project final report - europa - setis | strategic · pdf file · 2013-03-29project...
Post on 28-Mar-2018
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
PROJECT FINAL REPORT
Grant Agreement number: 213569
Project acronym: CESAR
Project title: CO2 Enhanced Separation and Recovery
Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project, small/medium scale
Period covered: from 1 February 2008 to 31 May 2011
Name of the scientific representative of the project's co-ordinator1, Title and Organisation:
Mr Peter van Os, TNO
Tel: +31 888 666 425
E-mail: peter.vanos@tno.nl
Project website address: www.co2cesar.eu
1 Usually the contact person of the coordinator as specified in Art. 8.1. of the Grant Agreement.
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 2/16
1 Table of Contents
1 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 3
2 Project context and objectives .................................................................................... 4
3 Main S&T results/foregrounds .................................................................................... 4
3.1 WP1 – Advanced separation processes ................................................................. 5
3.2 WP2 – Capture process modelling and integration .................................................. 5
3.3 WP3 – Solvent process validation ......................................................................... 6
4 Potential impact ....................................................................................................... 6
5 Website and contact details ..................................................................................... 15
5.1.1 Project partners ........................................................................................ 16
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 3/16
Final publishable summary report
1 Executive summary The scientific evidence for man-made changes in the earth’s climate as a result of greenhouse
gas emissions (in particular CO2) is now generally accepted. In January ’07, the European
Commission recommended new targets to cut their collective greenhouse gas emissions by 20
percent from the 1990 level by 2020 with the ambition to go to a 30% cut if other non-EU
states are prepared to collaborate. The 27 European Union member governments approved
these new targets at the Spring Council meeting of EU heads of government (March 8th ’07).
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is considered as an essential component in the strategy to
meet the ambitious emission reduction goals. CCS buys time needed for the transition to
sustainable energy systems as it allows for continued use of fossil energy sources without CO2
emissions. Although technically possible a major obstacle for the large-scale introduction of CCS
is the cost of capturing CO2. Current existing technologies under development aim for 30-40
€/ton1 while a cost level of at most 15 € CO2/ton is required according to the topic of the call:
ENERGY.2007.5.1.3.
The main results for the project are:
• Selection of the best available Amine or Amino Acid Based Solvent, characterized and tested
in the Esbjerg Pilot plant.
CESAR1 performed best with 2.6 GJ/ton CO2 (including LVC and intercooling).
• CO2 Capture Process Models and Modifications including novel models and methodology,
based upon solvent system properties investigating options like interstage cooling, vacuum
or pressure desorption, flue gas cooling, split stream options and utilization of flash tanks.
Determination of technical and economical performance. Assessment of CESAR 1 in five
base cases.
The benchmark MEA capture process with simplistic heat integration was calculated to incur costs of €42 - €68 per tonne CO2 abated across the five base cases. The CESAR 1 capture
process with advanced integration was calculated to incur costs of €35-€55 per tonne CO2
abated.
• Pilot Scale Validation (1% of full scale, 1 ton CO2/hr) of novel solvent systems in terms of
operability and absorption performance, comparison with main stream, thus paving the way
for large-scale demonstration. Pilot scale validation includes an environmental impact
assessment by emission and degradation measurements and a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
study.
Three pilot plant campaigns were performed (MEA and CESAR1 for 2000 hrs op operation,
CESAR2 for 500 hrs of operation). Pioneering work has been performed regarding emission
measurements.
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 4/16
2 Project context and objectives The CESAR project aims for a breakthrough in the development of low-cost Post-Combustion
CO2 capture technology in order to provide an economically feasible solution for both new large
scale power plants and the retrofit of existing power plants which are responsible for the
majority of all anthropogenic CO2 emissions (worldwide, approx. 5,000 power plants emit
around 11 GtCO2/year).
With CESAR we focus on post-combustion capture as this is generally accepted to be the only
option for the current technology and for retrofit in existing power plants. Moreover, analysis of
the current R&D projects in Europe shows that there was follow-up to the successful post-
combustion work in the CASTOR project that ended in February 2008, while R&D aimed at other
types of carbon capture technologies have already been accommodated for.
