mapping metalinguistic knowledge in dili, timor-leste€¦ · – highest dropout rates in the...

Mapping Metalinguistic Knowledge in Dili, Timor-Leste

Melody Ann Ross 13th East-West Center

International Graduate Student Conference February 13-15, 2014

Overview •  Introduction •  Research Question

–  Where is Dili, ethnoling makeup –  History and effect on Dili’s Demographics

•  Lit Review –  Map tasks, perceptual dialectology –  The importance of speaker intuitions –  Sociolinguistics in Dili, what specifically

•  Methods •  Participants

–  language issues •  Results

–  Unique Lgs, Total Lgs, Word Counts –  Maps

•  Conclusions –  Future Research (ask for mother tongues!!) rankings?

2

Dili Introduction

•  1400’s – Portuguese Colony •  1975 – Power shifts to Indonesia •  1999 – Power shifts to UN •  2002 – Independence •  2006 – Crisis •  2013 – UN ends mission

3

Dili Introduction

•  Dili Demographics –  large youth population – highest dropout rates in the country

•  highest literacy rates

– wealthiest citizens – 74% of all migrants in the country settle in Dili

•  51% of this group is under the age of 30

•  Linguistically Diverse

4

Introduction

5

Lit Review

– John Hajek, University of Melbourne •  2000; Sociolinguistic Environment in East Timor:

Colonial Practice and Changing Language Ecologies

– Aone van Engelenhoven, Leiden University •  2006; Ita-nia Nasaun Oin-Ida, Ita-nia Dalen Sira

Oin-Seluk: Our Nation is One, Our Languages are Different

– Kerry Taylor-Leech, Griffith University •  2008; Language and identity in East Timor

6

Lit Review

•  Dennis Preston, 1982 – From performance-based dialectology to

perceptual dialectology – Performance-based rely on professional

elicitation and analysis of observed behavior – Perceptual rely on opinions and experiences

of non-professionals – Why is this important?

7

Lit Review

•  Currently, studies tend to focus on macro-areas in the West – Bucholtz, Mary, et al. (2007) “Hella Nor Cal or

Totally So Cal?: The Perceptual Dialectology of California”

– Fought, Carmen. (2002) “California Students’ Perceptions of, You Know, Regions and Dialects?”

– Purschke, Christoph. (2011) “Regional linguistic knowledge and perception: on the conceptualization of Hessian”

8

Research Questions

•  Anecdotes suggesting that certain people tend to settle in certain places: – What are Dili resident’s perceptions of

language use in Dili? •  What factors influence perceptions of language

use in Dili?

9

Methods

10

Methods •  Distribution

– Student Training – Problems

•  map culture, labels •  group mentality •  infrastructure

•  Metadata entered in Excel for qualitative analysis in R –  total word counts, total language labels, unique

language labels, demographic groups, etc. •  Quadrat analysis

11

Participants

12

F M

2030

4050

60Participant's Age

Mean of both groups=26

Years

F M

05

1015

2025

30

Participant's Years Lived in Dili

Mean of both groups=13

Years

3

5

19

7

2

8

5

10

3

2

2

1

9

Participants

13

40yo; F; Baucau; 17 years in Dili

14

24yo; F; Baucau; 2 years in Dili

15

Mother tongues become like district identities for each person in East Timor and one feels proud to bring and preserve those languages there into the international world.

20yo; M; Dili; 20 years in Dili

16

24yo; F; Baucau; 20 years in Dili

17

Unique Languages (20)

18

31

1

113

3 0

91

30

4 6 13

69

12

182

198

5

35

0 1

82

54

32 25

0

50

100

150

200

250

Total Language Labels

Population (p=0.9)

19 0 50000 100000 150000

050

100

150

200

Actual Speaker Populations and Perceived Populations in Dili

2010 Census Language Population

Map

Lan

guag

e Fr

eque

ncy

Baikeno

Bekais

Bunak

EnglishChinese

Fataluku

Galolen

IdateIndonesianKairui

Kemak

Makalero

Makasae

Mambae

Midiki

Naueti

PortugueseRahesuk

TetunTerik

TokodedeWaima'a

Languages of One’s Own District

20

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Tota

l Num

ber o

f Lab

els

Own-District and Non-District Languages by District

Own-District Language

Non-District Language

Results - Mambae

21

Central Timor-Leste, 130,000 speakers

Results - Bunak

22

Mountain-Central Timor-Leste, 75,000 speakers

Results - Kemak

23

West Timor-Leste, 72,000 speakers

Results - Makasae

24

Eastern Timor-Leste, 70,000 speakers

Results - Fataluku

25

Far Eastern Timor-Leste, 30,000 speakers

Conclusions •  Maps show that respondents don’t believe certain

languages to be in certain areas •  Different groups (male, female, young, old, etc.)

did not show significant differences of opinion •  Maps show high linguistic and social awareness •  Labels show that respondents’ awareness of

languages roughly corresponds to their speaker populations (p=.9)

•  Speakers are more likely to identify languages from outside their districts that their ‘own’ languages

26

References •  BUCHOLTZ, Mary, Nancy BERMUDEZ, Victor FUNG, Lisa EDWARDS, & Rosalva VARGAS. (2007)

“Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The Perceptual Dialectology of California”, Journal of English Linguistics 35: 325-352.

•  DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE. (2010). “Highlights of the 2010 Census Main Results in Timor-Leste.” Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, Dili.

•  EVANS, Betsy E. (2002) “Attitudes of Montreal Students Towards Varieties of French”, in Daniel Long and Dennis

•  Preston (eds.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71-93. •  FOUGHT, Carmen. (2002) “California Students’ Perceptions of, You Know, Regions and Dialects?”, in

D. Long and D. Preston (eds.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benajmins, 117-136.

•  HAJEK, John. (2000) “Language planning and the sociolinguistic environment in East Timor: Colonial practice and changing language ecologies.” Current Issues in Language Planning 1:400–413.

•  INOUE, Fumio. (1999) “Classification of dialects by image”, in Dennis Preston (ed.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161-176.

•  PRESTON, Dennis R. (1982) “Perceptual Dialectology: Mental maps of the United States dialects from a Hawaiian Perspective”, University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2): 5-49.

•  PRESTON, Dennis R. (1989) Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris. •  PURSCHKE, Christoph. (2011) “Regional linguistic knowledge and perception: on the

conceptualization of Hessian”, Dialectologia special issue II, 91-118. •  TAYLOR-LEECH, Kerry. (2008). “Language and identity in East Timor: The discourses of nation

building.” Language problems and language planning, 32, 2, 153-180. •  VAN ENGELENHOVEN, Aone. (2006) “Ita-nia Nasaun Oin-Ida, Ita-nia Dalen Sira Oin-Seluk: Our

Nation is One, Our Languages are Different.”, in: Paulo Castro Seixas & Aone van Engelenhoven (eds) Diversidade Cultural na Construção da Nação e do Estado em Timor-Leste (pp. 106-131), Porto: Fernando Pessoa University Press.

27