principals meeting msl standard 6 update
Post on 22-Dec-2014
149 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Implementation of the Measures of Student Learning
Dr. Rebecca Garland
Angela Quick
Jennifer Preston
July 31, 2012
Focusing on the WHY
NC is implementing a new curriculum, new assessments, new
technology tools to improve instruction, new ways of engaging
students, and the list goes on
Because all our efforts in other areas depend on an effective
teacher in every classroom and an effective leader in every school
building
So why is the State focusing on educator
effectiveness in the face of so many other
changes?
Focusing on the WHY
The work around educator effect iveness, including the Measures of
Student Learning, is grounded in the belief that:
Every student in North Carolina deserves an
effective teacher in all courses and grades.
Our students need to learn al l of the standards in the North
Carol ina Standard Course of Study in order to be READY for thei r
futures.
·
Focusing on the WHY
·In order to increase their effectiveness, teachers need access to
·high-quality data
·Every teacher in North Carolina deserves
·feedback on the growth of their students.
·It’s not about firing our way to a better teaching force. It’s about
·creating a system that:
·Identifies the strongest teachers so that we can all learn
·from them, and
·Identifies those teachers who need additional support
·and targets that support to their needs
What is educator effectiveness?
Results of Observations
Assessments to Measure Growth
End of Grade End of Course
CTE Post Assess.MSLs
Standard 6
The Tools We Need:
Tools
Assessments to
Measure Growth
Student Survey
Possible use of Tripod Survey pending SBE decision
Standards 1-7
Standards 1-5
n of rae End of Grade
e e
Standard 8 End of Grade
End of Course
CTE Post Assess.
MSLs
Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate
Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
Principals (and other Administrators)
8Strategic Leadership1 65432 7Instructional
LeadershipCultural
Leadership
Human Resource
Leadership
ManagerialLeadership
External Development
Leadership
Micro-political
Leadership
Academic Achievement
Leadership
Strategic Leadership
Teacher Ratings CategoriesRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
Teachers
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
5 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
3 Rating CategoriesDoes Not Meet Expected Growth
Meets Expected Growth
Exceeds Expected Growth
Teacher Ratings in 2011-12Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
School-wideEVAAS Growth
Teacher EVAAS Growth
Weighted Average
Yearly Rating• Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
• Meets Expected Growth
• Exceeds Expected Growth
Why is school-wide EVAAS growth included?
• To encourage collaboration and collective ownership of overall outcomes
• Teacher = 70% and School-wide = 30%
Note: In 2011-12, teachers without individual EVAAS growth will get school-wide growth for Standard 6.
6
Draft – March 2012. Check http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/ for Updates to this Presentation
Teacher Ratings in 2012-13Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
School-wide
EVAAS Growth
Teacher EVAAS Growth
Weighted Average
TeamEVAAS
Growth (?)
Yearly Rating
• Does Not MeetExpected Growth
• Meets Expected Growth
• Exceeds Expected Growth
6
Student Surveys
(?)
