missed the teleconference prompt on webex? · customizable to your area/property, your needs, your...
Post on 03-Oct-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CISMA Call Log-InDon’t forget your Conference Code and Attendee ID!
Missed the teleconference prompt on WebEx?
You have 2 options to bring it back to the screen:
1. Click on the ‘Audio’ tab and click on ‘Teleconference’2. Hang up the phone (if you’re already in the teleconference)
Prompt Box has these 3 things:1. Call into the meeting
1-866-385-9623 (US) (Call-in toll-free number)1-443-863-6602 (US) (Call-in number)
2. Enter the access code:751 091 0623 (Conference code)
3. Enter your Attendee ID: #????#(it will be several digits with pound # signs on either side)
NOTE: All numbers are entered on phone keypad and there is NOT an audio prompt for the ATTENDEE ID
CISMA Call Agenda
1:30pm Introductions
Kris Serbesoff-King
1:35pm Technical Presentation
Spatial Invasive Infestation and Priority Analysis (SIIPA) in the Heartland (CISMA) – Deb Stone
1:55pm CISMA Update
Osceola CISMA – Cody Miller
2:10pm Shoutouts
10th Annual FLEPPC CISMA Session, Future FISP/CISMA activities
2:30pm Adjourn
Technical Presentation
Spatial Invasive Infestation and Priority Analysis (SIIPA) in the
Heartland (CISMA) Presented by Deb Stone
{
The Spatial Invasive Infestation and Priority Analysis (SIIPA) GIS tool
Deb Stone
Invasive Plant Program Supervisor, SJRWMD
Figure 1. Flow chart for Adaptive Management of Weeds describing management actions and decisions confronting natural area managers (from Randall (1997), based on a diagram by Oren Pollak, personal communication).
Weed Management Template
1. Establish conservation targets and goals
2. Identify and prioritize species/infestations that threaten targets and goals
3. Assess control techniques
4. Develop and implement weed management plan
5. Monitor and assess impact of management actions
6. Review and modify
Taken from Ellen Jacquart
Never enough time and resources to get it all done
Success is less likely without directed effort
Identify goals
Select winnable battles
Direction keeps us from going crazy
Why Prioritize?
Re-treatment time frame
Effective control methods available
Invasiveness of each species
Size of infestations
Legal obligations
Effective and thorough surveys
Quality of surrounding habitat
Feasibility
Available funding
Access
Mapping
Protected species or other important resources
Potential Vectors
Prioritization Considerations
TNC’s Draft Weed Management Plan
Alien Plants Ranking System
Invasive Exotic Plant Management Tutorial for Natural Lands Managers
Invasive Species Assessment Protocol
WHIPPET (Weed Heuristics: Invasive Populations Prioritization for Eradication Tool)
Many Different Prioritization Systems Available
Great theoretical approach, but how can we directly apply this?
Want to look at individual populations on the preserve rather than species as a whole
Provide better direction to treatments using our available data
Product that is customizable for varied situations
Spatial Invasive Infestation and Priority Analysis Model
Six Criteria Used
Species Impacts
Available Control Methods
Total Number of Populations (‘extent’)
Proximity to Protected Lands (‘habitat quality’)
Proximity to Protected Plant Species
Potential Vectors
HCISMA Framework
Rankings
Data Sources
2015 EDDMapS data
2013 FNAI data
Data Gathering and QC
Time Consuming
Taxonomic changes
Species Impacts Criteria
CISMA EDRR Species 1IFAS Assessment = Invasive, Prohibited or Invasive (No Uses) in Central Region 2CISMA Priority Control Species 3FLEPPC Category 1 (and not in a higher ranking) 4FLEPPC Category 2 (and not in a higher ranking) 5Species of Concern (not listed but could be a problem; watching) 7Non-native 8IFAS Assessment = OK in Central Region 9
SCI_NAME IMPACTSMelinis repens ControlArdisia crenata EDRRCallisia fragrans EDRRCupaniopsis anacardioides EDRRDianella ensifolia EDRRPraxelis clematidea EDRRPueraria montana EDRRRhodomyrtus tomentosa EDRRRuellia simplex EDRRSyzygium cumini EDRRTradescantia spathacea EDRREucalyptus spp. EDRR?Asparagus aethiopicus FL1Eugenia uniflora FL1Ligustrum lucidum FL1
Rankings
Data Sources
UF’s Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants
Data Gathering and QC
Time Consuming
Control Methods Criteria
Control recommendations listed on the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Species Website (includes linked documents) 1Control recommendations NOT listed on the Center for Aquatic and Invasive Species Website 5Need More Information/Species NOT listed on Center for Aquatic and Invasive Species Website 9
SCI_NAME CONTROLMelinis repens YESArdisia crenata YESCallisia fragrans NMICupaniopsis anacardioides YESDianella ensifolia NOPraxelis clematidea NMIPueraria montana YESRhodomyrtus tomentosa YESRuellia simplex YESSyzygium cumini NMITradescantia spathacea NMIEucalyptus spp. NMIAsparagus aethiopicus YESEugenia uniflora YESLigustrum lucidum YES
Rankings
Data Sources
2015 EDDMapS shapefile
2013 FNAI Data
Data Gathering and QC
Simple in and of itself
Number of Populations Criteria
Lowest total of populations: 1 - 453 1Medium-low number of populations: 454 - 771 3Medium number of populations: 772 - 2309 5Medium-high number of populations: 2310 - 7451 7Highest number of populations: 7452 - 10039 9
FREQUENCY SCI_NAME1984Imperata cylindrica1603Lygodium microphyllum670Melinis repens600Schinus terebinthifolius593Urena lobata549Panicum repens445Solanum viarum349Ludwigia peruviana327Lygodium japonicum325Abrus precatorius287Cinnamomum camphora279Lantana camara263Urochloa mutica171Leucaena leucocephala165Dioscorea bulbifera114Panicum maximum
Rankings
Data Sources
2015 FNAI shapefile for uplands
2015 FWC shapefile for public water bodies
Data Gathering and QC
Not much, just merging files
Protected Lands Criteria
In a protected area 1
Within 1/4 mile of a protected area 4
Greater than 1/4 mile from a protected area 9
Rankings
Data Sources
2015 FNAI shapefile
Data Gathering and QC
Easy-Peasy (Yah FNAI!)