CESARs primary objective is to decrease the cost of capture down to 15€/tCO2 captured. Translated into technical terms
this objective comes down to:
• Reduction of the energy requirement of the capture process (mainly concerns regeneration of chemical solvents)
from around 3.8 GJ/t CO2 for MEA (3,5 GJ/t CO2 with CASTOR1) down to 3.0 GJ/ton CO2. The numbers are
based on the results of the CASTOR project.
• Reduction of capital expenditures (CAPEX) related to the capture process by a factor of 1.5 per installed MW-e.
• Reduction of the total overall energy efficiency losses (including losses due to integration of the capture process
into the plant) from 11 to 6 Percentage points for gas-fired stations and from 13 to 8 Percentage points for coal-
fired power or 0.40-0.45 kWh electricity lost per captured kg of CO2 down to 0.25 kWh per kg CO2 captured.
• Assessment and comparison of novel integration concepts with mainstream techniques on a pilot plant scale,
providing technical and economical proof of technological advancements.
The cost of capture (target of 15 €/tCO2) will be reported in D2.3.5 at the end of the project. However, this is a
subjective target and depends on the fuel type in use as well as on the various estimations on capital costs, fuel costs, etc. Therefore, all assumptions will be given, and the calculation will be
based on the definitions in the Common Frame Definition document (D2.4.1) that has been made within the EBTF
framework. This gives a solid bases with well known (public) assumptions to calculate a realistic number.
3 Main S&T results/foregrounds The main scientific and technological objectives were:
• Selection of the best available Amine or Amino Acid Based Solvent, characterized and tested
in the Esbjerg Pilot plant.
APM-PIP (CESAR1) performed best with 2.6 GJ/ton CO2 (including LVC and intercooling).
• Low Energy Hybrid Solvent Systems including novel precipitating solvents such as
precipitating amino acid salts and carbonate systems allowing: better operability, reduced
waste, compact equipment, low-energy regeneration.
Carbonates and polymers systems studied within CESAR seem not well adapted for CO2
capture but there is a good potential for the DECAB process using amino acids.
• Tests and modelling of High Flux Membrane Contactors that will allow reduction in terms of
size and alleviating a number of constraints imposed by the standard equipment (packed
columns), and thereby resulting in both lower CAPEX and OPEX.
The potential of size reduction of the HFMC modules is high, but it is essential that de CAPEX
costs go down before the technique is economical feasible.
• CO2 Capture Process Models and Modifications including novel models and methodology,
based upon solvent system properties investigating options like interstage cooling, vacuum
or pressure desorption, flue gas cooling, split stream options and utilization of flash tanks.
Determination of technical and economical performance. Assessment of CESAR 1 in five
base cases.
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 5/16
The benchmark MEA capture process with simplistic heat integration was calculated to incur costs of €42 - €68 per tonne CO2 abated across the five base cases. The CESAR 1 capture
process with advanced integration was calculated to incur costs of €35-€55 per tonne CO2
abated.
• Pilot Scale Validation (1% of full scale, 1 ton CO2/hr) of novel solvent systems in terms of
operability and absorption performance, comparison with main stream, thus paving the way
for large-scale demonstration. Pilot scale validation includes an environmental impact
assessment by emission and degradation measurements and a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
study.
Three pilot plant campaigns were performed (MEA and CESAR1 for 2000 hrs op operation,
CESAR2 for 500 hrs of operation). Pioneering work has been performed regarding emission
measurements. Also the LCA study was completed.
3.1 WP1 – Advanced separation processes
In the CESAR project an extensive search and analysis has been performed to advanced solvent
systems going beyond what is achieved in the timeframe of the CASTOR project. In this project
we have covered almost all of the promising solvent systems and selected two solvents for
further testing at the Esbjerg pilot plant. AMP-PIP appeared to be the best choice regarding
energy efficiency and costs. In our opinion it will be difficult to find a solvent with significantly
better performance.
