industry break-out building construction seoul© astm international seoul south korea industry...
Post on 30-Jan-2021
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
© ASTM International
Seoul
South Korea
Industry
Workshop
Break-Out
Building
Construction
21 October
2014
-
© ASTM International
Sustainable Construction Case Study: Copper and the Phoenix
Health Sciences Education Building Seoul, South Korea, 21 October 2014
Andy Kireta Jr.
Vice President
Copper Development Association Inc
www.astm.org
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 3
North American “Green Building” Landscape
USGBC
LEED® Green
Globes Living
Building
Challenge NAHB
National
Green
Building
Standard International
Green
Construction
Code
Energy Star
Water Sense
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 4
“Green Building” Goals
Established by prescription
Rating schemes that award “points” based on building inputs, technologies
Score sheet approach
i.e. LEED for New Construction v2009
Points for inputs and design considerations in 7 areas
Established by performance
Heavily focused on life-cycle analysis of
buildings as holistic systems
i.e. LEED v4 (released in 2014)
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 5
“Green Building” v. Sustainable Construction
Facts instead of Claims
“Green Building” has devolved into a
pursuit of points, marketing claims and
rating schemes that have lost sight of
the goal of sustainable construction –
buildings that:
last longer,
operate more efficiently,
with less input,
and less environmental impact
during the building’s construction and
throughout its lifetime.
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 6
Why?
Sustainable Buildings offer benefits
Environmental benefits
Less energy usage/renewable energy usage
Lower CO2 emissions
Less water usage/better water maintenance
Lower impact
Financial benefits
Lower rents/higher occupancy
Tax benefits
Increased resale value
Social benefits
Health gains
Productivity improvement
Reputational benefits
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 7
Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 8
Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Energy & Atmosphere
Embed Kireta Clip 1
here; start on click
https://www.dropbox.com/s/14fc0u0ub7brv
om/Kireta%20Clip%201.mp4?dl=0
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 9
Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Innovation in Design
Embed Kireta Clip 2
here; start on click
https://www.dropbox.com/s/g97az04o1u1y
tnf/Kireta%20Clip%202.mp4?dl=0
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 10
Case Study: Phoenix Health Sciences Education Building: Materials & Resources
Embed Kireta Clip 3
here: start on click
https://www.dropbox.com/s/yh7rawkwt99d
hvs/Kireta%20Clip%203.mp4?dl=0
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 11
Materials Content Driven by Standards
Copper Sheet
ASTM B370
Ice & Water
Shield
ASTM D1970,
D3767, D412,
D903, E96, D46,
E108
Aluminum Z-purlins
ASTM B308
Mineral Wool Rigid
Insulation Board
ASTM C726
-
© ASTM International 10 October 2014 Title of Presentation 12
Environmental Performance Claims driven by Standards
Page 8 of 11
Copper sheet and strip for building construction
According to ISO 14025
Life Cycle Assessment: Results
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
CML 2001 (Nov 2010)
Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits
Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D
GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E+00 2.08E-03 -2.54E-01
ODP kg CFC-11 eq 3.85E-08 1.61E-12 -6.52E-09
AP kg SO2 eq 3.93E-02 1.28E-05 -6.43E-03
EP kg PO43-
eq 1.13E-03 1.75E-06 -1.12E-04
POCP kg C2H4 eq 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.67E+00
ADPE kg Sb eq 1.56E-04 7.52E-10 -2.24E-05
ADPF MJ 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.67E+00
TRACI 2.1 Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits
Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D
GWP kg CO2 eq 3.24E+00 2.08E-03 -2.54E-01
ODP kg CFC-11 eq 4.21E-08 1.71E-12 -7.15E-09
AP kg SO2 eq 3.50E-02 1.39E-05 -5.58E-03
EP kg N eq 5.79E-04 1.21E-06 -5.98E-05
SP kg O3 eq 1.92E-01 2.85E-04 -1.86E-02
RESOURCE USE Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits
Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D
PERE [MJ] 2.87E+00 2.18E-03 -3.50E-01
PERM [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
PERT [MJ] 2.87E+00 2.18E-03 -3.50E-01
PENRE [MJ] 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.68E+00
PENRM [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
PENRT [MJ] 3.85E+01 2.93E-02 -2.68E+00
SM [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
RSF [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
NRSF [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
FW [m³] 2.18E+00 -5.52E-02 3.98E-01
OUTPUT FLOWS AND WASTE CATEGORIES Manufacturing End-of-Life Credits
Parameter Unit A1-A3 C4 D
HWD [kg] 4.20E-02 0.00E+00 -9.02E-03
NHWD [kg] 9.32E+01 1.55E-01 -1.99E+01
RWD [kg] 1.35E-03 5.20E-07 -6.41E-05
CRU [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
MFR [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.00E-02
MER [kg] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
EEE [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
EET [MJ] 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
Glossary
Environmental Impacts
GWP Global warming potential
ODP Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer
AP Acidification potential of land and water
EP Eutrophication potential
POCP Formation potential of tropospheric ozone photochemical
oxidants
ADPE Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources
ADPF Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources
FF Fossil fuel consumption
Resource Use
PERE Use of renewable primary energy excluding renewable
primary energy resources used as raw materials
PERM Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw
materials
PERT Total use of renewable primary energy resources
PENRE Use of non-renewable primary energy excluding non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw
materials
PENRM Use of non-renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials
PENRT Total use of non-renewable primary energy resources
SM Use of secondary material
RSF Use of renewable secondary fuels
NRSF Use of non-renewable secondary fuels
FW Use of net fresh water
Output Flows and Waste Categories
HWD Hazardous waste disposed
NHWD Non-hazardous waste disposed
RWD Radioactive waste disposed
CRU Components for re-use
MFR Materials for recycling
MER Materials for energy recovery
EE Exported energy per energy carrier
Page 9 of 11
Copper sheet and strip for building construction
According to ISO 14025
Life Cycle Assessment: Interpretation
For almost all assessed impact categories, the use of primary copper has the greatest contribution to the overall
impact. However, the recycling of copper sheet at the end of life has the potential to recover a large proportion of this impact.
The use of fossil energy sources has a strong correlation with the GWP. These categories therefore have a similar profile.
Impact Assessment Method: TRACI 2.1
Impact Category Impact Units
Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq
Acidification potential 2.94E-02 kg SO2 eq
Eutrophication potential 5.20E-04 kg N eq
Ozone depletion potential 3.50E-08 kg CFC-11 eq
Smog potential 1.74E-01 kg O3 eq
Impact Assessment Method: CML 2001 – Nov 2010
Impact Category Impact Units
Global warming potential 2.99E+00 kg CO2 eq
Acidification potential 3.29E-02 kg SO2 eq
Eutrophication potential 1.02E-03 kg PO43-
eq
Ozone depletion potential 3.20E-08 kg CFC-11 eq
Photochemical ozone creation potential 3.59E-04
kg C2H4 eq
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
AP
EP
GWP
ODP
SP
ADP(elem
)
ADP(fossil)
AP
EP
GWP
ODP
POCP
Rela
veIm
pact
D
C4
A1-A3
TRACI2.1 CML2001-Nov2010
-
© ASTM International
Thank you
www.astm.org
top related