monographic purchasing trends in research libraries: did electronic journals really destroy the...
Post on 06-Jul-2015
586 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Monograph Purchasing Trends in Research Libraries:Did Electronic Journals Really Destroy the
University Press?
Elisabeth A. Jones & Paul N. CourantUniversity of Michigan Libraries
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
University Press Bedtime Stories (1)
“Once upon a time, before predatory commercial journal publishers began their assault on the purchasing budgets of academic libraries, libraries could be counted on for a certain level of sale of academic monographs. That virtual guarantee permitted university presses to support the research activities of scholars, especially in the humanities. But when the library budgets began to get gobbled up by the villainous commercial houses, monograph sales plummeted, taking the fortunes of university presses with them. Thus, the goal is to find a new business model, a ‘sustainable’ one, which would enable the presses to continue with their historical support of the research community.”
- Joe Esposito, 2010
2
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
University Press Bedtime Stories (2)
“Back in the ‘good old days,’ university presses used to be able to count on selling X (large) number of copies of every book to libraries, but now they can only sell Y (small) number of copies to libraries – and that’s just not sustainable. “But it’s not the Press’s fault! It’s those evil library serials subscriptions, eating up the libraries’ budgets and keeping them from buying our books!”
- Lightly paraphrased from several sources
3
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
4
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
These are nice stories…
4
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
These are nice stories…
…but are they true?
4
Monday, March 31, 14
5
Would it surprise you to hear that the total number of U.S.
university press monograph titles purchased by U.S. university libraries actually more than
doubled between 1975 and 2000?
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
• Internal and/or anecdotal data; difficult to verify
• Problematic overgeneralization from ARL data
• Median materials expenditure for the 126 ARL institutions: $10.9 million
• Median materials expenditure for the 324 doctorate-granting ACRL institutions: $3.8 million
• ARL institutions are far from typical
• University press books ≠ first to cut in a budget squeeze
6
Some Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
7
More Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
• Claimed number of copies of each book sold to libraries in “the good old days” = 700-800 (e.g. Hitchcock 1999, Smallwood 2002, Thompson 2005, Wasserman 1998)
7
More Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
• Claimed number of copies of each book sold to libraries in “the good old days” = 700-800 (e.g. Hitchcock 1999, Smallwood 2002, Thompson 2005, Wasserman 1998)
• ARL libraries may collect relatively comprehensively, but there are only 126 of them
7
More Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
• Claimed number of copies of each book sold to libraries in “the good old days” = 700-800 (e.g. Hitchcock 1999, Smallwood 2002, Thompson 2005, Wasserman 1998)
• ARL libraries may collect relatively comprehensively, but there are only 126 of them
• Smaller libraries have never had the resources to buy every book put out by every U. Press
7
More Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
• Claimed number of copies of each book sold to libraries in “the good old days” = 700-800 (e.g. Hitchcock 1999, Smallwood 2002, Thompson 2005, Wasserman 1998)
• ARL libraries may collect relatively comprehensively, but there are only 126 of them
• Smaller libraries have never had the resources to buy every book put out by every U. Press
So who was supposed to have been buying the rest of these books?
7
More Grounds for Suspicion
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
8
Fact-checking the Fairy Tale (Our Research Questions)
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
1. Has there actually been a downturn in library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010? And if so, does this decline temporally coincide with the sharp increases in serials prices in the 1980s and 1990s, as is often claimed?
8
Fact-checking the Fairy Tale (Our Research Questions)
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
1. Has there actually been a downturn in library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010? And if so, does this decline temporally coincide with the sharp increases in serials prices in the 1980s and 1990s, as is often claimed?
2. Are the purchasing trends for university press books consistent across
a. Different-sized academic libraries (by materials budget)?
b. Different-sized university presses (by title output)?
8
Fact-checking the Fairy Tale (Our Research Questions)
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
1. Has there actually been a downturn in library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010? And if so, does this decline temporally coincide with the sharp increases in serials prices in the 1980s and 1990s, as is often claimed?
2. Are the purchasing trends for university press books consistent across
a. Different-sized academic libraries (by materials budget)?
b. Different-sized university presses (by title output)?
3. Does academic library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010 exhibit the same trend as academic library purchasing of monographs in general over the same period?
