nist’s new 3d airspeed calibration rig addresses turbulent

Post on 03-May-2022

19 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

NIST’s New 3D Airspeed Calibration Rig Addresses Turbulent Flow Measurement Challenges

Authors: Iosif Shinder, Vladimir Khromchenko, Michael Moldover

Is this research important?There are at least two reasons why it is important: 1. Humanitarian: Let’s keep the Earth a habitable place

for future generations! 2. Mercantile: A lot of money involved!

What is this talk about?

• Why we are doing 2-D and 3-D calibrations?• 3-D Calibration Rig.• How turbulence intensity affects calibration.• Traditional turbulence generators.• Flag-like turbulence generator.• How to measure turbulence?• Low turbulence s-probe calibration.• Pitot tube and s-probe in turbulent flows.

Flow is Complicated

Real stacks have swirls and turbulence

Flow is Complicated

Real stacks have skew

How are Emissions Measurements Made Today?Emission is a product of concentration and flow

Flow Problems:

No Traceability to NIST

There is so called: Annual “Relative Accuracy Test Audit” (RATA) which “calibrates” continuous emission flow monitors (usually ultrasonic flowmeter). Typically, the flow is surveyed with S-probe and 5-hole pitot static probes, which are temporarily installed on the stack.

For S-probes the calibration factor is fixed and these probes can be used without calibration for certain specified geometries.

As the name suggests, the EPA protocols provide only relative accuracy, not uncertainty relative to primary standards. 6

Wind Tunnel Parameters

• Test volume: 2 m long × 1.5 m wide × 1.2 m high

• Airspeeds up to 75 m/s (165 mi/hour)

• Uncertainties – 0.42% increasing to 1% near 1 m/s

• Low (0.1 %) turbulence intensity; to increase turbulence, we install turbulence generators upstream of the test volume

VTuVσ

=

Y X

Z

Yaw Angle (around Y)

Pitch Angle (around Z, arc approximated using X and Y stages)

Automated 3D Pitot Tube Calibration Rig (2013)

2D S-Probe

3D Conic Probe

S-probe: workhorse for stack flow measurements

CheapStable

RuggedPassive

Can be calibrated

S-probe: cannot detect pitch

Flow Flow

≠Flow

-30˚ pitch 0˚ pitch +30˚ pitch

S-Probe, (used in EPA protocol 2)

Calibration Factor is a Function of 4 variables1. Air speed2. Pitch angle3. Yaw angle4. Turbulence intensity

EPA protocol assumes calibration factor = 0.84(literature shows small, linear dependence on air speed)

11

EPA Method 2: S-Probe Calibration

Calibration data for one probe; others might be different.

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-180 -90 0 90 180

360˚ S-Probe response in 2˚ steps10 m/s; 0 °pitch

Yaw, [degree]

0 Yaw°

90 Yaw°

PP

∆S-probe

Pitot

yaw angle, degrees-180 -90 0 90 180

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

pitch angle 30 o

0 o

20 o

-10 o

-20 o

10 o

-30 o

NIST Calibration of S-Probe Flow: 10 m/s, turbulence intensity < 0.5%

Magnify 0 ° and 90 °PP

∆S-probe

Pitot

--

-

yaw angle, degrees

-10 0 101.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

yaw angle, degrees

80 90 100

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4 pitch angle

0 o

S-Probe (used for CEM per EPA protocol 2)flow: 10 m/s, turbulence intensity < 0.5%3 zeros ⇔

± 5 ° yaw uncertainty

± 5 ° yaw~8% cal

uncertainty

yaw angle, degrees

-10 0 101.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

yaw angle, degrees

80 90 100

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4pitch angle

30 o

0 o

20 o

-10 o

-20 o

10 o

-30 o

S-Probe (used for CEM per EPA protocol 2)Flow: 10 m/s, turbulence intensity < 0.5%

Calibration depends upon pitch angle

---

Adapted from:“Experimental Study of the Factors Effect on the S type Pitot Tube Coefficient” Nguyen Doan Trang et. al. XX IMEKO World Congress

Effects of Pitch: Other Researchers

well-known for airfoils, unknown in Pitot tube literature

Calibration factor has hysteresis in low turbulenceIncreasing turbulence reduces hysteresis

18

Calibration of Multi-Hole Pitot Tubes

20o

RecirculationZone

Flow

19

Modify wind tunnel: addGrid to Generate Turbulence

Measure Effects of Grid. Periodic Structure.

FLOW

7.5

15

Large Scale Homogeneous Turbulence and Interactions with a Flat-Plate Cascade. Jon Vegard Larssen, Ph.D. Thesis.

Turbulence intensity probes

slope = 0.98

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

slope = 1.01

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

CobraTu

LDATu

LDATu

Hot wireTu −

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

25 m/s 20 m/s 15 m/s 10 m/s 5 m/s

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

0 10 20 30

( ) ( )1 2LDA

Pitot

Tu F V F TuTu

=

L-shape pitot tube turbulence calibration

0.98

1

1.02

1.04

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

Calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

LDA turbulence

10 m/s

( ) ( )1 2/ ReP NISTV V F F Tu=

( )2

21

2

P a TuVρ∆

= +

0

5

10

15

20

25

V, [m/s]

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0 .99

0.99

0.995

0.995

1

1

1.005

1.005

1.01

1.01

1.015

1.015

1.02

1.02

1.025

1.025

1.03

1.03

Vpi

tot/V

NIS

T

Vpi

tot/V

NIS

T

-2.5

0

2.5

-180 -90 0 90 180

Yaw, [˚]

0˚ Pitch Angle0.27%5.20%8.60%13.80%

-2.5

0

2.5

-180 -90 0 90 180

Yaw, [˚]

-30˚ Pitch Angle

-2.5

0

2.5

-180 -90 0 90 180

Yaw, [˚]

+30˚ Pitch Angle

s probe

primary

PP

−∆

∆s probe

primary

PP

−∆

s probe

primary

PP

−∆

±3%0˚Flow direction

-30˚Flow direction

+30˚Flow direction

28

Summary1. NIST calibrates S-probes and 3D (multi-hole) probes.

2. S-probes can have multiple nulls. Incorrect nulling may cause errors during calibrations and measurements.

3. S-probes are sensitive to pitch angle; therefore, calibration factors does not represent measured flow.

4. Five-hole pitot tubes are sensitive to turbulence intensity.

5. Regular pitot tube and s-probe much less sensitive to turbulence.

6. NIST has studied only a few probes. How sensitive are other probes to turbulence?

We thank Greg Scace for design, assembly, and continuing support of the 3-D system

and

Jim Filla for writing 3-D system software and readiness to modify and improve it on first request.

The paper with the same title “NIST’s New 3D Airspeed Calibration Rig Addresses Turbulent Flow Measurement Challenges” was published in the proceedings of ISFFM, Arlington, Virginia, April 14-16, 2015

top related