With respect to slurry systems (WP1.2), carbonates and polymers systems studied within
CESAR seem not well adapted for CO2 capture but there is a good potential for the DECAB
process developed by TNO using amino acids.
Despite the delay, WP1.3 delivered interesting results. A PTFE module of 10 m2 was realized,
tested and modelled. The technology used seems well adapted for CO2 capture (no leakage was
observed during operation). The potential of size reduction of the HFMC modules is high, but it
is essential that de CAPEX costs go down before the technique is economical feasible.
3.2 WP2 – Capture process modelling and integration
A full techno-economic analysis of the leading CESAR solvent, CESAR 1, was undertaken and
revealed significant improvements in reducing the energy penalty and the cost associated with
integrating post combustion capture into 5 power plant bases case designs. The benchmark
MEA capture process with simplistic heat integration was calculated to incur costs of €42 - €68
per tonne CO2 abated across the five base cases. The CESAR 1 capture process with advanced
integration was calculated to incur costs of €35-€55 per tonne CO2 abated. Similarly, taking the
800MW supercritical case as an example, the efficiency penalty imposed by the capture process
was reduced from 12.1 percentage points with an MEA process to 7.8 percentage points with
the CESAR 1 process. The development of advanced integration options between the power
plant and capture plant also contributed to the cost and performance improvement seen with
the improved CESAR 1 solvent.
CESAR work package 2 also provided significant progress in the modelling of complex solvent
systems using both the commercially available ASPEN software and CO2SIM the in-house
SINTEF modelling package. Initial work to investigate the scale up of membrane contactors
from the laboratory pilot scale tested in work package 1 to a full 800MW commercial scale
revealed that at the current stage of development membranes are less cost effective than the
benchmark MEA process. Initial work into the flexibility of power plant fitted with post
combustion capture provided relationships between strategies for improving flexibility and the
reduction in power plant efficiency that these create.
The European Benchmark Task Force (EBTF) (in cooperation with two other FP7 projects
CAESAR and DECARBit) reported the third and final deliverable, titled ‘European Best Practice
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 6/16
Guidelines for Assessment of CO2 Capture Technologies’. The report is a publicly available
document presenting a comprehensive common framework for techno-economic evaluation of
carbon capture technologies and test cases demonstrating the level of consistency that can be
achieve. The document can be found on the public area of the CESAR website
(http://www.co2cesar.eu/site/en/downloads.php). The report can be found in the folder: public
deliverables.
3.3 WP3 – Solvent process validation
In work package 3.1, 6 different solvent systems were tested at lab pilot scale at NTNU/SINTEF
facility and at UNIKL. Mainly based on reboiler duty performance 2 systems where selected for
testing at the Esbjerg facility. That were AMP+Piperazine (Cesar 1) and EDA (Cesar 2)
Several modifications were realized at the Esbjerg test facility to optimize the process. In the
three pilot campaigns several tests were performed to optimize the operational parameters like:
L/G ratio, Inter-cooling temperature, LVC (lean vapour compression) pressure, stripper pressure
and capture ratio.
With the first pilot campaign a new reference for MEA was set (compared to CASTOR). The
energy performance was set at 2.9 GJ/ton CO2 (including LVC and intercooling).
For CESAR1 the performance was 2.6 GJ/ton CO2 (including LVC and intercooling).
For CESAR2 the performance was 2.9 GJ/ton CO2 (including LVC and intercooling). It must be
stated that the CESAR2 campaign was ended after about 500 hrs of operation due to severe
corrosion. Nevertheless, this time was sufficient to determine the performance.
Pioneering work on characterizing emissions from amine based post combustion CO2 capture
plants has been performed. Samples were taken from the flue gas stream exiting the CO2
absorber at the MEA and CESAR1 campaign. Sampling and analysis was performed by an
external analytical services provider.
Emissions leaving the plant are dependent on the solvent itself, the operational conditions of the
plant and the flue gas washing equipment used. Based on chemical theory, it is plausible that
nitrosamines can be formed in the process by reaction between amines or amine degradation
products and flue gas NOx dissolved in the absorption liquid. In the flue gas samples taken from
Esbjerg, nitrosamines were found in very small amounts (ppb level). The exact amount is not
easy to determine at this stage due to limitations of the methods currently used for sampling
and analysis. More research is needed in this field to develop methods as this is crucial to the
quantification of nitrosamine emissions. Hence, the present results are not considered validated.
