piketty inequality and the role of the state in economic thinking · 2015-02-05 · the piketty...

Post on 14-Jul-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Piketty Inequality and the Role of the State

in Economic Thinking

Raul V. FabellaUP School of Economics and NASTBSP UP Professional Chair Lectures 2014

The Context: Clash of Ideologies

• “Property is theft.”K. Marx / P. Proudhon (1840s)

• “The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” -Winston Churchill

• Parasites, Looters, Moochers: the destroyers of progress: Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged (1957)

The Context: Clash of Idealogies

• Industrialists / Rational Profit Seekers are the creators of progress: Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged (1957)

• "...Atlas Shrugged is a celebration of life and happiness… Creative individual and undeviating purpose and rationality achieve joy and fulfillment. Parasites who purposely avoid either purpose or reason perish as they should.“-Alan Greenspan

"... Atlas Shrugged is not merely a novel. It is also… a cogent analysis of the evils that plague our society... You (A.R.) have the courage to tell the masses what no politician told them: you are inferior and all the improvements in your conditions… you owe to the efforts of men who are better than you.“

-Ludwig von Mises(letter to Ayn Rand)

- inspired F. Hayek who mentored M. Friedman

The Context: Clash of Idealogies

Contemporary Echoes

• To raise or not to raise the tax on the rich

• To embrace or not the affordable health insurance

• To reduce or not the coverage of safety nets such as unemployment insurance

• To impose or not user fees in education and public goods

• To do or no to do CCT.

The State in Economic Thinking

• First Fundamental Theorem: Given no-market failures, the welfare optimum is attained without the state.

• Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare: If the Walrasian optimum violates the socially desired Rawlsianequity norm, redistribute initial assets and then let Walrasian tattonnementattain the preferred welfare optimum.

• Meta-Market Failure vs. Market Failure!

The State in the Kuznets Economy

• By SFTW, the state has a role! Or has it?

• Enters the Kuznets Inverse U Hypothesis (1954): In the process of development, income inequality first rises, reaches a maximum and finally falls as per capita income grows.

• Income Inequality is a temporary itch, part of the life cycle of economic catch-up – the price of rapid growth.

The State in the Kuznets Economy

• SFTW just a neat existence theorem, not a serious policy prescription!

• Faster income growth eventually fosters income equality.

• Redistribution of asset is politically messy and contentious.

• Growth-enhancing policies are less so –export-promotion led to higher growth with lower GINIs in Tiger Economies.

The Berg and Ostry Thesis

• Berg and Ostry (2011): What factors contribute to sustainability of growth in developing countries?

• Income inequality shortened the duration of growth – robustly!

• The downward phase of the KuznetsCurve may never come!

• The State has a role at least in developing countries!

The Piketty Thesis

• Enter Thomas Piketty (2014): Capital• The Piketty Thesis: Income inequality,

measured by the share of top income decile, relentlessly rises with economic growth in well-functioning market economies.

• Nothing to do with ordinary market failures! It comes from r > g! This is true of mature high-income economies.

The New Yorker Magazine

By far the best summary of the Piketty Thesis:

“Piketty Inequality in Six Charts”

Chart 1

Chart 2

Chart 3

Chart 4

Chart 5

Chart 6

The Piketty Thesis

• The Piketty empirics seems robust against challenges (e.g., FT’s Giles et al., 2014)

• Piketty’s growth theoretic interpretation (r > g) plausible but may not be unique (e.g., Ray, 2014)

The State in the Piketty Economy

• Meta-Market Failure (the real objection of socialists to markets) grows relentlessly leading to

• Loss of legitimacy and possible Armageddon for Capitalism.

• The new role of the state: snatch Capitalism from the jaws of death!

• SFTW is restored as a policy prescription!

Piketty, Marx, Schumpeter and Keynes

• Marx’s Kapital:Capitalism’s demise is a law of scientific socialism; progressive impoverishment inevitable; the state cannot stay its execution.

• Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism Democracy: “Can Capitalism survive? No. I don’t think it can.” (To be fair, JS referred to Laissez Faire Capitalism)

Piketty, Marx, Schumpeter and Keynes

• JM Keynes General Theory: The market at times cannot heal itself; fiscal activism can and must heal it.

• Piketty Capital: The market is headed towards self-destruction; the state can and must save it.

• T. Piketty and J.M. Keynes are the true intellectual soulmates.

Thank You!

Mabuhay Kayo!

Summary of Gil B’s Results

• Between 2012 and 2009: GINI and SharesIncome Gini fell from .345 to .288Share of lowest income decile rose from

2.0 to 2.9%Share of the highest decile fell from 35.3

to 30.5%• Determining Factors OFW and GDP no impact on lowest

decile share, impacts the 2nd and 3rd

Summary of Gil Beltran’s Results

• CCT raises the lowest decile’s share• Microfinance raises the shares of the

lowest three deciles• LagsGDP growth takes 6 years to impact

shares of the poorer decilesCCT impacts only after 3 years Microfinance has immediate positive

impact on shares of lower deciles

top related