preliminary stratigraphic interpretations of the soledad ... · & quartz phenocrysts,...
Post on 22-May-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Abstract �is study presents preliminary geologic mapping, stratigraphy, and provenance data from the “Soledad Rojo formation”, an informal name given by previous workers to a moderately east-dipping section of early Neogene(?) pre-Bouse Formation red beds on the western side of the northern Palo Verde Mountains of southeastern California. �is unit has been correlated to the Tolbard Fanglomerate located ~13 SW of the study area, which was likely deposited during early Miocene extensional deformation in the lower Colorado River region; however, this association is uncertain due to the lack of depositional age controls and the geographic distance between these two formations. �e Soledad Rojo formation likely represents deposition in adjacent alluvial fan and braided �uvial systems in a normal fault basin that developed during regional early Neogene extension. �is basin is bounded by Oligocene-age intermediate volcanic rocks of the Palo Verde Mountains to the east, and the late Oligocene tu� of Black Hills to the west. �e base of the formation is generally not exposed; however, in one locality it overlies a welded tu� that is similar in appearance to the tu� of Black Hills. Our study subdivides the formation into three stratigraphic units: 1) a lower alluvial unit, consisting primarily of trough cross bedded brick red coarse-grained lithic arkose and granule-pebble conglomeratic sandstone, interbedded with matrix- and clast-supported, subangular-subrounded, moderate-poorly sorted cobble conglomerate with meta-plutonic and volcanic clasts; 2) a middle �uvial unit of clast-supported, imbricated, rounded-subrounded, moderate-well sorted, cobble-boulder conglomerate with primarily meta-plutonic clasts, interbedded with brick red lithic arkose similar to lower unit; and 3) an upper alluvial unit of light gray-bu� conglomeratic lithic arkose and interbedded matrix- and clast-supported pebble-cobble conglomerate with subangular-subrounded meta-plutonic and volcanic clasts. In the northern study area, bimodal volcanic rocks are intercalated in the section. Following (and possibly during) deposition, the Soledad Rojo formation was extended and gently tilted east by NW-trending, W-dipping normal faults. In the northern part of study area, a younger dacitic intrusion crosscuts the tilted section.
Preliminary stratigraphic interpretations of the Soledad Rojo formation in the lower Colorado River Extensional Corridor,
western Palo Verde Mountains, southeastern CaliforniaBryan P. Murray & Abdulla Al-kaabi
Department of Geological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Geologic Setting
Figure 1 (left): Regional geologic map of southeastern California & southwestern Arizona, showing the distribution of early Neogene volcanic & sedimentary deposits (orange) and potential basement sediment source rocks, including Precambrian-Mesozoic metaigneous & metasedimentary rocks (pink) and the Orocopia schist (green). �e proposed path of the ancestral Colorado River is indicated by blue dashed line south of the Palo Verde Mountains (modi�ed from Sherrod and Tosdal, 1991). �e location of the study area is indicated by the black box (Fig. 2); the Tolbard Fanglomerate, which is tentatively correlated to the Solodad Rojo formation, outcrops in the Midway Mountains ~13 km to the south
Figure 2 (right): Simpli�ed geologic map of the Palo Verde Mountains & Black Hills (from Sherrod and Tosdal, 1991). Map units Tcs, unde�ned in the explanation, and Tf in the Black Hills and northern Palo Verde Mountains correspond to the Solodad Rojo formation (an informal formation name proposed by Elliot and Marshall, 2011). �e red box indicates the location of Figure 3.
115°W 114°30’W
33°3
0’N
33°N
San Andreas Fault Zone
Chocolate Mtns.
Colora
do R
iver
Gila River
Palo Verde Mtns.
Trig
o M
tns.
Mule M
tns.
Little Chuckwalla Mtns.
Black Hills
Mid
way
Mtn
s.
path of ancestralColorado River
Cho
cola
te M
tns.
Mid
dle
Mtn
s.
Dome Rock M
tns.
McCoy Mtns.
Laguna Mtns.
Cargo Muchacho
Mtns.
Colorado River
Blythe
Cibola
Yuma
CA AZmap area
0 10 20 30
kilometers
N
Figure 2
Holocene - late Miocene sedimentary deposits
Oligo-Miocene (ca. 32-18 Ma) volcanic & sedimentary deposits - includes minor Tertiary granites
Orocopia schist (Mesozoic) - includes Mesozoic & Tertiary granitic rocks in western Chocolate Mtns.
Metaigneous & metasedimentary rocks (Mesozoic-Proterozoic)
Figure 3
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrc
Td
Tsrc
Tbh
Tqv
Tsrs
Td
Tsrc
Tsrs
Td
Tsrs
Tsrv
Tsrc
Tsrc
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrv
Tsrc
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tbh Tbh?