For the CESAR2 solvent, the emission campaign was not done because the campaign was ended
after 500 hrs op operation due to severe corrosion.
4 Potential impact Post Combustion Capture is an essential technique needed to be successful in achieving
societies main goal in achieving the ambitious emission reduction goals. CCS buys time needed
for the transition to sustainable energy systems as it allows for continued use of fossil energy
sources without CO2 emissions. The results achieved within CESAR will be taken further by the
community to guarantee a successful start-up of the announced DEMO projects around Europe
to prepare for full scale implementation. Many of the important players in the field are partner
in CESAR, they can use the knowledge for in the implementation phase.
CESAR has also shown that it is hard to set a number for the reduction in costs at the start of a
three or four years project. The prices of raw materials and of oil can change significantly during
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 7/16
the running time of the project. CESAR, together with CEASAR and DECARBit, have established
a calculation method within the EBTF that is now regarded as a standard for cost calculations.
This makes it possible to compare different techniques based on the same base numbers.
CESAR has performed a lot of research in possible solvent candidates for post combustion
capture. The most promising ones have been tested at pilot plant scale revealing a lot of
information about the larger scale use of such solvents. This will be taken further in future
developments.
CESAR has also performed pioneering work in the field of emission measurements. On the issue
of nitrosamine emissions, CESAR has send a statement on the results obtained within the
project on this topic to the ZEP (Zero Emissions Platform). CESAR is one of the projects setting
the research agenda for this important subject.
As a direct results from the CESAR project a number of industrial parties have decided to
initiate a long term test campaign at the DONG facilities in Esbjerg. This project has been on-
going since the autumn of 2010. Also a number of other projects have be initiated as a direct
result and follow up of the CESAR project.
Part of the CESAR project has also initiated a follow up project for CESAR in the FP7-ENERGY-
2011-2 call. This project (OCTAVIUS) in Activity : “ENERGY-2011-5+6 - Cross-cutting actions
between activities Energy-5 and Energy-6” build on the knowledge gained in CESAR and is more
focused on demonstration of operational aspects of Post Combustion Capture using test facilities
of different partners around Europe. At this time (September 2011) we are in the negotiation
phase of this project, that will be coordinated by IFPEN.
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 8/16
The following table indicates the public deliverables that can be obtained from the website.
Del. No. Deliverable name Lead partner Dissemination
level
D1.1.3b Final report on solvent characterization public
summary
TNO Public
Summary
D1.2.2b Final report on sorbent public summary SINTEF Public
Summary
D1.2.3 Report on the performance of precipitating
amino-acids public summary
TNO Public
Summary
D1.3.2 Report on definition of the modules public
summary
IFPEN Public
Summary
D1.3.5b Report on modules test and modelling public
summary
IFPEN Public
Summary
D2.1.4 Final report on models, process model and
predictions public summary CESAR 2
NTNU Public
Summary
D2.1.5 Final report on evaluation of process
modification for all selected solvent systems
public summary
SINTEF Public
Summary
D2.3.1 Baseline Power Plants Documents public
summary
EON-uk Public
Summary
D2.3.4 Economic baseline study for newly defined
power plants public summary
EON-uk Public
Summary
D2.3.5 Report on results Integration Studies (8x)
public summary
EON-uk Public
Summary
D2.4.1 Common framework definition document
(Month 12)
EON-uk Public Report
D2.4.2 Test cases/preliminary benchmarking results
from 3 projects public summary
EON-uk Public Report
D2.4.3 European Best practice guidelines for CCS
plants
EON-uk Public Report
D3.2.5 Benchmark solvent results (1) public
summary (MEA)
VTF-rd Public
Summary
D3.2.9 Evaluation and simulation of CESAR 2 solvent
results
VTF-rd Public
Summary
D3.3.4 Report on Life Cycle Assessment public
summary
TNO Public
Summary
D4.1.2 CESAR project website for management,
communication and dissemination purposes.
