meredith a. newman, ph.d. president, american society for public administration professor and chair,...
Post on 31-Mar-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Meredith A. Newman, Ph.D.President, American Society for Public AdministrationProfessor and Chair, Florida International University
Service Delivery in Times of Crisis: Questions of Accountability
We should never forget that we are here as public servants. And public service is a privilege...We must stand up together and answer a new call to service to meet the challenges of our new century (President Obama)
Address one of the less visible administrative challenges that becomes exacerbated in times of crisis – Accountability
Emotive skills essential to collaborative governance
Focus is on service delivery and first-responders
Three questions:1. Accountability to whom?2. How do workers reconcile conflicting accountabilities?3. How is accountability measured?
2
3
Q.1: Accountability to Whom?
• Bureaucratic accountability
• Legal accountability
• Political accountability
• Professional accountability
4
Within this “multiple masters” context, lines of accountability become blurred as workers find themselves facing more than one set of legitimate accountability expectations simultaneously
Two other elements of accountability: accountability to various parties and accountability for results
5
Accountability to CitizensAccountability relationships are understood as two directional. First-responders recognize that they are accountable:
“Upwards” – to their bureaucratic and political masters
And “downwards” – to the firefighters riding the truck and to the citizens whom they assist
6
Wild Fires, Russia, August 2010
Igor Komarov7
Accountability to Agency Rules
• These jobs are inherently discretionary• Tension between needs of citizens and limits of rules• Face-to-face contact with recipients of services• Relationships are personal and emotional, rarely
cold and rational
8
Earthquake in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, January 2010
Justin Stumberg, U.S. Navy 9
Mine collapse in Chile, August 2010
UPI 10
Q. 2: How do workers reconcile conflicting accountabilities?
The exercise of discretion, and the moral and value judgments that accompany it, may render the goal of reconciliation misplaced, even irrelevant
Rather than seeking to reconcile competing accountabilities, first-responders seek first to save lives and property
11
Flood in Queensland, February 2009
William West/AFP/Getty Images 12
Q. 3: How is Accountability Measured?
Accountability, like merit, may be in the eye of the beholder
Problems of verification and “many hands”
Competing definitions of success
First-responders can decide to make their work harder, more dangerous and less officially “successful” in order to respond to the needs of the individual
13
Earthquake in Padang, Indonesian, October 2009
International Federation of Red Cross /Red Crescent 14
Floods in Pakistan, August 2010
Akhtar Soomro/Reuters 15
Emotive Skills
Expressing compassion
Centrality of person-to-person interactions in the citizen-state exchange
Symbols of competent caring on the part of the government are important
16
BP Oil Spill, Louisiana, USA, 2010
Chuck Kennedy, Official White House Photo 17
Bushfires in Victoria, Australia, 2009
18Cate Swannell
Nature of first-response blurs and confounds simple models of accountability
If we are to find new ways to share responsibilities, we need to recognize the complexities of these accountability relationships
And the importance of technical as well as emotive skills in service delivery
Public service is a privilege – let us find ways to bring it together in order to meet our big challenges
Conclusion
19
top related