lexington ii at market square north, washington d.c

Post on 09-Jan-2016

21 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Lexington II at Market Square North, Washington D.C. Alexis Pacella – Structural Option. Presentation Outline. Building Summary Existing Structure Proposal Gravity System Lateral System Other Structural Factors Construction Management Mechanical Conclusion. Building Summary. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Lexington IIat Market Square North, Washington D.C.

Alexis Pacella – Structural Option

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Building Summary

12 Story Residential Tower

Market Square North Complex

3 below grade levels

72,000 sq ft

49 Apartment Units

Completed in 2002

Building Summary

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Existing Structure

Gravity System:

2 Way Flat Plate Slab8 inches

Irregular Column LayoutSmall Bays

Lateral System:

Shear Walls

Foundation:

MAT

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Proposal

Current design restricted by height limit: 130 feet(current height = 125 ft w/ penthouse)

Only structures with a thin floor sandwich, such as flat plate and pre-stressed were considered

When height restriction is not a factor,

Can A More Economic System be Found???

Proposal

How will a steel structural system effect…

Other building systems

Time

COST

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Gravity System

Composite:Steel composite deck on steel beams and

columns

Relatively shallow floor sandwichNo large change in stiffness and vibrationSteel is usually most cost effective

Additional cost and labor for fireproofing and connections

Gravity System

New column layout required for steel system to be economical

Does not interfere w/architecture

Windows moved

One closet obstructed

Gravity System

Composite Decking:

Span is too long, bisect each bay with a beam

Unshored saves on labor and material

Unshored will use extra concrete

Residential Levels: 2” LOK floor deck with 4.5” slab

Public Levels: 3” LOK deck with 5.5”slab

Decking chosen from USD catalog.

Beams, columns, and shear studs were designed for gravity loads using RAM software.

Gravity System

RAM criteria set to LRDF 3rd Edition

Gravity System

Final Design:

4.5” deck + slab

12” beam

= 16.5” Total floor sandwich depth

Increase of 8.5” per floor 8.5’ total

New Height = 133.5’ > Allowable 130’

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

3 possible Lateral Systems:Shear WallsMoment FramesBraced Frames

Located around elevator shaft

Architectural Feature of the building

Will not obstruct bays

Costly connections

High strength and stiffness

Easy to erect

Lateral System

Lateral System

Shear Walls:

Check Existing Walls

ETABS

Results:

Surround Elevator Shaft

Steel Lighter Weight Less Seismic Load

8.5’ height increase Slightly Greater Wind Load

Braced Frames:Find location in building Distribute Loads by RigidityCheck ASCE 7 wind casesDesign, check on STAAD

Design was controlled by

allowable stress

Lateral System

Lateral System

STAAD Design:

Chevron Braces

Member Stresses Controlled

Size Range: W12x65 – W12X170

Total Deflection < 3.6” allowable

Final Design:

Some columns controlled by biaxial bending increased size

Sizes: W12x65 – W14x342

Final Deflection = 2.7”< 3.6” allowable

12

Mny

Muy

Mnx

Mux

Pn

Pu

Lateral System

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Are there other issues with the structure to be considered?

Connections

Substructure

Foundation

Other Structural Factors

Beam to Column Connections:

Stiffeners Required

Typical 7th floor connection

Other Structural Factors

Heavy Bracing Connection:

Uniform Force MethodSame beam to column connection

27”x27”x1/2” gusset plate

3”x3”x1/2” angles

Other Structural Factors

Typical 7th floor connection

Other Structural Factors

The Substructure:

Concrete is better in subterranean conditions

Additional building weight

Concrete is a more durable parking structure

Other Structural Factors

Substructure:

One way joist floor ~easy to construct

~works with new bay sizes

20” pans; 5” ribs; 25” o.c.

