personalised healthcare short guide (for web)

Post on 01-Nov-2014

574 Views

Category:

Health & Medicine

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Medical profiling and online medicine:

The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age

A guide to the report

Table of contents

Introduction 01

Whatis‘personalisedhealthcare’? 02

Ethics 03

Intervention 04

Casestudies Onlinehealthinformation 05 Onlinepersonalhealthrecords 06 Buyingmedicinesonline 08 Telemedicine 09 Personalgeneticprofiling 10 Bodyimaging 11

Conclusions 12

01

IntroductionThisguidesummarisestheconclusionsandrecommendationsthatarediscussedinmoredetailintheNuffieldCouncilonBioethics’reportMedical profiling and online medicine: The ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age(publishedOctober2010).

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Newdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinearepromisedbytheirprovidersasleadingtoaneweraof‘personalisedhealthcare’.Thesedevelopmentsinclude:

•direct-to-consumerbodyimaging(e.g.CTandMRIscans)andpersonalgeneticprofilingasahealthcheck

•theincreaseinwebsitesthatprovidehealthadvice,diagnosis,storageofhealthrecords,andmedicinesforsale.

Thetechnologiesbehindthesedevelopmentsarealreadybeingusedinpositiveways.Forexample,theUK’sNationalHealthService(NHS)usesapprovedgeneticteststodetectraregeneticdisorders.Weexplorethemorecontroversialusesofthesetechnologies,andtheextenttowhichtheyreallydoleadtohealthcarebecomingmorepersonalised.

Notesinsquarebracketsrefertothechaptersinthereport.

02 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS02 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

What is ‘personalised healthcare’?Theterm‘personalisation’hasbecomeverywidespread,withmanycompanies,policymakersanddoctorsclaimingthatthisisthefutureofhealthcare.

Wefoundseveralmeaningsfor‘personalisedhealthcare’.Forexample,itcanmeanhealthcarethatistailoredtoaperson’sspecificcharacteristics,orhealthcarewheremoreresponsibilityisgiventoindividualsratherthanmedicalprofessionals[Chapter1].

LinkswithresponsibilisationandconsumerisationSomeofthesetypesofpersonalisedhealthcarecorrespondwithtwokeysocialpressures,called‘responsibilisation’and‘consumerisation’.Thesepressuresarenotjustrelevanttohealthcare,butpresentparticularethicalchallengesforthedevelopmentsbeingconsideredinthisreport.

‘Responsibilisation’

PolicymakersintheUKandelsewhereoftenencouragepeopletotakemoreresponsibilityfortheirownhealth–toleadahealthylifestyleandplayanactiveroleinmanagingtheirhealthcare.Developmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinecanprovidenewtoolstoenablepeopletotakemoreresponsibilityfortheirhealth.

‘Consumerisation’

Thereisnothingnewaboutbeingabletoselectandpayforhealthcareintheprivatesector,buttodayevenpublichealthcareservicesareaimingtobecomemoreuserfocused.Aconsumeristapproachtohealthcareandthenewtechnologiesavailablehavebeenseizeduponbyfirmsofferingmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineservices[Chapter2].

0303NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Ethics Thefollowingfiveethicalvaluesareimportantwhenconsideringdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicine:

1Privateinformationshouldbesafeguarded.

2Individualsshouldbeabletopursuetheirowninterestsintheirownway.

3Thestateshouldacttoreduceharm.

4Publicresourcesshouldbeusedfairlyandefficiently.

5Socialsolidarity(sharingrisksandworkingtogethertoprotectthevulnerable)shouldinformpublicpolicy.

ConflictingethicalvaluesTheseethicalvaluesoftenconflictwithoneanother.Allareimportantandnoonevalue‘trumps’another.

Inthefollowingcasestudies,weexaminethebenefitsandharmsineachsituation.Wethenattemptto‘soften’theconflictsbetweentheethicalvaluesbyrespectingeachofthemasmuchaspossibleandmakingrecommendationsthatareevidence-based,proportionateandfeasible[Chapter3].

04 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Intervention Ifthereisbroadagreementthatanewdevelopmentinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineislikelytocausesignificantharm,theninterventionbygovernmentsorotherorganisationsisjustified.

TypesofinterventionCoercivevsnon-coerciveSomeinterventionsinvolveformalstate-specificformsofcoercion,suchaslawsandregulations,whileothersdonot,suchasvoluntarycodesofconductoreducationcampaigns.