TNO Public
Summary
D4.1.5 Final technical activity report and publishable
report
TNO Public
Summary
Table 1
The table below lists the dissemination activities from the project up to August 2011.
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 9/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2009.02 Pilot plant testing in CESAR Oral DONG CCS conference Oslo
2009.05
Post-combustion capture
pilot plant in Esbjerg:
Experiences from the
CASTOR and CESAR projects
Oral DONG /
Vattenfall
ACI's Carbon Capture
and Storage Event,
Berlin
2009.06 Amine amino acid salts for
carbon dioxide absorption
Oral NTNU TCCS-5
2009.06 CO2 capture into NN-
dimethylethanolamine/3-
amino-1-
methylaminopropane
(DMMEA:MAPA) solution
Poster NTNU TCCS-5
2009.09 Evaluation of Process
Improvements in Pilot Scale
Activities Under the EU
CESAR Projects
Oral DONG /
Vattenfall
12th meeting of the
international PCC
Network – Regina
Canada
2009.11 CESAR Project overview Oral TNO CCS conference Oslo
2009.11 Solvent developments in
CESAR
Oral SINTEF CCS conference Oslo
2009.11 Hollow fiber membrane
contactors for CO2 capture :
from lab-scale screening to
pilot-plant module tests
Abstract IFPEN /
Polymem /
CNRS / LMOPS
GHGT10
2009.12
CO2 capture into aqueous
solutions of the mixed
solvent Cesar 1
Oral
NTNU / SINTEF 2nd Annual Gas
Processing Symposium,
Quatar. A paper will be
written.
2009.12 Evaluation of process
upgrades and novel solvents
for CO2 post combustion
capture in pilot-scale
Abstract DONG /
Vattenfall
GHGT10
2009.12 DECAB: process
development of a phase
change absorption
Abstract TNO GHGT10
2009.12 Design Criteria for CO2
Compressors in Power Plants
with Post-Combustion
Carbon Capture
Abstract Siemens GHGT10
2009.12 Open-loop step responses for
the MEA post-combustion
capture process:
Experimental results from
the Esbjerg pilot plant.
Abstract Vattenfall /
DONG
GHGT10
2009.12 Pilot Plant Experiments with
MEA and New Solvents for
Post
Combustion CO2 Capture by
Reactive Absorption
Abstract UNIKL GHGT10
2010.01 Modelling and simulation of
the Esbjerg pilot plant using
the Cesar 1 solvent
Abstract SINTEF/NTNU GHHT10
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 10/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2010.01 Common Framework, Base
Cases and Guidelines for
Transparent and
Comparable Techno-
Economic Evaluations of CCS
Technologies – the work of
the European Benchmarking
Task Force
Abstract Alstom UK /
NTNU / E.ON
Engineering /
Polit. Di Milano
/ Shell /
University of
Ulster / TNO
GHGT10
2010.01 Post combustion CO2 capture
with an amino acid salt
Abstract SINTEF/NTNU GHHT10
2010.01 CO2 Capture into aqueous
solutions of the mixed
solvent CESAR1
Oral NTNU 2nd Annual Gas
Processing
Symposium, Qatar
2010.02 Emission measurements at
Dong’s pilot plant for CO2
capture in Esbjerg
Oral Statoil /
SINTEF
IEA GHG workshop:
Impacts of Amine
Emission during Post
Combustion, Oslo
2010.03
Post-combustion capture
pilot plant in Esbjerg:
experiences from the
CASTOR and CESAR projects
Oral DONG /
Vattenfall
Carbon, Capture &
Storage 2010
Providing Clean Energy
systems to Europe
2010.04 Evaluation of process
improvements at pilot scale
Oral DONG CCS Conference
Rotterdam
2010.04 Environmental aspects
CESAR solvent systems
Oral Statoil CCS Conference
Rotterdam
2010.04 Precipitating solvents for
CO2 capture
Oral TNO CCS Conference
Rotterdam
2010.04 Hollow fiber membrane
contactors
Oral IFPEN CCS Conference
Rotterdam
2010.06 Simplified Method to
