new holy angel university college of criminal justice … · 2018. 2. 1. · 4logic holy angel...
Post on 22-Oct-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
4LOGIC
HOLY ANGEL UNIVERSITY College of Criminal Justice Education and Forensics
4LOGIC
University Vision, Mission, Goals and Objectives:
Mission Statement (VMG)
We, the academic community of Holy Angel University, declare ourselves to be a Catholic University. We dedicate ourselves to our core purpose, which is to provide accessible quality education that transforms students into persons of conscience, competence, and compassion. We commit ourselves to our vision of the University as a role-model catalyst for countryside development and one of the most influential, best managed Catholic universities in the Asia-Pacific region. We will be guided by our core values of Christ-centeredness, integrity, excellence, community, and societal responsibility. All these we shall do for the greater glory of God. LAUS DEO SEMPER!
A center of excellence in the criminal justice education and forensics producing top-caliber professionals who are globally competitive and are equipped with well-founded knowledge in the field of law enforcement, criminal justice and forensics
Mission
To nurture its students with the comprehensive and updated knowledge, develop their skills and high level of competencies, in the field of law enforcement, criminal justice, and forensic science
Goal
To enhance student engagement through dynamic and high–quality instruction for students to stay in the course and graduate on time. Objectives
1. To hire academically and professionally qualified faculty who are values oriented, proficient to deliver quality instructions both in-campus and
off-campus settings;
2. To recruit guest lecturers who are highly qualified experts in the field of criminalistics and jurisprudence;
3. To continuously acquire state-of-the-art laboratory and equipment
-
4LOGIC
4. To establish linkages and partnership with key local, national or international government and non-government institution; law enforcement
agencies for the on-the job training and immersion programs
5. To engage both faculty and student in an extensive research and extension activities in pursuit of new knowledge and development
initiatives in law enforcement, criminal justice and forensic sciences
6. To register a consistent significant board examination performance that will be included among the top performing schools in the country.
Program Outcomes – CRIMINOLOGY
Academic Quality
and
Organizational
Excellence
Authentic
Instrument
for
Countrysid
e
Developm
ent
Great University to
Work For
Faithful
Catholic
Educatio
n
1. Apply knowledge essential to the conduct of criminological research on
crimes, crime causation, victims, and offenders to include deviant
behavior;
√ √ √
2. Apply knowledge, skills essential to the practice of crime detection and
investigation and fields of criminalistics;
√ √ √
3. Apply knowledge, skills in criminal law, evidence and procedure; √ √ √
4. Apply knowledge, skills in law enforcement administration; √ √ √
5. Apply knowledge, skills in handling offenders’ welfare and development
for their re-integration to the community.
√ √ √
CORE VALUES
-
4LOGIC
COURSE LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
At the end of the course, the student should be able to:
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
Identify and distinguish the problem areas, theories, nature, aim, usefulness and relation of philosophy and logic to the humanities or other
Define and analyze concepts, terms, propositions, inferences and syllogisms as to their soundness, veracity and relevance;
Program Outcomes – CRIMONOLOGY
CHRIST - CENTEREDNESS
INTEGRITY
EXCELLENCE
COMMUNITY AND SOCIETAL RESPONSIBILITY
LEADERSHIP
SCHOLARSHIP
LIFELONG LEARNING
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
INNOVATION
GENDER SENSITIVITY
TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION
1. Apply knowledge essential to the
conduct of criminological research
on crimes, crime causation, victims,
and offenders to include deviant
behavior;
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
2. Apply knowledge, skills essential to
the practice of crime detection and
investigation and fields of
criminalistics;
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
3. Apply knowledge, skills in criminal
law, evidence and procedure;
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
4. Apply knowledge, skills in law
enforcement administration;
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
5. Apply knowledge, skills in handling
offenders’ welfare and development
for their re-integration to the
community.
