intertanko latin american panel 13 march 2008
Post on 12-Jan-2016
92 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
INTERTANKO Latin American Panel
13 March 2008
United States Coast Guard
Jeff LantzDirector of Commercial Vessel Regulations
and Standards
United States Coast Guard2
Scope of Port State Control Exams
Substantial
“…ship will not sail until it can proceed to sea without presenting a danger to the ship or
persons on board, or without presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine
environment, whether or not such action will affect the normal schedule of the departure
of the ship.”
IMO Resolution A.787(19), Chapter 2, 1.6.3
Substandard Quality Standard
United States Coast Guard3
USCG Port State Control Exams
Conduct Navigation Safety Checks Evaluate the Safety Management System Evaluate the Vessel’s Security System Conduct a Deck Walk and Evaluate the Vessel’s Structure Conduct Steering Gear Tests Test the Oily Water Separator and Bilge Monitor Test the Fire Detection System Test the Fixed Deck Foam System (Oil Tankers Only, use water) Operate the Main and Emergency Fire Pump Examine Emergency Lighting Test the Emergency Generator Witness Fire & Boat Drills Evaluate ILO Conditions That May Be Unacceptable
United States Coast Guard
MARPOL Annex I EnforcementMARPOL Annex I Enforcement
• U.S. Coast Guard enforcement of MARPOL Annex I has been enhanced by issuance of policy guidance, G-PCV Policy Letter 06-01.
• U.S. Government criminal investigations into MARPOL Annex I violations show vessel and crew concealment of pollution discharge caused by poorly maintained or faulty equipment, or by vessels taking short cuts to save money.
• U.S. Coast Guard continues to partner with IMO and other Port State Control regimes to ensure consistent enforcement of MARPOL Annex I requirements.
4
United States Coast Guard5
Rate of Detention by Vessel TypeDetention Rate by Vessel Type 2003-2006
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
*All Tanker(crude oil, oil
products, chem,chem/oil)
Bulk Carrier Container Ship General CargoShip
LPG/LNG Tanker RefrigeratedCargo Ship
DayCruise/Gambling
Vessel
Ro-Ro CargoShip/Vehicle
carrier
2003 Detentions
2004 Detentions
2005 Detentions
2006 Detentions
2003-2006 Average = 1.83%
United States Coast Guard6
Rates of Vessel Arrivals vs. Detentionsby Age of Vessel
4.47%
0.81%0.37% 1.57% 2.50%
10.92%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
0-4 years 5-9 years 10-14 years 15-19 years 20-24 years 24+ years
Vessel Age (Years)
Rat
e Detention Rate
Total Arrivals
5 Year Average for Flag State Targeting = 2.14%
United States Coast Guard
USCG, Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU Detention Rates
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
USCG Detention Rate
Paris MOU Detention Rate
Tokyo MOU Detention Rate
United States Coast Guard
Summary of PSC Performance 2006 2007 % increase
Safety Detentions 110 152 28%
Major Control Actions 35 42 17%
Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2006: 1.78%Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2007: 1.60% 1
Security Major Control Action Ratio 2006: 0.43% 2
Security Major Control Action Ratio 2007: 0.53 1 & 2
Note 1: 2007 preliminary data, subject to changeNote 2: In 2006, the CAR targeting level was fixed at
1.50% for all flag registries.
United States Coast Guard
QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”
Eligibility Requirements:
• Must not have an IMO Detention in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months
• Must not have any marine violations (civil or criminal) and no more than one paid Notice of Violation (ticket) case, within the previous 36-month period
• Must not have a reportable marine casualty that meets the criteria of a serious marine incident (46CFR4.03-2) in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months.
• Must have completed a successful, U.S. Port State Control exam within the previous 12-month period.
• Must not be classed by or have their statutory Convention Certificates issued by a targeted class society.
9
United States Coast Guard10
QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”
Eligibility Requirements (Cont):
• Must not be registered with a Flag State that has an overall U.S. IMO detention percentage of more than 1% over the previous three-year period. Also, the vessel’s Flag State must have at least 10 distinct arrivals in each of the previous 3 years.
• Vessel’s Flag State must have submitted their Self-Assessment of Flag State Performance to the IMO and provided a copy to the USCG.
Qualship 21 Certificates: - Qualship 21 certificates are good for 2 years and the issue date is based on the vessel’s last successful U.S. PSC exam.
United States Coast Guard
QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21st Century”
Qualifying Registries for 2007:
Barbados China Marshall IslandsBelize Greece PhilippinesBermuda Hong Kong Republic of Korea Canada Israel United Kingdom Cayman Islands
Qualifying Registries for 2008 will be announced in May 2008 and vessel flying their flag will be eligible until May 2009.
Due to excellent performance from certain flag States, there will likely be additions to the current qualified flag States.