Tsrv
Tsrs
Tsrc
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tsrs
Tqv
Tsrs
6
19
13
466238 56
44 3728 35
2820
42
4424
2724
2822
5722
23
67
2415
51
30
32
47 33
57
49
5142
4034
60 22
1870
12
14
41
37
2523
28
40
3528
3732
37
40
31
24
2112
1624
23
14
20
1917
24
24
20
2262
32
5031
30 373049
19
15 2721 26
32
24
2568
23
72 1811
19 16 78
13
19
19
114°54'0"W114°54'30"W114°55'0"W114°55'30"W114°56'0"W114°56'30"W
33°2
5'0"
N33
°24'
30"N
33°2
4'0"
N33
°23'
30"N
33°2
3'0"
N33
°22'
30"N
0 0.5 1 1.5 20.25Kilometers
Lithologic UnitsTd
Tsrc
Tsrs
Tsrv
Tbh
Tqv
Strike & dip of bedding Approximate strike & dip of bedding
Dip & dip direction of fault plane
Strike & dip of lava flow banding Strike & dip of ignimbrite compaction foliation
Trend & plunge of slickenlines
Fault - approximately located
Rounded, clast-supported conglomerate
Contact - approximately locatedContact - certain
Fault - queried
Fault - certain
Td - “Mill” dacitic intrusionTsrc - Soledad Rojo fm., light gray conglomerate & sandstoneTsrs - Soledad Rojo fm., reddish-orange sandstone & conglomerateTsrv - Soledad Rojo fm., mafic lava & silicic tuffTbh - Tuff of Black Hills (late Oligocene-early Miocene)Tqv - Quechan Volcanics (late Oligocene-early Miocene)
Symbols
Geologic Map
Figure 3 (above): Geologic map (A) and satellite image (B) of the Solodad Rojo basin in the western Palo Verde Mountains/Black Hills. �e Solodad Rojo formation in the basin are gently-moderately (~20-45°) tilted towards the east, and are o�set by several NNW-striking, W-dipping normal/oblique faults. �e basin is bounded on the east by a poorly exposed NE-striking, NW-dipping normal fault, with the late Oligocene-Miocene (ca. 18-26 Ma) Quechan Volcanics in the footwall. �e west side of the basin is bounded by a NE-striking, SE-dipping normal fault with the Oligo-Miocene (ca. 22-28? Ma) Tu� of Black Hills in the footwall (age data from Sherrod and Tosdal, 1991, and references therein). At one locality within the southern part of the map area, the Solodad Rojo formation is deposited unconformably upon a welded ignimbrite interpreted as the Tu� of Black Hills. �e location of the Tadpole Tanks measured section (Fig. 5) is shown on Figure 3B.
Figure 5
A BFigure 4: Solodad Rojo formation generalized stratigraphy
Stratigraphy
cl s vf f m c vc g p cb b
45
40
30
25
5
0
Grain Size
10
15
20
35
met
ers
abov
e se
ctio
n ba
se
Trough cross-bedded sandstone
Cross-bedded conglomerate
Matrix-supported conglomerate with subangular clasts
Clast-supported conglomerate with rounded clasts
Conglomeratic sandstone
EXPLANATION
Vertical scale in meters
LITHOLOGY
Massive sandstone
cl s vf f m c vc g p cb b
0
GRAIN SIZEcl - clay vc - very coarse sands - silt g - granulevf - very fine sand p - pebblef - fine sand cb - cobblem - medium sand b - boulderc - coarse sand
base not exposed
top not exposed
banded gneiss (biotite, quartz, feldspar), biotite augen gneiss, medium-grained granite, andesite, red porphyritic rhyolite(clast-supported, rounded to subrounded)
hornblende porphyritic andesite, vesicular basalt, white rhyolitic tuff, red rhyolite (matrix-supported, subangular to subrounded)
Clast compositions
Figure 5: Tadpole Tanks measured stratigraphic section
Tsrs: red medium-coarse grained arkosic sandstone & conglomeratic sandstone: moderately sorted, subangular-subrounded, trough cross-bedded, horizontal laminated, channel scours, and massive, with thin granule-pebble conglomerate lenses (braided fluvial deposits); red matrix-supported pebble-small boulder conglomerate: poorly sorted, subangular-subrounded (locally angular), clasts of mafic-silicic volcanics & metamorphic/plutonic basement (debris flow deposits). Upper section consists of red clast-supported cobble-boulder conglomerate: rounded-subrounded, imbricated metamorphic/plutonic basement ± mafic-silicic volcanic clasts, interbedded with medium-coarse grained sandstone lenses (braided fluvial deposits). 400+ m- thick
Fig. 5
Tsrc: light gray pebble-cobble conglomerate: matrix-supported (locally clast-supported), poorly sorted, subangular-subrounded clasts of metamorphic/plutonic basement & mafic-silicic volcanics (debris flow deposits); light gray/tan medium-very coarse grained arkosic sandstone & conglomeratic sandstone: moderately-poorly sorted, subangular-subrounded, with thin granule conglomerate lenses (braided fluvial deposits). 450+ m-thick
Td: light red dacitic intrusion: aphanitic groundmass, 5-10% biotite & plagioclase phenocrysts, small (<1 cm) gray volcanic xenoliths
Tsrv: basal bimodal volcanic rocks: gray, vesicular, flow-banded basaltic lava with 10-15% olivine (to 2 mm) & plagioclase phenocrysts; tan rhyodacitic tuff with 5% biotite, quartz, & plagioclase phenocrysts, trace gray volcanic lithic fragments; interbedded volcaniclastic granule-pebble conglomerate. 200+ m-thick
Tbh: Tuff of Black Hills (welded ignimbrite): light red-orange groundmass, dark gray fiamme (becomes white pumice upsection), 5-10% biotite, sanidine, & quartz phenocrysts, reddish-gray silicic volcanic rock fragments (to 1 cm)
Figure 4 (top): Generalized stratigraphic column of the Solodad Rojo formation, describing the key characteristics, depositional environment interpretations, and the approximate thickness of the mapped rock units in the study area (Fig. 3). �e red bar roughly corresponds to the stratigraphic position of the Tadpole Tanks measured section (Fig. 5).