8
Fact-checking the Fairy Tale (Our Research Questions)
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
…but that’s not available
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
…but that’s not available
• What is available:
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
…but that’s not available
• What is available:
• Press output figures from AAUP’s annual Directory
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
…but that’s not available
• What is available:
• Press output figures from AAUP’s annual Directory
• Library materials budget figures from ACRL’s annual Academic Library Trends & Statistics
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Sources
• Ideal would be detailed university press sales data, broken out by customer types
…but that’s not available
• What is available:
• Press output figures from AAUP’s annual Directory
• Library materials budget figures from ACRL’s annual Academic Library Trends & Statistics
• Library holdings data from OCLC WorldCat (via FirstSearch)
9
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Sampling: Presses
• Population: 53 AAUP members with complete publication records,1975-2010
• Divided into Top, Middle, and Bottom thirds by mean annual title output
• Randomly selected five presses from each third (n=15)
10
Sample Presses Mean Books/YrPrinceton University Press 205.1
MIT Press 182.6
Johns Hopkins University Press 161.8
University of Michigan Press 97.8
University of Washington Press 91.2
University of North Carolina Press 78.3
Duke University Press 71.1
University of Minnesota Press 65.2
University of Wisconsin Press 53.6
Pennsylvania State University Press 53.2
University Press of Mississippi 46.2
Ohio University Press 43.7
University of Missouri Press 41.9
Wayne State University Press 35
Northern Illinois University Press 15.2
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Sampling: Libraries• Population: 324 libraries included in ACRL’s 2010 statistics
for doctorate-granting institutions
• Divided into quartiles by total 2010 materials expenditures
• Data from initial 8-library sample presented at ASIS&T 2013
• UM & UW, plus 2 libraries each from the other three quartiles (randomly selected w/in similar in-quartile ranges)
• Expanded sample using same semi-random selection process to choose 6 more libraries roughly evenly distributed throughout each quartile (n=32)
11
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Sampling: Libraries
12
Sample Library ARL? 2010 Mat. Exp.
U of Michigan Yes $23,002,928
U of North Carolina Yes $16,970,946
U of Washington Yes $14,841,396
Indiana U Yes $13,490,434
Ohio State U Yes $11,954,846
George Washington U Yes $11,509,525
Rutgers U Yes $10,510,456
U of Missouri - Columbia Yes $9,751,527
Wayne State U Yes $8,601,311
U of California - Davis Yes $7,462,149
U of Utah Yes $6,728,095
Clemson U No $6,171,729
U of Central Florida No $5,933,541
U of New Hampshire No $5,631,810
SUNY at Albany Yes $5,193,274
Nova Southeastern U No $4,587,719
Sample Library ARL? 2010 Mat. Exp.
U of North Dakota No $3,679,894
U of Toledo No $3,273,810
Eastern Michigan U No $2,997,353
U of Colorado - Denver No $2,594,027
Middle Tennessee State U No $2,368,158
U of San Francisco No $2,212,411
U of Alaska No $1,975,558
Worcester Polytechnic U No $1,704,634
Texas Woman's U No $1,160,169
Southern New Hampshire U No $982,113
Barry U No $723,143
Teachers Coll. at Columbia U No $616,796
Alabama State University No $507,296
University of Dallas No $438,834
S. Dak. Sch of Mines & Tech No $218,304
Alliant International U No $160,307
Q1
Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Collection• Iterated manual WorldCat search
• Number of books held by each library published by each press in each year (1975-2010)
• Example:
• Publisher: “Duke University Press”
• Limit type to: Books
• Limit availability to: EYE
• Post-search: Limit > Limit Your Results By Year
13
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Data Collection
15 presses
x 32 libraries
x 36 years
= 17,280 data points
14
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Database Limitations• Data errors: duplication, inconsistent entries,
retrieval bugs
• Change over time: WorldCat reflects library holdings now(ish)
• Could have purchased long after publication
• Could have gotten rid of books in years since purchasing
• Cataloging backlogs: may cause errors in counts of recent works
15
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Beyond the Limitations
• Sources of error in WorldCat tend to affect the raw numbers, but not necessarily the overall trends
• Numbers for press output should be solid: straight from AAUP’s own Directory
So, what do these data show?
16
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
17
Findings 1 Trends in Library Purchasing: Volume Count
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 20100
500
1000
1500
2000
Titl
e C
ount
Mean Sample Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesTotal Sample Press Output
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
17
Findings 1 Trends in Library Purchasing: Volume Count
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 20100
500
1000
1500
2000
Titl
e C
ount
Mean Sample Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesTotal Sample Press Output
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 1Trends in Library Purchasing: Volume Count
18
0
500
1000
1500
2000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Titl
e C
ount
Total Sample Press OutputMean Sample Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesU of MichiganU of North CarolinaU of WashingtonIndiana UOhio State UGeorge Washington URutgers UU of MissouriWayne State UUC-DavisU of UtahSUNY at AlbanyClemson UU of Central FloridaU of New HampshireNova Southeastern UU of North DakotaU of ToledoEastern Michigan UU of Colorado - DenverMiddle Tennessee State UU of San FranciscoU of AlaskaWorcester Polytechnic InstituteTexas Woman's UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityBarry UniversityTeachers College at Columbia UniversityAlabama State UniversityUniversity of DallasSouth Dakota School of Mines & TechnologyAlliant International University
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 1Trends in Library Purchasing:
Library Holdings as a % of Press Output by Year
19
0
25
50
75
10019
75
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2010
% o
f Pre
ss O
utpu
t
Mean Holdings (%)
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Returning to the first question...