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
-
4LOGIC
Develop the basic intellectual skills of reading and listening comprehension along with argumentation and debate;
Identify common errors in reasoning (fallacies) in everyday discourse
Speak and write with logical order, clarity, truth and consistency, and
Appreciate the practical value of logic in everyday life
Analyze and evaluate moral judgments critically based on sound moral grounding.
COURSE SYLLABUS
Course Title LOGIC Course Code 4LOGIC
Course Credit Lecture – 3 Units Year Level 5
Pre-requisite: 4PHILOMAN Course Calendar 2nd Semester
Course Description: This course deals with the principles, concepts and activities of logic as a science and an art. As a tool for learning, this discipline promotes and cultivates critical and reflective thinking among the students in the tertiary level.
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES:
At the end of the course, the students are expected to: 1. identify the problem areas, theories, nature, aim, usefulness and relation of philosophy and logic to the humanities or other disciplines; 2. analyze concepts, terms, propositions, inferences and syllogisms as to their soundness, veracity and relevance; 3. develop the basic intellectual skills of reading and listening comprehension along with argumentation and debate; 4. identify common errors in reasoning (fallacies) in everyday discourse; 5. express oneself with logical order, clarity, truth and consistency; 6. discover the practical value of logic in everyday life; 7. evaluate moral judgments critically based on sound moral grounding.
-
4LOGIC
COURSE CONTENT:
Timetable
Desired Learning Outcomes
Course Content/Subje
ct Matter
HAU Core Values
Specific Expression of
Values
Teaching and Learning Activities
(Methodology)
Assessment Task/Studen
t Output
Evaluation Tool
Resource Materials
6 hours
Explain the meaning of Philosophy and its branches. Develop insights from selected materials. Differentiate philosophy as a process and a discipline Assess the value of philosophizing Classify logical thinking from other modes of thinking
Nature, Scope and Aim of Philosophy Brief History of Philosophy Definition of Philosophy Branches of Philosophy Why Study Philosophy? Philosophy and Logic The Nature, Objective and Usefulness of Logic Definition of Logic as an Art and Science Division of Logic
Excellence Impart the value of openness and receptivity to philosophical learning Emphasize the value of logical thinking
Lecture-discussion.
Group work
Class participation through clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
assessment
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
exams Workbook Exercises
Workbook activities to be accomplished at the end of the Lecture-Discussions Paper and pen test Rubrics
Required Textbook Chapters 1 and 2
-
4LOGIC
6 hours
Point out the role of ideas in simple apprehension and classify the different kinds of terms
The Concepts/ Ideas and Terms Nature and Formation of Concept Definition of Terms Nature of the Term Connotation and Denotation Classification of Terms according to: Comprehension Extension Origin Relation Meaning Quality
Excellence Introduce the value of developing concepts/terms as to their soundness, veracity and relevance
Lecture-discussion.
Group work
Class participation through clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
assessment
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
exams Workbook Exercises
Workbook activities to be accomplished at the end of the Lecture-Discussions Paper and pen test Rubrics
Required Textbook Chapter 4
6 hours
Demonstrate the importance of a clear definition and compare the different types of definition.
Definition Nominal definition Real definition
Excellence Impart the value of defining concepts/terms in the logical thinking process
Lecture-discussion.
Group work
Class participation through clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
exams Workbook Exercises
Workbook activities to be accomplished at the end of the Lecture-Discussions Paper and pen test Rubrics
Required Textbook Chapter 5
-
4LOGIC
assessment
6
hours
Define and describe the second mental operation, viz., the judgment, and analyze it to study its constituent elements. Familiarize the students with the definition of proposition as well as its different parts. Distinguish simple propositions from compound propositions.
The Logic of Judgment and Proposition
The nature and Function of Judgment and Proposition
Kinds of Proposition Categorical Proposition
- Form of a Categorical Proposition
- Basic Elements
Quantity and Quality
Excellence
Teach the value of appropriating logical statements in communication and dialogue
Lecture-discussion.
