journal club: residual renal function
Post on 30-Nov-2014
3.124 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Association of Residual Urine Output with Mortality, Quality of Life, and Inflammation in
Incident Hemodialysis
The Choices for Healthy Outcomes in caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) Study
Peter Schrier, MDJournal Club
Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine2011
Outline
• Residual Renal Function– What it is– Why it matters
• Peritoneal Dialysis Data• Hemodialysis Data• CHOICE Study
Residual Renal Function
• Small Solute Clearance (measured GFR)
• Volume Clearance (Urine output/volume)
• Endocrine Kidney (ESA usage, hemoglobin)
Residual Renal Function
AY-M Wang & K-N Lai, Kidney International (2006) 69, 1726–1732
Residual Renal Function
• Mortality– All-cause mortality– Cardiovascular
• Quality of Life– Overall QoL– Fewer diet restrictions– Less volume restriction– Others (sleep, pain,
perceived disease burden, etc.)
RKF and Morality in PD
• Effects of Increased Peritoneal Clearances on Mortality Rates in Peritoneal Dialysis: ADEMEX, a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial– 965 person, multicenter, prospective, randomized
controlled trial– Follow-up at least 2 years– RCT was to measure mortality with standard PD dose vs.
more intense PD dose with greater pCrCl (peritoneal creatinine clearance)
– Looked at other factors that correlated with mortality, including rCrCl (renal creatinine clearance)
RKF and Mortality in PD
RKF and Morality in PD
• The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: An analysis of the Netherlands cooperative study on the adequacy of dialysis (Necosad)-2– 413 person, multicenter, prospective,
observational, cohort study of incident PD patients– Mortality with increased rGFR (renal GFR = RKF) vs.
increased pCrCl (peritoneal creatinine clearance)
NECOSAD-2- Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1293- 1302.
RKF and Mortality in PD
NECOSAD-2- Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1293- 1302.
RKF and Morality in PD
• Relative Contribution of Residual Renal Function and Peritoneal Clearance to Adequacy of Dialysis: A Reanalysis of the CANUSA Study– 680 person, multicenter, prospective cohort study – 2-year follow-up– Reanalysis of data– Mortality with increased rGFR (renal GFR = RKF) vs.
increased pCrCl (peritoneal creatinine clearance) vs. urine output
CANUSA- J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2158–2162, 2001
RKF and Morality in PD
CANUSA- J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2158–2162, 2001
RKF and Morality in PD
CANUSA- J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2158–2162, 2001
RKF and Mortality in HD
• Residual renal function and mortality in hemodialysis patients– 114 person, single center, prospective cohort
study– 2-year follow-up– Mortality in patients with vs without RKF– Residual renal function defined as producing
> 100cc urine / 24 hour urine collection– Patients included all current patients at the
single hemodialysis center who agreed to participate and RFK was assessed at study initiation only Shemin- Am J
Kidney Dis. 2001;38(1):85-90.
RKF and Mortality in HD
Shemin- Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(1):85-90.
RKF and Mortality in HD
Shemin- Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(1):85-90.
RKF and Mortality in HD
• Relative Contribution of Residual Renal Function and Different Measures of Adequacy to Survival in Hemodialysis Patients: An analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2– 740-person, prospective, observational
multicenter cohort study– Incident ESRD patients– Median follow-up 1.7 years
J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1061–1070, 2004
RKF and Mortality in HD
Figure 1. The effect of single-pool Kt/Vurea (sp-dKt/Vurea) on mortality by presence of residual renal function (rKt/Vurea = 0 [“anurics’” versus rKt/Vurea >0). The rKt/Vurea and sp-dKt/Vurea were included as time-dependent variables. The relative risks are adjusted for age, Davies’ comorbidity score, primary kidney disease, subjective global assessment, and body mass index.
J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1061–1070, 2004
RKF and Mortality in HD
J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1061–1070, 2004
RKD and Mortality in Dialysis
Pearl and Bargman, Am J Kidney Dis 53:1068-1081
Quality of Life (QoL) in PD
NECOSAD-2- Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(6):1293- 1302.
CHOICE STUDY
• 734 patients from 81 clinics nationally• Prospective, observational cohort study• Incident dialysis patients– New onset of long-term dialysis– Baseline at within after initiation of therapy
• Goal: Determine association of urine output with mortality, quality of life, and inflammation in incident HD patients
Assessment of RKF
• Urine output used as a surrogate for RKF• Questionnaire at baseline and one year– “Do you produce at least one full cup (250cc) of
urine daily?”– Urine output was measured in 42% of patients
and was found to correlate well with reported production of 250cc/day
Baseline Characteristics of Study
Baseline Characteristics of Study
Baseline Characteristics of Study
All-Cause Mortality
e Clinical and treatment factors in addition to demographic characteristics: smoking history (ever smoked), pulse pressure, body mass index, primary cause of kidney failure (diabetes, hypertension, glomerulonephritis, or other), Index of Coexistent Disease score (0-3), cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes, and serum albumin level (at baseline or year 1).
All-Cause Mortality
All-cause Mortality by baseline urine output
All-cause Mortality by one-year urine output
Cardiovascular Mortality
e Clinical and treatment factors in addition to demographic characteristics: smoking history (ever smoked), pulse pressure, body mass index, primary cause of kidney failure (diabetes, hypertension, glomerulonephritis, or other), Index of Coexistent Disease score (0-3), cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes, and serum albumin level (at baseline or year 1).
Cardiovascular Mortality
Cardiovascular Disease mortality by baseline urine
output
Cardiovascular Disease mortality by one-year urine
output
Mortality and Change in Urine Output
Quality of Life (QoL)
EPO Dose Requirements
Improvements
• CVD Mortality– Not enough power? Many variables were very
close to statistical significance
• Definition of Residual Renal Function– Subjective urine output of >250cc rather arbitrary.
Maybe we are mislabeling those with ~100 cc urine output/day as not having RKF when they do enjoy its protective effects
Improvements
• More nit-picking than real concerns– Diuretics shouldn’t increase RKF even though they
do increase urine output (unless volume is the issue!)
– EPO usage was only calculated at baseline and 6 months, much earlier than the study stopped follow-up. Maybe not the best measure of residual endocrine kidney function
Conclusions
• Residual Renal Function, especially the maintenance of existing residual renal function, has important prognostic value
• Future studies may be useful to assess interventions aimed at preserving residual renal function
• As nephrologists, it is our responsibility to be advocates for the last few cc’s of GFR; they may be the difference between life and death…
• …or certainly a keg-stand and a picnic
top related