post harvest management & technology 22 march 2012
Post on 04-Jan-2016
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Post Harvest Management & Technology
22 March 2012
NCML’s Network
42
117
50
52
5026
39 18
37
243
6
9
429
1
1
3
1
952 Locations
18 States + 2 Union Territory
57 Commodities
+16,000 Clients
AUM – Rs 60 Billion
Cross Border Trade Transaction
Permanent Footprints
2
84
4
42
7 3
3
2
44 Locations
4
1 VIDISHA UJJAIN
DEWAS BIKANER
12 States
Post Harvest ManagementTechnology used elsewhere is not necessarily the best for use under conditions in India
Many of the recent developments in post-harvest technology have come about in response to the need to economize on labor, materials, and energy use, and to protect the environment.
•Latest jargon is “PHL”
PRSERVATION OR
Containment of Post Harvest Loss
Maize Post Harvest Loss (PHL)
Activity%
Loss
1Harvesting & Field Dryland 6.40%
2 Platform Drying 4.00%3 Shelling 1.20%4 Transport to Farm 2.30%5 Farm Storage 2.10%6 Transport to Market 1.00%7 Market Storage 4.00%
Total PHL21.00%
Is this the
solution
Agriculture Warehousing: Macro View
PSU Capacity (in million MT)
FCI 32.05
CWC 10.07
SWCs 21.29
State Civil Supplies Corporations/ Deptts.
11.30
Total Public Sector 64.30
Cooperative Sector 15.07
Private Sector 18.97
Total 108.75
Why Silo projects have not created replicas• Mega Silo Structures without any state subsidy
can be successful when the other activities in the supply chain also develop
• Incoming : Mega Silo being filled in by opening bagged cargo result in operational incompatibility
• Outgoing: Rail Rakes being filled again by re-bagging the bulk cargo will AGAIN create incompatibity
• Individual projects have remained only as pilots
% variation in Maize Prices vs Silo Construction materials
(Base 2003)
World’s Oldest Mega Grainery for Post Harvest Management
Location :PatnaCapacity :140,000 MT
Year: 1786
Faults the economic thinking for failing to consider the most appropriate scale for an activity
Raises the question on the notion that “Bigger is Better"
POSTCOSECHA Programme (1983-2003) in Central America has been a success. Approximately 336,000 tons of grain worth US$ 75 milo could be saved from loss.
Silo technology costs (incl. financial expenses)Price for 900 kg silo = 100 USD, lifetime = 15 years => amortization costs
7.0 USD/year
Interest rate = 10% => cost of capital invested 3.0 USD/year
Price of storage technology replaced by silo 3.0 USD/year
Fumigation costs 0.5 USD/year
TOTAL 13.5 USD/year
Silo technology benefits
10% loss avoidance (90 kg à 0.22 USD) 20.0 USD/year
Net average profit due to silo technology 6.5 USD/year
Silo production costsPrice of tools = 200 USD, lifetime = 5 years => amortization costs
40 USD/year
Interest rate = 10% => cost of capital invested 10 USD/year
Raw materials for 40 silos 2000 USD/year
Interest rate = 10%, stocking period = 1 month => cost of operating capital
17 USD/year
TOTAL 2067 USD/year
Silo sales benefits
40 silos à 60 USD 2400 USD/year
Net average profit from silo production 333 USD/year
Growers Benefit Tinsmith Benefit
Suggested Post Harvest Mgmt. Models• Homegrown solutions and need based scales• Labour efficiency by optimum used of
technology• Use of material for structures suited for the
climatic regions • Cost Efficiency from farm-gate to warehouse
& warehouse to destination• Nationwide Post Harvest Loss Grid and
plugging the gaps• Grading Sorting and Testing
Thank You
National Collateral Management Services Ltd.Gayatri Towers954, Appasaheb Marathe Marg,Prabhadevi,Mumbai 400025.
Tel: +91 22 4041 9191Fax: +91 22 4041 9193
website: www.ncmsl.com
Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success
top related