We are piloting some additional elements for possible inclusion in Standard 6 in 2012-13
Possible additional elements
Draft – March 2012. Check http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/ for Updates to this Presentation
Ratings Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
1 65432 7 8Strategic Leadership
InstructionalLeadership
Cultural Leadership
Human Resource
Leadership
ManagerialLeadership
External Development
Leadership
Micro-political
Leadership
Academic Achievement
Leadership
Teachers
Principals
Key Note on Ratings• Every educator is evaluated every year
• Each standard and rating stands on its own (1 out of 6, not 1/6)
• Ratings are used to create professional development plans each year
• Ratings are used to determine status
Draft – March 2012. Check http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/ for Updates to this Presentation
Status Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
Ratings Status• Teachers
6 separate ratings to help teachers grow each year
• Principals8 separate ratings to help principals grow each year
• A single overall status that is determined once a principal or teacher has three years of growth data to populate 6 or 8
• Categories for Status
1. In Need of Improvement
2. Effective
3. Highly Effective
Draft – March 2012. Check http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/ for Updates to this Presentation
Teacher StatusRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
In Need of Improvement
EffectiveHighly
Effective
Standards 1-5In the year
Standard 6Three-year rolling average
6 6 62 years ago
1 year ago
Thisyear+ + /3)
)
1 5432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Any rating lower than proficient
And/Or
Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Proficient or Higher
on Standards1-5
And
Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth
Accomplishedor Higher
on Standards1-5
And
Exceeds Expected Growth
Status and Standard 6 & 8 Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
• An educator receives an effectiveness status only once she has 3 years of data on standards 6 or 8
• A 3-year rolling average of growth data from standards 6 or 8 is used as part of determining overall status
DRAFT
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Evaluation Summary SheetName: Martha Washington School: Independence Elementary SchoolLEA: Freedom County Schools Licensure: Career-Status Overall Status: In Need of Improvement
Standard One: Teachers demonstrate leadership.Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard Two: Teachers establish a respectful environment.Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard Three: Teachers know the content they teach.Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard Four: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard Five: Teachers reflect on their practice.Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard Six: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.*Only three-year rolling average is used to determine overall status*Year One (2009 – 2010) Year Two (2010 – 2011) Year Three (2011 – 2012) Three-Year Rolling Average*
Individual Student Growth: -1.8School-wide Student Growth: .1Year One Growth: -1.23
Individual Student Growth: 1.2School-wide Student Growth: .9Year Two Growth: 1.11
Individual Student Growth: .7School-wide Student Growth: .9Year Three Growth: .76
.21Does not
meet expected growth
Meets expected growth
Exceeds expected growth
Overall
Status:
In Need of Improvement
Effective Highly Effective
Does not
meet expect
ed growth
Meets expected growth
Exceeds expected growth
Does not
meet expecte
d growth
Meets expecte
d growth
Exceeds expecte
d growth
Does not meet
expected growth
Meets expected growth
Exceeds expected growth
Focusing on the WHY
1.So why have statewide Measures of Student 2.Learning?
1.1. North Carolina has a statewide evaluation system to ensure 2. that every teacher receives a fair and consistent evaluation, 3. regardless of his or her employing LEA
4.2. Teachers in all content areas should receive a Standard Six 5. rating based on the growth of their own students on their 6. content-specific standards
7.3. Most LEAs do not have the capacity to design their own 8. assessments for all non state-tested grades and subjects
LEA-NCDPI Partnership
Prior to submitting a Race to the Top application, LEA
superintendents and the NCDPI came to an agreement on how to
measure student growth for the grades and subjects not assessed
with state exams:
Step Description Owner
One Design statewide assessments
NCDPI (with teacher input)
Two Administer new assessments
LEAs/Charter Schools
Three Determine growth with
data from new
assessments
NCDPI
Four Buckets of Assessments for GrowthRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs
▲
EOCs, EOGs and
VoCATS
Category One of MSLs
With appropriate resources and time, these MSLs can be validated psychometrically
Category Two of MSLs
With the heavy emphasis on performance, these MSLs cannot be validated psychometrically
Locally Developed Courses
A B C D
Implementation Guide
·Currently in DRAFT form
·Balances between LEA flexibility in implementation and the need to
collect secure data to send to EVAAS
·Will be revised after feedback from testing coordinators and
superintendents (feedback due by August 15; updated version posted by
September 15)
·Will also be revised after Fall 2012 administration prior to launch of
Spring 2013 administration
·Outlines decisions that LEAs need to make about implementation of the
MSLs
·Plans should include:
·Training for teachers and school administrators on the MSLs (in
conjunction with Human Resources staff)
·How/if MSLs will be used for student accountability (i.e. as final
exam grades)
·How/if parents and guardians will be notified of the MSLs
·Testing window
LEA Expectations…
· Training for teachers on how to score the performance-based
items (NCDPI module released in early Fall 2012)
· Administration mode and security
· Uniform procedures for administration
· Procedures for the distribution, collection, storage, destruction,
or recycling of MSL materials
· Roles and responsibilities for LEA and school-level staff
members
LEA Expectations…
Wilkes County Schools
• Proposed Implementation Plan Final Draft by October 1
• MSL’s Timeline
• Questions
Resources
NCEES Wiki
http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki
Region 7 Support Wiki
http://rt3region7.ncdpi.wikispaces.net
DPI Educator Effectiveness Website
http://www.ncpublicschools.org/educatoreffect/
top related