Describe Kinetics of CO2
absorption into Mixed Amine
Solvents
Oral NTNU International
Conference on
Processes and
Technologies for a
Sustainable Energy
(PTSE-2010), Ischia,
Italy,
2010.09 Pilot Plant Experiments with
MEA and new solvents for
post combustion CO2
capture by reactive
absorption
Oral UNIKL Distillation Absorption
2010
2010.09 Evaluation of process
upgrades and novel solvents
for CO2 post combustion
capture in pilot-scale
Poster DONG GHGT10
2010.09 DECAB: process
development of a phase
change absorption process
Poster TNO GHGT10
2010.09 Design Criteria for CO2
Compressors in Power
Plants with Post-Combustion
Carbon Capture
Poster Siemens GHGT10
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 11/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2010.09 Open-loop step responses
for the MEA post-
combustion capture
process: Experimental
results from the Esbjerg
pilot plant
Oral Vattenfall GHGT10
2010.09 Pilot Plant Experiments with
MEA and New Solvents for
Post Combustion CO2
Capture by Reactive
Absorption
Poster UNIKL GHGT10
2010.09 Hollow fiber membrane
contactors for CO2 capture :
from lab-scale screening to
pilot-plant module tests
Poster IFPEN GHGT10
2010.09 Common Framework, Base
Cases and Guidelines for
Transparent and
Comparable Techno-
Economic Evaluations of
CCS Technologies – the
work of the European
Benchmarking Task Force
Poster EBTF GHGT10
2010.09 Modelling and simulation of
the Esbjerg pilot plant using
the Cesar 1 solvent
Oral SINTEF GHGT10
2010 09 Gas permeability: a simple
and efficient method for
testing membrane material
solvent compatibility for
membrane contactors
application
Paper CNRS Desalination and
Water Treatment 14
(2010)
2010.12 NMR study on liquid
speciation of Diamine-H2O-
CO2 system as CO2
absorbent
Oral NTNU The PACIFICHEM 2010,
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA,
2010.12 N,N-dimethylethanolamine
(DMMEA) mixed amine
systems for postcombustion
CO2 capture
Poster NTNU The PACIFICHEM
2010, Honolulu,
Hawaii, USA,
2011.01 Pilotanlagenexperimente zur
CO2-Absorption aus
Kraftwerksabgasen mit
neuen reaktiven
Lösungsmittel
Abstract UNIKL ProcessNet
Fachausschuss
Thermische
Verfahrenstechnik
2011.03 Study of an innovative gas
liquid contactor for CO2
absorption
Paper CNRS Energy Procedia 4
(2011) 1769-1776
2011.03 Hollow fiber membrane
contactors for CO2 capture:
from lab scale screening to
pilot plant module
conception
Paper CNRS, IFPEN,
Polymem
Energy Procedia 4
(2011) 763-770
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 12/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2011.03 Modelling and simulation of
the Esbjerg pilot plant using
the Cesar 1 solvent
Paper SINTEF /
NTNU/ UNIKL
Energy Procedia 4
(2011) 1644-1651
2011.03 Post combustion CO2
capture with an amino acid
salt
Paper SINTEF /
NTNU
Energy Procedia 4
(2011) 1550-1557
2011.03 Pilot plant experiments for
post combustion carbon
dioxide capture by reactive
absorption with novel
solvents
Paper UNIKL Energy Procedia 4
(2011)
2011.03 Open-loop step responses
for the MEA post-
combustion capture
process: Experimental
results from the Esbjerg
pilot plant
Paper VTF-RD /
DONG
Energy Procedia 4
(2011)
2011.05 Solvent comparison for post
combustion CO2 Capture
Oral NTNU PCCC1
2011.05 Economic benefit of Lean
Vapor Compression in a
carbon capture
plant
Poster TNO PCCC1
2011.05 Integration of Benchmark
Post Combustion CO2
Capture Technology for Four
Reference Power Plant
Cases.
