post-questionnaire results

Post-questionnaireResults

Created by Jasdeep Kaur Jabbal – JRS Production

How will the feedback benefit the production?

The feedback will help us improve, as we are able to gain an insight of our audience. Their feedback and criticism helps to improve our film.

With the feedback given we can see the strengths and weaknesses.

Question 1: Are you male or female?

yes60%

no40%

Gender

The questionnaire was given to 6 males and 4 females as this questionnaire was voluntarily. This shows that males might have more interest in thriller films.

The results show

40% - Females

60% - Males

This agrees with the stereotyping of males liking thriller films more than females. This helps us know that our film is made for our both sex’s.

Question 2:

11%

22%

33%

22%

11%

How effective was our opening sequence?1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

34% of the audience gave a 10/10 in the effectiveness of the opening sequence, this shows a good sign of the opening sequence to be liked.

22% of the audience gave 6/10 and 8/10 this also shows the audience to have an increase in effectiveness.

11% of the audience gave 7/10 and 9/10 this shows that the audience thinks that the effectiveness is averaged out in the opening sequence.

None of the audience (0%) gave 1/10, 2/10, 3/10, 4/10 and 5/10. This shows that the effectiveness is well conveyed and that the audience will enjoy the opening sequence.

Question 3: 1:

Did the opening scene intrigued you to want watch more of the

film?

yes70%

no30%

Did the opening scene intrigued you to want watch more of the

film?

30% of the participants said that the opening scene did not intrigued them to watch more of the film whereas 70% of the participants said that they are intrigued to watch more of the film.

To makes the 30% intrigued to watch the film we have to improve on the storyline and the ending, also the ending could end by a cliff-hanger to grab the audiences attention.

Question 3:2:

yes 100%

Was it easy to distinguish the antagonist and the protagonist?

All (100%) of the participants say that they have distinguish the antagonist and the protagonist. This is good as we can see that they have clearly understood the storyline and they understand each character.

Question 3:3:

yes80%

no20%

Is the actors portrayed their character effectively?

80% of the audience say that the actors have portrayed their character effectively and 20% of the participants say that actors did not portray their character effectively.

This shows that we might need to train and make the actors to be more effective with what they are doing. This might make the 20% of the participants to believe that the actors acted effectively.

Question 3:4:

Did the opening sequence follow the convention of a thriller film?

yes60%

no40%

Did the opening sequence fol-low the convention of a thriller

film?

According to the audience the opening sequence follow the convention of a thriller film.

As 60% of the audience said that the film was recognised to be a thriller and 40% said that the film was not.

This makes us want to change the 40% of the audience to make then also recognise it is a thriller film.

This will be done by intensifying scenes to make then look completely thriller like.

Question 3:5:

Was the camera angles and movement effective?

yes70%

no30%

Was the camera angles and movement effective?

As we were not completely satisfied with the camera angles and movements, we added this question to get a insight of what the audience thinks.

70% of the audience thinks that the camera angles and movement effective and 30% of the audience think the camera angles and movement were not effective.

This information helped us to improve on our camera angles and movements to make them better and effective.

Question 3:6:

yes 60%

no40%

Was the editing effective?

We were not fully satisfied with the editing done so we decided to add this question to get a insight of what the audience makes of the editing.

60% of the audience think that the editing was effective and only 40% of the audience think that the editing was not effective and needs improving.

This helps us to improve as we would like the 40% of the audience to think that the editing was effective. So these results show that the editing might be needed to be improved on some areas but over all it is good.

Question 3:7:

Was the narrative simple to fol-low?

yes 60%

no40%

Was the narrative simple to follow?

60% of the audience believes that the narrative was simple to follow and only 40% think that the narrative was not simple to follow.

This shows that the narrative needs a little tweaking so that the 40% of the participants are able to follow the narrative simply .

Question 3:8:

yes80%

no20%

Do you think that our production meets a professional standards?

80% of the audience think that JRS Productions meets the professional standards and 20% of the audience believe that JRS Production does not meet the professional standards.

These results show that JRS Productions needs to increase on the professional standards for the 20% of the audience to agree that our production meets the professional standards.

Conclusion:As a group, we are planning to use this feedback

to help us reconstruct areas of the film, and to address to the technical areas such as editing and camera movements and angles.

This helps us see our strengths and weaknesses and it has been helpful as it helps us to take the right decision to hopefully make the opening sequence successful by the feedback.