20
1. Has there actually been a downturn in library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010? And if so, does this decline temporally coincide with the sharp increases in serials prices in the 1980s and 1990s, as is often claimed?
FINDING: Yes - but only since ~2000.
The claim that these purchases have been in free fall since the 1980s or 1990s does not hold up.
However: from the press perspective, one could see how it might seem that way.
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 2Larger Libraries ≠ Smaller Libraries
Title Count
21
0
300
600
900
1200
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Libr
ary
Hol
ding
s: T
itle
Cou
nt
Large Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesMedium-Large Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesMedium-Small Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesSmall Library Holdings of Sample Press Titles
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 2Larger Libraries ≠ Smaller Libraries
% Change Since 1975
22
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
% C
hang
e si
nce
1975
Total Sample Press OutputLarge Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesMedium-Large Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesMedium-Small Library Holdings of Sample Press TitlesSmall Library Holdings of Sample Press Titles
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
23
0
20
40
60
80
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Libr
ary
Hol
ding
s: T
itle
Cou
nt
Large Presses Medium Presses Small Presses
Findings 2Different Press Sizes, Similar Library
Purchasing TrendsTitle Count
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
24
Findings 2Different Press Sizes, Similar Library
Purchasing TrendsLibrary Holdings as a % of Press Output by Year
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Libr
ary
Hol
ding
s as
% o
f Sam
ple
Pres
s O
utpu
t
Large Presses Medium Presses Small Presses
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Returning to the second question...
25
2. Are the purchasing trends for university press books consistent across
a. Different-sized academic libraries (in terms of materials budgets)?
b. Different-sized university presses (in terms of title output)?
FINDING: There is a difference in trend between big and small libraries, but not between big and small presses.
Libraries above the median kept pace with increases in U. Press output until the late 1990s, and their purchasing only began to
decline after 2000.
Only the smallest libraries in the sample showed a steady decline in purchasing from these presses over the full 36-year period.
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 3University Press Books Are Different
26
-25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Purchasing by Sample Libraries
% C
hang
e si
nce
1975
Sample Press Monographs Overall Monographs
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Findings 3University Press Books Are Especially
Different at ARL Institutions
27
-67%
-33%
0%
33%
67%
100%
133%
167%
200%
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Purchasing by Sample Libraries
% C
hang
e si
nce
1975
ARL Institutions - Sample Presses ARL Institutions - Overall MonographsNon-ARL Institutions - Sample Presses Non-ARL Institutions - Overall Monographs
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Returning to the third question...
28
3. Does academic library purchasing of university press books from 1975-2010 exhibit the same trend as academic library purchasing of monographs in general over the same period?
FINDING: No - and especially not at ARL institutions.
ARL purchasing of university press books far outpaced purchasing of other monographs at those same libraries, at
least since the late 1980s.
Monographic purchasing overall may be suffering due to increases in electronic serials prices, but that overall trend does not uniformly extend to university press monographs.
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Conclusions (1)
29
• U Press output increased sharply from 1975 to 2004 - by nearly 200%
• Output declined after 2004; back down to 1999 levels by 2010
• U Library purchasing also increased from 1975 to 2000, but at a slower rate than press output - by “only” 140%
• Purchasing declined after 2000, much faster than decline in press output; back down to 1989 levels by 2010
• No temporal correlation between decline in U Library purchasing of U Press books and the “serials crisis” of the 1990s
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Conclusions (2)• Purchasing of U Press monographs has been
much more robust at large libraries than at small ones
• No apparent difference in purchasing trend by size of press
• U Library purchasing of U Press books has been far more robust than U Library monograph purchasing in general, especially at ARL institutions
30
Monday, March 31, 14
Overall:Something is happening here, but it doesn’t fit the fairy tale
31 Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Monday, March 31, 14
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Going Forward...
32
• How did the conventional wisdom diverge so far from what these data show? Is there something that this approach overlooks?
• What other explanations might there be for the decline in the fortunes of university presses?
• A few thoughts: “Big Deals” post-1997 or so; generalized university budget/econ woes; increase in DDA/PDA; application of usage data to hone approval plans
• Whatever happened, it happened later
• If U Press internal data show markedly different trends than those depicted here, why is that so?
• We hope they (you?) might share!
Monday, March 31, 14
Thanks!Elisabeth A. Jones & Paul N. Courant
Contact: elisjone@umich.edu
33
Library U N I V E R S I T Y O F M I C H I G A N L I B R A R Y
Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library913 South University AvenueAnn Arbor, Michigan 48109-1190
Monday, March 31, 14
top related