parent connection meeting may 7, 2014. agenda welcome good news – chemistry, shelby hubbell,...
Post on 05-Jan-2016
212 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
PARENT CONNECTION MEETINGMay 7, 2014
AGENDA
Welcome
Good News – Chemistry, Shelby Hubbell, Craigs Cruisers, any other?
School Improvement Plan
Federal Grant On-time Graduation Program
Plan Data and Focus Group
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Look and Discuss – Add suggestions for improvement
ON-TIME GRADUATION PROJECT
Your school has been assigned to Wave 2. This means that data collection will begin in spring of this school year and implementation of EWIMS will begin in the fall of 2015. The evaluation team will be in touch shortly to discuss the timeline and procedures for data collection as part of the research component of this project. As we approach the fall of 2015, the implementation team will follow up with you to discuss next steps for implementing EWIMS.
STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS (N=385)# Question A B C D Blank
1 On a scale of 1 (not helpful) to 4 (very helpful), to what degree has the use of iPads helped your learning in class?
6517%
Not Help
14638%
Somewhat
8622%
Helpful
359%
Very Helpful
5314%Blank
2 To what extent do you use the iPads in your English Class?
7620%
Not At All
20453%
Somewhat
5113%Often
10%
All the Time
5314%Blank
3 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Math Class?
17144%
Not at All
9023%
Somewhat
5214%Often
195%
All the Time
5314%Blank
4 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Science Class?
5113%
Not at All
9324%
Somewhat
12131%Often
6717%
All the Time
5314%Blank
5 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Social Studies Class?
174%
Not at All
3710%
Somewhat
9725%Often
17846%
All the Time
5615%Blank
6 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Elective Classes?
19751%
Not at all
10227%
Somewhat
267%
Often
72%
All the Time
5314%Blank
STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS (N=385)# Question A B C D Blank
7 Would you prefer having textbooks as eBooks on the iPad or a printed book?
14137%
EBooks
13034%
Regular Books
5915%No
Preference
00%
5414%Blank
8 My grades have _______________ as a result of the iPad project.
4913%
Gone Down
4612%
Improved
23661%
Stayed Same
00%
5414% Blank
9 I believe that the iPad distracts me from my school work.
339%
Strongly Disagree
15440%
Disagree
11029%
Agree
298%
Str Agree
5915%Blank
10 I feel that the training that I received in how to use the iPad was informative and helpful.
308%
Strongly Disagree
9525%
Disagree
17846%
Agree
226%
Str Agree
6015%Blank
11 What did you have the most difficulty in learning?
7018%
Downloading E-Books
7025%
Google Docs
12934%
iMovie
5314%
Connecting to a Netwk
6316% Blank
12 My teachers consistently enforce the iPad rules?
205%
Strongly Disagree
6316%
Disagree
18147%
Agree
6016%
Str Agree
6116%Blank
PLAN DATA
Subject (2013-2014) Local NationalEnglish 16.5 16.2Math 17.1 17.6Reading 17.1 16.7Science 18.9 17.8Composite 17.5 17.2
Subject (2013-2014) Local NationalEnglish 18.2 16.4Math 18.2 17.9Reading 18.9 16.9Science 20.7 18.0Composite 19.1 17.5
PHS Grade 9 vs. the Nation (Grade 9)
PHS Grade 10 vs. the Nation (Grade 10)
PLAN DATA BY COHORT
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 ACT % % % % %
2012-2013 PLAN 10
52% 77% 57% 36% 30%
2010-2011 EXP 8th
56% 72% 51% 42% 16%
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2014-2015 ACT % % % % %
2013-2014 PLAN 10
61% 83% 68% 36% 41%
2012-2013 PLAN 9
46% 69% 51% 25% 23%
2011-2012 EXP 8th
40% 61% 35% 24% 21%Year Composite English Reading Math Science
2015-2016 ACT % % % % %
2014-2015 PLAN 10
% % % % %
2013-2014 PLAN 9
47% 70% 52% 26% 27%
2011-2012 EXP 8th
40% 61% 35% 24% 21%
Current Juniors
Current Sophomores
Current Freshmen
PLAN DATA
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 10th 61% 83% 68% 36% 41%2013-2014 9th 47% 70% 52% 26% 27%2012-2013 10th 52% 77% 57% 36% 30%2012-2013 9th 46% 69% 51% 26% 23%2011-2012 10th 61% 75% 59% 51% 38%2010-2011 10th*
48% 68% 52% 34% 23%
2009-2010 10th 59% 78% 61% 39% 36%2008-2009 10th 54% 69% 55% 39% 32%
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 10th 73.5% 78.7% 71.6% 59.2% 80.6%
2013-2014 9th 58.3% 61.5% 60.4% 49.7% 70.6%
2012-2013 10th 67% 72.4% 69% 57.6% 69.5%
2012-2013 9th 57.5% 56.9% 62.3% 49.5% 66.5%
2011-2012 10th 68.6% 69.1% 75% 67.6% 72.9%
2010-2011 10th*
57.3% 49.8% 61.1% 55.9% 58.3%
Percent of Students Above 50th Percentile*2013-14 Not Available
Percent of Students Proficient by Year*2013-14 Not Available
EXPLORE DATA: 8TH GRADE
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 8th % % % % %
2012-2013 8th 57% 77% 57% 39% 29%
2011-2012 8th 40% 61% 35% 24% 21%
2010-2011 8th* 56% 72% 51% 42% 16%
Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 8th % % % % %
2012-2013 8th 56.7% 57.1% 68.2% 54.2% 69.3%
2011-2012 8th 50.7% 49.3% 62.7% 63.1% 54.8%
2010-2011 8th* 69.8% 63.7% 65.1% 59.4% 70.8%
Percent of Students Proficient by Year*2013-14 Not Available
Percent of Students Above 50th Percentile*2013-14 Not Available
top related