fees $7,900,000 $8,300,000
$12,500,000 $13,300,000
$15,400,000 $15,600,000
Sub-Total
$48,000,000 $46,600,000
$76,000,000 $74,200,000
$93,700,000 $87,200,000
TOTAL
$160,100,000 $152,000,000
$258,900,000 $247,000,000
$323,100,000 $293,000,000
*Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of 9/21/10. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Debt Service Obligations
In table 6.17, Tthe county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized in table 6.17. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
42
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.17: Indian River County Bond Schedule
FY Ending
Water & Sewer
Revenue Refunding
Bonds
Water & Sewer
Revenue Refunding
Bonds
Recreational Revenue
Refunding Bonds
Environmentally Sensitive Land
Acquisition
Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition
Environmentally Sensitive Land
Acquisition
Water & Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds
Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds
1993 A Series
5.755% $47,190,000
2009 Series 3.68%
$26,370,000
2003 Series 3.65%
$6,455,000
2001 Series 3.89%
$11,000,000
2003 Series 2.05%
$7,800,000
2006 Series 4.22%
$48,600,000
2005 Series 3.94%
$27,675,000
2001 Series 4.87%
$16,810,000 Interest $1,745,350 $148,638 $266,492 $71,400 $1,945,463 $1,053,150 $664,633 Principal $1,395,000 $490,000 $720,000 $1,170,000 $2,670,000 $1,350,000 $560,000 Total $3,140,350 $638,638 $986,492 $1,241,400 $4,615,463 $2,403,150 $1,224,633
2009 Balance $3,030,000 $26,370,000 $3,685,000 $5,955,000 $1,210,000 $41,045,000 $23,320,000 $12,895,000 Interest $1,668,625 $1,331,610 $135,164 $240,573 $36,300 $1,838,662 $1,012,650 $642,233 Principal $1,475,000 $0 $510,000 $745,000 $1,210,000 $2,775,000 $1,395,000 $585,000 Total $3,143,625 $1,331,610 $645,164 $985,573 $1,246,300 $4,613,662 $2,407,650 $1,227,233
2010 Balance $1,555,000 $26,370,000 $3,175,000 $5,210,000 $0 $38,270,000 $21,925,000 $12,310,000 Interest $1,587,500 $1,268,200 $119,864 $213,007 $1,727,663 $970,800 $618,833 Principal $1,555,000 $0 $520,000 $780,000 $2,885,000 $1,435,000 $605,000 Total $3,142,500 $1,268,200 $639,864 $993,007 $4,612,663 $2,405,800 $1,223,833
2011 Balance $0 $26,370,000 $2,655,000 $4,430,000 $35,385,000 $20,490,000 $11,705,000 Interest $1,268,200 $102,964 $183,368 $1,612,262 $925,250 $593,423 Principal $1,610,000 $535,000 $810,000 $3,000,000 $1,480,000 $630,000 Total $2,878,200 $637,964 $993,368 $4,612,262 $2,405,250 $1,223,423
2012 Balance $24,760,000 $2,120,000 $3,620,000 $32,385,000 $19,010,000 $11,075,000 Interest $1,203,800 $83,169 $151,777 $1,492,263 $877,150 $566,333 Principal $1,675,000 $555,000 $845,000 $3,120,000 $1,530,000 $655,000 Total $2,878,800 $638,169 $996,777 $4,612,263 $2,407,150 $1,221,333
2013 Balance $23,085,000 $1,565,000 $2,775,000 $29,265,000 $17,480,000 $10,420,000 Interest $1,136,800 $62,356 $117,978 $1,367,462 $800,650 $537,513 Principal $1,745,000 $580,000 $885,000 $3,255,000 $1,605,000 $685,000 Total $2,881,800 $642,356 $1,002,978 $4,622,462 $2,405,650 $1,222,513
2014 Balance $21,340,000 $985,000 $1,890,000 $26,010,000 $15,875,000 $9,735,000 Interest $1,067,000 $39,881 $80,807 $1,204,713 $736,450 $501,550 Principal $1,815,000 $600,000 $925,000 $3,390,000 $1,670,000 $725,000 Total $2,882,000 $639,881 $1,005,807 $4,594,713 $2,406,450 $1,226,550
2015 Balance $19,525,000 $385,000 $965,000 $22,620,000 $14,205,000 $9,010,000 Interest $976,250 $15,881 $41,495 $1,035,212 $652,950 $463,488 Principal $1,905,000 $385,000 $965,000 $3,545,000 $1,750,000 $760,000 Total $2,881,250 $400,881 $1,006,495 $4,580,212 $2,402,950 $1,223,488
2016 Balance $17,620,000 $0 $0 $19,075,000 $12,455,000 $8,250,000 Interest $881,000 $893,413 $565,450 $423,588 Principal $2,000,000 $3,705,000 $1,840,000 $795,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,598,413 $2,405,450 $1,218,588
2017 Balance $15,620,000 $15,370,000 $10,615,000 $7,455,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
43
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Interest $781,000 $745,212 $473,450 $381,850 Principal $2,100,000 $3,890,000 $1,930,000 $840,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,635,212 $2,403,450 $1,221,850
2018 Balance $13,520,000 $11,480,000 $8,685,000 $6,615,000 Interest $676,000 $550,713 $376,950 $337,750 Principal $2,205,000 $4,085,000 $2,025,000 $890,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,635,713 $2,401,950 $1,227,750
2019 Balance $11,315,000 $7,395,000 $6,660,000 $5,725,000 Interest $565,750 $346,462 $275,700 $291,025 Principal $2,315,000 $4,290,000 $2,130,000 $930,000 Total $2,880,750 $4,636,462 $2,405,700 $1,221,025
2020 Balance $9,000,000 $3,105,000 $4,530,000 $4,795,000 Interest $450,000 $131,963 $186,750 $242,200 Principal $2,430,000 $3,105,000 $2,220,000 $980,000 Total $2,880,000 $3,236,963 $2,406,750 $1,222,200
2021 Balance $6,570,000 $0 $2,310,000 $3,815,000 Interest $328,500 $92,400 $190,750 Principal $2,550,000 $2,310,000 $305,000 Total $2,878,500 $2,402,400 $495,750
2022 Balance $4,020,000 $0 $3,510,000 Interest $201,000 $175,500 Principal $2,680,000 $320,000 Total $2,881,000 $495,500
2023 Balance $1,340,000 $3,190,000 Interest $67,000 $159,500 Principal $1,340,000 $340,000 Total $1,407,000 $499,500
2024 Balance $0 $2,850,000 Interest $142,500 Principal $355,000 Total $497,500
2025 Balance $2,495,000 Interest $124,750 Principal $375,000 Total $499,750
2026 Balance $2,120,000 Interest $106,000 Principal $390,000 Total $496,000
2027 Balance $1,730,000 Interest $86,500 Principal $410,000
2028
Total $496,500
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
44
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Balance $1,320,000 Interest $66,000 Principal $430,000 Total $496,000
2029 Balance $890,000 Interest $44,500 Principal $455,000 Total $499,500
2030 Balance $435,000 Interest $21,750 Principal $435,000 Total $456,750
2031 Balance $0
Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 200910/101 and ending in FY 20134/145. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 20134/145. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,572,981,6971,354,835,802 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 200910/101 to fiscal year 20134/145. Sources of these funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,572,981,6971,354,835,802. Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. The total estimated cost of For all projects contained within the County’s Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $305,824,490204,821,475 for the next five fiscal years. This is 19.4415.12% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level-of-service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place which that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. ThisThat system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level-of-service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
45
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the county's level-of-service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level-of-service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county’s comprehensive plan. According to Section 163.3180(6), F.S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County shall applyapplies the single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990. Currently, all county maintained roads are operating below the adopted level of service and have additional capacity to accommodate future growth. Service Standards Level-of-service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level-of-service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. These measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
46
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.18: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities
Public Facility Category
Specific Facility
Capacity Measure
Demand Measure
Geographic Scope
Transportation
Roadway
Volume of cars accommodated over time
Peak Season/Peak Direction/Peak Hour Trips
Affected Roadways
Sanitary Sewer
Treatment Plant
Treatment design Capacity (GPD)
Generation Rate (GPD)
Service Area
Potable Water
Treatment Plant
Treatment Design Capacity (GPD)
Generation Rate (GPD)
Service Area
Solid Waste
Landfill
Volume in active cell (cubic yards)
Generation Rate (tons per capita per year)
Entire County
Recreation
Parks
Acres of park land
Acres of parks per thousand population
Entire County
Stormwater Management
Drainage conveyances
Volume of water
Volume of stormwater outfalling for design storm
Basin
Education*
Public Schools (K-12)
Number of Children accommodated over time
Enrolled Students/ Future Student Generation Service Area
*Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District
Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project’s impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways roadways arewill be those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. All projects, rRegardless of size, all projects impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project are usually impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadwaysthat gain 5% or more of the project’s traffic or 50 or more of the project’s generated trips, whichever is less are included. Level-of-service standards fFor transportation concurrency related facilities, level-of-service standards are to applyied to all impacted roadways.requests for development orders and permits. Those lLevel-of-service standards are measurements based on peak-hour trips and based on volume ranges or average travel speed for the peak hour range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
47
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Demand
Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level-of-service for the facility. As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line.
Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances,
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
48
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated.
Projected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is non-committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on these lots. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
49
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
both existing, in-the-ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. According to Chapter 9J-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida Administrative Code, the capacity of existing, in-the-ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met:
For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities:
1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or
2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.]
For parks and recreation facilities:
1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer’s fair share are committed; and
a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the
necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
50
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.]
Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by
segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is:
1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or
2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and
if:
a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or
b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the
facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county’s adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project’s first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies:
i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the
estimated date of project completion (for Indian River County, this is included in policy 5.11 of this element and within Appendix B of this element).
ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or
delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
51
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or
3. The segment’s new roadway capacity if, Aat the time a development order or permit is
issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project’s first building permit or its functional equivalent; or
4. The segment’s new roadway capacity if, Aat the time a development order or permit is
issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F.S.]
5. The segment’s new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the
subject of a proportionate fair-share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement.
For school facilities:
A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S.
Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level-of-service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level-of-service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
52
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county’s planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand.
Table 6.19: Monitoring System Design
Public Facility
Category
Specific Facilities
Total Capacity
Existing Demand
Committed Demand
Available Capacity
Traffic
Roadways
Peak season/ peak direction/ peak hour (LOS D)
Annual count (average) (peak season/peak direction/peak hour)
Volume estimated from approved Development Orders (DO)
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Sanitary Sewer
Treatment Plants Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from
approved DO’s
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Potable Water
Treatment Plants
Design flows
Existing flows
Volume estimated from approved DO’s
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Solid Waste
Landfill
Active cell design capacity
Active cell volume used
Volume estimated from approved DO’s
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Recreation Parks Park Acreage (Acres per thousand population) X (existing population)
(Acres per thousand population) X (projected population for approved DO’s)
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Drainage
Drainage conveyances
Volume
Existing flows
Volume of stormwater allowed to outfall for approved DO’s
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
53
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.19: Monitoring System Design
Public Facility
Category
Specific Facilities
Total Capacity
Existing Demand
Committed Demand
Available Capacity
Education
Public Schools(K-12)
Permanent Student Stations (FISH)
Annual Enrollment Count (FTE)
Students estimated from approved residential Development Orders)
(Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand)
To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary.
Table 6.20: Monitoring System Tasks
Action
Responsible Department
Timing Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand
Engineering
Annually
Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes
MPO
Annually
Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant
Utilities
Annually
Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used
Utilities
Annually
Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand
Planning
Annually
Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances
Engineering
Annually
Enter data received from other departments into computer
Planning
Ongoing
Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand
School District
Annually
Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO
Planning
Ongoing
Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated
Planning
Ongoing
Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level-of-service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
54
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Goal, Objectives and Policies
Goal
It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making.
Objectives and Policies Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By 20145, the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth. Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element’s adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, defer, or elimination will cause the level-of-service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DCA. Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance.
Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; Elimination of existing deficiencies; Maintenance of adopted level-of-service standards; Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; Protection of prior infrastructure investments; Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands;
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
55
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction;
Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas;
Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; Reduction of operating costs; Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters.
Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub-elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level-of-service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county’s Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%. Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $25,000100,000. Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities. Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department’s capital improvements.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
56
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Policy 1.12: The county shall hereby adopts the 2010 – 2011 through 2014 - 2015 Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work Plan “School District of Indian River County Five-Year Capital Improvement Schedule” from the School District’s adopted Five Year Capital Plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(a)(5) F.S. The Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work PlanCapital Improvement Schedule withll be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work PlanSchool District’s Five-Year Capital Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county’s current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards. Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level-of-service standards. Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level-of-Service Standards Through 2030, adopted levels-of-service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan’s concurrency management system. In
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
57
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level-of-service on any facility below that facility’s adopted minimum level-of-service standard. Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub-Elements. Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels-of-service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level-of-service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below:
Stormwater Management:
The county hereby adopts the following level-of-service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county:
New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves.
Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre-development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre-development discharge.
By 20105, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level-of-service standards:
Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets.
The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a
10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
58
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: By 2007 5-Year/24 Hour Storm Event By 2010 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event
The county hereby adopts the following water quality level-of-service standard:
As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law.
Potable Water
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
Countywide level-of-service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit.
Solid Waste The following level-of-service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
Countywide level-of-service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year.
Sanitary Sewer
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
Countywide level-of-service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25.
Recreation & Open Space
The county adopts the following recreation level-of-service standard:
County wide level-of-service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population.
Transportation
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
59
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
The county adopts traffic circulation level-of-service standards as follows:
Level-of-Service “D” during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service “E” plus 20%.
• 27th Ave – South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave – Oslo Road to 16th Street
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service “B” is adopted for rural areas, and level of service “C” is adopted for urban areas. Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level-of-service standards for selected public facilities as follows:
Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level-of-service standard:
County wide level-of-service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Fire/EMS
The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level-of-service standard:
County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level-of-service standard of .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Law Enforcement
The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level-of-service standard:
Unincorporated County level-of-service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Libraries
The county adopts the following Libraries level-of-service standards:
County wide level-of-service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
County wide level-of-service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
60
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
County wide level-of-service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
County wide level-of-service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Public Buildings
The county adopts the following Public Buildings level-of-service standard:
County wide level-of-service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population.
Schools
The county adopts the following Schools level-of-service standard: Schools (School Service Areas):
100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high).