Individual work: Simple propositions hunt in a newspaper article for at least 10 propositions.
Class participation through clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
assessment
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
exams
Workbook Exercises
The propositions prepared by the students will be checked using the Constituent Elements (paper and pen test/activity) Oral arguments to be graded using rubrics.
Required Textbook Chapter 6 Newspaper
6
hours
Differentiate Categorical from Hypothetical proposition; Identify and define the three kinds of
Logical opposition of Proposition
Hypothetical
Excellence Inculcate the importance of propositions in constructing valid arguments
Lecture-discussion.
Group work
Class participation through
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
Workbook
Workbook activities to be accomplish
Required Textbook Chapter 8
-
4LOGIC
Hypothetical propositions.
Proposition
- Conditional Proposition
- Disjunctive Proposition
Conjunctive Proposition
clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
assessment
Exercises
ed at the end of the Lecture-Discussions Paper and pen test Rubrics
6
hours
a. Equivalenc
e of Proposition
Excellence
Teach the value of constructing logical expressions for complex issues which are described both in qualitative and quantitative terms
Lecture-discussion.
Group work
Class participation through clarificatory questions, practice exercises after each section
assessment
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
Workbook Exercises
Rubric for group presentation
Required Textbook Chapter 7
MIDTERM EXAM
3 hour
s
Distinguish invalid and valid inferences, and reasoning
Inference and Reasoning Nature of Inference Argument in Ordinary Language
Excellence Introduce the value of identifying, choosing and defending valid arguments appropriate to a problem in any field of study
Discussion/ Lecture
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
Workbook Exercises
50-item quiz Recitation Rubric Worksheets
Textbook Chapter 9
4 hour
s
Define the different parts of Categorical syllogism
Categorical Syllogism Nature of Categorical
Excellence Emphasize the value of creating appropriate arguments using
Discussion/ Lecture
Recitation
Quizzes
50-item quiz Recitation Rubric
Textbook Chapter 10
-
4LOGIC
Test the validity of syllogism vis-à-vis rules of categorical syllogism Construct categorical syllogism illustrating the rules of categorical syllogism
Syllogism Parts of Categorical Syllogism Rules
the rules of logical reasoning
assignments
Workbook Exercises
Worksheets
5 hours
Criticize fallacious arguments used in common language, media, advertisements, etc.
Informal Fallacies Fallacy of Language Fallacy of Relevance
Excellence Teach the value of evaluating and reconstructing arguments by identifying common errors in reasoning
Discussion/ Lecture
Recitation
Quizzes
assignments
Workbook Exercises
50-item quiz Recitation Rubric Worksheets
Textbook Chapter 14
6 hour
s
Analyze ethical dilemmas and evaluate moral judgments based on moral principles/ethical perspectives
Moral Reasoning
Excellence Teach the value of appreciating the moral dimension of any decision and accepting responsibility for them.
Lecture-discussion/Reporting
Debate
Ethics bowl
Position paper
Rubric on Debate Rubric/Position Paper
Chapter 15
FINAL EXAM
Textbook: Espartinez, Alma S, Logic: The Art of Reasoning (8th Edition), Octamiles, 2015 Course Requirements: Quizzes, recitation, workbook exercises, group dynamics, major exams References:
A. (Books) Damer, E. (2013). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments. Australia: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Hurley, P. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Logic. Australia: Cengage Learning. Rainbolt, G. W. (2015). Critical Thinking: The Art in Argument. Australia: Cengage Learning. Roscoe, K. (2016). Aristotle: The Father of Logic. New York: Rosen Publishing.
-
4LOGIC
B. Web References www.radical.philosophy www.philosophypages.com www.plato.stanford.edu https://www.nwabr.org/sites/default/files/EthicsBackgroundReading.pdf http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/intro_1.shtml http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/legal-aspects-of-property-estate-planning-and-insurance/s05-02-major-ethical-perspectives.html Classroom Policies:
1. Attendance and Punctuality. Regular attendance is expected of all students. The student must attend every class meeting on time and prepared.
