mro/id in rail a standard for the future - gs1 · mro/id in rail a standard for the future dominik...
Post on 27-Jul-2018
212 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
MRO/ID in Rail
A Standard for the FutureDominik Halbeisen SBB AG, Corporate SCM, October 2016, GS1 Meeting Brussels
Agenda.
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 2
1. Driving factors for improved asset and material management
2. The marking/identification challenges therein
3. The goal of the MRO/ID in Rail working group
4. Most-FAQs
5. Application example
6. Future outlook
7. Benefits
Manifold External Influences on the Rail Sector…In recent years the environment of the rail sector has changed.
Most importantly due to new legislation and steadily rising cost pressure.
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 3
ECM
EU 445/2011
TSI
SMS Infra
EU 1169/2010
SMS Operator
EU 1158/2010
CE
«Blue Guide»
Single European
Market Cost Pressure
Higher Reliability
New Automotive
Technologies
Supply Chain
Globalization
Improved
Service
Legislation Market Pressure
For the supplier to customer interfaces it looks like a relatively easy fix.
Many elements already seem to be there or fairly quick to implement.
…Require Improved Asset and Material ManagementThis requires, among other things, a new level of asset and material management in MRO value
added chains, as this is the basis for further process improvement and stability
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 4
Serialization based
on supplier S/N (where necessary)
Marking of part numbers(where missing)
Today Tomorrow
At a Second Glance First Challenges Appear…
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 5
Including your part number (= the customer part number) on a material is:
- Feasible for parts manufactured for you only
… because the solution toolbox is not complete
- Costly for parts manufactured
not only for you.
-- Solution 1: Follow an
industry standard (like DIN)
-- And if there is no
industry standard?
-> no solution today
OK
OK
NOT OK
At a Further Glance even more Challenges Appear…
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 6
Which one is the S/N?
Reg-Nr.?
Series?
Fabr.Nr.?
Nr.? ID-Nr.?
No description?
How is it constructed?
Is it unique in my
asset mgmt. system?
09A884
101607
006-1-3026 04/07 01
0031
How do I need to type the
data string in?
… because the numbering conventions are not clear
What AIDC-technology can be
requested to eliminate typing errors?
10710
No description?
What about Marking Parts Yourself?By marking parts yourself you could do it your own way without relying on other parties
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 7
… so marking yourself is clearly not the ideal solutionMarking parts yourself allows you to:
- Remain independent of your suppliers
- Use your own AIDC-standard
However:
- This is costly and time consuming
- Can be difficult
- Your label normally has a shorter life
expectancy than the part
- There may be no space
- This is a waste, as often
there already are AIDC markings
- Is impossible in a shared refurbishment pool
Getting Your Parts Marked is Clearly a Cross-company Challenge…
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 8
… shared by many industry players… and addressed in the MRO/ID in Rail working group
What is the Goal of the MRO/ID in Rail Working Group?
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 9
To create a rail-specific numbering standard for assets and materials
with rules and ID-keys for:
• Secondary part numbers (= class IDs)
• Unique serial numbers (= serial IDs),
Based on part numbers and independent of part numbers
• Regulate the use of the following attributes
Manufacturing lot ID
Refurbishment lot ID
Function level of a part
Revision level of a part
Refabrication location
• As well as establish marking rules for primary packaging
… a numbering standard aimed at multilateral interfaces
Most-FAQs
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 10
What parts will be affected?
• At part number level: Parts manufactured for n-customers
• At S/N level: Primarily parts with safety, operational, TSI or
high economic relevance
Will I have to replace my part numbers?
• Normally no. The new normed class ID is meant as secondary key
Will I have to replace my serial numbers?
• Only the S/N marked on a part
What is the timeline
• The standard is planned to take effect on the 1st of January 2017.
• Its application is from then on planned to gradually become a
requirement for suppliers to the main actors in the rail sector
ETCS-Balises Fastenings for ETCS-Balises
Application Example: ETCS-Balises
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 11
Current serial number
will be replaced by a GIAI(during 2017)
In a first step receive a
GTIN on the packaging
In a second step will be
Directly marked with a GTIN(during 2017)
(8004)76132994000000000001
(01)07612399012347
Future Outlook for the Standard Development
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 12
In Q1/2017 phase 2 of the standard will commence
• Goal: define rules for BOM / data-exchange
• Aim: make the next step towards a «RAIL CLOUD»
What is the Benefit for Me?
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 13
• For suppliers: Reduced number of deviating and contradictory
customer requirements. The standard protects you.
• For customers: Increased buying power in regards to marking
• As a consequence: Increased certainty for production and
IT-process planning in regards to marking
• Therefore: Reduction of process complexity
• A tool box for so far unresolved asset and material marking cases
• After phase 2: A tool box for the standardized BOM/data exchange
• FINALLY: the «RAIL CLOUD», which will allow for sharing of configuration
data, maintenance data, part histories and a common, shared data basis
… for ALL parties involved in the lifecycle of a part
Temporary ETCS Balises for Building Sites
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 15
What are ETCS-balises?
They are the modern version of traffic lights and signals telling a train
how fast it can go, whether it is allowed to enter a given part of track etc.
And this is what the names ETCS stands for: European Train Control System
Pilot: Application of GS1 MRO/ID in Rail standard for temporary
ETCS-balises
For temporary and mobile ETCS-balises the GS1 MRO/ID in Rail standard
will be rolled out in 2017.
Theses balises circulate in intervals of roughly 8 weeks and
need to be individually programmed for each building site.
Asset management is crucial!
Process yesterday (without MRO/ID in Rail)
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 16
Assets managed as SAP PM Equipment
• Based on SBB S/N or equipment number or part number
Process limits:
• No space for permanent barcodes
• Therefore no use of AIDC-technologies
• Either: How to make sure the correct serial and equipment numbers are
by SBB labelled to the correct object?
• Or: Supplier uses/affixes multiple numbers/tags (cost and data exchange)
• Use of additional labels is a waste of money and time
• How does a user know which number to use (without specific training)?
• Data exchange with supplier difficult (data matching)
Process tomorrow (with GIAI as per MRO/ID in Rail)
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 17
Assets managed as SAP PM Equipment
• In the system only: SBB S/N, equipment number or part number
• On the tag: Supplier GIAI, barcoded (no more SBB S/N)
New processes opportunities:
• Permanent barcode (enabler)
• Therefore use of AIDC-technologies possible (faster, less errors)
• S/N does not have to be typed in any longer (faster, less errors)
• No more affixing of SBB S/N by supplier (reduced cost)
• Easy S/N recognition by users across all types of parts (once rolled out)
• Data exchange with supplier easy (no more data matching)
What about part number level?
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 18
The MRO/ID in Rail Standard completes the tool box
• Parts marked yellow: Serialized parts. Marked with GIAI
• Parts marked in blue: SBB-specific parts. Marked with SBB part number
• Parts marked in green: Not SBB specific parts. Marked with Siemens GTIN
Search and Result Page for Equipment w/o GIAI
SBB • K-SCM-LOG • October 2016 - GS1 Meeting Brussels 21
top related