Transit
The County adopts the following transit level-of-service standard:
One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes. Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level-of-service standards. Policy 4.2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. Objective 5: Local Government’s Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
61
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities. Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element. Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority:
Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels Affordable housing projects New development orders permitting redevelopment New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the
infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation
Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub-Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services:
Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi-use facilities;
More efficient land use patterns and phasing; Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least-cost
manner; Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures.
Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non-enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
62
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non-debt revenue. Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level-of-service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level-of-service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following:
Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements;
Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or
Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level-of-service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed.
Policy 5.11: The county hereby adopts Appendix B as the County’s Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule. This schedule provides the project description, estimated date of commencement of actual construction, estimated date of completion, and estimated cost for projects that will increase roadway capacity on priority facilities. Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring Implementation
An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
63
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level-of-service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level-of-service standards are maintained.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
64
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.21: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy
Type of Action
Responsibility
Timing
Capital Expenditure
1.1
Maintain the CIP
OMB/PD
2010-2014
No
1.2
Follow the CIP
PD 2010-2014
No
1.3
Prioritize capital improvement projects
OMB/PD/SD
Ongoing
No
1.4
Implement recommendations
Appropriate County
Departments/SD
2010-2014
Yes
1.5
Prioritize and implement programs
Appropriate County
Departments/SD
2010-2014
Yes
1.6
Maintain previous commitments
BCC/PWD/SD
Ongoing
No
1.7
Replacement and renewal of infrastructure
Appropriate County
Departments/SD
Ongoing
No
1.8
Budget Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
1.9
Define capital improvement
PD/OMB
Ongoing
No
1.10
Capital Budget Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
1.11
Capital Improvements Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
2.1
Define costal high hazard area
DCA
Ongoing
No
2.2
Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map
PD
Ongoing
No
2.3
Budget management
Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
Yes
2.4
Maintain LOS standards
Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
Yes
2.5
Funding mechanisms
BCC/Private Developers
Ongoing
No
2.6
Infrastructure replacement strategy
Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
No
3.1
Maintain concurrency management system
PD
Ongoing
No
3.2
Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub-Elements
Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
No
3.3
Maintain adopted LOS standards
PD
Ongoing
No
3.4
Land use decisions
BCC
Ongoing
No
3.5
Adopt LOS standards
BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No
4.1
Impose regulations
Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
Yes
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
65
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
Table 6.21: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix Policy
Type of Action
Responsibility
Timing
Capital Expenditure
4.2
Conduct research
OMB/PD
Ongoing
No
4.3
Work with municipalities
BCC/SD/Other Local Governments in IRC
Ongoing
No
5.1
Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can support land use change
BCC
Ongoing
No
5.2
Prioritize capital improvements
BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments
Ongoing
No
5.3
Extension of facilities and services
BCC/Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
No
5.4
Create an efficient capital improvements schedule
Appropriate County Departments/Other
Government Agencies
Ongoing
No
5.5
Utilize enterprise funds
OMB
Ongoing
No
5.6
Finance non-enterprise fund supported projects
OMB
Ongoing
No
5.7
Fund the construction of public facilities
OMB/SD
Ongoing
Yes
5.8
Permitting Requirements
BCC/Appropriate County
Departments
Ongoing
No
5.9
Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements
BCC/OMB/PD/SD
Ongoing
No
5.10
Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate
C D2014
No
5.11
Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule
BCC/PWD/MPO
Ongoing
No
BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization OMB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department PWD = Public Works Department SD = School District
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
66
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County
are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of the level-of-service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level-of-service standards will be maintained.
Table 6.22: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix Objective
Measure
Timeframe
1
Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities
20145
2
Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area
2030
3
Level-of-service provided for county services
2030
4
Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations
2030
5
Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2030
While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e), F.A.C. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 67
Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level-of-service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments. The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element.
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 68
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Indian River County Five Year Schedule of Improvements
Conservation and Aquifer Recharge Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Env. Land Bonds $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 Park Impact Fees $ 25,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Grant $ 1,025,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,125,000 Total Revenue $ 1,350,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,525,000 Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source Archie Smith Fish House $ 45,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 Env. Land Bonds South Prong Preserve $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds NAWCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds NAWCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 Grant NSCA Addition Fencing $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Env. Land Bonds CFHP Cypress Cottage Restoration $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds Ansin Tract Boardwalk/Pier $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,000 Env. Land Bonds Cypress Bend Community Preserve $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds ORCA South Link Pavilion $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds ORCA Diamond Tract Boardwalk/Pier $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 Env. Land Bonds Flinn Tract - Access $ 25,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Park Impact Fees Flinn Tract - Access $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 125,000 Grant
Total Expenditures $ 1,350,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,525,000 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $1,350,000 $75,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $1,525,000 Total Expenditures $1,350,000 $75,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $1,525,000 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Emergency Services Revenue Sources FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 69
Emergency Services Dist. $ 1,226,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ 4,837,882 Optional Sales Tax $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 Impact Fees $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 Total Revenue $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ 9,237,882 Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace $ 88,332 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 88,332 Emergency Services Dist. Emergency Svcs. Station 13 - Addition $ 1,137,845 $ 1,486,705 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,624,550 Emergency Services Dist. 800 MHz Radio Expansion $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 Optional Sales Tax Emergency Svcs. Station 14 - Addition $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 Impact Fees Two Med Units and One Fire Engine $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 875,000 Emergency Services Dist. Two Med Units $ - $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 450,000 Emergency Services Dist. One Quiint (Fire Apparatus) $ - $ - $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 Emergency Services Dist. Total Expenditures $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ 9,237,882 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $9,237,882 Total Expenditures $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ - $ 9,237,882 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 General Services Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Optional Sales Tax $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 3,910,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,279,508 Court Facility Surcharge $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Total Revenue $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508 Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source Expansion of Fiber Optic Network $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 429,508 Optional Sales Tax New Courtroom Facilities $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 $ - $ - $ 1,850,000 Optional Sales Tax New Courtroom Facilities $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Court Facility Surcharge Displaced Courtroom $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 Optional Sales Tax Total Expenditures $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 70
Total Revenue $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508 Total Expenditures $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Law Enforcement Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Impact Fees $ - $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $1,200,000 Optional Sales Tax $ 558,960 $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $1,258,960 Total Revenue $ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $2,458,960 Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source
Evidence Addition $ 558,960 $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,258,960 Optional Sales Tax
Evidence Addition $ - $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,200,000 Impact Fees
Total Expenditures $ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,458,960 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Total Revenue $ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,458,960
Total Expenditures $ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,458,960
Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Parks and Recreation Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total FBIP $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Grant $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 80,000 Optional Sales Tax $ 1,883,545 $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ 3,283,545 Impact Fees $ 1,985,755 $ 2,050,000 $ 2,005,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 11,365,755 Total Revenue $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,929,300
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 71
Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 FBIP Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking $ 298,643 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 298,643 Impact Fees S. County Regional Park improvements $ 81,819 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 81,819 Impact Fees South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility $ 1,843,545 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,843,545 Optional Sales Tax South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 Impact Fees Fairgrounds Building Enclosure $ - $ - $ 630,000 $ - $ - $ 630,000 Impact Fees State Road 510 Fishing Pier $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ - $ 1,400,000 Optional Sales Tax Land for Future Parks $ 1,575,000 $ 1,575,000 $ 1,175,000 $ 1,175,000 $ - $ 5,500,000 Impact Fees West County Regional Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Impact Fees North County Regional Park Restroom $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Impact Fees Gifford Park Restroom/Concession Bldg $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 Impact Fees 16th Street Ballfields Restroom $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 Impact Fees Round Island Riverside Rpl Boardwalk $ - $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 80,000 Grant North County Regional Park Lazy River $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Impact Fees Kiwanis Hobart Park Restroom $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 Impact Fees Fairgrounds Campground $ 30,293 $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 230,293 Impact Fees Fairgrounds Campground $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 Optional Sales Tax Total Expenditures $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,929,300 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $14,929,300 Total Expenditures $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $14,929,300 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Cash Forward $ 8,528,533 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,528,533 Impact Fees $ 1,200,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 10,900,000 User Fees $ - $ - $ 285,000 $ - $ 285,000 $ 570,000 Grant Funding $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Total Revenue $ 9,928,533 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,285,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,785,000 $ 20,198,533
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 72
Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source
Misc Water Improvements $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,250,000 Impact Fees Misc Sewer Improvements $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 875,000 Impact Fees 77th West of Kings (Tuscanny Lakes) $ 112,237 $ 112,237 $ - $ - $ - $ 224,474 Impact Fees 12WM 17th St. SW from 27th Av to 43rd Av $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 610,000 $ 610,000 Impact Fees
Design FM and WM on 4th St from 82nd to 98th Ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Impact Fees Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main $ 85,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 85,000 Impact Fees
12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St SW (Madera Isles & Echo Lake $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 341,000 $ 341,000 Impact Fees South County Brine Disposal $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 4,000,000 Impact Fees Hydromentia Pilot $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Grant Funding
58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th St $ 50,000 $ 500,000 $ 450,000 $ 232,000 $ - $ 1,232,000 Impact Fees
Svce Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of VB Gardens $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $ - $ 700,000 Impact Fees
Install Wells and Piping at North County RO Plant $ 1,948,293 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,948,293 Impact Fees Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant $ - $ - $ 640,050 $ 574,358 $ - $ 1,214,408 Impact Fees 12" W.M. along 66th Av. from 16th to 20th St. $ 229,418 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 229,418 Impact Fees
16" WM from Kings Tank to College Ln. and Loop to Club of Vero $ 115,450 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 115,450 Impact Fees Install 6" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 Impact Fees
Install 24" WM along 77th St from 66th Ave to 70th Ave then North to CR 510 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Impact Fees N. Reg. Reuse Sto. & Repump Facility with Transmission Mains to Barrier Island $ 1,512,490 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,512,490 Impact Fees
Brine line on 77th to CR510,Bridge conversion & 16" line to A1A $ 984,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 984,000 Impact Fees
Construct 12" WM along 53rd St. E/O RR, Lat H Canal $ 745,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 745,000 Impact Fees Construct 20"WM on 66th Av 45th to 77th St $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,052,000 $ 2,052,000 Impact Fees
Construct 20" WM on 66th Av from 20th St. to 45th St. $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 Impact Fees Verona Trace Developer's Agreement $ 40,100 $ 40,100 $ - $ - $ - $ 80,200 Impact Fees
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 73
Madera Isle/Echo Lake Dev Agreement $ - $ - $ 97,400 $ 97,400 $ - $ 194,800 Impact Fees Upgrade Dataflow System w/Auto Valves $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Impact Fees
Inst. FM Stub-out at 66th Av. & 16th St. Rangeline Canal $ 35,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,000 Impact Fees Vac Truck $ - $ - $ 285,000 $ - $ 285,000 $ 570,000 User Fees Total Expenditures $ 6,681,988 $ 1,077,337 $ 4,497,450 $ 5,028,758 $ 2,913,000 $ 20,198,533 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 9,928,533 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,285,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,785,000 $ 20,198,533 Total Expenditures $ 6,681,988 $ 1,077,337 $ 4,497,450 $ 5,028,758 $ 2,913,000 $ 20,198,533 Annual Balance $3,246,545 $522,663 -$2,212,450 -$2,428,758 $872,000 $0 Solid Waste Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Assessments & User Fees $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Total Revenue $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 Expenditures FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source
Citizen Convenience Center Improvement Projects
Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center Phase I Improvements $ - $ - $ - $ 247,000 $ - $ 247,000 Assessments & User Fees
Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements $ - $ - $ 1,920,000 $ - $ - $ 1,920,000 Assessments & User Fees
Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements $ - $ 1,430,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,430,000 Assessments & User Fees
Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and Improvements $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,500,000 Assessments & User Fees
Transfer Tractor/Transfer Trailers and Roll-off Truck/Containers $ - $ 400,000 $ 280,000 $ 320,000 $ 667,802 $ 1,667,802 Assessments & User Fees
Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill - Co Disposal (former 33 Acres for C&D) $ 6,450,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,450,000 Assessments & User Fees Retrofit of MRF $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 Assessments & User Fees
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 74
Partial Closure of Cell I, C&D Landfill, Seg-1, Seg-2 and the Infill $ - $ - $ - $ 6,400,000 $ - $ 6,400,000 Assessments & User Fees
Total Expenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 Total Expenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Stormwater Management Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Optional Sales Tax Funds $ - $ 400,000 $ 600,000 $ 900,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,300,000 Grant $ 969,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 7,469,000 MSTU Assessments $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 IRC Utility Dept $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 Total Revenue $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000
0 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Revenue Source Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park $ 969,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 969,000 Grant
PC North - North Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber System) $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,000,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC North - North Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber System) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber System) $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 800,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber System) $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 IRC Utility Dept
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber System) $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 75
Rockridge Surge Protection Project $ - $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Grant Rockridge Surge Protection Project $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 MSTU Assessments Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Grant Total Expenditures $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000 Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000 Total Expenditures $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000 Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transportation Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Gas Tax $ 10,297,507 $ 2,232,000 $ 2,255,000 $ 6,237,971 $ 6,237,971 $ 27,260,449
Bond Proceeds-Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 44,805,166 $ 44,805,166
Payback from FDOT-Gas Tax $ 7,865,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,865,009
Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000 Grant $ 8,095,502 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 2,339,000 $ 15,134,502 Traffic Impact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497 Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,311 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,311 Traffic Impact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532
Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,952
Optional Sales Tax $ 18,618,648 $ 3,360,000 $ 3,444,000 $ 3,530,240 $ 3,618,440 $ 32,571,328 Payback from FDOT- Optional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ - $ 14,823,571
Old Traffic Impact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,140,009
Developer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 4,600,000
Total Revenue $ 78,143,562 $ 13,522,000 $ 15,735,196 $ 18,620,111 $ 60,336,457 $ 186,357,326 Expenses FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Gas Tax $ 8,089,641 $ 11,850,525 $ 13,812,706 $ 18,381,957 $ 27,996,194 $ 80,131,023 Grant $ 8,095,502 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 2,339,000 $ 15,134,502
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 76
Traffic Impact Fees- District I $ 783,954 $ 139,500 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,318,043 $ - $ 3,341,497 Traffic Impact Fees- District II $ 9,339,300 $ 5,858,637 $ 2,100,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 1,341,374 $ 23,089,311
Traffic Impact Fees- District III $ 6,241,756 $ 2,935,700 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,280,000 $ 10,807,456
Old Impact Fees II $ 1,140,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,140,009
Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,952
Optional Sales Tax $ 10,875,262 $ 4,594,020 $ 12,137,294 $ 4,200,000 $ 16,200,000 $ 48,006,576