SpecificvsgeneralSomeinterventionsarespecifictotheproductorserviceinquestion,whileothersaremoregeneral,forexamplegeneralprofessionalcodesorrulesaboutdataprotection.

ChoosinginterventionsTheinterventionshouldbeproportionatetotheproblem.Lesscoerciveinterventionsshouldbeexploredfirst,unlessthedegreeofharminaparticularcasemeritsamorestringenttypeofintervention.

Moregeneralformsofinterventionareoftenpreferabletomoreservice-orproduct-specificones,particularlywheretechnologyisrapidlychangingandspecificrulescanquicklybecomeoutdated.

Interventionsshouldalsobefeasible.Theremaybetimeswhenmeasurescouldnotrealisticallybeenforced,wouldbeveryexpensiveorcouldhavenegativesideeffects[Chapter4].

05NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

OnlinehealthinformationPeoplehavealwaysbeenabletoaccesshealthinformationinnewspapersandmagazines,buttheinternethasopeneduparangeofnewpossibilitiesforconvenientlyfindingandexchanginginformationonhealth.Thiscanincreasepeople’sinvolvementintheirownhealthandprovidethemwithvaluablesupportfromothers.

However,itisdifficultforpeopletoassesstheaccuracyofinformationtheyaregettingonline,andtheymaynotknowwhohasaccesstoanypersonalinformationtheysubmit.Therearenostrongincentivesforinformationproviderstofollowbestpractice.

Thebestwebsitesarebasedonhighqualityresearch,originatefromanindependentnot-for-profitorganisation,areindependentlyevaluatedandcontinuouslyupdated.

Weconclude…•Allwebsitescontaininghealthinformationshouldcontain

keydetailsabout,forexample,thebasisoftheinformation,theauthors,fundingarrangements,andhowanypersonaldatawillbeused.Websitesshouldseekaccreditationfromrecognisedschemes.

•Governmentsshouldensurethathighqualityhealthinformationisavailableontheinternetanddoctorsshoulddirectpatientstothesesites.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingandadviceoncaringforpatientswhousetheinternettoaccessinformationaboutdiagnosisandtreatment[Chapter5].

Case studies

06 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

OnlinepersonalhealthrecordsBothpublicandprivatehealthcareprovidersarestartingtoofferonlinehealthrecordsservices.

ThroughitsHealthSpacewebsite,theNHScurrentlyintendstoprovideeveryoneinEnglandwithonlineaccesstoasummaryoftheirmedicalrecords,includinginformationabouttheircurrentandpasthealthproblems,medicationandallergies.

Severalcommercialcompanies,mainlyintheUS,provideservicesthatallowpeopletoorganisetheirpersonalhealthinformation,integratehealthrecordsfromdifferentproviders,andsharethemwithotherpeople,includinghealthcareprofessionals.

Theseservicesallowmoreconvenientandpatient-centredcontrolofhealthrecords.However,thereispotentialformisuseofstoredinformation.

Weconclude…•Governmentsshouldsetupaccreditationschemesforonline

healthrecordproviderstoimprovetransparencyandstandardsonhowpersonalinformationisstoredandused.Providersoftheseservicesshouldseekaccreditationfromsuchschemes.

•Duringthesigning-upprocess,onlinehealthrecordprovidersshouldprovidepotentialuserswithinformationaboutdatasecurityandlegalrights.

•ResponsiblebodiesintheEU,suchastheUKInformationCommissioner’sOffice,shouldapplyEuropeanUniondataprotectionlegislationtoonlinehealthrecordsusedbypeopleintheEU[Chapter6].

Case studies continued

07NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

08 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

BuyingmedicinesonlineOnlinepharmaciescanallowpeopletobuymedicinesconvenientlyandprivately.GreatBritainhasaregistrationsystemforonlinepharmaciestohelppeopleidentifylegitimatewebsites.

Theinternetcanalsobeusedtobuymedicinesforwhichpeopledonothaveaprescriptionandwhichareillegalintheircountry.Peopledoingthisriskbuyingharmful,fakeorlowqualitymedicinesandcouldmissoutonadviceofferedbydoctorsandpharmacists.Itcouldalsoleadtoanincreaseinantibioticresistancearisingfrommisuseofantibiotics.

