inference for a single population proportion (p)

Post on 28-Dec-2015

221 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p)

Sampling Distribution of the Sample Proportion

wherewhere n =n = sample size and sample size and x =x = the observed number of the observed number of “successes” in the sample“successes” in the sample

pp == estimate of population proportionestimate of population proportion pp== proportion of sample having a proportion of sample having a specified attributespecified attribute

==

xx

nn

sample tosample from variesand random is p̂

Sample Proportion

Sampling Distribution of the Sample ProportionThe histograms below show the estimated sampling distribution of the sample proportion based upon 1000 samples of the drawn for the given sample size (n).

For larger samples, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion is approximately normal.

Sampling Distribution of the Sample Proportion

Sampling Distribution of p̂

1. Provided n is “sufficiently large”, the sampling distribution is normal, generally

2. The mean of the sampling distribution is p = true population proportion

3. Standard deviation of the sampling distribution or the standard error of sample proportion is given by:

10)1( and 10 ** pnnp

n

pppSE

)1()ˆ(

* 5 is also used.

n

pppNp

)1(,~ˆ :Notation

Implications for Inference(n “large”)

CI for Population Proportion (p)

Test Statistic (Ho: p = po)

n

)p̂-(1p̂ value)-z(ˆ p

z-values from standard normal90% = 1.64595% = 1.96099% = 2.578

normal standard~)1(

ˆ

n

pp

ppz

oo

o

Effect Size

)1(

|ˆ|

oo

o

pp

ppd

Hypothesis Testing for a Population Proportion (p)

Null Hypothesis Ho: p = po

Alternative Hypotheses p-value

(upper-tailed)

z

P-value

(lower-tailed)

z

P-value

Hypothesis Testing for a Population Proportion (p)

Null Hypothesis Ho: p = po

Alternative Hypotheses p-value

(two-tailed)

z- z

For two-tailed tests in general it is preferable to simply construct a confidence interval for the parameter of interest and see if the hypothesized value under the null hypothesis is contained in the CI. If it is we fail to reject Ho and if it is not then we reject Ho.

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer

• Historically, one in five kidney cancer patients survive 5 years past diagnosis, i.e. 20%.

• An oncologist using an experimental therapy treats n = 40 kidney cancer patients and 16 of them survive at least 5 years.

• Is there evidence that patients receiving the experimental therapy have a higher 5-year survival rate?

Step 1: Formulate Hypotheses

p = the proportion of kidney cancer patients receiving the experimental therapy that survive at least 5 years.

better) is rate survival yr.-(5 20.:

better)not is rate survival yr.-(5 20.:

pH

pH

A

o

Step 2: Determine test criteriaChoose may want to consider smaller?)Use large sample test ? Definitely questionable as we have…

np = (40)(.20) = 8 > 5 and n(1-p) = (40)(.80) = 32 > 5

Step 3: Collect data and compute test statistic

16.3

40)20.1(20.

20.40.

)1(

ˆz

rate survival yr.-5 40% aor 40.40

16ˆ

n

pp

pp

p

oo

o

The observed 5-yr. survival rate for kidney cancer patients undergoing the experimental therapy is 3.16 standard errors above the historical rate!

Step 4: Compute p-value

z = 3.16

P-value = .0008

Step 5: Make Decision and Interpret

We have very strong evidence to suggest the 5-year survival rate for kidney cancer patients undergoing the experimental therapy is greater than the current 5-yr. survival rate of 20% (p = .0008).

It is highly unlikely we would obtain a 40% 5-yr. survival rate in our sample, if in fact the 5-yr. survival rate for the population of patients treated with the experimental therapy was truly 20%.

Step 6: Quantify significant results

55%) , (25%or )55,.25(.

15.40.

)077)(.96.1(40.40

)60)(.40(.96.140.

)ˆ1(ˆ96.1ˆ

n

ppp

Confidence Interval

Effect Size

large. as twiceis

therapyalexperiment theusing rate success the

given surprisingnot isch effect whi largeA very

25.1)80)(.20(.

|20.40.|

d

Power Calculation

Baseline proportion is the proportion under the null hypothesis (.20 or 20% here)

Difference to detect is the absolute difference between p under alternative and p under null (i.e., .40 - .20 = .20)

Power is calculated once sample size and difference information is entered (here, Power = .935).

For power use software

Power Curve for n = 40 and po = .20

For a difference of .20Power = .935 as seen on previous slide

Sample Size and CI’s for p

• Suppose we wish to estimate p using a 95% CI and have a margin of error of 3%. What sample size do we need to use?

• Recall the CI for p is given by:

n

)p̂-(1p̂ value)-z(ˆ p

MARGIN OF ERROR (E)

Sample Size and CI’s for p

• Here for a 95% CI we want E = .03 or 3%

• After some wonderful algebraic manipulation

03.n

)p̂-(1p̂96.1 E

2

2 )ˆ1(ˆ96.1

E

ppn

Oh, oh! We don’t know p-hat !!

1. “Guesstimate”

2. Use p-hat from pilot or prior study.

3. Largest n we would ever need comes when p-hat = .50.

Sample Size and CI’s for p

1. Informed approach

2. Conservative approach (i.e. worst case scenario)

knowledgeprior from ˆ )ˆ1(ˆ96.1

2

2

pE

ppn

.50 ˆ uses 4

96.12

2

pE

nStandard normal values90% = 1.64595% = 1.96099% = 2.578

Sample Size and CI’s for p• Original Question: Suppose we wish to estimate p

using a 95% CI and have a margin of error of 3%. What sample size do we need to use?

• Assume that we estimate the 5 yr. survival rate for a new kidney cancer therapy, and we know historical that it this survival rate is around 20%.

