noble progress report 2014 2015

The direct and indirect mechanisms of facilitation by shrubs play a

central role in maintaining leopard lizard populations.

Progress Report

Taylor Noble

M.Sc. Candidate

Supervisor: Dr. Christopher Lortie

Committee Member: Dr. Bridget Stutchbury

Positive Interactions: Facilitation

High abiotic stress environments

Many examples plant-plant interactions

Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve,http://www.ddcr.org/en/conservation/research/

(Bertness et al. 1997, Bruno et al. 2003, Holzapfel et al. 1999, Liu et al. 2014)

Animals too!

Amanda Liczner

B.Peterson, http://www.arkive.org/giant-kangaroo-rat/dipodomys-ingens/

(Holzapfel et al. 1999, Hughes 2012)

Direct and Indirect Interactions

Moon, D. C., Moon, J. & Keagy, A. (2010) Direct and Indirect Interactions. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):50

Direct Interaction

Indirect Interaction

Direct and indirect effects of shrubs on lizards.

Blunt-nosed leopard lizardGambelia sila

Photo by Gary Nafis. http://www.californiaherps.com/lizards/images/gsilaslo6084.jpg

USFWS 2010. 5-Year Review, Blunt-nosed Leopard Lizard

Karin Jeske

Study SiteCarrizo Plains National Monument

https://www.flickr.com/photos/darthjenni/4683874516/

Panoche Hills

Photo by Andrew Alden. http://science.kqed.org/quest/2012/03/08/side-trips-from-interstate-5-panoche-and-tumey-hills/

UC Davis arboretum

Dennis Stevensen

Chris Lortie

Hypothesis

Desert shrubs provide direct benefits to small animals such as shelter, indirect benefits in the form of resources such as prey.

Chapter 1: A systematic review of the effects of indirect plant-animal interactions.

Moon, D. C., Moon, J. & Keagy, A. (2010) Direct and Indirect Interactions. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):50

Indirect Interaction

Direct Interaction

Direct Interaction

Menge 1995

Predictions

Keystone predation and habitat facilitation.

Intermediate species will most often be a plant species.

Animal abundance or survival will increase.

Search Terms

Plant

AND

Animal

AND

Indirect

Initial Search

N = 349

Preliminary Findings

46%

33%

18%

3%

Trophic Environmental Behavioral Chemical

Categories of Indirect Interactions Study

31%

15%

15%

8%

4%

27%Habitat Facilitation

Trophic Cascade

Exploitation Competition

Keystone Predation

Apparent Predation

Other

What types of indirect effect sequences are studied?

Were interactions positive or negative?

56%35%

9%

Positive Negative Neutral

Was an intermediate species discussed?

Yes No

Was the intermediate species plant or animal?

Plant Animal

Was animal survival or abundance discussed?

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Abundance Survival

Chapter 2: A field survey of the effects of Ephedra californica on leopard lizard activity patterns.

Hypothesis: Desert shrubs provide direct benefits to small animals such as shelter, indirect benefits in the form of resources such as prey, and indirect benefits by increasing annual-plant density within the canopy thereby providing additional protection.

Predictions

Lizard activity will be highest under shrubs.

Larger shrubs will have higher lizard activity.

Insect density will be greater under shrubs.

Experimental Design

5 shrub size gradients x 4 trap arrays x 10 days

New Shrubs for each day.

Track Trap Array

Open vs. Shrub vs. Open Trail

Timeline of study

Jan.-Feb. Feb.-March March- April April- June

Large Shrub Survey

Planning and Systematic

Review

Pick Sites, Pilot Study, Set up

Survey

Conduct Survey

Chapter 3: An experimental manipulation of the shelter and resource effects of Ephedra californicaon leopard lizard foraging.

Long-nosed Leopard Lizard (juvenile), Cochise

Couny, AZ. Photo by Jim Rorabaugh

Hypothesis: Desert shrubs provide direct benefits to small animals such as shelter, indirect benefits in the form of resources such as prey, and indirect benefits by increasing annual-plant density within the canopy thereby providing additional protection, making them safer and more desirable for animals to forage at.

>

>

Predictions

Lizards will forage more frequently under shrubs and other shelters.

Lower giving-up densities (GUD) at shrubs.

Lizards will prefer stations with annuals removed.

Experimental Design

3 site treatments x 2 food densities x 2 annual treatments x 4 repeats x 5-10 days

Timeline of study

Large Shrub Survey

Continue to Research Foraging

Pilot Food Choices, Prep

Full Study

Conduct Feeding Trials

Acknowledgements

Thanks to:

Dr. Christopher Lortie

Dr. Bridget Stutchbury

Dr. Mike Westphal

Dr. Tim Bean

The Lortie Lab

ReferencesAhlborn G. 2000. California Wildlife Habitat Relationship System: Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizard. California Department of Fish and Game, California Interagency Wildlife Tak Group. Sacramento, CA.

