national cardiovascular disease database (ncvd) 2009 update nham asm 2009 17 april 2009 national...

Post on 17-Dec-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

National Cardiovascular Disease Database National Cardiovascular Disease Database ((NCVDNCVD)) ACS Registry PCI Registy

2009 Update 2009 Update

NHAM ASM 2009NHAM ASM 200917 April 200917 April 2009

Dr SIM Kui-Hian – Chair NCVD Board Dr Robaayah Zambahari – Chair NCVD Board

Dr Jeyaindran Tan Sri Sinnadurai – Chair ACS RegistryDr Hj Azhari Rosman – Chair ACS Registry

Dr Rosli Mohd Ali – Chair PCI Registry

Dr Wan Azman – Chair Publication

Rationale – NCVD Registries

Are the population & the patients groups in

Malaysia similar to those being investigated in

the clinical trials?

Are our hospitals following the guidelines set out

by the expert committees?

Are we seeing the same results and benefits of

implementing evidence-based strategies?

Which strategy will be the best value in terms of

cost-effectiveness for the Ministry of Health?

Objectives - NCVD ACS Registry

Determine the number & the time trend of ACS in

Malaysia

Determine the socio-demographic profiles of these

patients to better identify the high-risk group in our

Malaysian population

Determine the efficiency of, and adherence to

current treatment guidelines

Determine the cost to the nation by cardiovascular

disease and the cost effectiveness of treatment and

prevention programs

Stimulate and facilitate research of cardiovascular

disease using this database

No more‘guestimate’

Milestones - NCVD Registries 15 Oct 2005 Approval of MOH-MRG

9 Dec 2005 1st NCVD – ACS Registry Steering Comm

1st Jan 2006 eNCVD online data capturing

NCVD piloted in 6 centres

Expanded to nation wide – state government hospitals

31st March 2006 Officially launched by Director General of Health Malaysia

@ 10th ASM, National Heart Association of Malaysia

14 April 2007 1st Annual NCVD @ 11th NHAM ASM

19 Dec 2007 ACS Report Writing Committee

4 April 2008 2nd Annual NCVD @ 12th NHAM ASM

7 Dec 2006 1st NCVD - PCI Registry Steering comm

3 April 2008 1st NCVD – CABGs Registry Steering Comm

Organization of NCVD ACS registry

Sponsor

Governance Board

Expert Panel

NCVD Registry Office

Source Data Providers

Users group

Supporting Staff

Clinical Registry Manager Ms S Gunavathy Selvaraj Clinical Registry Associate Ms Noor Amirah Muhamad

Ms Hamimatunnisa Johar Clinical Epidemiologist Dr Jamaiyah Haniff

Ms S Gunavathy Selvaraj ICT Manager Ms Celine Tsai Pao Chien Database AdministratorMs Lim Jie Ying Application Developer Ms Amy R. Porle Network Administrator Mr Kevin Ng Hong Heng

Mr Adlan Ab. Rahman Webmaster & Publisher Ms Azizah Alimat Clinical Data Manager Ms Teo Jau Shya Biostatistics Consultants Dr Hoo Ling Ping

Ms Norhafizah Bt. Ab. Manan

eNCVD – real time report

Accessible – Anywhere & Anytime

Key of success

COLLABORATION

joint sacrifices of

Ministry Of Health’s hospitals

Ministry of Education’s (university) hospitals

Private hospitals

Ministry of Health Malaysia

• 2006

• 73 CCU in Malaysia

• Incidence of ACS admission

• 47.1 per 100,000 population

• Incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD)

• 141 per 100,000 population

• Over 4000 ACS being denied admission into its CCU

• 30% shortfall in CCU beds

Provision of ACS services in Malaysia ACS admissions

37 CCUs in MOH hospitals 60%

3 university hospitals’ CCUs 10%

private sector 27%

economically developed states like Penang, Perak,

Selangor/Wilayah Persekutuan have disproportionately large

number of ACS admissions

less developed states (Kedah/Perlis, Terengganu, Sabah and

Sarawak) were underserved

Patients in private hospitals are more likely to receive invasive

coronary interventions (emergency angiogram, PCI and CABG)