2. Active class participation.
The student must participate actively in class recitations, discussions, and other activities as the case may be. He/She must be responsible for his/her own learning and performance in class. Please refer also to Expectations from Students below.
3. Group work requirements. The student is expected harmoniously collaborate other students and/or groupmates through group presentations, study groups or peer
discussions and contribute significantly to the preparation of their group work.
4. Peer group evaluation. Members of the team would evaluate/assess the work of each team member by providing honest feedback.
Expectations from students:
It is the student’s responsibility to attend every class meeting prepared and on time. The student should participate actively in discussions, recitations, small-group work and presentations. He/She is expected to complete and submit assignments and take all examinations at a designated time. It is his/her responsibility to ask the faculty concerned for an exam he/she failed to take. A student who fails to take a major written exam should present a valid excuse slip (noted by the Department Chairperson) prepared by the student’s parent/ guardian.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: All students are expected to be academically honest and persons of integrity. They should embody the scholastic attitude adhering to the holistic development of their character through the following: 1. To be truthful at all times in all academic dealings and transactions with teachers and co-learners; 2. To observe proper decorum in learning engagement inside and outside the classroom and the university;
-
4LOGIC
3. To be respectful and sensitive to the needs of others at all times; 4. To be considerate in the use of common resources; 5. To practice punctuality in coming to class and in submitting requirements; 6. To be judicious in their preparations for major examinations and all academic requirements; 7. To create outputs of original contents in respect to ethical standards. Acts contrary to academic integrity will be subjected to sanctions in accordance with existing rules and policies stipulated in the College Student Handbook. POLICY on ABSENCES:
The maximum numbers of absences allowed for students, based on the College Student Handbook is as follows: for subjects held once a week is 3; subjects held twice a week is 7; for subjects held 3x a week is 10; subjects held 4x a week is 14; and for subjects held 5x a week is 18. Request for excused absences or waiver of absences must be presented upon reporting back to class. Special examinations will be allowed only in special cases, such as prolonged illness. It is the responsibility of the student to monitor his/her own tardy incidents and absences that might be accumulated leading to a grade of “FA.” It is also his/her responsibility to consult with the teacher, chair or dean should the case be of special nature. Grading System:
Passing Grade (50%)
CAMPUS++ COLLEGE ONLINE GRADING SYSTEM Legend: (All Items in Percent) CSA Class Standing Average for All Performance Items (Cumulative) P Prelim Examination Score M Midterm Examination Score F Final Examination Score MEA Major Exam Average PCA Prelim Computed Average MCA Midterm Computed Average FCA Final Computed Average
-
4LOGIC
Class Standing. : Quizzes, Written Works (70%) Major Exams : (30%) Passing Grade (50%)
CAMPUS++ COLLEGE ONLINE GRADING SYSTEM Legend: (All Items in Percent) CSA Class Standing Average for All Performance Items (Cumulative) P Prelim Examination Score M Midterm Examination Score F Final Examination Score MEA Major Exam Average PCA Prelim Computed Average MCA Midterm Computed Average FCA Final Computed Average Note: For purposes of illustration, the sharing between CSA and MEA is shown below as 70% and 30%, respectively, when computing the Computed Average for each Grading Period. Depending on the grading parameters set for a subject the sharing may be 65%-35%,
60%-40%, or other possible combinations. Computation of Prelim Computed Average (PCA)
CSA =
MEA = P PCA = (60%)(CSA) + (40%)(MEA) Computation of Midterm Computed Average (MCA)
CSA =
MEA =
-
4LOGIC
MCA = (60%)(CSA) + (40%)(MEA) Computation of Final Computed Average (FCA)
CSA =
MEA =
FCA = (60%)(CSA) + (40%)(MEA)
Note: A student's Computed Average is a consolidation of Class Standing Percent Average and Major Exam Percent Average.
top related