ndiipp project: collection and preservation of at-risk digital geospatial data partners: ncsu...
Post on 21-Jan-2016
229 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
NDIIPP Project:Collection and Preservation of At-Risk Digital Geospatial Data
Partners:
NCSU LibrariesProject Lead: Steve Morris
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Lead: Zsolt Nagy
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 2
Project Context
Partnership between university library (NCSU) and state agency (NCCGIA)$520,000 fundingFocus on state and local geospatial content in North Carolina (state demonstration)Tied to NC OneMap, which provides seamless access to data, metadata, and inventory information
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 3
Targeted Content
Resource TypesGIS “vector” (point/line/polygon) dataDigital orthophotography Digital mapsTabular data (e.g. assessment data)
Content ProducersMostly state, local, regional agenciesSome university, not-for-profit, commercialSelected local federal projects
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 4
Vector data (scale, accuracy, currency, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 5
Time series – vector dataParcel Boundary Changes 2001-2004, North Raleigh, NC
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 6
Aerial imagery (image resolution, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 7
Aerial imagery (image resolution, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 8
Aerial imagery (image resolution, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 9
Aerial imagery (image resolution, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 10
Time series – Ortho imageryVicinity of Raleigh-Durham International Airport 1993-2002
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 11
Tabular data (combined with vector data)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 12
Tabular data (combined with vector data)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 13
Tabular data (combined with vector data)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 14
Earlier Acquisition Efforts
NCSU University Extension project 2000-2001
Target: County/city data in eastern NC“Digital rescue” not “digital preservation”
Project learning outcomesConfirmed concerns about long term accessNeed for efficient inventory/acquisitionWide range in rights/licensingNeed to work within statewide infrastructureAcquired experience; unanticipated collaboration
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 15
Improving Access to Local Content and ServicesCounty and City GIS Directories
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 16
Processing Ingested Datae.g. Testing for data gaps in county orthophoto sets
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 17
Geographic Information Services - Trends
Map CollectionsPaper Maps
Data CollectionsCD-ROMs, File server & FTP access
Map ServersIntegrate collected data, Web-based mapping
Now: Map Portals and Streaming DataFront end to distributed, streaming data (OpenGIS)
MapCollections
DataCollections
MapServers
MapPortals
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 18
Content Identification and Selection
Work from NC OneMap Data Inventory
Combine with inventory information from various state agencies and from previous NCSU efforts
Develop methodology for selecting from among “early,” “middle,” and “late” stage products
Develop criteria for time series development
Investigate use of emerging Open Geospatial Consortium technologies in data identification
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 19
Content Acquisition
Work from NC OneMap Data Sharing Agreements as a starting point (the “blanket”)
Secure individual agreements (the “quilt”)
Investigate use of OGC technologies in capture
Use METS as a metadata wrapperIngest FGDC metadata (crosswalk to MODS?)
Maybe METS DRM short term; GeoDRM long term
Consider PREMIS elements (extract from FGDC?)
Consider links to services; version management
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 20
Partnership Building
Work within context of the NC OneMap initiativeState, local, federal partnership
State expression of the National Map
Defined characteristic: “Historic and temporal data will be maintained and available”Advisory Committee drawn from the NC Geographic Information Coordinating Council subcommittees
Seek external partnersNational States Geographic Information Council FGDC Historical Data Committee
… more
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 21
Content Retention and Transfer
Ingest into DspaceLook more generically at the issue of putting geospatial content into digital repositories
Investigate re-ingest into a second platform
Start to define format migration pathsSpecial problem: geodatabases
Purse long term solutionRoles of data producing agencies, state agencies; NC OneMap; NCSU
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 22
End of Project Outcomes
Components which become part of state geospatial data infrastructure
NC OneMap objectives for long term access
Start a dialog about digital preservation; create stories about digital preservation that can be told in geospatial industry venues
Components which NCSU Libraries continues for its own business reasons
High user demand for local data, historical versions
Components which are not sustainable
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 23
Big Problems/Issues
Management of data versions over timeHow to “get current object/metadata/DRM” from a given data object?
Relation of the canonical metadata package to the ingest (and export) metadata package for a particular repository environment
Tailor the canonical package to the repository environment or make the acquaintance when needed?
Format migration paths (geodatabases, etc.)
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 24
Big Problems/Issues (Continued)
Preserving relational databases
Role of persistent identifiers
Semantic issues (data attributes, etc.)
Viability of web services consumption as an archive development approach
Getting data sharing agreements to cover preservation use cases
Relation of DRM statement & rights for current object to older versions of object
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 25
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 26
Find – View – GetNorth Carolina’s Digital Geospatial Data
A Comprehensive, Statewide Geographic Data Resource
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 27
NC Local Landscape
100 Counties, 92 With GIS80 Counties with 1st Run Hi Res DB60+ Counties with Unique Map Servers.Growing Number of Municipal Systems$162 Million Plus . . .
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 28
NC Geographic Information Coordinating Council (GICC)
General Statute32 Member Council10 Local MembersCommittees – LGC; FIC; SGUC; SMAC; TACAdministrative Agency – NC CGIA
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 29
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 30
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 31
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 32
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 33
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 34
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 35
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 36
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 37
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 38
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 39
NC OneMap Data Survey
Contains specific questions about hardware, software, databases, projections, data distribution, metadata, and GIS “framework” data layers (frequency of update, scale, attributes, maintenance, source)For consistency purposes, modeled after the NC Floodplain Mapping GIS SurveyContains questions that address federal homeland security requirements
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 40
NC OneMap Initial Data Layers Produced by Cities and Counties
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Ortho Cadastral Roads Municipal Bnd.County Bnd. ETJs Surface Waters ElevationLand Use Airports Schools UniversitiesHospitals Storm Surge Police Stations Fire StationsLandfills Watersheds Wetlands Hazardous Disposal SitesBuilding Footprints Future Land Use Water Lines Sewer Lines
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 41
Better informed decisions Seamless map integration when tapping local, state, and federal data sources Enhanced statewide coordination and cost-savings Integration of data from multiple communities and jurisdictions presents new opportunities to address regional issues and problems NC OneMap is in line with The National Map initiative Statewide community of geographic data stakeholders tackles the technical and policy issues Successful intergovernmental collaboration rewards elected officials, government leaders and North Carolina citizens
Benefits of NC OneMap
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 42
Note: Percentages based on the actual number of respondents to each question 43
Questions?
top related