Other Structural Factors

Substructure:

Girders: 24”x15”

top steel = 7 #9’s

bottom steel = 4 #8’s

Stirrup PlacementReinforcement Cutoffs

Girder Section

Other Structural Factors

Substructure:

Columns:Below the Braced Frames:

Shear walls were used, shear controlled

Other Structural Factors

Substructure:

Connections ~ a base plate sunk into floor slab at each column

Other Structural Factors

Foundation:

Existing MAT foundation

Punching shear

Overturning

Forces affecting

overturning

No Problems

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Construction Management

Construction Management Issues:

Site Layout

Cost

Scheduling

Construction Management

Site Layout:

Needed spaces: offices, circulation paths, storage, etc…

Steel Design ~ Crane

~ Lay Down Area

Construction Management

Construction Management

Cost :

Concrete ......................................$1,526,000

Steel ………………………………...$1,455,600

Saves $70,000

This does not however account for cost due to extra façade material or fireproofing

Building Scale is not large enough to develop full economy associated with a steel structure

Construction Management

Each level is built in the sequence:

1 day for columns and beams 2 days for deck

Next level is started Slabs poured when beam, column, and deck

construction is 3 stories ahead.

Scheduling:

Total: 18 weeks

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Mechanical

Mechanical Considerations:

HVAC

Acoustics

Mechanical

HVAC:

Fresh air requirements are met by windows

Mechanical

HVAC:

MEP Systems can be moved from soffits into ceiling sandwich.

Beams should not be intersected.

Mechanical

SupplyExhaust

Mechanical

Acoustics:

Original System: Concrete ceilings with sprayed acoustical sealant

NRF = .75

Steel System: Suspended ceiling with acoustical tiles

NRF = .5 to .95

Mechanical

Acoustics:

Acoustic Tiles on suspended ceiling

Assembly Issues

Presentation Outline

Building SummaryExisting StructureProposalGravity SystemLateral SystemOther Structural FactorsConstruction ManagementMechanicalConclusion

Conclusions

Structural design was controlled by height restriction

Composite:

Larger Bays

Works well with other integrated systems

Full Economy of Steel Savings was not

achieved

Questions?

Building Summary

Key PlayersArchitectureFaçadeSite/ZoningOther Systems

OwnerSquare 407 LP

ArchitectStudios Architects

Structural EngineerThornton Tomasetti

MEPEngineering Design Group

General ContractorClark Construction

Transportation

2 elevators and stairwells in building core

MechanicalWater source heat pump;

Boiler, pumps, cooling tower

Electric/Lighting

1 phase, 3 wire; 120/208 VFluorescent Lights

12 Story Residential Tower

Market Square North Complex

3 below grade levels

72,000 sq ft

Completed in 2002

Existing Structure

Materials

Concrete: Columns and MAT ~ 5000psi Slab and Shear Walls ~ 4000psi

Reinforcement: Slab ~ bottom #4 every 12”

Shear Walls ~ #4 every 12” MAT ~ #8 bars every 9” Columns ~ varies by size

Top and extra reinforcement is placed as needed

Gravity System

Loads:

Dead Load: Self Weight of System

Superimposed = 30psf

Live Load: Residential = 60psf

Public = 100psf

Partitions = 20psf

Loads taken from ASCE 7 02

Construction Management

Cost:

Steel vs. Concrete

Steel Concrete

Costly Connections

Formwork

Fireproofing Reinforcement

Extra Façade Waste

Accessories

Excavation: $23,600Foundation:

$159,000

Concrete Design Cost:Sub Grade Floors:

$671,000Super Structure Floors:

$154,000Columns:

$395,000Shear Walls:

$123,900______________________________________Total $1,526,000

Construction Management

Prices taken from R.S. Means

Construction Management

Excavation: $23,600Foundation: $159,000

Steel Design Cost:Sub Grade Levels: $741,200Steel Levels: $467,200Braced Frames: $156,400Connections: $51,300

___________________________________Total: $1,455,600

Prices taken from R.S. Means

Construction Management

Scheduling:

Excavation

Backhoe .5 daySheathing .5 daysHauling 1 days

Sheathing 3 daysTotal per story 4 days

x 3 stories 2.4 weeks

Construction Management

Scheduling:

Foundation

Cast in Place MAT 1dayCuring 4 days

Total 5 days

3 weeks

Scheduling:

Substructure

Columns 1.1 dayGrade walls 2 daysShear walls .5 days

1-way Joist 5 daysCuring 4 days

Total per story 11 days x 3 stories 9.2

weeks

Construction Management

Construction Management

Scheduling:

Super Structure

Columns .5 dayBeams .5 dayDeck 2 days

Slab 1 dayCuring 1 day

Total per story 5 days

x 12 stories 18 weeks

Mechanical

Fire Suppression:

Sprinkler Layout

top related