Developer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 4,600,000
Total Expenses $ 45,272,376 $ 29,378,382 $ 32,750,000 $ 29,800,000 $ 49,156,568 $ 186,357,326 Expenses FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Grand Total Revenue Source 12th Street/27th Avenue $ - $ 250,000 $ 300,000 $ 550,000 Impact Fees II
Design & Engineering $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 500,000
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes (1 mile) $ 110,012 $ - $ - $ 110,012 Gas Tax
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes (1 mile) $ 289,472 $ - $ - $ 289,472 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 399,484 $ 399,484
17th Street/A1A Intersection $ 1,140,009 $ - $ - $ 1,140,009 Old Impact Fees II 17th Street/A1A Intersection $ 101,500 $ 101,500 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Construction $ 941,509 $ 941,509
20th Avenue SW, 17th Street SW to 25th Street SW, two lanes (1 mile) $ 383,635 $ - $ - $ 383,635 Gas Tax
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 77
20th Avenue SW, 17th Street SW to 25th Street SW, two lanes (1 mile) $ - Impact Fees III
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 383,635 $ 383,635
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to 66th Avenue, four/five lanes (2 mile) $ 375,687 $ 100,000 $ - $ 475,687 Impact Fees II
Design & Engineering $ 375,687 $ 100,000 $ 475,687 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ -
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five lanes (2 miles) $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 2,000,000 Impact Fees II
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five lanes (2 miles) $ 5,190,000 $ - $ - $ 5,190,000 Grant
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five lanes (2 miles) $ - $ 4,000,000 $ - $ 4,000,000 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Construction $ 5,040,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 11,040,000
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two lanes $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Developer Funded Construction
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two lanes $ 849,919 $ - $ - $ 849,919 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ -
Construction $ 1,449,919 $ 1,449,919
27th Avenue-13th St SW-25th St SW $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Impact Fees III Design & Engineering $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Right-of-Way $ -
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 78
Construction $ -
27th Avenue-5th St SW-13th St SW $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Impact Fees III Design & Engineering $ 10,000 $ 10,000
Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ -
27th Avenue-5th St SW-12th $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Impact Fees III
Design & Engineering $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ -
43rd Ave. 3-lane and Bridge Replacements 5th Street and 43rd Avenue over S. Relief Canal $ 1,085,272 $ - $ - $ 1,085,272 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 1,085,272 $ 1,085,272
43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three lanes (.5 miles) $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Developer Funded Construction
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, four lanes (1 mile) $ 20,000 $ 258,637 $ 500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,341,374 $ 4,120,011 Impact Fees II
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, four lanes (1 mile) $ 319,745 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 4,319,745 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 320,000 Right-of-Way $ 528,382 $ 450,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,378,382 Construction $ 3,000,000 $ 3,741,374 $ 6,741,374
43rd Avenue,12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes (2.5 miles) $ - $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax
43rd Avenue,12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes (2.5 miles) $ 20,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,720,000 Impact Fees III
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 79
Design & Engineering $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Right-of-Way $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 700,000 Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes $ 3,967,100 $ 1,500,000 $ 5,467,100 Impact Fees II
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes $ - $ 5,994,663 $ 5,994,663 Gas Tax
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street - 4 lanes $ 1,500,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 3,105,337 $ 6,705,337 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 467,100 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 667,100 Right-of-Way $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Construction $ 3,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 7,000,000 $ 12,500,000
45th Street Beautification $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ 200,000 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 200,000 $ 200,000
47th Street-East of US 1 $ 106,952 $ 106,952 Developer Contributions
Construction $ 106,952 $ 106,952
53rd Street – 58th Avenue to IR Blvd, add four lanes $ 2,476,513 $ - $ - $ 2,476,513 Impact Fees II
53rd Street – 58th Avenue to IR Blvd, add four lanes $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ 3,200,000 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 5,176,513 $ 5,176,513
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ 300,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,350,000 $ 2,150,000 $ - $ 4,900,000 Impact Fees II 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ 7,796,194 $ 9,896,194 Gas Tax 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Optional Sales Tax 58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection $ 300,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ 2,339,000 $ 3,839,000 Grant
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 Right-of-Way $ 1,000,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 2,350,000 $ 4,600,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 80
Construction $ 600,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 15,135,194 $ 18,735,194
58th Avenue 49th-65th St - 4 lanes-58th Ave26th to 53rd $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Developer Funded Construction
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,000,000
66th Ave 4th-12th St $ 2,201,606 $ - $ - $ 2,201,606 Impact Fees III 66th Ave 4th-12th St $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Construction $ 1,951,606 $ 1,951,606
66th Ave, 12th to SR60 $ 600,000 $ 900,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 Impact Fees II 66th Ave, 12th to SR60 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Gas Tax 66th Ave, 12th to SR60 $ - Grant 67th Ave, 12th to SR60 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Right-of-Way $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Construction $ 1,900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 3,700,000
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 $ 1,200,000 Impact Fees I
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets $ 2,400,000 $ 100,000 $ 618,043 $ 3,118,043 Gas Tax
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Grant
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets $ 7,831,957 $ 7,831,957 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 400,000 Right-of-Way $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Construction $ 1,900,000 $ 10,850,000 $ 12,750,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 81
66th Avenue, 41st Street to 77th Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Impact Fees II
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Construction $ -
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges $ - $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax 66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 Grant 66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges $ 600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 Impact Fees II 66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ 8,000,000 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 Right-of-Way $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Construction $ 4,900,000 $ 4,900,000 $ 9,800,000
82nd Avenue Over Lateral “D” Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening $ 1,509,843 $ 1,509,843 Optional Sales Tax
82nd Avenue Over Lateral “D” Canal and 4th Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening $ 380,000 $ 380,000 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Right-of-Way $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Construction $ 1,509,843 $ 1,509,843
CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes $ 617,358 $ 130,780 $ 400,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 5,500,000 $ 8,948,138 Gas Tax
CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes (1.6 miles) $ 189,325 $ 139,500 $ - $ - $ 328,825 Impact Fees I $ 129,720 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,129,720 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ 706,683 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 500,000 $ 4,306,683 Construction $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 82
CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes (1.5 miles) $ 531,727 $ 700,000 $ 600,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 10,031,727 Gas Tax $ 494,629 $ 494,629 Impact Fees I
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ 1,026,356 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 3,426,356 Construction $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 7,000,000
CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) $ - $ 1,318,043 $ 1,318,043 Impact Fees I
CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5 miles) $ 731,597 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 7,081,957 $ 8,000,000 $ 16,713,554 Gas Tax $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 8,000,000 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 365,799 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 565,799 Right-of-Way $ 365,799 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,965,799 Construction $ 9,500,000 $ 13,000,000 $ 22,500,000
Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 Grant Indian River Drive Sidwealk- North $ 219,959 $ 219,959 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 519,959 $ 519,959
12th Street Sidewalk-43rd to 27th Ave $ 172,351 $ 172,351 Grant $ - Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 172,351 $ 172,351
Misc. Intersection Improvements $ 300,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 2,700,000 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 300,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,300,000
Misc. Right of Way Acquisition $ 243,934 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,243,934 Gas Tax Misc. Right of Way Acquisition $ 483,450 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,483,450 Optional Sales Tax
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 83
Right-of-Way $ 727,384 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 4,727,384
Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane $ 2,050,000 $ - $ - $ 2,050,000 Impact Fees III Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane $ - $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 1,950,000 $ 1,950,000
Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) $ 1,470,150 $ - $ - $ 1,470,150 Impact Fees III
Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) $ 1,100,000 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 2,600,000 Gas Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 2,470,150 $ 1,400,000 $ 3,870,150
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) $ 500,000 $ 2,835,700 $ - $ 3,335,700 Impact Fees III
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four lanes (1 mile) $ 1,164,300 $ - $ 1,164,300 Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Right-of-Way $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Construction $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000
8th Street Sidewalk (US1 to 6th Avenue) $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax 8th Street Sidewalk (US1 to 6th Avenue) $ 105,300 $ - $ - $ 105,300 Grant
Design & Engineering $ - Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 105,300 $ 105,300
8th Street Sidewalk (18th Ct to Old Dixie Hwy) $ 129,720 $ - $ - $ 129,720 Optional Sales Tax 8th Street Sidewalk (18th Ct to Old Dixie Hwy) $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 Grant
Design & Engineering $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 219,720 $ 219,720
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 84
Indian River Blvd Sidewalk (12th Street to 17th Street) $ - $ - $ - Optional Sales Tax
Indian River Blvd Sidewalk (12th Street to 17th Street) $ 430,235 $ - $ - $ 430,235 Grant
Design & Engineering $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Right-of-Way $ - Construction $ 380,235 $ 380,235
Old Dixie Sidewalk- 38th lane to 65th street $ 1,497,616 $ 1,497,616 Grant Construction $ 1,497,616 $ 1,497,616
Traffic controllers $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 Gas Tax Traffic Fiber Optic $ 120,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 520,000 Gas Tax Traffic Fiber Optic $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 Optional Sales Tax
IR Lagoon-Misc Paving Projects $ 277,505 $ 277,505 Optional Sales Tax
Construction $ 277,505 $ 277,505
Design & Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Construction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Traffic Controllers & Fiber Optic $ 320,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,520,000 Total Transportation $ 320,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,520,000
Design & Engineering $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Right-of-Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0
Traffic Controllers & Fiber Optic $ 320,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Total Transportation $ 320,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 85
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Total Revenue $ 78,143,562 $ 13,522,000 $ 15,735,196 $ 18,620,111 $ 60,336,457 $ 186,357,326 Total Expenditures $ 45,272,376 $ 29,378,382 $ 32,750,000 $ 29,800,000 $ 49,156,568 $ 186,357,326 Annual Balance $32,871,186 -$15,856,382 -$17,014,804 -$11,179,889 $11,179,889 $0 Revenue and Expenditure Summary Revenue Source FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Env. Land Bonds $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000
Grant $ 10,289,502 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,580,000 $ 3,300,000 $ 6,839,000 $ 24,008,502 Emergency Services Dist. $ 1,226,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 800,000 $ - $ 4,837,882 Optional Sales Tax $ 23,450,661 $ 4,520,000 $ 9,354,000 $ 4,490,240 $ 4,078,440 $ 45,893,341
Impact Fees (Emergency Services, General Servics, Law Enforcement, Parks & Rec.) $ 2,010,755 $ 3,325,000 $ 2,005,000 $ 5,025,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,865,755
Court Facility Surcharge $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000
FBIP $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000
Water and Sewer User Fees $ - $ - $ 285,000 $ - $ 285,000 $ 570,000
Water and Sewer Impact Fees $ 1,200,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 10,900,000
Water and Sewer Cash Forward $ 8,528,533 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,528,533
Solid Waste Assessments & User Fees $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 MSTU Assessments $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000
IRC Utilities Department $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000
Gas Tax $ 10,297,507 $ 2,232,000 $ 2,255,000 $ 6,237,971 $ 6,237,971 $ 27,260,449
Bonds Proceeds - Gas Tax $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 44,805,166 $ 44,805,166
Payback from FDOT-Gas Tax $ 7,865,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,865,009
Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000 Traffic Impact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497 Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,311 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,311 Traffic Impact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 86
Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,952
Developer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 4,600,000
Payback from FDOT- Optional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ - $ 14,823,571
Old Traffic Impact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,140,009
TOTAL $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311 Expenditures by Category FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total Conservation and Aquifer Recharge $1,350,000 $75,000 $ - $100,000 $ - $ 1,525,000 Emergency Services $3,426,177 $2,361,705 $450,000 $3,000,000 $ - $9,237,882 General Services $189,508 $60,000 $4,160,000 $60,000 $60,000 $ 4,529,508
Law Enforcement $558,960 $1,900,000 $ - $ - $ - $2,458,960
Parks and Recreation $4,069,300 $2,050,000 $3,485,000 $2,825,000 $2,500,000 $ 14,929,300 Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water $6,681,988 $1,077,337 $4,497,450 $5,028,758 $2,913,000 $20,198,533 Solid Waste $9,075,000 $1,830,000 $2,200,000 $6,967,000 $667,802 $20,739,802 Stormwater Management $969,000 $500,000 $950,000 $3,000,000 $5,000,000 $10,419,000 Transportation $45,272,376 $29,378,382 $32,750,000 $29,800,000 $49,156,568 $186,357,326 Total $71,592,309 $39,232,424 $48,492,450 $50,780,758 $60,297,370 $ 270,395,311 Total Revenues All Categories $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311 Total Expenditures All Categories $ 71,592,309 $ 39,232,424 $ 48,492,450 $ 50,780,758 $ 60,297,370 $ 270,395,311 Difference $36,117,731 -$15,333,719 -$19,227,254 -$13,608,647 $12,051,889 $0
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 87
APPENDIX B: PRIORITY TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Priority Transportation Capital Improvements
Facility
From
To
Improvement Type
Estimated Begin Date Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost
43rd Ave 18th St 26th St Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) July-10 Jan-12 $18,200,000
43rd Ave 12th St 18th St Widening from 2 to 4 lanes (1 mile) Oct-11 April-13 $8,441,374
Oslo Rd 27th Ave 43rd Ave Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes August-10 March-11 $7,900,000 Cou
nty
Proj
ects
Oslo Rd 43rd Ave 58th Ave Widening from 2 to 4/5 lanes August -10 March-11 $6,100,000
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 88
APPENDIX CB: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has adopted its 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This plan prioritizes roadway improvements through a 20 year planning horizon. The table below lists these prioritized roadway improvements. Because the LRTP prioritizes long range roadway projects through 2030, or contains projects funded entirely by non-county sources, it includes some projects that are not in Appendix A, the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element) On Street From To Base Road Type Future Road Type Total Cost
I-95 S. County Line N. County Line 4 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Freeway $109,919,000
SR 60 98th Ave I-95 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $2,543,842SIS
SIS Total $112,462,842
SR 60 I-95 82nd Ave 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,119,445SR 60 6th Ave Indian River Blvd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $1,864,758US 1 S. County Line Oslo Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $12,064,823US 1 Aviation Blvd Old Dixie Hwy (N) 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $44,372,047US 1 Roseland Rd N. County Line 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $5,255,518
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $10,000,000
Stat
e R
oads
Other State Roads Total $81,676,5914th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $16,262,03512th St 90th Ave 82nd Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781,78612th St 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,61813th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,041,38813th St SW 43rd Ave 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,560,89913th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,68413th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,922,225
Cou
nty
Roa
ds
17th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 89
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element) On Street From To Base Road Type Future Road Type Total Cost
26th St 66th Ave 43rd Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $13,006,15426th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,850,481Aviation Blvd 43rd Ave U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,537,82827th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $9,560,90927th Ave Oslo Rd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $12,330,69943rd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $12,974,56343rd Ave Oslo Rd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $8,311,05853rd St 82nd Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $9,599,620
58th Ave S County Line/Koblegard Rd Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $11,850,325
66th Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $8,562,42366th Ave Oslo Rd 4th St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,887,46666th Ave 4th St SR 60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided $8,853,56566th Ave SR 60 C.R. 510 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,173,48982nd Ave S County Line Oslo Rd 00 2 Lane Undivided $7,302,94182nd Ave 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided $28,174,165Laconia St C.R. 510 C.R.512 00 2 Lane Undivided $2,679,879Aviation Blvd Ext U.S. 1 Indian River Blvd 00 4 Lane Divided $14,387,771
C.R. 510 C.R. 512 U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,369,280C.R. 510 U.S. 1 ICWW 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,718,539C.R. 512 Fellsmere City Limits I-95 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $19,192,929C.R. 512 I-95 C.R. 510 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $13,317,010C.R. 512 C.R. 510 Roseland Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $6,674,3708th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,955,196Indian River Blvd Royal Palm 37th St 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,678,255Oslo Rd I-95 58th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $19,484,669Roseland Rd C.R. 512 U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $12,847,897
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 90
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element) On Street From To Base Road Type Future Road Type Total Cost
Schumann Dr C.R. 510 Barber St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,974,335
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $10,000,000
County Roads Total $381,057,970Barber St Schumann Dr U.S. 1 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $3,621,587Barber St C.R. 512 Schumann Dr 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $7,596,306
City
Rds
City Roads Total $11,217,893
Total $576,415,296 Source: Indian River County MPO
F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS\CIE\2010\2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT - DRAFT 10-26-10 - REDLINED COPY.DOC
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 91
APPENDIX DC: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 92
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 93
APPENDIX ED: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 94
Comprehensive Plan
Community Development Department Supplement #___; Adopted November ___, 2010, Ordinance 2010-___
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 95
Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6 Capital Improvements Element Indian River County Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii
List ofTables ................................................................................................................................. iii
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... I
Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 2 Financial Resources ................................................................................................................. 2 Expenditures .......................................................................................................................... 19 Existing Outstanding Debt. .................................................................................................... 22 Local Policies and Practices .................................................................................................. 24
Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Analysis ofthe Timing and Location of Capital Improvements ............................................ 27 Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................. 34 Fiscal Assessment .................................................................................................................. 36 Fiscal Assessment Summary ................................................................................................. 42
Concurrency Management Plan .................................................................................................... 42 Project Applicability .............................................................................................................. 43 Service Standards .................................................................................................................. 43 Demand .................................................................................................................................. 44 Availability of Capacity ......................................................................................................... 46 Regulation .............................................................................................................................. 49 Monitoring System ................................................................................................................ 49 Applicability .......................................................................................................................... 51
Goal, Objectives and Policies ....................................................................................................... 52
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring ............................................................................... 61
Implementation .......................................................................................................................... 61
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures ..................................................................................... 63
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ............................... 66
APPENDIX B: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........................................................... 87
APPENDIX C: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE .................................................................................................... 90
APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE ............................................................................................................... 92
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
List of Figures
Title Ad Valorem Tax Revenue Enterprise Fund Revenue User Fees and Charges Special Assessment Revenue Impact Fee Revenue Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Tourist Development Tax Local Option Fuel Tax Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue Half-Cent Local Government Sales Tax County Revenue Sharing Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds County Fuel Tax Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Mobile Home License Tax Distribution of Revenue by Category General Expenditures by Function
Capital Improvements Element
Page 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 9
Figure 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures
11 13 14 15 15 16 17 19 21 36
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
List of Tables
Table Title Page 6.1 Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 07 /08) 2 6.2 Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities 8 6.3 Local Fuel Tax Rates 10 6.4 Indian River General Revenues by Source 18 6.5 Indian River County Expenditures by Function 19 6.6 Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt 23 6.7 Overall General Revenue Projection Summary 30 6.8 Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element 31 6.9 Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections 31 6.10 Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects
with Deficient Links 33 6.11 Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation
Projects 34 6.12 Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River
County 35 6.13 Indian River County General Expenditures Projection Summary 37 6.14 Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste 37 6.15 Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections 38 6.16 Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without 39
Public Vote 6.17 Indian River County Bond Schedule 40 6.18 Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities 44 6.19 Monitoring System Design 50 6.20 Monitoring System Tasks 51 6.21 Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix 62 6.22 Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix 64
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Introduction
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to be funded. This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements based on the level of need and the availability of funds.
For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan.
Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the concurrency management section, while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section ofthis element.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
1
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Conditions
Financial Resources
One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2008/09. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources.
Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2008/09) ... . ''ii ' ·: ;: .. : ', .; : ,. >
I t(';;'"·'';.)l;· ' ;·;' ..• •'' ,:; •... ,, •. " ..... ·· .:•···-.•· • '· .,.:; y.i· .. · , .. ;.·; ,c/i · • , . Fede~a1So1J~I!-~S / ···•·• •>> State Sources ;·~. -, -~C ·~~ >. '•" '' :.; ':'..;".•
Amount %ofTotal Amount %of Total Amount %of Total ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue
Various $12,859 5.48% Local Government $7,000 2.99% Ad Valorem Taxes $94,397 40.26% Grants Half-Cent Sales Tax
Total $12,859 5.48% County Revenue $2,558 1.09% Enterprise Funds $41,531 17.71% Federal Sharing
Constitutional Fuel $1,575 0.67% User Fees and $16,853 7.19% Tax Charges
County Fuel Tax $690 0.29% Special Assessments $487 0.21%
Alcoholic Beverage $50 0.02% Impact Fees $2,054 0.88% License Tax
Pari-Mutuel Tax $447 0.19% Local Discretionary $13,023 5.55% Sales Surtax
Mobile Home $108 0.05% Tourist Development $1,294 0.55% License Tax Tax
Various Grants $8,633 3.68% Local Option Fuel $3,200 1.36% Tax
Total State $21,061 8.98% Franchise Tax $9,670 4.12%
Interest Income $9,788 4.17%
Other $8,278 3.53%
Total Local $200,575 85.53%
Total All Sources $234,495 100.00%
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
2
Comprehensive Plan
Local Sources
Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. These local sources are shown in table 6.1, and are described in further detail below.
• Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)
Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 1 0 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY 2008/09, Indian River County applied an aggregate millage rate of 5.1628. According to County policy, ad valorem taxes may be used for both operating and capital project expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2008/09, Indian River County collected approximately $94,397,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem taxes represented 40.26% of all revenues collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09.
Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, ad valorem tax revenue increased 34.60%.
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
l!!l Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
l!!l Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
3
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Enterprise Funds
Within governmental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title "enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprises.
Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 17.71% of Indian River County's total source of funds for FY 2008/09. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 2.68%.
• User Fees and Charges
User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. User fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keep up with the increasing costs of services. This category includes fees collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriffs Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In FY 2008/09, user fees and charges represented 7.19% of all funds collected by Indian River County.
Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period,
Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges
$20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000
$8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007
Iii Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2008 2009
revenue from user fees and charges varied, but overall increased 17.99%.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024 4
Comprehensive Plan
• Special Assessments
Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services; the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment.
Special Assessment funds represented 0.21% of county funds for FY 2008/09 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years.
• Impact Fees
An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of subdivision or site plan approval, building peimit issuance, certificate of occupancy issuance, or other development or construction approval when the revenues collected are intended to fund the costs of capital improvements for any public facilities.
Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue
$600
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
11111 Revenue (in thousands}
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
$40,000
$35,000
$30,000
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$-
Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
11111 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
5
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings.
On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees are: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010 the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. The current suspension of impact fees will expire on March 31, 2011.
Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing economy and the suspension of five of the impact fees.
• Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, local governments are authorized to levy numerous types oflocal discretionary sales surtaxes. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000.
Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
$18,000 r--r===r-::-::~.,---------,
$16,000 +-----L
$14,000
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Under this category, Indian River County 111 Revenue (in thousands)
is eligible to impose a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or
Source: Indian River County Finance Department 1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
6
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
According to state law, the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection.
Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.55% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 1.35% over that period.
Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population.
Currently, twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax, while Martin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%, which is another local discretionary sales surtax.
• Tourist Development Tax
Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax.
Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax as well as an additional one percent tax.
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue
$1,800
$1,600
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
ll!il Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
7
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Sixty Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty counties, forty-three counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax.
Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie Counties have the highest tourist tax levy of the six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of 4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy.
Breva,rd 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 4.00%
Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% ---------- 5.00% 4.00%
Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% 5.00% 3.00%
Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. October 2010.
The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes:
(1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated ·· convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed;
(2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State ofFlorida;
(3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county;
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
8
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
( 4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access;
(5) Construct, improve, maintain, and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less than 500,000);
(6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations.
Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 19.59%.
• Local Option Fuel Tax
Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form ofthree separate levies. These levies are:
~ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; a one to five cent local option fuel tax; and a ninth cent fuel tax.
Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county-wide
$3,300
$3,200
$3,100
$3,000
$2,900
$2,800
Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2009
referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.36% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2008/09. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has decreased overall by 3. 73% from what it was in Fiscal Year 2004. Even though local option fuel tax revenues were less in fiscal year 2009 than what they were in fiscal year 2004, the county received a significant increase in local option fuel tax revenue in fiscal years 2005 through 2007. This was largely associated with the building boom.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
9
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax.
Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, it does not currently levy either tax. At this time, fifty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax, while twenty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax.
Brevard $0.06 $0.06
Indian River $0.06 $0.06
Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Palm Beach $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
St. Lucie $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. October 2010.
• Franchise Fee/Tax
Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024 10
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 4.12% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County increased 43.90%.
• Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 3.53% of all funds collected in FY 2008/09.
• Borrowing
As needed, the county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Currently, borrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be
Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
1m Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement ofVoted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance ofbonds sold on the public market.
According to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non-ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum.
General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance.
Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
11
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non-ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations.
In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. In addition, revenue bonds have been issued by the Housing Authority to finance the provision of more low-income housing units in the county. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt.
Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum.
Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid-offby assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal.
The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter m~turity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes.
• Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources
Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax.
Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024 12
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads.
The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility.
State Sources
Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below.
• Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax
The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; this account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of these monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received for the county. In FY 2008/09, Indian River County received $7,000,000 through the half-
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue
$10,000
$9,000 t===:::;L $8,000
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
1m Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
13
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
cent sales tax. As shown in table 6.1, that amount represented 2.99% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2008/09 fiscal year.
Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half-cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County's half-cent sales tax revenue decreased 7 .46%.
Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs.
• County Revenue Sharing
The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These sources include 2.90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding these funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness.
To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria:
(1) That law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements;
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
(2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue;
(3) That the county's most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
14
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.09% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall decreased by 11.61%.
• Constitutional Fuel Tax
Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida) of motor fuel. Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler.
In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state-shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body.
Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.67% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased 5.35%.
• County Fuel Tax
The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue
$1,800
$1,750
$1,700
$1,650
$1,600
$1,550
$1,500
$1,450
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
$800
$780
$760
$740
$720
$700
$680
$660
$640
Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax
2009
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Ill Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
15
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes.
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.29% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased 7.01 %.
• Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation.
Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
111 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $50,000 from this tax in FY 2008/09, 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same.
• Pari-Mutuel Tax
Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented 0.19% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
16
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Mobile Home License Tax
An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth-wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law.
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through
$160
$140
$120
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$-
Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
mil Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
the mobile home license tax represented 0.05% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last five fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue
received by Indian River County remained the same.
• Various Grants
Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 5.48% of funds received by the county in FY 2008/09. State grant funds received by the county in FY 2008/09 originated from the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Housing Finance Agency, the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the Department of Health, the Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
17
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Federal Sources
Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant.
During FY 2008/09, the county received approximately $12,859,000 in federal funds. These funds represented 5.48% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2008/09.
Overall Revenue Sources
As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2002/2003 through 2007/08.
~.?b; ,' , •·. •.•·•. . ·' ' ·''· ····.·........ • •. t',.:J:.~•··•·•·.·· ···• Table 6.4: Indian River County General ~.evenues By; Source, .'·•· ,.,. ,;,.: ,,•''
2003/04 $95,675,370 $1,033,394 $51,487,093 $54,729,505 $1,508,786 $14,545,961 $218,980,109 2004/05 $104,012,925 $1,354,282 $82,604,757 $68,389,360 $1,715,875 $42,170,294 $300,247,493 2005/06 $116,088,548 $1,274,638 $66,278,020 $68,028,618 $2,069,593 $40,182,777 $293,922,194 2006/07 $130,158,069 $896,612 $64,054,273 $65,111,301 $2,403,093 $26,773,753 $289,397,101 2007/08 $119,915,640 $9,904,590 $60,086,565 $63,355,209 $2,137,413 $18,486,026 $273,885,443 2008/09 $113,689,399 $12,433,598 $39,249,261 $58,384,013 $1,792,517 $8,946,401 $234,495,189
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2009 & Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
18
6.
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category
2004 43.69%
0.47%
23.51%
2007
44.98%
0.31%
22.50%
•Taxes
13 Charges for Sen.ices
Expenditures
2005 34.64%
22.78%
2008 43.78%
EJ Licenses & Permits
• Fines & Forfeitures
2006 39.50% 0.43%
22.55%
2009
o lntergm.emmental Re\.enue
s Miscellaneous Re\.enues
In the previous sub-section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed. This sub-section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the county's needs. Table 6.5 presents the county's overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2003/2004 through 2008/09 .
..•• ~.~~r~;~.s~!.i~~t~n~i"~t·<:~~·~ti:t;~~~f~IQ~f~l'~~;~~!i~*e~n~#~t~~·~~:r#~~~t~~~";;;•··.··,c ··~~i::f~~. ·;: .... ;,:.;~.·· .... ·;i·.:·~:;.·J;l:i:::m~:A •::Fi§ciii'Year . • • . < > I > . '2003104 ; . 2004/05C·t > '': c~·,:\2005/0om :1l''f!''/ 2006/0'tX ; i'; •·. 2oinios;• :;:;;; ···'..i200Sl09i; General Government $29,005,917 $30,565,484
$60,435,102 $63,231,330 $30,711,818 $25,801,688
P.ublic Safety $55,792,130 $57,161,390 $66,984,420 $73,275,110 $74,038,252 $74,813,164
Physical Environment $44,317,270 53,990,669 $54,445,121 $86,515,929 $54,243,069 $82,894,477
Transportation $23,038,234 $22,369,128 $31,966,926 $55,039,978 $53,489,116 $40,841,272
Economic Environment $627,914 $712,517 $1,054,239 $968,227 $4,579,574 $653,547
Human Services $7,197,342 $7,279,582 $12,470,222 $13,862,463 $12,619,575 $8,621,760
Culture/Recreation $17,828,311 $24,298,539 $19,977,771 $24,075,260 $19,624,278 $27,989,515
Court Related $6,210,614 $5,630,734 $5,915,727 $6,649,724 $6,940,682 $6,620,830
Debt Service $3,727,534 $3,495,500 $4,406,090 $8,126,643 $7,873,176 $8,068,758
TOTAL 187,745,266 205,503,543 $257,655,618 $332,037,467 $300,843,382 $239,288,366
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2009
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
19
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years.