Protected Plants Criteria
Population occurs within a 1/4 mile of a protected plant species 1
Population occurs greater than a 1/4 mile from a protected plant species 9
Rankings
Data Sources
Websites for each property
FGDL- WMD Land Use shapefiles
Data Gathering and QC
Incredibly time consuming
Potential Vectors CriteriaHighest number of land uses (recreation types, logging, grazing, waterways, etc.): 5-10 1
Medium number of land uses: 2-4 3
Low number of land uses: 0-1 5
Unknown number of land uses: 99 7
Population occurs in agricultural land or waterways within 1/4 mile of protected area 8
Population occurs greater than 1/4 mile from protected area 9
Weighted averages
Species Impacts- 25%
Proximity to Protected Plant Species- 25%
Available Control Methods- 20%
Proximity to Protected Lands (‘habitat quality’)- 10%
Total Number of Populations (‘extent’)- 10%
Potential Vectors- 10%
Criteria Totals
Challenges
Gathering data
Vectors
Quality control of data
Species shapefile
Natives
Taxonomic changes
Missing data
Duplicated data
How far apart to be separate populations?
Archbold Biological Station
Group decisions
Results W/ ABS
Results W/ ABS
Results w/o ABS
Results w/o ABS
Identify data gaps
Area-wide funding programs
Target outreach to private landowners
Prioritize workdays
Potential Applications
Customizable to YOUR area/property, YOUR needs, YOUR invasives
Document your ranking system
Model is only as good your data
Requirements to use this model:
Shapefiles: Invasive species, natural lands, protected species, land use
ArcGIS software with ArcInfo licensing
Can do a workaround with basic licesning
Several days to a few weeks to review, edit and customize
Important
All 3 versions available for download at TNC’s Conservation Gateway website
Submitting paper to Ecological Restoration
Going to be adapted for EDDMapS
Coming Soon!
Any Questions?
CISMA Update• Oscela CISMA
• Presented by:
Cody Miller
Co Chairs:
Cody Miller
Eleanor Foerste
Set standing meeting time of the second Wednesday of every other month, 9:30-noon (next meeting July 13th)
Assigned a steering committee
Developed a new logo/ Changed Name
Developed outreach materials
Applied for and received the FLEPPC CISMA Grant
Held an Air potato Mega Raid
Co-hosted Exotic Pet Amnesty Day Kissimmee
Changed name from Osceola County CWMA to Osceola CISMA
Still considering more drastic name change
Other possibilities: Toho CISMA, OCISMA, Invasives CO-OP
Received $800.00 From the FLEPPC CISMA
Grant
Alternatives brochure
CISMA business Cards
4 EDRR trainings for city and county
employees
May Shout Outs
• Osceola – Meeting 5/11/2016
• FKIETF – Ranking Meeting 5/12/2016
• CF & ECF – Aquatic Invasives Workshop 5/13/2016
• Heartland – 2nd
annual Exotic Pet Amnesty Day 5/14/2016
• Heartland– 6th
annual Central Florida Invasive Species Workshop 5/24/2016
Time to start planning for the 10th Annual FLEPPC CISMA Session!
It’ll be hard but let’s make it the best CISMA Session to date!
Accepting Suggestions Now
FLEPPC 2017
New Reporting Method
–Google Form!• To be emailed & embedded on FISP Success Stories
page.
• Automatically fills a spreadsheet!
• So easy it can be done while talking on the phone ;-)
Next Month’s Call
– June 22, 2016
• To Be Determined
• CISMA Update: Central Florida
– Sherry Williams
2016-2017 CISMA Call Agenda
Suggestions Needed!
1. Onlinehttps://nethope.webex.com/Meeting Number: 824 138 461Meeting password: Invasive2!2. PhoneUS Toll-free: 1-866-385-9623Conference Code: 751 091 0623Attendee ID: In WebEx prompt after logging onEnter at any time on key pad 3. SkypeSkype name: nethopeandaffilliatesConference Code: 751 091 0623
Florida Cooperative Invasive Species Management Area (CISMA)
Monthly Call– Hosted by the Florida Invasive Species Partnership (FISP)
participation is voluntary, we promise it will only last 1 hour, and we can guarantee that you will enjoy the conversations
4th Wednesday of Every Month at 1:30pmExcept November and
December
Join the listserv to receive announcements at: floridainvasives.org
top related