powerpoint presentation · 2020. 5. 26. · powerpoint presentation author: odean-carlin, kodi...
Post on 06-Mar-2021
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
• DOE’s Leadership team • Secretary Ben Jones, Dep Secretary Mary Stadick Smith, Mr. Joe Moran, Ms. Ann Larsen, Ms. Becky
Nelson, Ms. Jacquie Larson, Ms. Laura Scheibe, Ms. Shannon Malone, Ms. Holly Robling
• SDEA: Mary McCorkle• SASD: Mr. Rob Monson• Tribal Affairs: Ms. Julianna White Bull-Taken Alive• Department of Social Services: Ms. Carrie Johnson• SD National Guard: Major General Jeff Marlette, Major Sarah Jensen• School Districts:
• Dr. Teresa Boysen - Sioux Falls SD• Supt Jeremy Hurd – Hoven SD• Ms. Connie Kaltenbach – Oglala Lakota SD• Supt Steve Millard - Belle Fourche SD• Supt Terry Nebelsick and Mr. Rodney Mittelstedt - Huron SD• Supt Tammy Meyer – Sisseton SD• Dr. Lori Simon - Rapid City School District• Supt Shad Storley - Wagner SD
• State Library: Ms. Daria Bossman• SD Board of Regents: Dr. Paul Beran• Parent Connection: Ms. Carla Miller
Who is here?
Is America the Land of Opportunity?
It is when these characteristics are present:
High mobility areas have(1) less residential segregation,(2) less income inequality,(3) better primary schools,(4) greater social capital, and(5) greater family stability.
See more here.
ESSA Plan – Aspirational GoalsSD ESSA Plan – Aspirational Goals
Because 4th and 9th grade, which are five and 10 years into a student’s educational experience, serve as key markers in the state’s goal system, interim targets are aligned to these grade expectations such that:
• In five years (2022-23), the proficiency expectation will be that all student groups, schools, and subpopulations will demonstrate both mathematics and English language arts proficiency levels equal to the all students proficiency percentage as measured at the 50th percentile of public schools on the 2017 summative assessment.
• In 10 years (2027-28), the proficiency expectation will be that all student groups, schools, and subpopulations will demonstrate both mathematics and English language arts proficiency levels equal to the all students proficiency percentage as measured at the 75th percentile of public schools on the 2017 summative assessment.
• Goals are set with the expectation that all student groups and subpopulations will perform at these levels with the intent that in 2030-31, the aspirational goal is that all students will demonstrate both English language arts and mathematics proficiency.
The Full State ESSA Plan is here.
SD ESSA Plan – Aspirational Goals
3650437808 38456
40426
9701 9768 9537
14479
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
SY2016-17 SY2017-18 SY2018-19 SY2022-23 (Projection)
Num
ber o
f Stu
dent
s Pro
ficie
nct
Interim Benchmark - Academic Achievement for ELA (All Grades) - N-Size
All Students
Economically Disadvantaged
SD ESSA Plan – Aspirational Goals
52.70%
54.58%53.98% 54.44%
35.68%36.93% 36.27%
54.44%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
SY2016-17 SY2017-18 SY2018-19 SY2022-23 (Benchmark)
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
Interim Benchmark - Academic Achievement for ELA (All Grades)
All Students Economically Disadvantaged Linear (All Students )
Increasing gap with diminishing time between now and 2022-23 school year
Urgent need to think of thischallenge in a comprehensive way
SD ESSA Plan – Aspirational Goals
So, where do we begin?
• What does “Economically Disadvantaged” mean?:• Various definitions but recommend we use the same
identification as we define for the Report Card • Gives us four years of longitudinal data• Already drives our state ESSA Plan
• How do we begin?• By breaking down the state numbers and determining
reasonable five-year goals
1595
2897
968
2722
603
2277
372
2275
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
All Students
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
(10,171 Learners)
(3,538 or 34.79% of our 8th grade math Learners)
Math - Grade 8 Proficiency Levels
• Of the 10,171 “All Students,” 4552 were proficient in 8th grade Math– 44.7% are proficient
• Of the 3538 “Economically Disadvantaged students,” 975 were proficient in 8th grade Math– 27.5% are proficient.
• That’s a 17.1% point gap
What if the economically disadvantaged students were proficient at the same rate as the All students?
• We would have 1581 students proficient in 8th grade math– That’s 606 more students– 303 is 50% and 152 is approximately 25% of 606
• The ESSA five year goal is 44.74% or 608 more students. (See Appendix A)
Can we find ~ 152 children in South Dakota over the next five years? • If so, there would be 1127 proficient, which would mean the gap would go from 17.1% to
12.8% (31.9% would be proficient)
What does it take to get 152 more students proficient in 8th grade math?
Let’s look at the numbers for Math
1688
2612
1152
2616
819
2556
573
2610
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
All Students
ELA - Grade 3 Proficiency Levels
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
(10,394 Learners)
(4,232 or 40.72% of our 3rd grade ELA Learners)
ELA - Grade 3 Proficiency Levels
• Of the 10,394 “All Students,” 5166 were proficient in 4th grade ELA – 49.7% are proficient
• Of the 4232 “Economically Disadvantaged students,” 1392 were proficient in 3rd grade ELA– 32.9% are proficient
• That’s a 16.8% point gap
What if the economically disadvantaged students were proficient at the same rate as the All students?
• We would have 2103 students who were proficient in 3rd grade ELA– 1052 is approximately 50% and 526 is approximately 25% of 2103
• Getting to the ESSA Goal of 54.4% would mean approximately 914 more students are proficient. (See Appendix A)
Can we find ~ 526 children in South Dakota over the next five years? • If so, there would be 1,918 proficient, which would mean we go from a 16.8% gap to a 4.4%
gap (45.3% would be proficient)
What does it take to get 526 more students proficient in 3rd grade ELA?
Let’s look at the numbers for ELA
What are all the tools?And do we use them together toward this goal?
• Tools for Educators
• Tools for the Department of Education
• Tools for Teacher Prep programs
• Tools for Localities
• Tools for Community Influencers
Next Steps?
Questionnaire coming- Provide top three things that
have worked for you OR promising ideas
- Provide top three things you have seen not work
Web page coming . . .
Dates on next meeting coming
top related