General Government
A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5,$25,801,688 was spent on general government services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2003/04 and 2008/09, general government expenditures decreased by 11.05%. General government services represented 10.78% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09. The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07 was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county administration building and the expansion of the jail.
Public Safety
The Sheriffs Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2008/09, spent $74,813,164 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, public safety expenditures increased by 1.05%. Since FY 2003/04, public safety expenditures have increased by 34.09%. Public safety represented 40.17% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Physical Environment
This classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $54,243,069was spent on these activities in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, physical environment expenditures decreased by 37.30%. Since FY2003/04, physical environment expenditures have increased by 22.40%. Physical environment services represented 22.6% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Transportation
Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
20
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
table 6.5, the county spent $40,841,272 on transportation facilities in FY 2008/09. Since FY 2003/04, transportation expenditures have increased by 77.28%. Transportation expenses represented 21.93% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Economic Environment
Included in this category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $653,547 on economic environment services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2006/07 and 2007/08, economic environment expenditures increased by 372.99%. Since FY 2002/03, economic environment expenditures have increased by 684.38%. Economic environment expenses represented 1.89% of all county expenses in FY 2007/08.
Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function
2007
8.4%
2004
22.1%
0.3%
23.6%
12.3%
0.3%
25.0%
G General Government
mil Transportation
E3 Culture/Recreation
Human Services
27.8%
2
2005
26.3% 10.9%
0.3%
3.5%
11.8%
24.6% 2008
111 Public Safety
111 Economic En\tironment
1111 Court Related
2006 26.0%
1.
2.3%7.8% 4.8%
31.3%
10.8%
3.4
o Physical En\tironment
ll!1 Human Ser\tices
~Debt Ser\tice
21.1%
12.4%
0.4%
2009
Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
21
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the county spent $8,621,760 on human services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, human services expenditures decreased by 31.68%. Since FY 2003/04, human services expenditures have increased by 19.79%. Human services represented 3.60% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Culture/Recreation
All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $19,624,278 on these services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, cultural/recreation expenditures decreased by 18.49%. Since FY 2003/04, cultural/recreation expenditures have increased by 10.07%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 8.20% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Court Related
All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $6,620,830 in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, Court Related expenditures decreased by 4.61 %. Beginning in FY 199711998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented 2. 77% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Debt Service
Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total county debt service expenditures were $8,068,758 in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, debt service expenditures increased by 2.48%. Since FY 2003/04, debt service expenditures have increased by 116.46%. Debt service expenses represented 3.37% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Existing Outstanding Debt
At the end ofFY 2009/10, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $108,815,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took advantage oflower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
22
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Enterprise Funds support 48.73% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 45.81 %; and Golf Course 2.92% ), leaving $55,790,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as the Vero Beach Sports Complex). Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. Those bonds have since been paid off. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in 2009. The County kept a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds.
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds:
1993 A Series $47,190,000 5.76% 2011 AAA/FGIC Water & Sewer
$1,555,000 (Insured) Revenues
3.94% 2022 AAA/FGIC Water & Sewer
2005 Series $27,675,000 $21,925,000 (Insured) Revenues
Water & Sewer 2009 Series $26,370,000 $26,370,000 3.68% 2024 AA+/AA Revenues
Recreation Revenue Bonds
2001 Series Spring AAA/FGIC State Funds, Y, Cent $16,810,000 4.87% 2031
Training Facility $12,310,000 (Insured) Sales Tax, Tourist Tax
Golf Course Net 2003 Series Income, Fronton Refunding
$6,455,000 3.65% 2016 AAA/AMAC Revenue and
Recreational $3,175,000 (Insured) Subordinate Lien on Revenue One Half Cent Sales
Tax
Voted G.O. Bonds
Environmental AAA/FSA
Lands Acquisition $11,000,000 3.89% 2016 (Insured)
General Obligation 2001 Series $5,210,000
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
23
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Environmental Lands Acquisition 2006 Series
Total Bonds Outstanding
$48,600,000 $38,270,000
$108,815,000
Source: Indian River County Budget 2010/11.
Local Policies and Practices
4.22% 2021 AAAIMBIA (Insured)
General Obligation
As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level-ofservice standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts.
Existing Level-of-Service Standards
Level-of-service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level-of-service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility.
Level-of-service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level-of-service standards for capital facilities as follows:
~ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) • 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
·Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
24
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Potable Water (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Schools (School Service Area): • 1 00 percent ofFlorida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school
type (elementary, middle, and high).
Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population per year
Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall
event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads
• The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads
• All drainage basins will meet the following level-of-service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event
Transportation (Roadways)
• Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways,
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
25
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%: • 2th Ave- South County Line to SR 60 • 43rd Ave- Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
Transit • One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes
Level-of-service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan Element.
Capital Improvements Program
A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax.
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years.
Impact Fees/Capacity Charges
Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses for implementing the CIE. Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
26
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers.
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building department services, and utility services as enterprise funds.
As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas.
Analysis
The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the county's fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development.
As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included.
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements
Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriffs office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
27
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county's comprehensive plan, the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system.
Using the county's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the county's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development.
Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation ofthose items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development.
If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives.
Appendix A constitutes the county's five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service.
Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
28
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Projected Revenues
In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered. This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section.
During the past five years, there has been a gradual decrease in most revenue sources. Estimates going forward show a decrease in most revenue sources for the next couple years followed by moderate increases. This is consistent with the current economic recession followed by an anticipated moderate recovery thereafter.
Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues.
As part of this capital improvements element, the county's general revenues have been projected for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections.
• Overall Projected Revenues
Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected revenue for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. These revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly in the next fiscal year and increase by only 3.22% by fiscal year 2014115. Overall, general revenue is projected to increase from $278,508,044 in FY 2010111 to $287,466,627 in FY 2014/15.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
29
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Taxes 96,290,805 100,034,202 100,034,000 105,392,971 108,028,000 509,779,978
Licenses & Permits 20,754,256 20,754,000 21,273,000 21,805,000 22,350,000 106,936,256
Intergovern-ment 18,691,686 18,692,000 19,159,000 19,638,000 20,129,000 96,309,686
Charges for Services 60,009,228 60,009,000 61,509,000 63,047,000 64,623,000 309,197,228
Fines & Forfeitures 312,000 312,000 320,000 328,000 336,000 1,608,000
Interest & Misc. 18,494,670 18,495,000 18,957,000 19,431,000 19,917,000 95,294,670
Other Sources 63,955,399 32,653,315 43,795,823 43,221,820 52,083,627 235,709,984
TOTAL 278,508,044 250,949,517 265,047,823 272,863,791 287,466,627 1,354,835,802 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Earmarked Projected Revenues
Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, Potable Water Sub-Element, and Solid Waste Sub-Element.
Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked projected transportation revenues are expected to increase by 30.66% over the next five fiscal years, from $19,025,710 in FY 2010/11 to $24,859,880 in FY 2014115.
Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 10/11 to FY 14115, it is important to note that FY 10/11 transportation revenue is $35,764,991 less than FY 2004/05 transportation revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom years to the present. Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2013/14 and fiscal year 2014115 is from a planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In fiscal year 2013/14, the proposed additional6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county's current 6 cent per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a significant revenue increase in FY 2014115.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
30
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 7.69% over the next five fiscal years, from $27,333,363 in FY 2010111 to $29,434,000 in FY 2014115. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 7.69% from $10,713,852 in FY 2010111 to $11,538,000 in FY 2014115.
2010111 3,313,710 1,550,000 682,000 1,200,000 12,000,000 280,000 19,025,710 27,333,363 10,713,852
2011112 3,314,000 1,550,000 682,000 1,650,000 12,000,000 280,000 19,476,000 27,333,000 10,714,000
2012113 3,347,000 1,566,000 689,000 2,256,196 12,300,000 280,000 20,438,196 28,016,000 10,982,000
2013114 6,237,971 1,582,000 696,000 2,600,000 12,608,000 280,000 24,003,971 28,716,000 11,257,000
2014115 6,300,000 1,598,000 703,000 3,055,880 12,923,000 280,000 24,859,880 29,434,000 11,538,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate
Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY 2014115. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9 .
.. ·· Tahi¢•6.9: IJ:lc)ian River Oo1lntyT~*l(Qase anoMillage:£ro]ecti~n~···. ··: -· - .... ' --·· ,_ ·· _ .. c·- ··- ... -. - . - ,-- .- · ··-. - . "-·- .,- ---::-~ - ,,_ --- - .. • .'·- .-·; . ~ •. --~ -. " ;;,-•. _-- .- - - _ .• o- .,.,- : •.
2010/11 $14,147,906,804 3.0892 $7,820,732,737 1.0733 $11,640,087,880 1.7148 $14,147,906,804 0.0681
2011/12 $13,016,074,260 3.0892 $7,195,074,118 1.0733 $10,708,880,850 1.7148 $13,016,074,260 0.0735
2012113 $13,016,074,260 3.0892 $7,195,074,118 1.0733 $10,708,880,850 1.7148 $13,016,074,260 0.0735
2013114 $13,341,476,117 3.0892 $7,374,950,971 1.0733 $10,976,602,871 1.7148 $13,341,476,117 0.0717
2014/15 $13,675,013,020 3.0892 $7,559,324,745 1.0733 $11,251,017,943 1.7148 $13,675,013,020 0.0699
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
31
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Changes to the Capital Improvements Program
With the ongoing depressed housing market, challenges in the national and global financial markets, and the reduction in building permit activity, county revenue again decreased and is expected to remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 2009/10 through 2013/14). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 2009/10 through 2013/14 CIP have had their time frame extended.
None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations. Because of the depressed housing market, problems with the financial markets, and limited construction activity, it is anticipated that the capacity associated with most of these projects will not be needed until later dates.
Two of the transportation projects that have had their construction dates extended involve improvements to roadways that are over capacity according to the County's concurrency management system. Listed in Table 6.10, these deficient links are C.R. 510 between 581
h Avenue and U.S. Highway 1 and AlA from 1 ih Street to the south city limits of the City ofVero Beach. While the transportation projects designed to improve these deficient links are being rescheduled to later years of the CIP, there are several factors that are expected to increase available capacity in the short term. One such factor is that concurrency certificates for some development projects with vested trips will expire soon. At that time, the reserved trips reflected by those projects will be removed from the concurrency management system. Another factor is that recent traffic counts indicate that traffic volumes are continuing to decrease on most roadways. These new traffic counts will soon be reflected in the County's concurrency management system. At that time, the increased capacity and decreased demand will have the effect of increasing the available capacity on County roadways and will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation projects in the County's CIP.
By extending the time frame of transportation projects, the county can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the county needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary projects, the County is also maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element.
'.l]r~llsport~tfori Project········ WitliDeficierit.Link ·. · · ·
CR 510, 61 st Drive to Indian River, four lanes (1.6 miles)
17' Street/AlA Intersection
C.R. 510, 581 Avenue to U.S. 1 C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. AlA C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. AlA S.R. AlA, Southern Vera Beach Ci Limits
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
810.00 810.00 -64.76 2,049.00 1,333.34 2,049.00 1,273.52 930.00 -151.37
Indian River County
32
Comprehensive Plan
TJ"an~portati~llJ?tpJect With DefiCient Link···•· .....
1020S
1030N 1030S 2120E
2120W
*Peak hour, directional trips
S.R. AlA, Southern Vera Beach City Limits to 1 71
h Street S.R. AlA, 171 Street to S.R. 60
1 i Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R. AlA 1 i Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R. AlA
Capital Improvements Element
930.00 1,058.13 -128.13
924.00 707.00 217.00 924.00 832.00 92.00 1,960.00 1,017.77 942.23
1,960.00 1,202.30 757.70
• Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program
The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity to be produced by these roadway improvement projects as being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development project impacting a deficient link can proceed despite the deficient link where a roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project.
Because of lower demand on area roadways from the depressed housing market and the pending expiration of concurrency certificates for previously approved developments, the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is no longer needed. Therefore, this CIE no longer includes a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program.
Of the four projects previously listed in the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program, two of those projects were removed because they will be under construction within the next six months. Those projects are: Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and Oslo Road from 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue. The other two projects were removed from the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program because the road capacity that those projects would add to the transportation system is no longer needed to maintain the current Level of Service ofE +20. Those projects and the available peak hour, directional trip capacity of the associated roadways are listed in Table 6.11. All of the roadways listed in that table currently have sufficient available peak hour, directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
33
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Tabl(l6.H: Concurren~Y. Lillks Rep~rtfor·Removed Priori.tyf;r:tansp()rtati()n Pi"()je~ts .·. ) ··.
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, 2925N 43'd Avenue, 12"' Street to 16th Street 1,071.00 555.95 515.05 four lanes (1 mile) 2925S 43'd Avenue, 12th Street to 16th Street 1,071.00 728.95 342.05
43rd Avenue, 18th Street to 26th Street, four lanes
*Peak hour, directional trips
Needs Assessment
2930N 43'd Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,071.00 665.40 405.60 2930S 43'd Avenue, 16th Street to S.R. 60 1,071.00 704.56 366.44 2935N 43'd Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26th Street 1,796.00 532.73 1,263.27 2935S 43'd Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26th Street 1,796.00 525.31 1,270.69
Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and may be paid for in phases.
Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2014/15 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service.
Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
Emergency Services
General Services
Law Enforcement & Corrections
Recreation & Open Space
Sanit Sewer &
$1,350,000
$3,426,177
$189,508
$558,960
$4,069,300
$6,681,988
Community Development Department
$75,000
$2,361,705
$60,000
$1,900,000
$2,050,000
$1,077,337
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
$ $ $100,000
$ $450,000 $3,000,000
$4,160,000 $60,000 $60,000
$ $ $
$3,485,000 $2,825,000 $2,500,000
$4,497,450 $5,028,758 $2,913,000
Indian River County
34
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
El~~e~t~rq~t~~->~; ;•1 .: •..•.... d6j();.i1:·••··•····.········· 1,. •...... ;ioii/i2.· :·: 1:···· .• · •. ·.·~t~rd}ij·! ;.;c·.i'·.:.··.':%9~~1:!~·.~···~·••i•'.·:r•:%~~~/t,:~1.·'.i··~
Potable Water
Solid Waste $9,075,000 $1,830,000 $2,200,000 $6,967,000 $667,802
Stormwater Management $969,000 $500,000 $950,000 $3,000,000 $5,000,000
Transportation $45,272,376 $29,378,382 $32,750,000 $29,800,000 $49,156,568
Total $71,592,309 $39,232,424 $48,492,450 $50,780,758 $60,297,370
Public School $42,851,573 $29,145,119 $10,347,761 $12,310,139 $13,026,495
Facilities*
*The School District oflndian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities.
Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $270,395,311.
Within the first fiscal year, projects are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenues. For the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas tax.
Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, but are not the fiscal responsibility of the County. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the management of the IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county.
In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on generallocational criteria for public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the county by 2014115 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
35
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures
$50,000,000 .
$40,000,000 .
$30,000,000 '
$20,000,000
$10,000,000 .
$0
FY2010/11
fim Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
• Law Enforcement & Corrections
• Solid Waste
Fiscal Assessment
FY2011/12 FY2012/13
!'.il Emergency Services
Ia Recreation & Open Space
D Stormwater Management
FY2013/14 FY2014/15
D General Services
• Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
IB Transportation
This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. For public school facilities listed in table 6.12, the School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements. The School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" (Appendix C) and "Summary ofEstimated Revenue" (Appendix D) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility ofthe School District's Five Year Capital Plan.
This assessment process consists of projecting future revenue receipts and comparing those receipts to anticipated expenditures. With this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs.
Projected Expenditures
Table 6.13 shows the county's projected expenditures for fiscal years 2010111 through 2014/15. By fiscal year 2014/15, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling $287,466,627. InFY
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
36
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2014/15, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Public Safety category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 2010/11 and ending in fiscal year 2014/15, the county's expenditures are projected to increase by 29.95%.
General Gov't. Services 16,980,605 17,271,000 21,801,000 18,142,000 18,594,000
Public Safety 72,041,547 74,019,705 71,952,000 76,290,000 75,122,000
Physical Environment 68,145,494 54,803,337 59,966,450 69,014,758 63,562,802
Transportation 57,843,301 42,263,382 45,957,000 43,337,000 63,031,568
Economic Environment 499,847 512,000 525,000 538,000 551,000
Human Services 7,597,176 7,787,000 7,982,000 8,182,000 8,387,000
Culture/Recreation 17,785,732 16,109,000 17,895,000 17,595,000 17,639,000
Debt Service 7,024,509 6,829,093 6,830,373 6,823,033 6,813,257
Other 30,589,833 31,355,000 32,139,000 32,942,000 33,766,000
TOTAL 278,508,044 250,949,517 265,047,823 272,863,791 287,466,627 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
Earmarked Projected Expenditures
Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. These expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year.
According to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefit the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the revenue and expenditure amounts increase and decrease with development. For that reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below county minimums.
2010111 $27,333,363 $10,713,852
2011/12 $27,333,000 $10,714,000
2012/13 $28,016,000 $10,982,000
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
37
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2013/14 $28,716,000 $11,257,000
2014/15 $29,434,000 $11,538,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
In FY 2014115, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $29,434,000. That is an increase of7.69% from the 2010/11 projected expenses of$27,333,363. Table 6.14 shows that, in FY 2014115, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $11,538,000. That is an increase of7.69% from the 2010111 projected figure of$10,713,852.
Operating Cost Projections
Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2010111 through 2014115. In fiscal year 2014115, the county is projected to incur approximately $189,485,892 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.15, the county's operating costs are projected to increase 7.46% between 2010111 and 2014/15.
2010/11 $176,325,902
2011112 $230,937,606
2012/13 $71,402,80 I 2013/14 $152,510,296 2014/15 $189,485,892
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget
Projected Debt Capacity
Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility.
Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bond revenue without a public vote. That table identifies the county's bonding capacity for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.16 indicates, the county's available bonding capacity for a 10 year issue is $160,100,000, while its bonding capacity for a 30 year issue is $323,100,000.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
38
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Half Cent Sales Tax $47,300,000 $80,300,000 $102,800,000
Gas Taxes $49,800,000 $78,900,000 $97,300,000
Tourist Tax $9,500,000 $15,000,000 $18,500,000
First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,800,000 $2,800,000 $3,500,000
Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,700,000 $5,900,000 $7,300,000
Sub-Total $112,100,000 $182,900,000 $229,400,000
Possible Pledge Sources
Franchise Fees $40,100,000 $63,500,000 $78,300,000
Road Impact Fees $7,900,000 $12,500,000 $15,400,000
Sub-Total $48,000,000 $76,000,000 $93,700,000
TOTAL $160,100,000 $258,900,000 $323,100,000 *Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of9/21!10. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Debt Service Obligations
In table 6.17, the county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
39
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
40
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Balance $15,620,000 $15,370,000 $10,615,000 $7,455,000 Interest $781,000 $745,212 $473,450 $381,850 Principal $2,100,000 $3,890,000 $1,930,000 $840,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,635,212 $2,403,450 $1,221,850
2018 Balance $13,520,000 $11,480,000 $8,685,000 $6,615,000 Interest $676,000 $550,713 $376,950 $337,750 Principal $2,205,000 $4,085,000 $2,025,000 $890,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,635,713 $2,401,950 $1,227,750
2019 Balance $11,315,000 $7,395,000 $6,660,000 $5,725,000 Interest $565,750 $346,462 $275,700 $291,025 Principal $2,315,000 $4,290,000 $2,130,000 $930,000 Total $2,880,750 $4,636,462 $2,405,700 $1,221,025
2020 Balance $9,000,000 $3,105,000 $4,530,000 $4,795,000 Interest $450,000 $131,963 $186,750 $242,200 Principal $2,430,000 $3,105,000 $2,220,000 $980,000 Total $2,880,000 $3,236,963 $2,406,750 $1,222,200
2021 Balance $6,570,000 $0 $2,310,000 $3,815,000 Interest $328,500 $92,400 $190,750 Principal $2,550,000 $2,310,000 $305,000 Total $2,878,500 $2,402,400 $495,750
2022 Balance $4,020,000 $0 $3,510,000 Interest $201,000 $175,500 Principal $2,680,000 $320,000 Total $2,881,000 $495,500
2023 Balance $1,340,000 $3,190,000 Interest $67,000 $159,500 Principal $1,340,000 $340,000 Total $1,407,000 $499,500
2024 Balance $0 $2,850,000 Interest $142,500 Principal $355,000 Total $497,500
2025 Balance $2,495,000 Interest $124,750 Principal $375,000 Total $499,750
2026 Balance $2,120,000 Interest $106,000 Principal $390,000 Total $496,000
2027 Balance $1,730,000 2028 Interest $86,500
Principal $410,000 Total $496,500
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted. November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
41
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Balance
Interest
Principal
Total
2029 Balance
Interest
Principal
Total
2030 Balance
Interest
Principal
Total
2031 Balance
Fiscal Assessment Summary
This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2010111 and ending in FY 2014115. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 2014/15. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,354,835,802 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2010111 to fiscal year 2014115. Sources ofthese funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. Portions of the money needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,354,835,802.
Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $204,821,4 7 5 for the next five fiscal years. This is 15.12% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period.
Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level-of-service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level-of-service standards.
While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
42
$1,320,000
$66,000
$430,000
$496,000
$890,000
$44,500
$455,000
$499,500
$435,000
$21,750
$435,000
$456,750
$0
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the county's level-of-service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available.
Project Applicability
All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level-of-service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist ofthe following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan.
According to Section 163 .3180( 6), F .S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County applies the single family de minim us allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990.
Service Standards
Level-of-service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements.
For each facility, level-of-service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. These measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
43
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
·· .. ··•.•· ..... ····•• .. · .. ,':. · .... >·. /I:~We §;t~.~;~et±~~~·~~¥~r~~~~:9.~~~~:t~r;;~.~.~sM#r~P.~~;f~.~l~i~9;;\l.t.~~~~itt~~;: < • •• :;;;;!';\<:,"' ::m:t::i\· l .• ••··~u~li~f~~w~c~t~~<>I"Y· • .. 1.···. s~~di~cf~clliM{i •. 'W .. r····~···· ·16~~~~r~;;i';y"l····•·•<~· .... !, .. ;·~~-~~~.:~::'·{ .·:,;;:iJ~~{;~r~s~·{~~~f::·;·
Transportation Roadway Volume of cars Peak Season/Peak Affected Roadways accommodated over time Direction/Peak Hour Trips
Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Treatment design Capacity
Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD)
Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment Design Capacity
Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD)
Solid Waste Landfill Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per
Entire County yards) capita per year)
Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand
Entire County population
Stormwater Management Drainage
Volume of water Volume of stormwater
Basin conveyances outfalling for design storm
Education* Public Schools (K- Number of Children Enrolled Students/ Future Service Area
12) accommodated over time Student Generation
*Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District
Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact
area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available,
the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is
to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by
project basis.
Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed
project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the
geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways
are those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. Regardless of size, all projects impact the roadway
on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project are usually
impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak
hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or
more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadways.
For transportation concurrency related facilities, level-of-service standards are applied to all impacted
roadways. Those level-of-service standards range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak
season/peak direction trips.
Demand
Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a
measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level-of-service
for the facility.
Comm~nity Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024 44
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management.
Existing Demand
Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements.
Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity.
Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line.
Committed Demand
Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects.
Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined.
Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
45
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element.
Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated.
Projected Demand
The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is noncommitted/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand.
Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on these lots.
The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand.
Availability of Capacity
Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number oflanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in-the-ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing.
According to Chapter 91-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida Administrative Code, the capacity of existing, in-the-ground facilities will be considered in all cases.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
46
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met:
~ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities:
1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or
2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.]
For parks and recreation facilities:
1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or
2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and
a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
47
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.]
Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is:
1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or
2. The segment's new roadway capacity iffacility expansion for the segment is proposed and if:
a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or
b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies:
1. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion.
n. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or
3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
48
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
4. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220, F .S ., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163 .3180(2)( c), F .S.]
5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair-share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement.
For school facilities:
A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S.
Regulation
No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level-of-service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required.
Monitoring System
To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level-of-service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility.
With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
49
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed.
Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand.
Peak season/ peak Annual count (average) Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Traffic Roadways direction/ peak hour (peak season/peak approved Development Demand) -(Committed
(LOS D) direction/peak hour) Orders (DO) Demand)
Sanitary Treatment Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing
Design flows Existing flows Demand)- (Committed Sewer Plants approved DO's
Demand)
Treatment Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Potable Water Plants
Design flows Existing flows approved DO's
Demand) - (Committed Demand)
Active cell design Volume estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Solid Waste Landfill Active cell volume used Demand)- (Committed capacity approved DO's
Demand)
(Acres per thousand (Acres per thousand
(Total Capacity)- (Existing Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing
population) X (projected Demand)- (Committed
population) population for approved
Demand) DO's)
Drainage Volume of stormwater (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Drainage Volume Existing flows allowed to outfall for Demand)- (Committed conveyances
approved DO's Demand)
Public Permanent Student Annual Enrollment Students estimated from (Total Capacity)- (Existing
Education Schools(K-12) Stations (FISH) Count (FTE) approved residential Demand)- (Committed Development Orders) Demand)
To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
50
Comprehensive Plan
Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand
Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes
IdentifY existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant
Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used
Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand
Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances
Enter data received from other departments into computer
Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand
Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO
Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated
Applicability
Capital Improvements Element
Engineering Annually
MPO Annually
Utilities Annually
Utilities Annually
Planning Annually
Engineering Annually
Planning Ongoing
School District Annually
Planning Ongoing
Planning Ongoing
The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level-ofservice measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
51
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Goal, Objectives and Policies
Goal
It is the goal oflndian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making.
Objectives and Policies
Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities
By 2015, the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth.
Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163 .31 77 (3 )(b) F. S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standards are achieved and maintained.
Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, defer, or elimination will cause the level-of-service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DCA.
Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance.
);> Preservation ofthe health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; );> Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; );> Elimination of existing deficiencies; );> Maintenance of adopted level-of-service standards; );> Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; );> Protection of prior infrastructure investments; );> Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; );> Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands;
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
52
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
~ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction;
· ~ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas;
~ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; ~ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; ~ Reduction of operating costs; ~ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters.
Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub-elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems.
Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level-of-service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements.
Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure.
Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%.
Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $100,000.
Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities.
Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
53
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 1.12: The county hereby adopts the 2010-2011 through 2014-2015 Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work Plan. The Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work Plan will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River County School District Five-Year Facilities Work Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level-of-service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained.
Objective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas
Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane.
Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions.
Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed.
Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level-of-Service Standards
Through 2030, adopted levels-of-service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities.
Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
54
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level-of-service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level-of-service standard.
Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub-Elements.
Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels-of-service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval.
Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability offacilities to maintain adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 3. 5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level-of-service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below:
~ Stormwater Management:
The county hereby adopts the following level-of-service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county:
~ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves.
Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre-development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre-development discharge.
By 2015, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level-of-service standards:
~ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets.
The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
55
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards: By 2007 5-Y ear/24 Hour Storm Event By 2010 10-Y ear/24 Hour Storm Event
The county hereby adopts the following water quality level-of-service standard: ~ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite
discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law.
~ Potable Water
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
~ Countywide level-of-service standard of250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit.
~ Solid Waste
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
~ Countywide level-of-service standard of2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year.
~ Sanitary Sewer
The following level-of-service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development:
~ Countywide level-of-service standard of250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25.
~ Recreation & Open Space
Th_e county adopts the following recreation level-of-service standard: ~ County wide level-of-service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/1 ,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
56
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
~ Transportation
The county adopts traffic circulation level-of-service standards as follows: ~ Level-of-Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all
TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%.
