overview - ric.nrc.gov · 2 pra? . 5 t 1, . 6 t 1, ∙∙∙ . Ç t 1, protected? ∙∙∙...
Post on 30-Jul-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Overview of NRC’s Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment Research Program
Fire and External Hazards Analysis BranchDivision of Risk Analysis
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
Meredith Carr Ph.D., P.E.meredith.carr@nrc.gov
Overview• Objectives• Key Challenges• Main Themes• Current Projects• Future Work
2
PFHA Research Objectives• Support development of risk‐informed licensing and oversight
guidance and tools for assessing flooding hazards and consequences– Addresses significant gap in probabilistic basis for external hazards
• Seismic and wind hazard assessments currently have probabilistic basis
• Support both new reactor licensing and oversight of operating reactors– Design basis flood hazard assessments for new facilities
• 10 CFR Part 50 ‐ traditional construction permits and operating licenses
• 10 CFR Part 52 ‐ early site permits (ESPs), combined operating licenses (COLs)
– Operating reactor oversight program (ROP)• Significance determination process (SDP) analyses for evaluating deficiencies
related to flood protection at operating facilities
3
2
PRA?
, , ,∙∙∙
Protected?
∙∙∙Magnitude
Load Intensity
Failure Probab
ilityFlood Protection Feature
No Impact
Mitigation
ImpactsSuccess?
No
No
Yes
Yes
Procedures and Manual Actions
Hazard Curves : Quantitative probabilistic assessment
of flood hazard(s)
Fragility Curves :Quantitative Reliability of Passive and
Active Flood Protection Features
Human Reliability Assessment (HRA) issues with flood protection and/or mitigation procedures
Fragility
Hazard
To Plant Internal Model
Risk-informed Assessment of Flooding Hazards and Consequences
4
Key Challenges• Interested in range of annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs)
from moderately rare to extreme floods
– Full hazard curves needed
• Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties
– AEPs in the range 1e‐4 to 1e‐6 desired
• Large uncertainties
• Component fragility and human reliability information is sparse
• Flooding impacts exhibit cliff‐edge effects
• Complexity
– Coincident and correlated mechanisms
– Associated effects
5
Protected?
∙∙∙
Load Intensity
Failure Probab
ility
Flood Protection Feature
Failure Model
Miti‐gation
ImpactsSuccess?
No
No
Yes
Yes
Procedures, Manual Actions
Fragility Curves
, , ,∙∙∙
Magnitude
HazardCurves
Internal Plant Model
potential impacts of dynamic and
nonstationary processes
Reliability of Flood Protection and Plant
Response
Improved Modeling Methods
PFHA Frameworks
Leverage Available Flooding Information
Phase 2 and Phase 3 Activities
Main Research Themes
No Impact
6
3
Leverage Available Flood Information Technical Basis for Extending Frequency Analysis Beyond Current
Consensus Limits– Contractor: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
Research to Develop Guidance on Extreme Precipitation Frequency in Orographic Regions
– Contractor: USBR– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Guidance on Application of State-of-Practice Flood Frequency Analysis Methods and Tools
– Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Development of Flood Hazard Information Digests for NPP Sites– Contractor: Idaho National Laboratory (INL)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Detailed TN River Paleoflood Study– Contractor: USGS– NRC PM: Mark Fuhrmann 7
Leverage Available Flood Information Technical Basis for Extending Frequency Analysis Beyond Current
Consensus Limits– Contractor: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
Research to Develop Guidance on Extreme Precipitation Frequency in Orographic Regions
– Contractor: USBR– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Guidance on Application of State-of-Practice Flood Frequency Analysis Methods and Tools
– Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Development of Flood Hazard Information Digests for NPP Sites– Contractor: Idaho National Laboratory (INL)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Detailed TN River Paleoflood Study– Contractor: USGS– NRC PM: Mark Fuhrmann 8
Leverage Available Flood Information Technical Basis for Extending Frequency Analysis Beyond Current
Consensus Limits– Contractor: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
Research to Develop Guidance on Extreme Precipitation Frequency in Orographic Regions
– Contractor: USBR– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Guidance on Application of State-of-Practice Flood Frequency Analysis Methods and Tools
– Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Development of Flood Hazard Information Digests for NPP Sites– Contractor: Idaho National Laboratory (INL)– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
• Detailed TN River Paleoflood Study– Contractor: USGS– NRC PM: Mark Fuhrmann 9
c s vf f m cs gsand
I
II
III
IV
25
0
inches
10
20
5
15
.