Theextentofanyharmcurrentlybeingcausedisnotknownbutthepotentialforharmisgreat.Aswithallonlineservices,theinternationalnatureoftheproblemmakesitadifficultareatoregulate.

Weconclude…•Registrationschemesforonlinepharmacies,suchastheone

inGreatBritain,shouldbemirroredinothercountries.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksofbuyingmedicinesonlineandhowtoidentifyaregisteredonlinepharmacy.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingandadviceonhowtodealwithpatientswhomaybebuyingmedicinesonline.

•Governmentsworldwideshouldsetandenforceregulationsonthesupplyofantibioticsintheircountry[Chapter7].

Case studies continued

09

TelemedicineTelemedicinereferstoanyhealthcarethatinvolvescommunicationstechnologyandanelementofdistance.Itincludespatientsanddoctorscommunicatingwitheachotherelectronically,andmedicaldevicesbeingoperatedremotely.

Althoughsometypesofcarewillalwaysneedtobedeliveredinperson,telemedicinehasthepotentialtooffercaretopeopleintheirownhomeandincreaseequitableaccesstohealthcareservices.

Telemedicinecouldhaveaparticularlypositiveimpactindevelopingcountries,forexample,byenablingdoctorstoseekexpertopinionsfromspecialistsindevelopedcountries.Telemedicinemayalsohaveanimpactonthe‘braindrain’effectofdoctorsmovingfromdevelopingcountriestoworkindevelopedcountries.

Therehasbeenlittleresearchontheimpactofdifferenttypesoftelemedicineondoctor-patientrelationshipsoronwhethertheybringcostsavings.

Weconclude…•Publichealthcaresystemsshouldoffertelemedicine

serviceswheretheycanfeasiblyandcost-effectivelyhelptoreduceinequitiesinaccesstohealthcare.Anyimpactsonthedoctor-patientrelationshipshouldbeevaluated.

•Internationalagenciesshouldencouragetelemedicinenetworksindevelopingcountrieswheretheyareshowntobebeneficial,cost-effectiveandsustainable.

•Developedcountriesshouldmonitoranyimpactsofoutsourcingtheirhealthcareservicestodevelopingcountriesviatelemedicine,forexampleonthe‘braindrain’effect[Chapter8].

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

10 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

PersonalgeneticprofilingSeveralcompanies,mainlyUS-based,nowofferpersonalgeneticprofilingservicesfordiseasesusceptibility.AfteranalysingasampleofDNA(e.g.fromasalivasamplesentinthepost),theyclaimtobeabletotellhealthypeopleabouttheirrisksofdevelopingcommondiseasesinfuture,suchascancer,Parkinson’sdiseaseanddiabetes.TheseservicescancostuptoUS$2000.

Thetestsmightprovidereassuranceorenablepeopletotakepreventativeaction.However,thereareanumberofpotentialdownsides:

•Thetestresultscanbeunreliableanddifficulttointerpret.

•‘Good’resultsmayleadtocomplacencyinlifestyle.

•Learningaboutriskofdiseasecouldbeupsetting,particularlyifnotreatmentsareavailable.

•Thereispotentialformisuseofpersonalgeneticinformation.

•Peoplemayseekunnecessaryfurthertestsoradvicefromtheirdoctor.

Thenumberofpeopleusinggeneticprofilingservicesandwhetherthisiscurrentlyleadingtoanyactualharmisnotknown.

Weconclude…•Regulatorsshouldrequestevidenceforanyclaimsbeingmadeby

companiesabouttheclinicalvalueoftheirtests.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksandbenefitsofpersonalgeneticprofiling,includingtherelevanceforinsurance.

•CompaniesshouldnotknowinglyanalysetheDNAofchildrenunlesscertaincriteriaaremet.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingongivingadvicetopatientsaboutcommercialgeneticprofilingservices.

•Companiesshouldvoluntarilyprovideclearinformationonthelimitationsofgeneticprofilingandwhatwillhappentopeople’sdata[Chapter9].

Case studies continued

11

BodyimagingCommercialcompaniesarenowofferingpeoplea‘healthMOT’usingbodyimagingtechnologiessuchasCTandMRIscans.Theyclaimtolookforearlysignsofconditionssuchascancerandheartdisease,andcancostmorethan£1000.

Thetestscanputpeople’smindsatrest,orencouragethemtoseektreatmentandmakelifestylechanges.However,thereareanumberofpotentialdownsides:

•CTscansexposepeopletoradiation,whichcanbeharmful.

