letícia quintanilha leticiaqs@ufrj · 2020. 8. 25. · letícia quintanilha –leticiaqs@ufrj.br...

Letícia Quintanilha – leticiaqs@ufrj.br

Victor Andrade – victorandrade@fau.ufrj.br

BIKE – TRANSIT INTEGRATION

_ Transit catchment area_ bike as way to give more

mobility and access to the city facilities

_ Costs of displacements_ people with low income

depending more on public transport

_ Brazilian context and urban mobility polices_ equity

as an important part of the mobility agenda

_3 Metro lines_

Line 1_The oldest line, middle class profile

(average income of R$ 5.520,00)

Line 2_ Densest area and lowest incomes

(average of R$2.550,00)

Line 4_ Built for the Olympic Games (2016),

highest incomes (average of R$ 7.600,00)

METHODOLOGY

METHODOLOGY

_ Circulation Infrastructure_ cycle lanes, cycle path, cycle

routes

_ Parking Infrastructure_ indoor parking and bike racks in

public spaces

_ Bike Sharing points_ bike sharing offer

METHODOLOGY

_GIS Mapping_ How bike infrastructure

relates to metro system

_ Catchment Area_ 200m from metro

access points

RESULTS

Photo: Transporte Ativo. <http://transporteativo.org.br/wp/2015/09/10/comprovado-infraestrutura-gera-demanda/>

RESULTS

Photo: Transporte Ativo. <http://transporteativo.org.br/wp/2015/09/10/comprovado-infraestrutura-gera-demanda/>

0,00

1000,00

2000,00

3000,00

4000,00

5000,00

6000,00

R$ 0,00 R$ 1.000,00 R$ 2.000,00 R$ 3.000,00 R$ 4.000,00 R$ 5.000,00 R$ 6.000,00 R$ 7.000,00 R$ 8.000,00 R$ 9.000,00

_Pearson Coefficient: 0,48 _

relatively low relation, but many

stations with no infrastructure on

the surroundings

RESULTS

RESULTS

0

50

100

150

200

250

R$ 0,00 R$ 1.000,00 R$ 2.000,00 R$ 3.000,00 R$ 4.000,00 R$ 5.000,00 R$ 6.000,00 R$ 7.000,00 R$ 8.000,00 R$ 9.000,00

_Pearson Coefficient: 0,60 _

relatively high relation, but with

an outline point in Pavuna

station

RESULTS

RESULTS

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

R$ 0,00 R$ 1.000,00 R$ 2.000,00 R$ 3.000,00 R$ 4.000,00 R$ 5.000,00 R$ 6.000,00 R$ 7.000,00 R$ 8.000,00 R$ 9.000,00

_Pearson Coefficient: 0,32 _

relatively low relation, same

number of bikes in many points,

bike share system restricted to

Line 1 stations

CONCLUSIONS

_ Metro-bike integration_ unarticulated vision

preventing systemic conformation of urban mobility

_ Infrastructure distribution_ bike infrastructure more

provided close to leisure and high income areas

_ Equity on urban mobility_ actual vision of transport

and urban planning reinforces inequalities of access

THANK YOU!

labmob@ufrj.br www.labmob.prourb.fau.ufrj.br