Age group, no. % (N = 3422)

20 - <30 23 (1)

30 - <40 143 (4)

40 - <50 621 (18)

50 - <60 1054 (31)

60 - <70 881 (26)

70 - <80 571 (17)

80 129 (4)

Age Group for patient with ACS,Malaysia 2006

Age-gender distribution male pts with ACS by ethnic group, Malaysia 2006

% o

f pa

tient

s

Male patients

0

10

20

30

40

Malay Chinese Indian Others*

20-<30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 60-<70 70-<80 >=80

Age-gender distribution for female pts with ACS by ethnic group, Malaysia

2006 N

o. o

f pa

tient

s

Female Patients

0

30

60

90

120

150

Malay Chinese Indian Others*

20-<30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 60-<70 70-<80 >=80

Age group (years) distribution for pts with ACS by ACS stratum, Malaysia 2006

% o

f pa

tien

ts

Age group0

10

20

30

STEMI NSTEMI UA

20-<30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 60-<70 70-<80 >=80

Gender, no. % (N=3422)

Male 2569(75)

Female 853 (25)

ACS Gender distribution Malaysia 2006

75%

25%

MaleFemale

49.2

23.0 23.3

1.4 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00

10

20

30

40

50

60

Malay

ChineseIndian

Iban

Other Malaysia

n

Foreigner

Bidayuh

Kadazan

MelanauMurut

Bajau

Orang Asli

Ethnicity

% o

f pa

tien

tsACS Ethnic group distribution

Malaysia 2006

Overall outcomes for pts with ACS, Malaysia 2006

in-hospital 30 days

NCVD-ACS GRACE NCVD-ACS

ACS stratum 7%

STEMI 9% 7% 11%

NSTEMI 7% 6% 8%

UA 3% 3% 4%

Overall outcomes for pts with ACS, Malaysia 2006

in-hospital mortality 30-day

mortality

elderly age group 10% 13%

Female patients 8% 10%

male patients 6% 8%

diabetes 7% 10%

without diabetes 5% 6%

Overall outcomes for pts with STEMI ACS, Malaysia 2006

in-hospital mortality 30-day

mortality

use of fibrinolysis 7% 9%

No fibrinolysis 13% 16%

PCI 8% 11%

No PCI 9% 11%

Prognostic factors higher Killip class, higher TIMI risk score, former or current cigarette

smoking, family history of premature cardiovascular disease,

dyslipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Older age

Report:NCVD-ACS Registry Annual report year 2006

Freely downloadable online at http://www.acrm.org.my/ncvd/publications.htm

N C V DACS Registry

Interim Analysis@ 9 April 2009

Patient Demographics : ACS by Age group

Age (years) 2006 2007 2008

Age (Mean ± sd) 59.12 ± 12.07 58.97 ± 11.9 58.89 ± 11.98

Results as of 28th October 2008

17.96

27.01

3.53

0.480.71

3.89

16.6

29.77

26.63

3.99

17.37

0.44

4.18

17.1

29.75

5.00

17.14

29.46

26.85

17.08

3.93

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

20 - <30 30 - <40 40 - <50 50 - <60 60 - <70 70 - <80 >80

Age Group (Years)

% o

f p

atie

nts

2006

2007

2008

ACS Patients by Gender

2006 2007 2008

Gender (%) N=3533 N=3857 N=1714

Male 74.67 75.86 75.09

Female 25.33 23.72 24.33

Results as of 28th October 2008, n=9,104

3.43

46.51

4.45

23.35

49.08

22.98

4.43

22.8223.07

43.7

24.2724.62

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Malay Chinese Indian Other Malaysia

