nws alaska region: challenges in an era of changing climate
Post on 14-Jan-2016
23 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
NWS Alaska Region: Challenges in an Era of Changing Climate
PRIDE Alaska Coastal Wind/Wave Climatology Workshop
August 2-4, 2005
James Partain, ChiefEnvironmental & Scientific Services Division
NOAA NWS Alaska Region
2
NOAA NWS Alaska Region - Overview
• 3 full-service Weather Forecast Offices
• 12 limited-service Weather Service Offices
• River Forecast Center• Tsunami Warning Center• 2 Aviation weather centers
NOAA NWS Alaska Region - Facilities
4
Climate Impacts on Service Programs in NWS Alaska Region
• Aviation – more frequent icing, IMC conditions; aviators in bush still operating on old assumptions
• Public - more frequent “high amplitude” weather episodes (e.g. mid-winter thaws, coastal storms, windstorms, heavy precip)
• Marine – more frequent high-impact events, esp. in areas of sea-ice retreat
• Wildfire - more variable regime-dependent fuel-moisture conditions
5
Climate Impacts on Service Programs in NWS Alaska Region (cont)
• Hydrology – greater variability in river volume & depth and related flooding and erosion; ice-dammed glacier lake releases
• Volcanic Ash – resuspension of relic ash from Katmai complex in Sept. 2003 led to redefinition of volcanic ashfall “event”
• Tsunami – sea-level rise may have eventual impacts
6
Example: Bering Sea Storm of Oct, 2004
• Greatest short-term weather impacts of climate change are for coastal storms and attendant erosion– Later freeze-up, less extent and thinner sea-
ice, combined with loss of coastal permafrost, is a recipe for erosion from normal Fall storms
– Impacts magnified by greater wave size due to increased open-water fetch
7
The Bering Sea Storm – Oct 18-20, 2004• Most important contributions from NWS are
Accuracy and Lead Time• The “bomb” of October 18-20, 2004,
illustrates the potential of our contributions– An ex-tropical cyclone rapidly deepened over a
period of several days to 940mb (hurricane intensity)
– Such storms normally handled very poorly by the models, even in the short-term
– In this case, atmospheric model had large-scale details, including amplification and track, predicted at 5-days lead time
– More importantly, run-to-run consistency was key to forecaster confidence in forecast/warning issuances.
8
The Bering Sea Storm – Oct 18-20, 2004• Lead-time from WFO Fairbanks with first
service products was 3 days• Emergency managers were in continuous
contact with NWS offices Fairbanks, Nome and Kotzebue before, during and after the event
• NWS storm surge guidance also quite accurate and useful both to NWS staff and EMs
• Evacuations took place and physical mitigations were put in place for structure protection…no loss of life or significant injuries resulted.
9
The Bering Sea Storm – Oct 18-20, 2004• Still…much erosion and property damage
occurred – $30M damage in Nome alone– 50+ feet of shoreline lost in Shishmaref…they
will not survive another such storm
• This storm showed:– The value of accurate, consistent objective
guidance in improving forecaster confidence in a developing storm
– The value of lead time– The value of NWS information to emergency
planners for disaster mitigation.
10
Nome, AK – during the storm
11
Nome, AK – Front Street
12
A residence in Shishmaref – after the storm
13
The Shishmaref school after the storm
A residence in Shishmaref – after the storm
The Shishmaref school after the storm
top related