mpls-tp - 79th ietf1 mpls-tp control plane framework draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp- framework-03.txt...
Post on 24-Dec-2015
221 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 1
MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework
draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-cp-framework-03.txt
Contributors:Loa Andersson <loa.anderson@ericsson.com>Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>Luyuan Fang <lufang@cisco.com>Nabil Bitar <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>:
Eric Gray <Eric.Gray@Ericsson.com>Attila Takacs <attila.takacs@ericsson.com>Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.fr>Elisa Bellagamba <elisa.bellagamba@ericsson.com>
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 2
Draft ObjectivesProvide a context for the MPLS-TP control plane
Based on MPLS-TP RFCs and drafts• Notably requirements, framework and survivability
Based on existing IETF control plane – LSPs and PWs• Apply GMPLS/MPLS, PW control planes wherever possible
Reviews control plane requirementsDerived from other requirements, but stated in the context of control planeAll requirements must be satisfied
• By the LSP control plane alone for Network Layer Adaptation (FW Section 3.4.3)
• By the combination of PW and LSP control planes for Pseudowire Adaptation (FW Section 3.4.2)
Provides a mapping of requirements to existing IETF mechanismsIdentifies gaps
Does define any protocol extensionsExtensions to be covered in other drafts as needed
Reminder: TP does not require a control planeDrives which functions are in OAM and which are in Control Plane
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 3
1st Last Call-02 version last called
Received comments from WG and ITU-T (liaison)
A few themes in the commentsMissing references to / updates based on recent documentsGeneral editorial comments• Nits and inconsistencies (thank you!)
Needed clarifications Control of OAM vs Control Plane based OAMPWs and ASON (ITU-T)
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 4
Draft -03-03 Version issued
Addressed all LC commentsUpdated OAM Requirements section (2.3) to match current versions of [RFC5860] and [TP-OAM], and updated LSP/PW tables to matchAdded Section 2.5, Identifier Requirement based on [TP-IDENTIFIERS], and updated LSP/PW tables to matchAddressed minor and editorial feedbackRevised editors listAddressed Liaison comments • As described in mail to lists and in Liaison, see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg11587.html
• Note that only comments were responded to, other text changes were viewed as editorial suggestions/comments
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 5
Current Status
Draft in joint CCAMP, PWE, MPLS last call
Completes November 9th
Document also sent to ITU-T via liaison• Response sent Nov. 5
Some comments already received Editorial and minor clarificationsSome relate to document scope• Requirements come from other documents,
those documents need to be changed to impact CP requirements
• Document scope is limited to CP considerations
– Non-CP considerations are out-of-scope
MPLS-TP - 79th IETF 6
Next StepsAddress LC commentsFollow normal IETF process
top related