measuring the bb cross- section using b d o x decays liming zhang & sheldon stone syracuse...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring the bb cross-section using BDo X m-n
decays
Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone
Syracuse University
Outline MC distributions from prompt D0 and DfB Efficiency ratio of prompt D0 and DfB MC distributions from signal MC Efficiency from signal MC
All distributions are obtained without any selections.
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Selection criteria Common cuts K & p PT>300 MeV, Sum PT>1400
MeV K and p IPCHI2>9 K DLL(K-p)>4, p DLL(p-K)> -10 all tracks fit c2/NDOF<10 D0 vertex fit c2<6 D0 Flight Distance c2>64
DfB (D from B) Cuts only
m PT > 500 MeV & IPCHI2>4 m ISMUON and DLL(m-p)>0 B vertex fit c2<5 vz(D0) – vz(B) > -0.5mm B DIRA>0.998 B invariant mass in [3, 5] GeV
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Prompt Do cuts only D0 DIRA > 0.9999 D0 IPCHI2 < 25
~800 mb-1
Prompt K-p+ Mass
IP & IPS from D0 daughters
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Prompt D0
DfB
K IP p IP
K IP significancep IP significance
P & Pt from D0 daughters
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Prompt D0
DfB
Distributions of D0
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Prompt D0
DfB
Sum Pt
D0 vertex c2
D0 Pt
D0 Flight Distance Significance
MC Efficiency for D0 (Inc_D0 MC 2010)
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Efficiency [%] Prompt D0 DfB
Reconstruction 39.4 ± 0.2 40.1 ± 0.9
Track fit c2/ndof<10 99.4 ± 0.1 99.5 ± 0.2
Pt>300 MeV for K & p 93.6 ± 0.2 93.3 ± 0.7
IP c2>9 for K & p 35.2 ± 0.4 81.9 ± 1.1
D0 FD c2>64 79.6 ± 0.6 95.1 ± 0.7
PIDK<10 for p 99.4 ± 0.1 99.4 ± 0.3
PIDK>4 for K 94.7 ± 0.3 95.5 ± 0.7
Pt>1400 MeV 99.0 ± 0.2 98.4 ± 0.4
D0 vertex c2<6 95.0 ± 0.3 95.3 ± 0.7
D0 DIRA>0.99 99.9 ± 0.1 99.6 ± 0.2
Total 9.07 ± 0.14 25.7 ± 0.8
Efficiency DfB/Prompt = 2.8 ± 0.1Relative efficiency with respect to the previous cut Geometrical cut efficiency is (42.5 ± 0.2)%
MC Efficiency from signal MC 2010
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Efficiency [%] B-D0Xm-n B0D0Xm-n
Reconstruction 36.3 ± 0.3 35.7 ± 0.3
Track fit c2/ndof<10 99.3 ± 0.1 99.4 ± 0.1
Pt>300 MeV for K & p 93.5 ± 0.3 93.1 ± 0.3
IP c2>9 for K & p 83.2 ± 0.4 82.9 ± 0.4
D0 FD c2>64 96.9 ± 0.2 96.9 ± 0.2
PIDK<10 for p 99.3 ± 0.1 99.4 ± 0.1
PIDK>4 for K 95.0 ± 0.3 95.2 ± 0.3
Pt>1400 MeV 99.0 ± 0.1 98.6 ± 0.2
D0 vertex c2<6 95.3 ± 0.3 95.1 ± 0.3
Geometrical cut efficiency is ~17%
MC Efficiency from signal MC 2010 (cont’)
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
Efficiency [%] B-D0Xm-n B0D0Xm-n
m track fit c2/ndof<10 99.9 ± 0.0 99.9 ± 0.0
m Pt>500 MeV 93.2 ± 0.3 92.9 ± 0.4
m IP c2>4 93.0 ± 0.3 92.2 ± 0.4
ISMUON 89.8 ± 0.4 89.2 ± 0.5
DLL( -m p)>0 98.7 ± 0.2 98.7 ± 0.2
B vertex c2<5 94.0 ± 0.4 93.0 ± 0.4
B DIRA >0.998 96.4 ± 0.3 96.4 ± 0.3
z(D0)-z(B)>-0.5mm (loosen) 96.7 ± 0.3 96.8 ± 0.3
M(D0m) [3, 5] GeV 84.4 ± 0.6 81.6 ± 0.7
Total 13.7 ± 0.2 12.6 ± 0.2
Distributions of B
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
DIRA B vertex c2
M(D0m)vz(D0)-vz(B)
MC are sum of B+ and B0
Things to do Evaluate cut efficiency from prompt D0
Especially for IPCHI2 and FDCHI2 cuts One idea is to smear the resolution and check.
Fake muon background estimation Remove muon ID Reweight candidates by the fake rate obtained
from the data.
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
The End
Things to do (I) DoK3 p do the same analysis as DoK : p two
usages: Tracking efficiency test using prompt Do(It’s better
to use the same cut on the K and one p as used in DoK p and do not cut on the other two , p if background is not large).
adding statistics to DomnX if background is acceptable.
Group Meeting May 14, 2010
top related