Bertness M and Leonard G. 1997. The role of positive interactions in communities: Lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78(7):1976-89.

Bertness M., Callaway R. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9(5):191-3.

Bortolus A, Schwindt E, Iribarne O. 2002. Positive plant-animal interactions in the high marsh of an Argentinean coastal lagoon. Ecology 83(3):733-742.

Brooker, R. W., F. T. Maestre, R. M. Callaway, C. L. Lortie, L. A. Cavieres, G. Kunstler, P. Liancourt, K. Tielborger, J. M. J. Travis, F. Anthelme, C. Armas, L. Coll, E. Corcket, S. Delzon, E. Forey, Z. Kikvidze, J. Olofsson, F. I. Pugnaire, C. L. Quiroz, P. Saccone, K. Schiffers, M. Seifan, B. Touzard, and R. Michalet. 2008. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology 96:18-34.

Bruno J, Stachowicz J, Bertness M. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18(3):119-25.

Callaway, R. M., and L. R. Walker. 1997. Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958-1965.

Callaway R.M. 2007.Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer. Dordrecht, Netherlands. 411 p.

Ellison, Aaron M.; Bank, Michael S.; Clinton, Barton D.; Colburn, Elizabeth A.; Elliott, Katherine; Ford, Chelcy R.; Foster, David R.; Kloeppel, Brian D.; Knoepp, Jennifer D. 2005. Loss of foundation species: Consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3 (9): 479.

Filazzola A, Lortie C. J. 2014. A systematic review and conceptual framework for the mechanistic pathways of nurse plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12202

Fisher, D. O. 2000. Effects of vegetation structure, food and shelter on the home range and habitat use of an endangered wallaby. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:660-671.

Forbes, A. R., and J. L. Craig. 2013. Assessing the role of revegetation in achieving restoration goals on Tiritiri Matangi Island. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 37:343-352.

Fukui, A. 2001. Indirect interactions mediated by leaf shelters in animal-plant communities. Population Ecology 43:31-40.

Galloway D., Riley F.S. U.S. Geological Survey. 1993. San Joaquin Valley, California, Largest Human Alteration of the Earth’s Surface. Menlo Park, CA.

Germano D.J. 2009. The number of census days needed to detect Blunt-Nosed Leopard Lizards, Gambelia sila. California Fish and Game. 95(2): 106-109.

Hansen DM, Kiesbuy HC, Jones CG, Muller CB. 2007. Positive indirect interactions between neighboring plant species via a lizard pollinator. American Naturalist 169(4):534-542.

Holzapfel C, Mahall BE. 1999. Bidirectional facilitation and interference between shrubs and annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 80(5):1747-1761.

Hughes AR. 2012. A neighboring plant species creates associational refuge for consumer and host. Ecology 93(6):1411-1420.

Liu N, Zhu WX, Sun ZY, Yang L, Yuan SF, Ren H. 2014. Canopy Size Dependent Facilitations from the Native Shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa to the Early Establishment of Native Trees Castanopsis fissa and Syzygium hancei in Tropical China. Restoration Ecology 22(4):509-516.

McIntire, E. J. B., and A. Fajardo. 2014. Facilitation as a ubiquitous driver of biodiversity. New Phytologist 201:403-416.

Menge B.A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs. 65(1):21-74.

Peterson BJ, Heck KL. 2001. Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass - a facultative mutualism. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213:143-155.

Schiffman P.M. 1994. Promotion of exotic weed establishment by endangered giant kangaroo rats (Dipodomys ingens) in a California grassland. Biodiversity and Conservation. 3:524-537.

Smit, C., C. Vandenberghe, J. den Ouden, and H. Muller-Scharer. 2007. Nurse plants, tree saplings and grazing pressure: changes in facilitation along a biotic environmental gradient. Oecologia 152:265-273.

Stachowicz, J. J. 2001. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. BioScience 51: 235-246.

Stoutjesdijk P., Barkman J.J. 1992. Microclimate, Vegetation, and Fauna. Opulus Press. Grangýrde, Sweden. 216 p.

Strauss S and Irwin R. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:435-66.

Suding K.N., Gross K.L., Houseman G.R. 2004. Alternate states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 19(1): 46-53.

Templeton A.R., Brazeal H., Neuwald J.L. 2011. The transition from isolated patches to a metapopulation in the eastern collared lizard in response to prescribed fires. Ecology. 92(9): 1736- 1747.

Tilman D. 1994. Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats. Ecology. 75(1):2-16.

Wiiliams D.F., Cypher E.A., Kelly P.A., Miller K.J., Norwell N., Philips S.E., Johnson C.D., Colliver G.W. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Blunt-nosed leopard lizard (Gambelia sila) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California.

van Heezik Y., Ludwig K. 2012. Proximity to source populations and untidy gardens predict occurrence of a small lizard in an urban area.