11
United States Coast Guard12
ISPS/MTSA Security Compliance
Vessel Security Level Verify ISSC Verify Ship Security Performance Review the CSR and other Records Ship ID (IMO number) Manning Non-Convention Vessel Security
Compliance Examination
Objective - determine whether vessel meets International Conventions and U.S. Domestic Law
United States Coast Guard13
Verify Ship Security Performance
Verify Ship Security Plan (SSP) is onboard and safeguarded
SSP not subject to direct inspection
If clear grounds exist that required security procedures are not in place, the PSCO will investigate.
PSCO may examine the relevant sections of the plan after exhausting other means to determine compliance.
PSCO must obtain the consent of the vessel’s flag State, or the master of the vessel as specified in ISPS Code Part A, 9.8.1 before examining relevant portions of the SSP.
United States Coast Guard14
Security Records
Training, drills, & exercises
Reports of security incidents/breaches
Changes in Security levels
External communications related to Ship Security
Internal audits/reviews
Periodic reviews of ship security assessments/plans
Maintenance, calibration, & testing of security equipment
United States Coast Guard
Conditions of Entry Additional security measures may be imposed on ships
arriving to U.S. ports from countries not maintaining effective anti-terrorism measures as a Condition of Entry
Concerns are discussed with country
Conditions of Entry are a last resort
Advance public notice given
Specific facilities or ports in a country may be exempted if adequate security is found in that particular facility
Countries for which Conditions of Entry are imposedCameroon Liberia
Equatorial Guinea Mauritania
Guinea-Bissau Syria
Indonesia
15
United States Coast Guard
Conditions of Entry Requirements – Vessels must…
While in the foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;
Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel.
Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security;
Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and
Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander prior to arrival in the U.S.
While in U.S. ports, after arriving from a foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures: Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that
they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
United States Coast Guard
Vessel Boardings Industry feedback
Frequency and redundancy of inspections/boardings. Consistent application of examination and boarding policy. Appropriate interactions with maritime professionals. Maritime security requires cooperation and partnership.
CBP Commissioner and USCG Commandant approved the national implementation of the following five collaborative efforts nationwide in November, 2006: Information Sharing – Both agencies will share relevant info/intel that could lead
to a joint enforcement initiative Joint Vessel Targeting - Co-located maritime targeting unit, daily interagency
targeting briefings Dual-Agency Vessel Boardings - When risk factors warrant a boarding by both
CBP & USCG, a dual-agency boarding team will be used. Training – Agencies will meet & exchange curriculums & local training
opportunities. Such as boarding practices, fraudulent document ID, etc. Professional Exchange – 90 day officer exchange program in order to familiarize
both agencies with operational protocol and procedures.
United States Coast Guard
Positive Policy Impact HIV - revised (June 07)
decreased boardings by 50%
1st time US arrivals not automatic HIV
No double jeopardy for Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDC) vessels
COTP flexibility to downgrade
PSC - revised (June 07)
Smarter targeting = Fewer random *(how much…50%...what are the numbers)
Modification to targeting rules = less redundancy (LPOC rules)
2007 HIV Summary
020406080
100120140160180
Month
Nu
mb
er
of
HIV
s135,240 Vessel Arrivals
United States Coast Guard
Interaction with marine industryALCOAST 108/08, 6 March 2008
Restore professionalism, respect and trust
Openness and transparency will be our hallmarks
Boarding members, marine inspectors, PSCOs will encourage open communication with mariners
Senior leadership contact information will be provided
Resolve issues at lowest level possible – encourage, facilitate and expedite appeals
Identify and resolve pending issues, identify best practices and recommendations
Actions that restrict vessel movement will be affirmed
19
United States Coast Guard20
United States Coast Guard
Environmental issues – IMO
Ballast Water Management Convention Entry into force
Technology development
Air emissions – revision of MARPOL Annex VI MEPC 58 (April 2008)
Greenhouse gas emissions MEPC 59 (October 2008)
Assembly 26 (November 2009)
EU
21
United States Coast Guard
Environmental issues - USCG
Dry Cargo Residue in the Great Lakes - TBD
Ballast Water Management – NPRM (09/2008)
Non-Tank Vessel Response Plans – NPRM (11/08)
Salvage and Marine Firefighting – FR (12/08)
Vessel and Response Plans for Oil – FR (02/08)
Tank Level Pressure Monitoring – FR (07/08)
Tank Vessel Response Plans for Hazardous Substance – SNPRM (TBD)
22
United States Coast Guard
23United States Coast Guard
http://homeport.uscg.mil
United States Coast Guard
USEFUL SITES1. HOMEPORT -http://homeport.uscg.mil
2. CFR - http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html
3. NVIC – http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/nvic/index.htm
4. E-NOA - www.nvmc.uscg.gov
5. COFR - http://www.uscg.mil/npfc/COFRs/index.htm
6. VRP Info - http://www.uscg.mil/vrp/
7. E-VRP Database – http://www.e-vrp.com
8. Ballast Water - http://invasions.si.edu/nbic/submit.html
9. PSIX - http://cgmix.uscg.mil/psix/
United States Coast Guard25
Thank you
top related