intelligent transportation systems (its)

Post on 30-Dec-2015

45 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). CEE 320 Anne Goodchild. Obama Opposed gas tax holiday Invest in developing alternative energy rather than drilling offshore Federal government should take lead on national infrastructure development Invest in “smart growth” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008Intelligent Transportation Systems

(ITS)

CEE 320Anne Goodchild

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Both oppose increasing the gas tax

• Obama• Opposed gas tax holiday• Invest in developing

alternative energy rather than drilling offshore

• Federal government should take lead on national infrastructure development

• Invest in “smart growth”• Infrastructure reinvestment

bank • $150 billion for clean energy

over 10 years• Modernize infrastructure –

ASCE D rating, 3 trillion unmet needs

• McCain• Supported gas tax holiday• Exploit remaining US oil

deposits• Small federal role in

transportation, strong input from state and local governments

• State’s should get back their investment in the highway trust fund

• $.3 billion for battery technology

• Modernize infrastructure

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Outline

• Need for traffic solutions• Improving technology

– Improved wireless networks– Low energy requirements– Improved management systems– Increased appetite for technology

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Road Use Growth

From the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 2003

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Changes in Congested Peak-Period Travel

Change in Congested Peak-Period Travel (1982-2000)

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1982 1990 1994 2000

Year

Per

cent

of

Pea

k-P

erio

d T

rave

l in

Con

gest

ion

Los Angeles, CA

Seattle-Everett, WA

Boston, MA

Denver, CO

New York, NY-Northeastern, NJ

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Problems Caused by Congestion

• Increased…– Travel time– Travel cost– Air pollution– Accident risk– …..

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Hig

hw

ay C

apac

ity

Full Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H

igh

way

Cap

acit

y

Remaining Effective Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

Incidents can comprise 50% of peak period congestion.1 min delay in clearance = 4 to 5 min of traffic backup.

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler

Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H

igh

way

Cap

acit

y

Remaining Effective Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

Caltrans reports 20% of freeway centerline miles are under construction.

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler

Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H

igh

way

Cap

acit

y

Remaining Effective Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity

75% of NHS is subject to snow & 100% is subject to rain.

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler

Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H

igh

way

Cap

acit

y

Remaining Effective Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity

Special events and disasters further restrict capacity

Periodic events can cause further restrict capacity.

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler

Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H

igh

way

Cap

acit

y

Remaining Effective Capacity

How Much Capacity Is There?

Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity

Special events and disasters further restrict capacity

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Options

• Construct new roads– Covered in geometric design– Not likely to happen on a large scale

• Reduce Traffic– Travel demand management– Alternative transportation

• Increase existing infrastructure capacity– Often exploits the intelligent transportation

systems (ITS)

All of these are required, and there will (probably) still be congestion

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Construction Is Part of the Solution

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Option 1: Construction

Highway Construction Cost Sampling

Project Total Cost Lane-Miles

Cost per

Lane-Mile

Route 3, North Boston $395.0 million 42 $9.4 million

I-4 Tampa to Orlando $403.0 million 73 $5.5 million

I-5 Oregon $30.0 million 5.16 $5.8 million

US 26 Sunset Hwy. Oregon $10.6 million 2.24 $4.8 million

US 12 near Walla Walla River $36.4 million 25 $1.5 million

US 101 on Olympic Peninsula $1.8 million 0.8 $2.2 million

General ConclusionHighways cost $1 to $10 million per lane-mile to build

San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway: Removed 1991

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Option 2: Reduce Traffic or Spread Demand

• Make the trip using another mode– Extra capacity

• Don’t make the trip– Pricing– Controls

• Make the trip at adifferent time– Pricing– Controls

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Sounder Commuter Rail

• Tacoma-Seattle– Began 2000– 4 trips each way daily

• Everett-Seattle– Began 2003– 2 trips each way daily

New Slide

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008New Slide

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway Co. (1907)

Asahel Curtis Photo Company Collection, University of Washington Digital Collection

New Slide

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Sounder vs. Interurban

Sounder Interurban

Tacoma service 2000 – present 1902 – 1928

Everett service 2003 – present 1910 – 1939

One-way trip time 52 – 58 minutes 70 – 100 minutes

Daily departures from Seattle 6 37

Number of stops 9 30

Top speed 80 mph 60 mph

One-way fare $3.00-$4.00 $0.60inflation adjusted: $12.00

Hauled freight? No Yes

Owner Sound Transit Puget Sound Energy

New Slide

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Option 2: Alternative Transport

SkyTran: Personal MagLev Transporter

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Option 3: Increase Existing Infrastructure Capacity

• An alternative to expensive new highway construction is the implementation of strategies that promote more efficient utilization of transportation infrastructures.

• Simple:– More people per vehicle (carpool, bus)– Smaller vehicles (motorcycles)– Narrow lanes

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Option 3: Increase Existing Infrastructure Capacity

• More complex:– Vehicle automation – Variable speed limits– Variable use facilities– Traffic monitoring– Ramp meters

• Many rely on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), which aims to reduce travel time, ease delay and congestion, improve safety, and reduce pollutant emissions

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Five Primary Functional Areas of ITS

• Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS)– Managing incidents

• Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)– Giving users information about the system

• Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO)– Simplifies regulations (with benefits)

• Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS)– Reduce obstacles to use, give priority to vehicles

• Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS)– Safer, more efficient driving

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Advanced Traffic Management Systems

Photo from the Human-Computer Interaction Lab: University of Maryland

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

ATMS: Snoqualmie Pass

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Advanced Traveler Information Systems

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

ATIS: trafficgauge

htt

p:/

/ww

w.t

raffi

cgau

ge.c

om

/in

dex.h

tml

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

WAP Traffic

www.wiresoft.net/traffic/seattle

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

ATIS: Traffic Cameras

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Commercial Vehicle Operations

• Apply, pay for and receive permits, registrations, and licenses electronically

• Share of common trucking data across agencies • Exchange information electronically with

roadside enforcement personnel• Electronic “screening” of trucks for safety or

other regulatory violations• Share information across state lines and with

Federal information systems

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

CVO: Weigh-In-Motion System

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Advanced Public Transportation Systems

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

An Example of APTS

http://busview.its.washington.edu/busview_launch.jsp?maps=gif

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

APTS: Bus Signal Priority

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

APTS: Smart Cards

• No need for change• Interoperable with

other transit agencies• Transit agency can

track passengers for better system design and cost control

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Advanced Vehicle Control Systems

Intelligent Cruise Control (ICC)

System

Lexus LS430/460, ES-350Benz S-Class, E55, AMG, CLS, SL, CLAcura RLAudi A6, A8, Q7Cadillac DTS, STS, XLRHonda LegendInfinity M, Q45Jaguar XK-RBMW 3, 5, 7 SeriesNisan PrimeraRange Rover SportToyota Sienna XLE, AvalonVolkswagon Phaeton, PassatRenault Vel SatisVolvo S80

New Slide

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

VW and Google Earth

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

CE

E 3

20F

all 2

008

Windows Live Local Street Level

top related