oig audits does program success trump program compliance? should we even be concerned with audits...

Post on 25-Feb-2016

40 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit PLLC Fall Forum 2011. OIG Audits Does Program Success Trump Program Compliance? Should We Even Be Concerned with Audits or Program Monitoring?. “Michael’s presentation is designed to scare you.” “Focus is on program success.” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq.Brustein & Manasevit PLLCFall Forum 2011

“Michael’s presentation is designed to scare you.”

“Focus is on program success.”▪ Phil Maestri, RMS April 27, 2011 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum

October 5, 2011 AEFFA Meeting in Charleston, SC

2

3

Program Compliance

Program Success

4

Risk Management

Innovation

•Inventory Management•Cash Management•Time & Effort Reporting•Procurement Control

•Silo Smashing•Transferability•Substitute Systems•Administrative Consolidation•Waivers

“Hyperfocus on compliance is an ineffective way to run an SEA.”

- Deborah Gist, Superintendent RIDE July 2011

5

“We need to get out of the way.”

- Cindy Hill, Wyoming Superintendent

of Instruction July 2011

6

“Special education began as a civil rights issue and there needed to be a focus on compliance back then, but that focus on compliance has remained constant, while the rest of the world has changed. I would rather be judged by OSEP on the real important issues.” - Ed Steinberg, Colorado Director of Special Ed August 2011

7

So how many audits excused noncompliance because of program success?

8

Section 441 of GEPA Each program must be administered in

accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, program plans, and applications.

9

“In enacting GEPA, Congress made clear its intention that States return misused funds.”

▪ U.S. Supreme CourtBell v. N.J.461 U.S. 773 (1983)

10

“Legislation enacted pursuant to the spending power is much in the nature of a contract; in return for federal funds, the states agree to comply with federally imposed conditions.”

▪ U.S. Supreme CourtPennhurst State School v. Halderman451 U.S. 1 (1981)

11

What types of audit violations are deemed “significant” by the U.S. Education Department?

12

The Department must establish a “prima facie” case for recovery of funds so that the PDL can stand on its face unless contradicted by other evidence.

13

The PDL must include an analysis of the harm to the federal interest.

14

See page 139 of EDGAR

15

16

1. Time Distribution2. MOE3. Supplement, not supplant4. Over-Allocating5. Unallowable Expenses

17

6. Illegal Procurement Practices7. Serving Ineligible Students8. Lack of Accountability for

Equipment/Materials9. Obligations Beyond Period of

Availability10.Matching Violations

18

11.Excess Cost12.Lack of Appropriate Record Keeping 13.Record Retention Problems14.Late or No Submission of Required

Reports15.Allocations Improperly Approved

19

16.Unresolved Audits of Subrecipients17.Lack of Subrecipient Monitoring18.Drawdowns before they are needed

or more than 90 days after the end of funding period

19.Large Carryover Balances20.Discrepancies in Reports Filed

20

21.Errors in Student Per Pupil Expenditures

22.Title I Comparability23.Lack of valid, reliable or complete

performance data

21

If you think program success trumps OIG Audit findings on match, listen to Susan Kelley.

22

If you think OIG findings on time and effort can be defeated by evidence of program success, consider:▪ Houston: $238 million▪ Philadelphia: $123 million▪ Detroit: $49 million▪ Colorado: $23 million▪ Kiryas Joel: $191,124*

* one public school serving 123 students, 6,000 students in private school

23

Why are time and effort findings so prevalent? Listen to Kristen Cowan’s presentation!

24

Is OMB waking up to a new reality on time and effort?

25

Does “program success” fare better with A-133 audits or federal/state monitoring?

26

27

Program Determination Letters (PDL) can be based on any information

▪34 CFR 81.30 (b)

28

Does the A-133 Single Audit process strike the right balance between success and compliance?

29

Section 305 of A-133 – Auditor Selection

Compare State Auditor General/ Legislative Auditor (Florida, Georgia, Louisiana) to private firms

30

Private audit firms develop and protect long-term client relationships, sometimes to detriment of public

Rosslyn, NY

31

Is there a fundamental conflict when the auditee pays the auditor?

Does this create incentives for the auditor to render a favorable opinion?

32

GAO mandatory audit rotation may not be the most efficient way of strengthening auditor independence and audit quality

33

34

Auditees cannot charge to federal grants audit costs if audit is not conducted in accordance with A-133

- Section 230

35

Compare OIG Audits to A-133 Audits on T/E and Supplanting

36

37

Until Congress repeals Section 441 of GEPA, OMB rewrites A-87 and A-21, and USDE disregards the current “Compliance Supplement,” Compliance trumps Program Success.

38

This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a

legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections

under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any

printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this

presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.  You

should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first

consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.

39

top related