lars bildsten kavli institute for theoretical physics university of california santa barbara
Post on 16-Jan-2016
34 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Lars BildstenKavli Institute for Theoretical
PhysicsUniversity of California Santa
Barbara
Putting Helium Layers onto Massive
White Dwarfs
The newfound prevalence of double white dwarfs with one being a low-mass (M<0.20M) helium white dwarf has re-motivated our exploration of possible explosive outcomes, as has the discovery of the first Helium burning star in a tight binary.
Jared Brooks (UCSB), David Kaplan (UWM), Kevin Moore (UCSB=>UCSC), Bill Paxton (KITP), Ken Shen (UCB), Justin Steinfadt (UCSB=>ATT), &
Dean Townsley (U Alabama)
Recent Collaborators:
Disclaimer from my 2010 Leiden Talk
“I was asked by the organizers to give a pedagogical talk…. so my referencing of all the vast literature is not thorough. Please don’t be offended if I don’t reference YOUR most excellent paper.”
Trust me, I read your paper and I loved it!!
Double White Dwarfs + WD/SdB Stars Galore
Kaplan, L.B. & Steinfadt ‘12
• These stay bright due to a stably burning H envelope (Panei et al ’07)• Many found to be with WDs in tight orbits (Badenes, Brown, Kilic, Mullally, Steinfadt. . • Many will reach contact in 10 Gyr• Note lack of binaries with Mt>1.4
SDSS revealed a large population of Helium WDs
Helium Burning Stars + WD Binaries
• A long discussed channel has been helium burning donors. These must come into contact in <100 Myr so that the Helium star is still burning and has a large radius.
• Early work found one (KPD 1930+2752; Geier et al. ’07) but at Porb=136 minutes, too long.
• Now have one good system CD-30 11223 (Vennes et al. 2013; Geier et al. 2013) with Porb=70 minutes and M1=0.74, M2=0.47. Will come into contact prior to burnout of the He burning star!
Gravitational Waves Drive the Objects into Contact: Direct Impact destabilizes many of
the Double WDs
Marsh, Nelemans & Steeghs ‘04
Outcomes for Unstable Mass Transfer
• One distinct possibility is formation of an R Cor Bor Star, with a stably burning He shell on the WD core
• Another option is that the He detonates and creates a thermonuclear transient. . .
• I am not discussing these cases here . . . but, yes, I read your paper!!
Three Pieces when Stably Accreting • Resulting accretion rate sets He shell masses
– He Burning stars made from Common Envelope evolution are large and fill RL at 20-40 minutes
– Low mass He WDs that fill RL “sooner” than expected
• Unstable helium shell burning outcomes– Defines a He Shell mass above which dynamical
burning can occur.
• Outcome from dynamical burning, potentially detonations that, themselves, can shock the C/O WD = > Type Ia ?
MESA is open source: anyone (over 600 users!) can download the source code, compile it, and run it for their own research or education purposes.
Bill Paxton, Father of MESA
Second “Instrument Paper” just Appeared
http://mesa.sourceforge.net
Third MESA Summer School at UCSB August 11-15, 2014
Stable and Unstable Helium BurningIben & Tutukov 1989
Mass Transfer for Roche Lobe Filling Low Mass Helium WDs
Kap
lan,
Bil
dste
n &
Ste
infa
dt ‘
12
MWD=0.8
Mass Transfer for RL Filling He Burning Stars
Brooks et al, in preparation
Helium Donor Mass
Iben & Tutukov ‘89 He Ignition Mass
MESA calculations of accumulated masses.
Evolution in timeEvolution in time
Mass Transfer Rates and Helium Mass for Ignition
• The higher accretion rate for the Helium WD donors lead to many flashes• He burning star donors (dashed line) have a much lower accretion rate and lead to thicker shell accumulation.
Path to Dynamical Helium ShellsThe radial expansion of the convective region allows the pressure at the base to drop. For low shell masses, this quenches burning. For a massive shell, however, the heating timescale set by nuclear reactions:
will become comparable to lthe dynamical time,
Allowing for a more dynamic outcome than just mass loss in a wind or RL overflow that would be a nova.. (V445 Puppis?)
Shen & LB ‘09
MESA Calculations for He Accretion
from a WD Donor• Series of weak He flashes: basically He Novae• Mass loss occurs due to Roche Lobe overflow during the Helium flashes • Final flash has a minimum heating time of 10 seconds (Bildsten et al. ‘07; Shen & LB ‘09) and becomes dynamical.
Onset of Rapid Burning => ? ?
• From bottom to top, three different accretion rate, 1.0x10-7 M/year. 6x10-8 M/year. 3x10-8
M/year.
• Lower accretion rates far more likely to become dynamical..
Burns Incompletely and Moves Slow (0.028 M He on a 1.0 MWD)
Dis
tanc
e (1
08 cm
)
Dis
tanc
e (1
08 cm
)
Distance (108 cm)Distance (108 cm)
Townsley, Moore and LB, 2012
Propagated at 9000 km/sec. Made mostly 44Ti, 48Cr, little 52Fe and 56Ni
Open Questions• He burning star channel gives He masses likely
large enough to trigger detonations. Does this ignite the C/O or remain a .Ia like outcome (especially if there is an O/Ne WD)?
• What about rotation? I don’t think it’s a big issue, as B fields drive accreted material into solid body rotation long before ignition; but see Yoon and Langer
• More to follow on the diversity of outcomes of the He Detonations. .
MESA He Flash CalculationAccretion onto a 1.0 M at 3.7x10-8 M/year. Accumulated He was 0.093M whereas convective shell has 0.022 M
top related