• Using informed approach

subjects 68395.68203.

)80)(.20(.96.1)ˆ1(ˆ96.12

2

2

2

nE

ppn

Sample Size and CI’s for p• Original Question: Suppose we wish to estimate p

using a 95% CI and have a margin of error of 3%. What sample size do we need to use?

• Assume that we estimate the 5 yr. survival rate for a new kidney cancer therapy, and we know historical that it this survival rate is around 20%.

• Using conservative approach

subjects 10681.1067)03(.4

96.1

4

96.12

2

2

2

nE

n

This is why in media polls you they usually report a sampling error of + 3% and that the poll was based on a sample of n = 1000 individuals.

Small Sample Inference for p: Binomial Exact Test

• When the sample size is “small” the sampling distribution cannot be approximated by a standard normal distribution.

• However, regardless of sample size the EXACT sampling distribution of the number of “successes” in n independent trials ALWAYS has a Binomial Distribution.

• Thus if we knew more about the binomial distribution we could use it to find p-values when conducting a hypothesis test and also when constructing confidence intervals for the pop. proportion p.

Binomial Probability DistributionA binomial random variable X is defined to the number

of “successes” in n independent trials where the P(“success”) = p is constant.

Notation: X ~ BIN(n,p)

In the definition above notice the following conditions need to be satisfied for a binomial experiment:

1. There is a fixed number of n trials carried out.2. The outcome of a given trial is either a “success”

or “failure”.3. The probability of success (p) remains constant

from trial to trial. 4. The trials are independent, the outcome of a trial is

not affected by the outcome of any other trial.

Binomial Distribution

• If X ~ BIN(n, p), then

• where

.,...,1,0 )1()!(!

! )1()( nxpp

xnx

npp

x

nxXP xnxxnx

psuccessP

nx

nnnn

)"("

trials.in successes""

obtain to waysofnumber the x"choosen " x

n

1 1! and 1 0! also ,1...)2()1(!

Binomial Distribution

• If X ~ BIN(n, p), then

• E.g. when n = 3 and p = .50 there are 8 possible equally likely outcomes (e.g. flipping a coin)

SSS SSF SFS FSS SFF FSF FFS FFF

X=3 X=2 X=2 X=2 X=1 X=1 X=1 X=0

P(X=3)=1/8, P(X=2)=3/8, P(X=1)=3/8, P(X=0)=1/8• Now let’s use binomial probability formula instead…

.,...,1,0 )1()!(!

! )1()( nxpp

xnx

npp

x

nxXP xnxxnx

Binomial Distribution

• If X ~ BIN(n, p), then

• E.g. when n = 3, p = .50 find P(X = 2)

.,...,1,0 )1()!(!

! )1()( nxpp

xnx

npp

x

nxXP xnxxnx

83or 375.)5)(.5(.3)5(.5.

2

3)2(

ways31)12(

123

!1 !2

!3

)!23(!2

!3

2

3

12232

XP

SSF

SFS

FSS

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer

• In our example we had n = 40 patients and if we assume the experimental therapy is no better than current treatments then probability of 5-year survival is p = .20.

• Thus the number of patients in our study surviving at least 5 years has a binomial distribution, i.e. X ~ BIN(40,.20).

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer • X ~ BIN(40,.20), find the probability that exactly 16

patients survive at least 5 years.

• This requires some calculator gymnastics and some scratchwork! Also, keep in mind for a p-value we need to find the probability of having 16 or more patients surviving at least 5 yrs.

• Remember p-value is defined as evidence as extreme or more extreme.

001945.80.20.16

40)16( 2416

XP

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer

• So we actually need to find:

p-value = P(X = 16) + P(X = 17) + … + P(X = 40)

+

+

EXACT p-value = .002936 YIPES!

001945.80.20.16

40)16( 2416

XP

000686.80.20.17

40)17( 2317

XP

080.20.40

40)40( 040

XP

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer

• X ~ BIN(40,.20), find the probability that 16 or more patients survive at least 5 years.

• USE COMPUTER!• Binomial Exact Test p-value calculator in JMP

Enter n = sample sizex = observed # of “successes”po = proportion under Ho

p-values are computed automatically for all three possible alternatives

Example: Treatment of Kidney Cancer

• X ~ BIN(40,.20), find the probability that 16 or more patients survive at least 5 years.

• USE COMPUTER!• Binomial Exact Test p-value calculator in JMP

Exact p-value = .0029362Contrasting this EXACT p-value (p = .0029) to the one calculated earlier using the normal approximation (p = .0008) we see a fairly substantial difference! MORAL: USE EXACT WHEN n is SMALL !!!

Exact CI for p using the binomial distribution

• Find LCL and UCL for p by finding probabilities that meet the following requirements:

P(X > x|p = LCL) = and

P(X < x|p = UCL) =

• Use computer to find these probabilities.

e.g. for 95% confidence

Exact CI for p using the binomial distribution

• Find a 95% CI for p for the kidney cancer study

For the lower confidence limit we find LCL = .248 or .249

Exact CI for p using the binomial distribution

• Find a 95% CI for p for the kidney cancer study

For the upper confidence limit we find UCL = .566 or .567

Therefore based on an EXACT 95% confidence interval we estimate that the success rate of the experimental therapy is between 24.8% and 56.7%.

Summary of Inference for a Single Population Proportion (p)

• When n is “large” use large sample methods based on the sampling distribution being approximately normal. (Easy)

• When n is “small” use exact methods based on the binomial distribution, which requires specific software or tables. (Hard)

• Exact methods can always be used!• In general, precise estimates of a population

proportion requires a large samples size, e.g. media polls which typically use n = 1,000.

top related