professional development course on catering for diversity in english language teaching eng5316...

Professional Development Course on Catering for Diversity in English Language

TeachingENG5316

 Assessing Diversity in English Language Learning

Session 4Assessing spelling,

handwriting and written expression

Prepared by YANG, Chi Cheung Ruby, Department of English, HKIEd

Nature of Written Language

2

Written language involves the linking of language, thought and motor skills.

Learner Factors that Influence Reading and/or Writing Performance

3

Prior content knowledgeAttitudes and motivationAcquisition of language competencePhysical developmentAttention, perception, and memory

(Lipson & Wixson, 2009)

Written Language AssessmentWork Sample Analysis

It involves reviewing students’ classwork and homework.

It is useful to:analyze work samples from different

subject areascompare the student’s work samples

from earlier in the school year with the current samples in order to note progress (or regression) (Spinelli, 2006)

4

Written Language AssessmentObservation

Observations should be made when the student is:copying from texts on the deskcopying from the boardwriting compositions

Areas of focus:PostureHandednessGrip of the writing instrumentQuality and speed of writing

5

Written Language Assessment

6

Checklist for Observing

Writing Habits

Written Expression AssessmentWritten Expression Error Analysis

Teacher can select from various writing samples, including in-class and homework assignments.

Identify the types and patterns of the errors

7

7

Written Expression AssessmentDiagnostic Inventory

A comprehensive inventory that assesses the student’s written language skills in specific areas (Spinelli, 2006).

8

Diagnostic Inventory

9

10

10

Spelling Assessment

Spelling Error AnalysisTypes of spelling errors:

Letter additionsLetter omissionsLetter substitutionsLetter reversalsLetter transpositions

11

Task 1

12

Based on the writing sample provided, try to identify the types of spelling errors made by the student.

13

Spelling AssessmentSpelling Demons

14

Spelling Assessment

Spelling DemonsCertain words are commonly misspelled

by general population.The 100 commonly misspelled words

are known as spelling “demons”.

15

Spelling Assessment

Dictated Spelling TestsWords selected from any graded word

list and students’ performance indicates their spelling grade level.

Instructional level:75-90% accuracy

16

Spelling AssessmentInformal Spelling Inventory

It is used to determine the approximate grade-level proficiency for spelling words (in isolation).

Teachers can construct their own informal spelling inventory (of about 20 words).

The list of words is dictated to the student.Adequate mastery:

90-100% correctInstructional level:75-89% correct

17

Spelling Assessment

Diagnostic Spelling InventoryIt can help to

determine which specific skills need further evaluation.

18

Spelling Flow List

19

Spelling Flow ListTo administer fewer words and closely

monitor progress toward mastery, teacher selects several key words and assesses them three days in a row.

If the word is spelled correctly three days in a row, proficiency is assumed.

To check long-term mastery, the teacher dictates the word again one week later.

Once mastery is achieved, more words will be added to the spelling mastery list (Spinelli, 2006).

20

Phonemic Awareness Spelling AssessmentTo determine whether students have

phonemic awareness, the teacher asks them to spell words that they do not already know.

Because they have not learned to spell these words, they must rely on invented spelling (Spinelli, 2006).

21

Administering the Phonemic Awareness AssessmentTeacher calls out each word at least

twice (or as many times as the student requests).

The teacher tells the student to spell each word as best he/she can, writing each sound he/she hear in the words.

Then compare the number of letters written to the phonemes in the word.

22

Interpretation for the Phonemic Awareness AssessmentStudents who consistently write three or

four letters:Have some ability to segment phonemes

Students who write only one or two reasonable letters per word:Beginning to segment phonemes

Students who write nothing / string together letters indiscriminately:Have not learned to segment phonemes

23

Handwriting Assessment

24

Prerequisite skills for handwriting:Muscular controlEye-hand coordinationVisual discrimination

How can teachers assess students’ prerequisite skills for handwriting?

Handwriting Assessment

25

Handwriting legibilityThe clarity and readability of handwriting

FluencyThe rate of written production

Handwriting Assessment

26Checklist of Handwriting Skills

Handwriting Assessment

27

Handwriting Error AnalysisMisdirection of lettersExcessive slantPoor spacingMessinessMisalignmentExcessive or insufficient amount of

pencil pressure

Task 2

28

Based on the writing sample provided, try to identify the handwriting errors made by the student.

Handwriting Assessment

29

Analysis of Handwriting Errors

Handwriting Assessment

30

Rating Scale: Zaner-Bloser Evaluation ScaleAssessment of students’ handwriting

based on samples provided for comparison.

A separate rate scale is available for printed and cursive writing.

Handwriting Assessment

31

Handwriting Assessment

32

Handwriting Assessment

33

Rating Scale: Zaner-Bloser Evaluation Scale

Handwriting Assessment

34

Rating Scale: Zaner-Bloser Evaluation ScaleRatings can also be made more

objective by considering the five major handwriting skills: shape, slant, spacing, size and smoothness.

Each is judged as either Satisfactory or Needs Improvement.

Handwriting Assessment

35

Rating Scale: Zaner-Bloser Evaluation ScaleExcellent: All the five factors are

satisfactoryGood: Four of the five factors are

satisfactoryAverage: Three factors are satisfactoryFair: Two satisfactory areasPoor: One satisfactory area

Task 3

36

Based on the writing sample provided, try to assess the student’s handwriting using the Zaner-Bloser Evaluation Scale.

Handwriting Assessment

37

ObservationIt is important to consider not only the

legibility of the student’s writing but also the speed.

Speed can be assessed by asking the student to copy a passage (of 100 words) and time how long it takes the student to complete the copying (McLoughlin & Lewis, 2008).

Handwriting Assessment

38

ObservationHow is the student seated?In what position is the student’s paper?Does the student grip the pen or pencil

too tightly?Does the student write with the right or

left hand?When the student writes, does he/she

move the entire hand smoothly across the page or just move the fingers in an attempt to draw each letter?

Handwriting Assessment

39

ObservationDoes the student exert a great deal of

pressure on the paper?If writing with a pencil, does the

student break pencil points frequently?How often does the student erase or

cross out mistakes?What is the size of letters (too small or

too large)?What is the proportion of one letter or

word to another?

Handwriting Assessment

40

ObservationHow about the slant of words (too much or

irregular)?What is the letter formation (e.g. poor circles

or straight lines, lines disconnected, etc.)?How about letter alignment (off the line,

etc.)?What is the speed of the student’s writing

(too fast or too slow)?Does the student have difficulty copying

from the board or from a text on the desk? (vision problem)

Assessing Written Products

41

Evaluation of written language using the student’s actual work products.

Issacson (1988) suggested that fluency, content, convention (including spelling and handwriting) and vocabulary should be evaluated.

Salvia and Hughes (1990) suggested that the two major areas of content and style should be evaluated. In the area of style, errors might be

located in grammar, mechanics (e.g. punctuation and capitalization), and word usage.

Assessing Written Products

42

References

43

Issacson, S. (1988). Assessing the writing product: Qualitative and quantitative measures. Exceptional Children, 54(6), 528-534.

Lipson, M. Y. & Wixson, K. K. (2009). Assessment and instruction of reading and writing difficulties: An interactive approach (4th ed). Boston, Mass.: Pearson Education.

McLoughlin, J. A. & Lewis, R. B. (2008). Assessing students with special needs (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Salvia, J. & Hughes, C. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught. New York: Macmillan.

Spinelli, C. G. (2006). Classroom assessment for students in special and general education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.