Dept
h b e
low
land
sur
f ace
Buzzard(1) charcoal2482; 1280 +/- 25A.D. 670-770
Buzzard(2) charcoal2481; 250 +/- 25A.D. 1526-1557,A.D. 1631-1670,A.D. 1779-1800,
4
PFHA Frameworks
Technical Basis for Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment – Riverine Flooding – Contractor: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment Framework Development– Contractor: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Structured Hazard Assessment Committee Process for Flooding– Contractor: PNNL– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
10
PFHA Frameworks Technical Basis for Probabilistic Flood Hazard
Assessment – Riverine Flooding – Contractor: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Probabilistic Flood Hazard Assessment Framework Development– Contractor: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Structured Hazard Assessment Committee Process for Flooding– Contractor: PNNL– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
11
Improved Process Modeling• Numerical Modeling of Local Intense Precipitation
Processes– Contractor: University of California Davis/USGS– NRC PM: Elena Yegorova
• Quantifying Uncertainties in Probabilistic Storm Surge Models
– Contractor: USACE– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Erosion Processes in Embankment Dams– Contractor: USBR– NRC PM: Jacob Philip
• Application of Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates to Watersheds
– Contractor: ORNL– NRC PM: Elena Yegorova
12
5
Improved Process Modeling• Numerical Modeling of Local Intense Precipitation
Processes– Contractor: University of California Davis/USGS– NRC PM: Elena Yegorova
Quantifying Uncertainties in Probabilistic Storm Surge Models– Contractor: USACE– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
• Erosion Processes in Embankment Dams– Contractor: USBR– NRC PM: Jacob Philip
• Application of Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates to Watersheds– Contractor: ORNL– NRC PM: Elena Yegorova
13
Observed 7-day accumulated precipitation field
Maximized 7-day accumulated precipitation field
Maximized 3-day accumulatedprecipitation field
Transposition of Hurricane Isaac (2012)
Reliability of Flood Protection and Plant Response to Flooding Events
• Performance of Flood Penetration Seals at NPPs– Contractor: Fire Risk Management (FRM)– NRC PM: Tom Aird
Effects of Environmental Factors on Manual Actions for Flood Protection and Mitigation at NPPs– Contractor: PNNL– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
Modeling Plant Response to Flooding Events – Contractor: INL– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
14
Reliability of Flood Protection and Plant Response to Flooding Events
• Performance of Flood Penetration Seals at NPPs– Contractor: Fire Risk Management (FRM)– NRC PM: Tom Aird
Effects of Environmental Factors on Manual Actions for Flood Protection and Mitigation at NPPs– Contractor: PNNL– NRC PM: Meredith Carr
Modeling Plant Response to Flooding Events – Contractor: INL– NRC PM: Joseph Kanney
15
6
Dynamic and Nonstationary Processes• Regional Climate Change Projections: Potential
Impacts to Nuclear Facilities– Contractor: PNNL– NRC PM: Elena Yegorova
16
Future Work*Technical Basis
• Interfacing Flood Hazard Modeling Outputs with HRA and PRA Models
• Probabilistic Treatment of Coincident and Correlated Hazards and Their Effects
• Application of SHAC-F toCoastal Flooding Hazard Assessments
• Quantifying Uncertainties in Probabilistic Riverine Flood Models
17
Future Work*Draft Guidance, Pilot Studies
18
• Development of Draft Guidance
• Piloting opportunities– on the hazard only – eg. LIP– also on the full risk – include Plant PRA
• Work with Industry, other Agencies– Inland location, coastal location
top related