Figure 5 (above): Measured stratigraphic section of the Solodad Rojo formation near Tadpole Tanks (Fig. 3B). Dashed line indicates the boundary between rounded-subrounded clast-supported cobble-boulder conglomerate above (marker bed in Fig. 3A) and subangular-subrounded sandstone & matrix-supported conglomerates below.
Figure 8 (above): Panoramic photograph looking NE at the western margin of the Solodad Rojo basin. �e hill near the center of the photograph consists of a resistant welded ignimbrite (tu� of Black Hills), which overlies white tu�aceous volcaniclastic rocks in the low-lying area to the west. East of the central hill is the basin-bounding SE-dipping normal fault, with E-dipping red Solodad Rojo formation sedimentary rocks in the hanging wall to the east.
Figure 6 (above & left): Photos of Solodad Rojo formation reddish-orange sandstone/conglomerate unit (Tsrs). (A) Trough cross-bedded conglomeratic sandstone, �lling a channel scour in underlying cobble conglomerate. Restored channel axis indicates westward (291°) �ow. (B) Trough cross-bedded sandstone with interbedded pebble-cobble conglomerate lenses. Clasts are generally subangular with metamorphic, plutonic, & ma�c-silicic volcanic compositions. (C) Clast-supported cobble-boulder conglomerate with rounded metamorphic, plutonic, & ± volcanic clasts (marker bed in Fig. 3A), interbedded with sandstone
Field Photographs
A B
C
Figure 7 (right): Photos of Solodad Rojo formation light gray conglomerate/sandstone unit (Tsrc). (A) Clast-supported polymictic cobble conglomerate with subangular-subrounded imbricated clasts. (B) Close-up of outcrop in photo A, showing the metamorphic, plutonic, & ma�c-silicic volcanic clast compositions with light gray silty-sand matrix
A
B
Figure 9 (left): Possible growth strata (fanning bedding dips) in the the Soledad Rojo formation, suggesting synextensional deposition. Dark red sandstone on left dips ~50°E, which is overlapped by lighter red sandstone dipping ~40°E near center of photograph.
NW SEW E
~50°E~40°E
Preliminary Interpretations
• �e Solodad Rojo formation was primarily deposited in a proximal-medial alluvial fan system that developed in a normal fault basin.
• Sediment in the alluvial fan deposits was mainly derived from the metaplutonic basement & ma�c-silicic volcanic rocks exposed in the areas adjacent to the basin; however, the di�erent textures and clast compositions of the rounded conglomerate layer (Fig. 5) suggest it may have been derived from more distal sources transported into the basin by incursion of a moderate-energy �uvial system.
• Growth strata suggests synextensional deposition of the Solodad Rojo formation, with main downdropping on the eastern side of basin.
• Bimodal volcanic rocks at the base of the formation and post-depositional dacitic intrusions also suggests coeval extension and magmatism (samples have been submitted for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology to constrain depositional timing)
• Future work will consist of sandstone point-counting, conglomerate clast counts, and detrital zircon U-Pb dating to further constrain the provenance of basin sediments
• A detailed sedimentological comparision of the Solodad Rojo formation to the Tolbard Fanglomerate in the Midway Mountains will determine if the proposed correlation of these units is valid.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:Cal Poly Pomona GSC 491L Field Module Spring 2017 students, Jonathan Nourse, Frank Wille, Dana Roeber Murray REFERENCES CITED:Elliot, W.J., and Marshall, M., 2011, In search of Colorado River “B” gravel, northeastern Imperial County, California, with
notes on Early Tertiary red beds in Wirths, T.A., ed., Picacho and the Cargo Muchachos: gold, guns, and geology of eastern Imperial County, California, 2nd edition: San Diego Association of Geologists, p. 183-193.
Sherrod, D.R., and Tosdal, R.M., 1991, Geologic setting and Tertiary structural evolution of southwestern Arizona and southeastern California: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 96, no. B7, p. 12407-12423.
top related