• •
2ih Ave- South County Line to SR 60 43rd Ave- Oslo Road to 16th Street
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
Policy 3.6: The county hereby adopts level-of-service standards for selected public facilities as follows:
~ Correctional Facilities
The county adopts the following correctional facilities level-of-service standard: ~ County wide level-of-service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population
~ Fire/EMS
The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level-of-service standard: ~ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level-of-service standard of .089
Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
~ Law Enforcement
The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level-of-service standard: ~ Unincorporated County level-of-service standard of2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent
plus weighted peak seasonal population
~ Libraries
The county adopts the following Libraries level-of-service standards: ~ County wide level-of-service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
57
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
>- County wide level-of-service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
>- County wide level-of-service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
>- County wide level-of-service standard of0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
~ Public Buildings
The county adopts the following Public Buildings level-of-service standard: >- County wide level-of-service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population.
~ Schools
The county adopts the following Schools level-of-service standard:
Schools (School Service Areas):
~ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high).
~ llransit
The County adopts the following transit level-of-service standard: >- One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes.
Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs
Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 4.1: llhe county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level-of-service standards.
Policy 4.2: llhe county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
58
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Objective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities
Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities.
Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element.
Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ~ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ~ Affordable housing projects ~ New development orders permitting redevelopment ~ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the
infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ~ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation
Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 ofthe Potable Water Sub-Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ~ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi-use
facilities; ~ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ~ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ~ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least-cost
manner; ~ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures.
Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non-enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
59
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources.
Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non-debt revenue.
Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level-of-service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level-of-service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment.
Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: );;> Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within
or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; );;> Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent
availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served
- by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or );;> Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level-of-service for public
facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
60
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring
Implementation
An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution ofthe plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results.
For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure.
To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption ofland development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports.
Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities.
As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level-of-service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level-of-service standards are maintained.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
61
Comprehensive Plan
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.11
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.1
4.2
Maintain the CIP
Follow the CIP
Prioritize capital improvement projects
Implement recommendations
Prioritize and implement programs
Maintain previous commitments
Replacement and renewal of infrastructure
Budget Management
Define capital improvement
Capital Budget Management
Capital Improvements Management
Define costal high hazard area
Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map
Budget management
Maintain LOS standards
Funding mechanisms
Infrastructure replacement strategy
Maintain concurrency management system
Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan SubElements
Maintain adopted LOS standards
Land use decisions
Adopt LOS standards
Impose regulations
Conduct research
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Capital Improvements Element
OMB/PD 2010-2014 No
PD 2010-2014 No
OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No
Appropriate County 2010-2014
Departments/SO Yes
Appropriate County 2010-2014
Departments/SO Yes
BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments/SO No
OMB/SD Ongoing No
PD/OMB Ongoing No
OMB/SD Ongoing No
OMB/SD Ongoing No
DCA Ongoing No
PD Ongoing No
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments Yes
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments Yes
BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments No
PD Ongoing No
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments No
PO Ongoing No
BCC Ongoing No BCC/SD/ Appropriate
Ongoing County Departments
No
Appropriate County Ongoing
Departments Yes
OMB/PD Ongoing No
Indian River County
62
Comprehensive Plan
4.3
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
Work with municipalities
Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can support land use change
Prioritize capital improvements
Extension of facilities and services
Create an efficient capital improvements schedule
Utilize enterprise funds
Finance non-enterprise fund supported projects
Fund the construction of public facilities
Permitting Requirements
Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements
Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements
Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Schedule
BCC =Board of County Commissioners FDOT =Florida Department of Transportation OMB =Office of Management and Budget PWD =Public Works Department
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures
Capital Improvements Element
BCC/SD/Other Local Ongoing No Governments in IRC
BCC Ongoing No
BCC/SD/ Appropriate Ongoing No County Departments
BCC/Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments
Appropriate County Departments/Other Ongoing No
Government Agencies
OMB Ongoing No
OMB Ongoing No
OMB/SD Ongoing Yes
BCC/Appropriate County Ongoing No Departments
BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No
BCC/SD/ Appropriate 2014 No
BCC/PWD/MPO Ongoing No
DCA= Department of Community Affairs MPO =Metropolitan Planning Organization PD = Planning Department SD = School District
To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan.
Table 6.22 identifies each ofthe objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are qua.rititative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
63
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
the level-of-service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives.
The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level-of-service standards will be maintained .
. ····,;·· .. '';('.·!;:·;:.' .. '.··
; ·JilP~~#~ ,. Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 2015
2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2030
3 Level-of-service provided for county services 2030
4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2030
5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2030
While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element.
As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures are the format requirements listed in 91-5.005-(l)(a)(e), F.A.C.
The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports.
Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
64
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level-of-service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments.
The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan.
As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element.
Community Development Department Indian River County 65 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
__________________ ,;::I.;;;;n..;;:dian River County Five Year Schedule oflmprovements
Env. Land Bonds
Park Imoact Fees $
Grant $ $ $
Total Revenue $
:,:•:\; 11171 I •1'. l~iii?.~i:t WJ'!!WJ.)¥l~oi2i13~i~~:ifa ~l(i~F:vJ2oi'37l!fll!:~~;' ,.,.,, .n; ''''''"'''''-''"''''"' I''''''"'"C''.ii:iti'~Y '!'oit,/l':·l::'i<IU 1~/}:l'::
$ - $ - $ -Archie Smith Fish House $ 45,000 $ - $ 45,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -South Prong Preserve $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -NA WCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -NA WCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Grant
$ - $ - $ -NSCA Addition Fencing $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -CFHP Cypress Cottage Restoration $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -Ansin Tract Boardwalk/Pier $ 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -Cypress Bend Community Preserve $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -ORCA South Link Pavilion $ 25,000 $ - $ 25,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ - $ -ORCA Diamond Tract Boardwalk/Pier $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 Env. Land Bonds
$ - $ -Flinn Tract - Access $ 25,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ 100,000 Park Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Flinn Tract - Access $ 25,000 $ 100,000 $ 125,000 Grant
$ - $ -Total Expenditures $ 1,350,000 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,525,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 66 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Services Dist.
Sales Tax
$ $
Total Revenue $
$ r;~'1i?£;~o12/n'~!.£\~~ 11if£tr~:zurazt"llll! :~l~f~if:Yi!211'1~f1'Siii1!•
- $ - $ -Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace $ 88,332 $ - $ 88,332 Emergency Services Dist.
$ - $ -Emergency Svcs. Station 13 -Addition $ 1,137,845 $ 1,486,705 $ - $ 2,624,550 Emergency Services Dist.
$ - $ $ 800 MHz Radio Expansion $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 Optional Sales Tax
$ - $ $ -Emergency Svcs. Station 14- Addition $ $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ Two Med Units and One Fire Engine $ - $ 875,000 $ - $ 875,000 Emergency Services Dist.
$ - $ Two Med Units $ - $ 450,000 $ - $ 450,000 Emergency Services Dist.
$ - $ - $ One Quiint (Fire Apparatus) $ - $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Emergency Services Dist.
$ -Total Expenditures $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 9,237,882
Community Development Department Indian River County 67 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
·I Annual Balance . I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I
$ $
$ $
$ $
Community Development Department Indian River County 68 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ -Evidence Addition $ 558,960 $ 700,000 $ - $ 1,258,960 Optional Sales Tax
$ - $ -Evidence Addition $ - $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Total Expenditures $ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ - $ 2,458,960
Total Revenue
Community Development Department Indian River County 69 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ -State Road 5 10 Fishing Pier $ - $ 1,400,000 $ - $ 1,400,000 Optional Sales Tax
$ -Land for Future Parks $ 1,575,000 $ 1,575,000 $ 1,175,000 $ 1,175,000 $ 5,500,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -West County Regional Park $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -North County Regional Park Restroom $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Gifford Park Restroom/Concession Bldg $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -16th Street Ballfields Restroom $ - $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Round Island Riverside Rpl Boardwalk $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000 Grant
$ - $ -North County Regional Park Lazy River $ - $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Kiwanis Hobart Park Restroom $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Fair~rrounds Camp~rround $ 30,293 $ 200,000 $ - $ 230,293 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -Fairgrounds Campground $ 40,000 $ - $ 40,000 Optional Sales Tax
Total Exoenditures $ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 14,929,300
Community Development Department Indian River County 70 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
I Total Revenue I $ 9,928,533 I $ 1,600,000 I $ 2,285,000 I $ 2,600,000 I $ 3,785,000 I $ 20,198,533 I
~:~EX'P'ena~tnres::~,~:~:~~~~r~~)~~~:~{;~;~%~il~t~?~~:~JfH~~I1~~~§~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~t':?!,~}i!~:81 >~7ii!:!:'i~l'i:"J.<W~'2011111'1,1llf'.'I:'£Yi :,:;:;;::;(:F,£J2Qff/12T:[?#iJlc !iil1itf!tYi:2o112713i~i'il i:i11~ 1':.l:F;Y::zot3tr.:t%i~'' ~~~~F\\:zol4115i't11~;: ~·~~tff~¥:!I~Xbfiil?~·~1~i~f0~~,:
Mise Water Improvements $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,250,000 Impact Fees
Mise Sewer Improvements $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 875,000 Impact Fees $ $
77th West of Kings (Tuscanny Lakes) $ 112,237 $ 112,237 $ - $ 224,474 Impact Fees $ $ -
12WM 17th St. SW from 27th Av to 43rd Av $ $ $ 610,000 $ 610,000 Impact Fees
Design FM and WM on 4th St from 82nd to 98th $ $ -Ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th $ - $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ $ -Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main $ 85,000 $ - $ 85,000 Impact Fees
12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St $ - $ SW _{Madera Isles & Echo Lake $ $ - $ 341,000 $ 341,000 Impact Fees
$ $ -South County Brine Disposal $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 Impact Fees
$ - $ - $ -H_ydromentia Pilot $ 200,000 $ $ 200,000 Grant Funding
58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th $ St $ 50,000 $ 500,000 $ 450,000 $ 232,000 $ 1,232,000 Impact Fees
Svce Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of VB $ $ - $ Gardens $ $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Impact Fees
Install Wells and Piping at North County RO $ - $ - $ -Plant $ 1,948,293 $ $ 1,948,293 Impact Fees
$ - $ Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant $ - $ 640,050 $ 574,358 $ 1,214,408 Impact Fees
$ $ $ -12" W.M. along 66th Av. from 16th to 20th St. $ 229,418 $ - $ 229,418 Impact Fees
16" WM from Kings Tank to College Ln. and $ - $ - $ -Loop to Club ofVero $ 115,450 $ - $ 115,450 Impact Fees
$ - $ -Install6" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 100,000 Impact Fees
Install24" WM along 77th St from 66th Ave to $ $ -70th Ave then North to CR 510 $ $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Impact Fees
N. Reg. Reuse Sto. & Repump Facility with $ - $ $ -Transmission Mains to Barrier Island $ 1,512,490 $ $ 1,512,490 Impact Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 71 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Brine line on 77th to CR510,Bridge conversion & $ - $ - $ 16" line to AlA $ 984,000 $ - I $
Construct 12" WM along 53rd St. E/0 RR, LatH $ - $ - $ Canal $ 745.000 $ - I $
$ - $ Construct 20"WM on 66th Av 45th to 77th St $ - I $
Construct 20" WM on 66th Av from 20th St. to $ 45th St. $ -
Verona Trace Developer's Agreement $ 40,100 $ 40.100 $
Madera Isle/Echo Lake Dev Agreement I $ - $ $ - $
w/Auto Valves I $ 200,000
$ - $ - I I $ $ 35,000
$
Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 72 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Roseland Citizens Convenience Center Expansion $ - $ -and Improvements $ - $ 1,920,000 $ - $ 1,920,000 Assessments & User Fees
Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion $ - $ -and Improvements $ - $ 1,430,000 $ - $ 1,430,000 Assessments & User Fees
Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion and $ - $ - $ -Improvements $ 2,500,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 Assessments & User Fees
Transfer Tractorffransfer Trailers and Roll-off Truck/Containers $ - $ 400,000 $ 280,000 $ 320,000 $ 667,802 $ 1,667,802 Assessments & User Fees
Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I Landfill -Co Disposal (former 33 Acres for $ - $ - $ -C&D) $ 6,450,000 $ - $ 6,450,000 Assessments & User Fees
$ - $ - $ -Retrofit of MRF $ 125,000 $ - $ 125,000 Assessments & User Fees
Partial Closure of Cell I, C&D Landfill, Seg-1, $ - $ - $ -Seg-2 and the Infill $ - $ 6,400,000 $ 6,400,000 Assessments & User Fees
Total Exoenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
$ Stormwater Park $
Community Development Department Indian River County 73 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
PC North - North Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ -
I System) $ - $ 200,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 1,000,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC North- North Relief Canal Treatment System !
