osps

Post on 23-Feb-2016

57 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

OSPS. CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED CHANGES. WHY?. We are living longer Longer pensions need more funding. OPTIONS. Run up debt Rely on investments Increase employer contribution Increase employee contribution Reduce benefits. DEFICIT. OSPS has £82 million deficit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

CONSULTATIONON

PROPOSED CHANGES

OSPS

We are living longer

Longer pensions need more funding

WHY?

Run up debt Rely on investments Increase employer contribution Increase employee contribution Reduce benefits

OPTIONS

OSPS has £82 million deficit Not life-threatening, but unhealthy At present rates will take 17 years to pay

down Need to reduce, not grow, the deficit Bring payment down to around 10 years

DEFICIT

Market conditions unhelpful

Unlikely to improve for some time

INVESTMENTS

Has already increased over time now at 21.5%

18% goes to funding future benefits leaves little to pay off deficit

Employers committed to keeping this level but need to increase share that goes

to pay deficit

Target – find 4% savings

EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION

You already pay 6.35% To reach 4% savings target, would need to rise to

over 8% for everyone Unacceptable Need to keep employee costs to reasonable level If possible, offer a lower cost option for those who

can afford least

EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION

Committed to a good, affordable pension based on salary and defined benefits

No radical reductions But some savings unavoidable

REDUCE BENEFITS

Run up debt Rely on investments Increase employer contribution No other choice Increase employee contribution Reduce benefits

OPTIONS

Proposals are all about the balance between extra costs and lower benefits

What is the best combination to achieve the necessary savings?

Best for scheme, best for members We offer options You must let us know your preferences

CONSULTATION AIM

If accepted, changes will be implemented on 1 January 2013

Proposed changes only affect future service

Past service is not affected The proposed changes will not affect any

benefits you have earned up 31 Dec 2012

IMPORTANT NOTE

Average age 45 Average service 8 years Average salary £20,000

MR AVERAGE

Age Under 30 30-40 40-50 50-60

Average service 2 years 5 years 8 years 10 years

Average salary £18,000 £20,000 £21,000 £21,000

Number of members 643 869 1070 1163

Relatively low salaries Relatively stable salaries Many joiners do not stay to retirement But older joiners often do High turnover means there are many

deferred members

MR AVERAGE

SalaryFinal Salary or CARE

Adjustment for inflationRPI or CPI

Accrual rateFaster or slower

Employee contributionHigher or lower

Insurance benefits

WHAT COULD WE CHANGE?

Final Salary Uses your finishing salary as the base for

pensions calculation Tends to favour those who achieve

promotions and big pay rises towards end of career

Final Salary or CARE

Career Average Revalued Earnings (CARE) Pension based on earnings each year Revalued to adjust for inflation Fairer than FS Works for those who do not receive late

career promotions May even out-perform FS in periods when

inflation is greater than pay awards

Final Salary or CARE

Proposal is to move all members to CARE from 1 Jan 2013

Believe it is well suited to the profile of theOSPS member

Final Salary or CARE

Inflation index used to revalue:

pension payments deferred pensions CARE contributions

CPI or RPI

CPI on average 0.7% p.a. lower than RPIover time this can make a big difference

The effect gets bigger the longer you pay contributions (under CARE)the longer your benefits are deferred before you take themthe longer you live after taking your pension

CPI or RPI

CPI brings big savings

Many pensions have moved to CPI

Our proposal is to keep RPI

Better protection against inflation for thoseon modest salaries and pensions

CPI or RPI

Pension scheme has to be protected againsthigh inflation

In unlikely event inflation goes above 8%adjustments will be capped at that level

Inflation Cap

Current accrual rate 1/80 Savings if rate reduced to 1/85 or 1/90 This means

if you pay the same contributions for the same period of time, you finish with a smaller pensionorif you want the same size pension, you have to work longer

Faster or slower

Working longerIf at 1/80 it takes 10 years to build pension X

at 1/85 it takes 10 years 8 months at 1/90 it takes 11 years 3 months

Some people are working longer anywayNo compulsory retirement age

Faster or slower

No appetite for large increases in employee contributionsSome members prepared to pay a little more to retain better benefitsOthers cannot afford more, or might join the scheme if contributions were lowerSuggests a flexible approach

Higher or Lower

One savings option is to reduce benefits paid to family on your deathDependants pension

currently 2/3rd; could be reduced to 1/2Death in service lump sum

currently 4x salary; could be reduced to 3x

Would allow more flexibility in employee contributions and accrual ratesBut depends on the value you place on these benefits

Insurance benefits

Pension age 65 then State Pension Age

No upper age limit to joining Late pension benefits Flexible retirement

Other changes

Brought all this together to propose two packages

Both have CARE RPI Inflation cap Annual choice of cost plan

Packages

Members choose between three cost plans

Insurance benefits are reduced

Package A

Cost plan

Employee contribution

Accrual rate

Change in weekly

cost

Lower 5.6% 1/90 £2.88 less

Standard 6.6% 1/85 £0.96 more

Higher 7.8% 1/80 £5.58 more

Flexible optionIncludes an employee contribution rate lower than nowOffers possibility of keeping same accrual rate as nowBut only possible by reducing insurance benefits

Package A

Members choose between two cost plans

Insurance benefits are kept at current levels

Package B

Cost plan

Employee contribution

Accrual rate

Change in weekly

cost

Standard 6.5% 1/90 £0.58 more

Higher 7.5% 1/85 £4.42 more

Less choiceNo cheaper optionNo possibility to pay for same accrual rate as nowBut insurance benefits are maintained at current levels

Package B

More past service, less the effect of changes

CARE will impact more if you expect significant promotion

Both packages make savings by slowing accrual rate but how long would it take to ‘catch up’?

Both packages ask you to pay more for the standard package

but how much do I want to pay for a good pension?

Worse off – how much?

Left options open so we can take account of your viewsNow:

Feedback at meetingsEmail or letter

UnionsMay:

Questionnaire

Your views

Questions&

Comments

top related