neuroergonomics for flight safety - gob.mx · nec septembre, 8-11 munich, germany. 38. institut...

Post on 20-Mar-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Neuroergonomicsfor flight safety

Dr. Vsevolod PeysakhovichISAE-SUPAERO, Toulouse, France

vsevolod.peysakhovich@isae-supaero.frPeysakhovich@peysakhovich

What can go wrong?

2

A difficult landing…

3

…and limited attentional resources

4

48 sec

Human causes of accidents

5

1900 Today

Human causes of accidents

6

1900 Today

Cockpit without pilots?

7

Aircraft evolution…

8

Aircraft evolution improved safety

9

Air

bu

s, 2

01

9 1950 1960 1980 1990

Average human cognitive capacity

but…

“Errors” are inevitable! Let’s adapt to them

“I was thinking. I was telling myselfthat what was particularly missingfor the good system performance, itwas the human error, and that it hasto urgently get involved.”

10

“Errors” are inevitable! Let’s adapt to them

11

Adaptive systems: closing the loop

12

System state

Control

Operator state

Feedback

What is neuroergonomics?

13

Neuroscience Ergonomics

Why measure something at all?

14

What we can measure?

15

Ph

oto

: O

. K

on

on

enk

o/

Ro

sco

smo

s

What we can measure?

16

Ph

oto

: O

. K

on

on

enk

o/

Ro

sco

smo

s

Eye tracking:• Eye movements• Pupil diameter

EEG:• Brain waves (Δ, Θ, A, B, Γ, M)• Event-related potentials (ERP)

fNIRSHaemodynamic response

Face temperature

System state

Respiratory rate

ECG:• Heart rate• Heart rate variability

How can we measure?

17

EEG fNIRS Eye Tracking

P

O

R

T

A

B

I

L

I

T

Y

A

C

C

U

R

A

C

Y

Aerospace: different operational constraints

18

Studying phenomena from lab to real life

19

Ecologic validityExperimental control

How to study inattentional deafness?

20

Oddball paradigm

Ecologic validityExperimental control

How to study inattentional deafness?

21Giraudet, L., St-Louis, M. E., Scannella, S., & Causse, M. (2015). P300 event-related potential as an indicator of inattentional deafness?. PLoS one, 10(2)

To land or not to land?400 times

Ecologic validityExperimental control

How to study inattentional deafness?

22

To hear or not to hear?240 times

Dehais, F., Roy, R. N., & Scannella, S. (2019). Inattentional deafness to auditory alarms. Behavioural brain research, 360, 51-59.

Ecologic validityExperimental control

How to study inattentional deafness?

23Dehais, F., Rida, I., Roy, R. N., Iversen, J., Mullen, T., & Callan, D. (2019). A pBCI to Predict Attentional Error Before it Happens in Real Flight Conditions. IEEE SMC

To hear or not to hear?1000 times

Ecologic validityExperimental control

How to study inattentional deafness?

24

• Real alert with context

• Once or twice

• More pilots

• 100% accuracy

Ecologic validityExperimental control

From science (fiction) to real life

What can we implement today?

Hint: Monitoring matters!

26

Pilot Not Flying Pilot Monitoring

Eye tracking systems ancestors

27

Fitts, Jones & Milton (1950)

Modern eye tracking systems

28

Wearable Remote

Eye tracking in an aircraft

29

Eye tracking in full flight simulator

30

Eye-tracking integration

31

Gaze-BasedFlight Deck Adaptation

Gaze-BasedAircraft

Adaptation

In flight

Pilot Training &

Performance Analysis

On ground

Visual BehaviorDatabase

On-boardGaze

Recordings

Visual BehaviorChecking

System

Peysakhovich, V., Lefrançois, O., Dehais, F., & Causse, M. (2018). The neuroergonomics of aircraft cockpits: the four stages of eye-tracking integration to enhance flight safety. Safety, 4(1), 8.

Eye-tracking integration

32

Gaze-BasedFlight Deck Adaptation

Gaze-BasedAircraft

Adaptation

In flight

Pilot Training &

Performance Analysis

On ground

Visual BehaviorDatabase

On-boardGaze

Recordings

Visual BehaviorChecking

System

Peysakhovich, V., Lefrançois, O., Dehais, F., & Causse, M. (2018). The neuroergonomics of aircraft cockpits: the four stages of eye-tracking integration to enhance flight safety. Safety, 4(1), 8.

Eye-tracking integration

33

Gaze-BasedFlight Deck Adaptation

Gaze-BasedAircraft

Adaptation

In flight

Pilot Training &

Performance Analysis

On ground

Visual BehaviorDatabase

On-boardGaze

Recordings

Visual BehaviorChecking

System

Peysakhovich, V., Lefrançois, O., Dehais, F., & Causse, M. (2018). The neuroergonomics of aircraft cockpits: the four stages of eye-tracking integration to enhance flight safety. Safety, 4(1), 8.

Human state integration

34

Human State-Based

Flight Deck Adaptation

Human State-Based

Aircraft Adaptation

In flight

Pilot Training &

Performance Analysis

On ground

Human StateDatabase

On-boardHuman State Recordings

Human StateChecking

System

Peysakhovich, V., Lefrançois, O., Dehais, F., & Causse, M. (2018). The neuroergonomics of aircraft cockpits: the four stages of eye-tracking integration to enhance flight safety. Safety, 4(1), 8.

What is yet to be solved?

1. Summarize big (human) data

2. Certification(Explainable AI)

3. Ethics and privacy

4. 100% accuracy35

Human State-BasedFlight Deck Adaptation

Human State-BasedAircraft Adaptation

In flight

Pilot Training & Performance

Analysis

On ground

HumanState

Database

On-boardHuman State Recordings

Human StateChecking

System1

23 41 4

Technology! But also safety regulations…

36

Venues to talk more about neuroergonomics

37

▪ ETAVIMarch, 17

Toulouse, France

▪ ICCASMarch, 18-19

Toulouse, France

▪ NECSeptembre, 8-11Munich, Germany

38

Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace

10, avenue Edouard Belin – BP 54032

31055 Toulouse Cedex 4 – France

T +33 5 61 33 80 80

www.isae-supaero.fr

39

¡Muchas gracias por su atención!

Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace

10, avenue Edouard Belin – BP 54032

31055 Toulouse Cedex 4 – France

T +33 5 61 33 80 80

www.isae-supaero.fr

40

¡Muchas gracias por su atención!

Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace

10, avenue Edouard Belin – BP 54032

31055 Toulouse Cedex 4 – France

T +33 5 61 33 80 80

www.isae-supaero.fr

Aviation – the safest transportation mode

42

Air

bu

s, 2

01

9

Are we too reliant on automation?

43

Decreasing manual flying skills Necessity to master (and to monitor)the latest changes in cockpit technology

It’s all started with an idea…

44

Eye tracking systems ancestors

45

Shackel (1960)Dodge & Cline (1901)

Modern eye tracking systems

46

SR

Res

earc

h,

Ey

eL

ink

100

0 P

lus

Pu

pil

La

bs,

Pu

pil

Inv

isib

le

top related