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ - $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ -System) $ - $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ 800,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 IRC Utility Dept
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System (Canal Screening System and Algal Turf Scrubber $ - $ -System) $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Grant
$ - $ - $ -Rockridge Surge Protection Project $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Grant
$ - $ - $ -Rockridge Surge Protection Project $ - $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Optional Sales Tax Funds
Vero Lake Estates Phase 11 and liT $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ !00,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 MSTU Assessments $ - $ -
Vero Lake Estates Phase II and lli $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Grant
Total Expenditures $ 969,000 $ 500,000 $ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000 i
$ $ $ $
from FDOT-Gas Tax $ 7
Community Development Department Indian River County 74 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000 Grant $ 8,095,502 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 2,339,000 $ 15,134,502 Traffic Impact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497 Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,311 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,311 Traffic Imoact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532
$ - $ - $ - $ -Develooer Contributions $ 106,952 $ 106,952 Optional Sales Tax $ 18,618,648 $ 3,360,000 $ 3,444,000 $ 3,530,240 $ 3,618,440 $ 32,571,328
$ -Payback from FDOT- Optional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ 14,823,571
$ - $ - $ - $ -Old Traffic Impact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ 1,140,009
$ - $ -Develooer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,600,000 Total Revenue $ 78,143,562 $ 13,522,000 $ 15,735,196 $ 18,620,111 $ 60,336,457 $ 186,357,326
Community Development Department Indian River County 75 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two lanes
Community Development Department
$
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Capital Improvements Element
$
Indian River County 76
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Construction
43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three lanes $ $
Community Development Department Indian River County 77 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
lanes
43rd Avenue/SR 60- 18th Street to 26th Street- 4 lanes
43rd Avenue/SR 60- 18th Street to 26th Street- 4 lanes
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 78
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 79 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles ), Includes side streets & side street bridges
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes (4.0-miles), Includes side streets & side street bridges
Street/82nd Ave. Intersection m;"a";""
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Capital Improvements Element
Indian River County 80
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th
Community Development Department Indian River County 81 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
12th Street Sidewalk-43rd to 27th Ave
$
$
Community Development Department Indian River County 82 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 83 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 84 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$ - $ - $ - $ -Water and Sewer Cash Forward $ 8,528,533 $ 8,528,533 Solid Waste Assessments & User Fees $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802 MSTU Assessments $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000
$ - $ - $ -IRC Utilities Department $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Gas Tax $ 10,297,507 $ 2,232,000 $ 2,255,000 $ 6,237,971 $ 6,237,971 $ 27,260,449
$ - $ - $ -Bonds Proceeds - Gas Tax $ - $ 44,805,166 $ 44,805,166
$ - $ - $ - $ -Payback from FOOT-Gas Tax $ 7,865,009 $ 7,865,009 Interest $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 280,000 $ 1,400,000
Traffic Imoact Fees District I $ 741,497 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 $ 2,991,497
Traffic Impact Fees District II $ 17,764,311 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 22,864,311
Traffic Impact Fees District III $ 8,582,456 $ 350,000 $ 556,196 $ 600,000 $ 705,880 $ 10,794,532 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Developer Contributions $ 106,952 $ 106,952 $ - $ -
Developer Funded Construction $ 600,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,600,000 $ -
Pavback from FOOT- Ootional Sales Tax $ 4,051,671 $ 2,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,771,900 $ 14,823,571 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Old Traffic Imoact Fees $ 1,140,009 $ 1,140,009
TOTAL $ ... 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311
Community Development Department Indian River County 85 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Total Revenues All Categories $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311 Total Expenditures All Catee;ories $ 71,592,309 $ 39,232,424 $ 48,492,450 $ 50,780,758 $ 60,297,370 $ 270,395,311 Difference $36,117,731 -$15,333,719 -$19,227,254 -$13,608,647 $12,051,889 $0
Community Development Department Indian River County 86 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX B: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has adopted its 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This plan prioritizes roadway improvements through a 20 year planning horizon. The table below lists these prioritized roadway improvements. Because the LRTP prioritizes long range roadway projects through 2030, or contains projects funded entirely by non-county sources, it includes some projects that are not in Appendix A, the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
2030 Roadway lm:Qrovement Plan {Table 4.9.3 of the Trans:Qortation Element) On Street From To Base Road Tvoe Future Road Tyue Total Cost
I-95 S. County Line N. County Line 4 Lane Freeway 6 Lane Freeway $109,919,000 rF.J
SR60 98th Ave I-95 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $2,543,842 -rF.J
SIS Total $112,462,842
SR60 I-95 82nd Ave 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,119,4451
SR60 6th Ave Indian River Blvd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $1,864,758 1
"' "0 US I S. County Line Oslo Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $12,064,823 0: Q
~ US I Aviation Blvd Old Dixie Hwy (N) 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $44,372,047 ~ .... us 1 Roseland Rd N. County Line 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $5,255,518 0: ....
rF.J Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $10,000,000
Other State Roads Total $81,676,591
4th St 98th Ave 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $16,262,035
12th St 90th Ave 82ndAve 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,781,786
"' 12th St 43rdAve 27th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $2,854,618 "0 0: Q
$4,041,388 ~ 13th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided ;>, .... 13th St SW 43rdAve 34th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,560,899 = = Q 13th St SW 34th Ave 27th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,359,684 u
13th St SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $1,922,225
17th St SW 66th Ave 58th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $4,019,519
Community Development Department Indian River County 87 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element) On Street From To Base Road Ty[!e Future Road Ty[!e Total Cost 26th St 66th Ave 43rdAve 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $13,006,I54 26th St 82nd Ave 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,850,48I Aviation Blvd 43rdAve U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,537,828 27th Ave S. County Line Oslo Rd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $9,560,909 27th Ave OsloRd S.R. 60 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $12,330,699 43rdAve S County Line OsloRd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $I2,974,563 43rdAve OsloRd 8th St 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $8,3Il,058 53rd St 82ndAve 66th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $9,599,620
58th Ave S County
OsloRd 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $1I,850,325 Line/Koblegard Rd
66th Ave S County Line OsloRd 00 2 Lane Undivided $8,562,423 66th Ave OsloRd 4th St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $8,887,466 66th Ave 4th St SR60 2 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided $8,853,565 66th Ave SR60 C.R. 5IO 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,173,489 82ndAve S County Line OsloRd 00 2 Lane Undivided $7,302,941 82nd Ave 26th St C.R. 510 00 2 Lane Undivided $28,I74,I65 Laconia St C.R. 510 C.R.5I2 00 2 Lane Undivided $2,679,879 Aviation Blvd Ext U.S. I Indian River Blvd 00 4 Lane Divided $14,387,77I C.R. 510 C.R. 512 U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $36,369,280 C.R. 510 U.S. I ICWW 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,718,539 C.R. 512 Fellsmere City Limits I-95 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $I9,192,929 C.R. 512 I-95 C.R. 5IO 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $13,3I7,010 C.R. 512 C.R. 5IO Roseland Rd 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $6,674,370 8th St 82ndAve 74th Ave 00 2 Lane Undivided $3,955,196 Indian River Blvd Royal Palm 37th St 4 Lane Divided 6 Lane Divided $8,678,255 OsloRd I-95 58th Ave 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $I9,484,669 Roseland Rd C.R. 5I2 U.S. I 2 Lane Undivided 2 Lane Divided $I2,847,897 Schumann Dr C.R. 510 Barber St 2 Lane Undivided 4 Lane Divided $3,974,335
-
Community Development Department Indian River County 88 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2030 Roadwav Improvement Plan (Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element) On Street l,_.,rom l:ro IBase Road Ty[!e IFuture Road Ty[!e Total Cost
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year) $10,000,000
County Roads Total $381,057,970 Cll Barber St !schumann Dr lu.s. 1 I 2 Lane Undivided I 2 Lane Divided $3,621,587 "0 ~ Barber St lc.R. 512 !schumann Dr I 2 Lane Undivided I 2 Lane Divided $7,596,306 0 a City Roads Total $11,217,893
Total $576,415,296 Source: Indian River County MPO
F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS\CIE\20I0\20IO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT- DRAFT 10-26-10 CLEAN.DOC
Community Development Department Indian River County 89 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX C: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE
Summary of Capital Improvement Program
Project
New Construction New Construction and Additions
Fellsmere Cafe. Expan & asrm Addn
Sebastian River HS Addttion
Storm Grove Middle School
SupporfServices Complex
Traffic Improvement Projects
Subtotal New .Construction and Additions
Subtotal New Ccmstruction
Comprehensive Needs Modernizations & Replacements
Dodgertown ·cafeteria & HVAC Replacement
DodgertoiNn School HVAC
Osceola Magnet Replacement
VBHS Freshman Learning ctr Renov,
liero Beach El Replacemeni
Vero Beach Hi!tl School Restoration
Wabasso School Renovation
.Subtotal Modernizations & Replacements
Subtotal Comprehensive Needs
other Items Capital Maintenance Gapital Maintenance (buyback)
Gapital Maintenani:e/Hith & Life Safety
HVACRepair arid Replace
Community Development Department Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Total
9,000,000
13,000,000
45,048,476
13,000,000
820;000
80,868,476
80,868,476
3,512,500
2,750,000
20,000,000
3,150,000
20,174,852
54,217,750
1,885,043
105,690,145
105,690,145
33,003,030
21,984;256
1,800,000
Prior to FY2011- FY 2011 FY201~' 2011
0 9,000,000 9,000,000
13,000,000
45,048,476
8,000,000 5,0oo,ooo 5,000,000
0 820,000 820,000
66,0.48;476 14,820,000 14,820,000
66,048,476 14,82o.ooo 1 14;82o,ooo
3,512,500
2,750,0.()0 2,750,000
0 20,000,()0Q
2,150,000 1.ooo,b0o 1,000,000
5,174,852 15,000,000 15,000,000
54,217,750
1,885,043
66,940,145 ~8.7&0,000 18,750,000
66,940,145 38;75MO~ 18,750,000
I I I I
15,632,180
15,084,256
1,800,000
17,370,8~0 3,474;170
6.,909,000 1,500,000
FY 2012
20,000,000
20,000,000
20,000,000
3,474,170
900,000
Indian River County Public Schools
Indian River County 90
FY 2013
3,474,170
1,400,000
FY 2014
3,474,170
1,500,000
FY 2015
3,474,170
1,600,000
Ill
Comprehensive Plan
Relocatables
Relocatable le~sing
Relocatable Renovation
Subtotal Relocatables Educational Technology
District Technology
Subtotal Educational Technolo~ Furniture & Equipment F,F&E Buyback
School BusesNehicles
Subtotal Furniture & Equipment Reserves and Contingencies
Other Projects District Wide~
Subtotal Reserves and C.ontin encies
Subtotal otherHems
Total Projects
Total Prior to
2011
Capital Improvements Element
FY2011· FY20t5
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
ss, 787;286 1 32,516,436 24,270,850 4;974,170 4,374,170 4,874,170
24,239,1581 19,464,158 1,476,450 1,476,450
4,775,000 775,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
25.715,6081 20.940.608 4.775.000 775.000 1.000.000 1.000.000
1 10,833,802 7,483,802 3,350,000 1,350,000 500,000 500,000 10,833,802 7,483;802 3,350,000 1,350,000 500,000 500,000
I 5,802,962 4,302,962 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
13;200,330 7,725,330 5,475,000 325,000 1,500,000 650,000 19,003,292 12,028,292 6,975,000 625;000 1,800,000 950,000
I 18,866,409[ 4,126,172 14,740,237 1,557,403 1,470,949 3,023,591 18,866,409 4,.126,172 14;740,23[ 1,557,403 1,470,949 3,023,591
131,206,397 77,095,310 54;111,087' 9,281,573 9,145,119 10,347,761
I 107;681;0~7 42,851,573 29,145,119 10,347,761
FY 2014 4,974,170
1,000,000
1.000.000 ~ .
500,000
500,000
300,000
1,500,000
1,800,000
4,035,969
4,035,96.9
12,310,139
12,310,139
FY 2015 5,074,170
1,000,000
1.000.000 . ~ . ~
500,000
500,000
300,000
1,500,000.
1,800,000
4,652,325
4,652,325
13;026,495
13,026;495
Indian River C()Uilty Public Schools IV
Community Development Department Indian River County 91 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED REVENUE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010 • 2011 Work Plan
Edu~ational District Technology $1,350,000 $500,00.0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3,350,000
Local Expenditure Totals: $20, 685;847 $22,066,479 $22,564,665 $24;282,929 $24,528,282 $114;128;202
Revenue
1.50 Mill Revenue Source
Schedule ofEstimated Capital Outlay Revenue·from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative districtfacilitieswork program. All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans. etc. Districts cannot use 1.~Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenance/repair projects. (1 011.71 (5). F.S.)
1.50 1.50
$25,501,561 $27,561,085 $131,980,814
370 $21;858,481 $23,623,787 $'112,354,983
$3,643,080 $3,826;706 $3;937;298 $1
PECO Revenue Source
The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance" will be subtracted from funds available.for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. · · ·
CO & OS Revenue Source
Revenue fi'om Capita:! Outlay and Debt Service funds.
Fair Share. Revenue Source
Page 4of18 91912010 10:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 92 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 201 0 - 2011 Work Plan
All legally binding commitments for proportionate fair-share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5-year district work program.
Nothing reported for this section.
Sales Surtax Referendum
Specific information about any referendum for a 1-cent or Y,.-cerit surtax referendum during the previous year.
Old tho school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year 2009-20107 No
Additional Revenue Source
My additional revenue sources
$0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$30~000 $30,000 $30,000
$0 $0 $0
$0 $9
$20,000;000 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0 so
$0 $0 $0
$0
Private donations $0
Cir not~feir- $0
$109;293 $114,801 $114,801 $558,458
Page 5 of 18 9/91201010:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 93 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
IND.IAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds from 1 cent or 1/2 cent $ales Surtax
Total. Fund Balance Carried Forward
General Capital Outlay Obligated'Fund Balance.Carried. Forward From Total Fund Balance Carried Forward
special Facilities Construction.Account
One Cent -1i2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt Service From Total Fund Balance Carried Forward
Capital Outlay Projects Funds Balance Carried Forward From Total Fund Balance Carried Forward
RAN PROCEEDS
Subtotal
Total ReVenue Summary
PECO and 1.5 Mill Main! and.Other 1.5 Mill Expenditures
PECO Maintenance Revenue
PECO New Construction Revenue
Other/Additional
Project Schedules
Capacity Project Schedules
$0
$12,452,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000,000
$32,589,986
Capital Improvements Element
2010 • 2011 Work Plan
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $12,452,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 :io $5,900,000
$20,139,293 $141,577 S144,1io1 $144,801 $53,160;458
($22,066,479)
$472,019
$0
$20, 139,293
$20,207;998
A schedule ofcapital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms· for the projected student.enrOIIment in K-12 programs.
Page 6 of18 9/9/2010 10:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 94 Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITIZEN COURTESY INFORMATION LIST
Local Government: Indian River County
Hearing Date: __ 1""""1"--'/0=2"--"/1=0 __
Type of Hearing: Board of County Commissioners Adoption Public Hearing
DCA Amendment Number: \0 ~~IE!
Amendment Identification:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs
NAME ADDRESS, CITY, TELEPHONE TYPE OF STATE, ZIP NUMBER COMMENT
Written Spoken Please ClcarJv Print Your Name and Address Information comment comment Be!m.v
_/en {}ill£.,__ J ve f'IJLA d r YV' J 1_ I G 93 L---/:. 0 ;3 {))0 ,s~; .2 r- o? c, 5-b?
OL4e/c JV--A rv ;;t;N'~/ ?tt?<-LJ i3~f FC:.
.f'fAA[v ~~\ 3 .4-y s I v--3 't 0 £, IA.Ji/l..v .!lrl y 1,1>/, :.rx-r--- do v y...
v. ~I s~~o.
;2, 1).:Jofi!J6t:J ~ (j~--5Cf7#e,i, S C.V / )o --l) ~03 L-Vt/!,20 !JIP~Lll, I 17: 32f 6k
f?()J/~Kj) /4 ::J,{: JS_L P.i.S)("/ "52: 7/ '-} 2, ~~ v /1 tf/'J/;1 6.~<P7£ag_ )I J ¥'); 2.
fet,y t,MM/il 111P /))J5~(ji/~C::U/
t/ v /.; .3:J'l68" ~ 7 <;--- '2.S't79
Page 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CITIZEN COURTESY INFORMATION LIST
NAME ADDRESS, CITY, TELEPHONE TYPE OF STATE, ZIP NUMBER COMMENT
Written Spoken Please Clearlv Print Your Name and Address Information comment comment Below
Page 2
top related