Ethnicity

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

) o

f P

ati

en

ts 2006

2007

2008

ACS Patients by Ethnicity

Results as of 28th October 2008, n=9,104

AC S s tratum by year

41.21

26.13

0.28

20.92

30.57

5.06

15.05

25.38

32.68

43.4542.18

17.39

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

S TE MI NS TE MI UA Missing

AC S s tratum

Per

cent

age

(%)

2006 2007 2008

Results as of 28th October 2008, n=9,104

CV Risk factors

Dyslipidaemia 33.90 %

Hypertension 61.30 %

Diabetes 43.48 %

Family History of CVD 12.77 %

MI history 16.76 %

Documented CAD 15.15 %

New onset angina (< 2 wks) 13.23 %

Chronic angina (>2 wks) 47.73 %

Chronic Lung Disease 3.45 %

Renal disease 7.14 %

Peripheral vascular disease 0.87 %

Cerebrovascular disease 3.84 %

Heart Failure 7.77 %

2008(n=6,516)

43 %

57 %

23 %

68%

7.2%

10.3%

8.3%

11%

GRACE

32.42 %

57.69 %

40.56 %

11.16 %

16.68 %

16.21 %

48.08%

11.29%

3.26 %

6.40 %

0.75 %

3.42 %

6.46 %

2009(n=10,846)

TIMI Risk Score NSTEMI/UA (n=5,427)

11.72

17.36

25.7623.55

1.290.17

14.09

6.06

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

TIMI Risk Score

Per

cen

tag

e (%

)

Results as of 9th April 2009, n= 10,864

Given at this centre 60.81 %

Given at another centre prior to transfer

12.41 %

Not given - proceeded directly to primary angioplasty

7.25 %

Not given - Missed Thrombolysis 12.48 %

Not given - patient refusal 0.17 %

Not given - Contraindicated 4.21 %

Not Applicable 2.67 %

Fibrinolytic Therapy Status

Baseline (n= 4,705)

Results as of 9th April 2009, n= 10,864

Door to needle time

  

Year

2006 2007 2008

Door to needle time 98.9 +

140.5588.42 + 130.02

86.87 + 129.18

(Mean + SD)

Results as of 28th October 2008, n=9,104

Pharmacological Therapy

Drug used/given during admission (%)

Drug Pre-admission

During After discharge

ASA 52.26 85.98 69.78

ADP Antagonist 20.50 60.53 47.08

GP Receptor inhibitor 0.52 2.90

Unfrac Heparin 1.29 11.36

LMWH 9.75 50.64

Beta Blocker 24.51 61.73 52.40

ACE Inhibitor 18.87 53.57 45.08

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

4.60 7.35 6.32

Statin 30.03 83.97 69.31

Results as of 9th April 2009, n= 10,864

Follow Up at 30 days & 12 months

Outcome

Alive 85.39%

Death 3.45 %

Lost to FU 8.98 %

Transferred 0.58 %

Missing 1.6 %

84.53 %

2.31 %

10.58 %

0.18 %

2.4 %

Cause of death

CVD 55.31 %

Non CVD 10.62 %

Others 13.27 %

Missing 20.80 %

47.44 %

8.97 %

21.79 %

21.80 %

30days (n= 6,550) 1year (n= 3,374)

n= 226 n= 78

Cardiovascular readmission

ACS STEMI NSTEMI UA Missing

3.89 %14.51 %14.90 %53.73 %16.86 %

Heart Failure 0.49 %

Revascularization 5.15 %

PCI 87.54 %

CABG 9.79 %

Stroke 0.11 %

2.07 %12.86 %7.14 %61.43 %11.43 %

0.53%

3.11%

78.09 %

15.24 %

0.06 %

30days (n= 6,550) 1year (n= 3,374)