•Theresultscanbedifficulttointerpret.

•MRIscansoftenpickup‘abnormalities’whichareactuallyharmless,butwhichcouldleadtounnecessaryanxietyandfurtherinvasivetests.

•Thereispotentialformisuseofpersonalhealthinformation.

Thenumberofpeopleusingdirect-to-consumerbodyimagingservicesandwhetherthisiscurrentlyleadingtoanyactualharmisnotknown.

Weconclude…•Companiesthatsellbodyimagingservicesasahealthcheck

shouldberegulatedtoensuretheyaremeetingstandardsofqualityandsafety.

•Direct-to-consumerwholebodyCTimagingshouldbebanned.Part-bodyCTscansshouldonlytakeplaceifitisinthebestinterestsofthecustomer.

•Governmentwebsitesshouldprovideinformationabouttherisksandbenefitsofcommercialbodyimaging,includingtherelevanceforinsurance.

•Companiesshouldvoluntarilyprovideclearinformationonthelimitationsofdirect-to-consumerbodyimaging,andwhatwillhappentopeople’sdata.

•Doctorsshouldreceivetrainingongivingadvicetopatientsaboutdirect-to-consumerbodyimagingservices[Chapter10].

NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

12 NUFFIELDCOUNCILONBIOETHICS

Conclusions

PersonalisationAllthedevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineconsideredinthereportofferincreased‘personalisation’tosomeextent.Butmanyoftheclaimsformoreindividualiseddiagnosisandtreatmentseemtobeoverstatedandshouldbetreatedwithcautionatthepresenttime.Forexample,commercialgeneticprofilingandbodyimaginghavethepotentialtotailorhealthcaretotheindividual,butthatpotentialhasyettobefullyrealised.

ConsumerisationAllthedevelopmentsconsideredbythereportcanlendthemselvestotheprovisionofhealthcareasaconsumergood.Wethinkchoiceisoftenagoodthing,buttoworkeffectivelyinhealthcareitneedstobeaccompaniedbyproperinformationandadvice.

Wealsoneedtofindwaysofbalancingindividualchoicewiththeprincipleofsocialsolidarity–i.e.thatweshouldsharetheresponsibilitytohelppeopleinneed.

ResponsibilisationThedevelopmentsconsideredinthisreportcanleadtonewobligationsandexpectationsfortheindividualswhousethem.Forexample,onlinepersonalhealthrecordssystemscanplacenewdemandsonindividualstochecktheirrecordsandensuretheirsecurity.

Wethinkresponsibilityforhandlingnewrisksassociatedwiththesedevelopmentsshouldbeplacedinthehandsofthosebestplacedtomanageit.Insomecasesthisisthestate,insomecasesthemedicalprofessional,andinothercasestheindividual.Eachcaseneedstobeconsideredonitsownmerits.

Copiesofthereportandthisguideareavailabletodownloadat:www.nuffieldbioethics.org

Toorderaprintedcopy,pleaseemailbioethics@nuffieldbioethics.org

PublishedbyNuffieldCouncilonBioethics28BedfordSquareLondonWC1B3JS

Telephone:+44(0)2076819619

©NuffieldCouncilonBioethics2010

PublishedOctober2010

SummaryNewdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicinearepromisedbytheirprovidersasleadingtoaneweraof‘personalisedhealthcare’.

‘Personalisedhealthcare’canhavedifferentmeanings,includinghealthcarethatistailoredtotheindividualandhealthcarethatgivesmoreresponsibilitytotheindividual.

Anumberofnewdevelopmentsinmedicalprofilingandonlinemedicineareconsideredascasestudies:

•Personalgeneticprofiling

•Direct-to-consumerbodyimaging

•Onlinehealthinformation

•Buyingmedicinesonline

•Onlinepersonalhealthrecords

•Telemedicine

Thebenefitsandharmsofeachareweighedup,alongwiththeethicalvaluesthatcomeintoplay,suchasindividualsbeingabletopursuetheirowninterestsandeffortsbythestatetoreduceharm.Wequestionthedegreeofpersonalisationachievedbythenewdevelopmentsandalsotheirimplicationsfor‘consumerisation’and‘responsibilisation’ofhealthcare.Recommendationsforpolicyandpracticearemadeineachcase.

top related