Outcome at Discharge

Results as of 28th October 2008, n=9,104

0.233.33

6.711.19

91.85

0.181.717.57

85.12

14.99

6.65

74.80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

D is charged T rans ferred D ied Mis s ingOutc ome

Per

cen

tag

e(%

) of p

atien

ts

2006

2007

2008

N C V DPCI Registry

Interim Analysis@ 9 April 2009

Total PCI = 6,441 as of 30th October 2008

Age (years) 2007 2008

Age (Mean ± sd) 56.7 ±10.1 56.72 ± 10.08

Patient Demographics : PCI by Age Group

28.06

0.810.12

4.15

20.15

36.97

19.51

3.90.5

10.22

27.19

36.14

0.73

11.12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

20 - <30 30 - <40 40 - <50 50 - <60 60 - <70 70 - <80 >80

Age Group (years)

% o

f p

ati

en

ts

2007 2008

PCI by Gender

Gender (%) 2007 2008

N= 3,952 N=2,482

Male 81.28 82.72

Female 18.55 17.16

Total PCI = 6,441 as of 30th October 2008

Ethnicity (%) 2007 2008

N= 3,952 N=2,482

Malay 46.38 47.34

Chinese 25.56 25.10

Indian 23.58 21.15

Other Malaysia 3.98 5.52

PCI by Ethnicity

Other Malaysian includes Punjabi, Iban, Kadazan Dusun, Melanau, Bidayuh, Other Sabahan and Other Sarawakian

Total PCI = 6,441 as of 30th October 2008

89.4

4.78 1.92 2.052.784.31 1.49

91.98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Elective Urgent Rescue Primary

PCI Status

Per

cen

tag

e (%

) o

f p

atie

nts

2007

2008

PCI Status by year

Total PCI = 6,441 as of 30th October 2008

Stent Used

2007 2008

Other stents refer to stents other than listed in the Reference Stent List

Total Stent, n =10,152 as of 10th of October 2008

61.34%30.39%

0.32%2.89% 5.06%

DE S B MS

B ioabs orbable A ntibody C oated

Others

2.30%1.69%

42.41% 53.59%

0.02%

D E S B MSB ioabs orbable Antibody C oatedO thers

Aspirin 92.20 %

Clopidogrel 93.14 %

Ticlopidine 5.62 %

Statin 90.18 %

Beta blocker 71.01 %

ACE inhibitor 53.64 %

ARB 13.65 %

Warfarin 1.10 %

Others 68.71 %

Medications at dischargeBaseline (n=8,236)

Total PCI = 8,236 as of 9th April 2009

Outcome at Discharge of Notification

Outcome (%)2007 2008

N=3,952 N=2,482

Alive 3791 (95.93) 2440 (98.31)

Transferred 2 (0.05) 0 (0)

Died 38 (0.96) 24(0.97)

Missing 121 (3.07) 18 (0.72)

Total PCI = 6,441 as of 30th October 2008

2007 2008

N=1,429 N=1429 N=428 N=917 N=107

Outcome

(No., %)30 Days FU 6 Months FU 1 Year FU 30 Days FU 6 Months FU 1 Year Fu

Discharged1364

(95.45)

653

(96.03)

411

(96.03)

900

(98.15)

106

(99.07)N/A

Transferred1

(0.07)

0

(0)

0

(0)

2

(0.22)

0

(0)N/A

Died9

(0.63)

7

(1.03)

2

(0.47)

4

(0.44)

1

(0.93)N/A

Lost to FU55

(3.85)

20

(2.94)

15

(3.50)

11

(1.20)N/A N/A

Outcome at Follow up

NCVD Registries

PopulationPublic Health

Disease Burden/Risk Factors

Hospital

ACS/PCI/CABG

Communities

Rehabilitation

My NCDs NCVD ACS RegistryPCI Registry

CABGs Registry

Implantable devicesHeart Failure

European Society of Cardiology

American College of Cardiology

www.crc.gov.my

www.acrm.org.my/ncvd

Ta & G’day

Acknowledgement

Clinical Research Centre, HKL

Datamed Computing Services Sdn. Bhd.

ClinResearch Sdn. Bhd.

National Heart Association of Malaysia

Ministry of Health Malasyaia

Participating centres – Nurses, Doctors

top related