Poster TNO, EON PCCC1
2011.05 Monitoring and impacting
gaseous emissions in post
combustion carbon capture
Oral Laborelec,
DONG
PCCC1
2011.05 Results from test campaigns
at the 1 t/h CO2 post-
combustion capture pilot-
plant in Esbjerg under the
EU FP7 CESAR project
Oral DONG,
Vattenfall
PCCC1
2011.05 Overview of CESAR results,
what lessons have we
learned
Oral TNO CCS Conference
London
2011.05 Pilot plant testing of CESAR
solvents in Esbjerg
Oral DONG,
SINTEF
CCS Conference
London
2011.05 Techno-Economic
Integration Studies within
CESAR
Oral EON CCS Conference
London
2011.05 Hollow fiber membrane
contactors for CO2 capture:
experimentation on mini-
modules and a 10 m2
module, modelling and up-
scaling to CO2 capture for
an 800 MWe coal power
station.
Oral TNO, EON,
IFPEN, CNRS
CCS Conference
London
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 13/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2011.05 Emission measurements at
Dong’s pilot plant for CO2
capture in Esbjerg
Oral Denmark
2011.06 Pilot plant experiments with
new solvents for post-
combustion CO2 capture
Oral UNIKL ICEPE 2011
2011.06 Detailed Benchmarking of
Post Combustion CO2
Capture Technologies for
Four Reference Power Plant
Cases:
Economic Assessment
Poster TNO, EON TCCS6
2011.06 AMP emissions: Pilot plant
measurements and Aspen
Plus modelling
Oral TNO TCCS6
2011.06 Capacity and kinetics of
solvents for post
combustion CO2 capture
Abstract NTNU TCCS-6
2011.08 Pilot plant study of two new
solvents for post
combustion carbon dioxide
capture by reactive
absorption and comparison
to monoethanolamine
Paper UNIKL Chemical Engineering
Science 2011.
2011.08 Pilot plant study of post-
combustion carbon dioxide
capture by reactive
absorption: Methodology,
comparison of different
structured packings, and
comprehensive results for
monoethanolamine.
Paper UNIKL Chemical Engineering
Research and Design
2011, 89, 1216 –
1228, Special Issue on
Distillation &
Absorption.
2011 Liquid – liquid phase
separation during CO2
capture
Paper NTNU Chemical Engineering
Science
2011 CO2 capture into aqueous
solutions of piperazine
activated 2-amino-2-
methyl-1-propanol.
Paper NTNU /
SINTEF
Chemical Engineering
Science
2011 CO2 capture into aqueous
solutions of 3-
metylaminopropylamine
activated dimethyl-
monoethanol-amine.
Paper NTNU /
SINTEF
To be submitted to
Chem. Eng. Sci.
2011 Pilot study - CO2 capture
into aqueous solutions of 3-
methylaminopropylamine
(MAPA).
Paper NTNU To be submitted to
Int. J. Greenhouse Gas
Control
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 14/16
Date Name
Type of
publication
Organization
s Reference
2011 Pilot study - CO2 capture
into aqueous solutions of 3-
methylaminopropylamine
(MAPA) activated dimethyl-
monoethanolamine
(DMMEA).
Paper NTNU To be ubmitted to Int.
J. Greenhouse Gas
Control
2011 Solvent development - CO2
capture into aqueous
solutions of 3-
methylaminopropylamine
(MAPA).
Paper NTNU To be submitted to
Chem. Eng. Sci.
2011 Kinetics of carbon dioxide
absorption into aqueous
amino acid salt: potassium
salt of sarcosine solution
Paper NTNU /
SINTEF
Under review in Ing.
Eng. Chem. Res.
2011.09 On-line monitoring and
controlling emissions in
amine post combustion
carbon capture: a field test
Paper Laborelec /
Dong
Under review in
International Journal
of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
2011.09 Membrane processes and
post-combustion carbon
dioxide capture
Paper CNRS Chemical Engineering
Journal (2011) 171,
782-793
2011.09 Membrane contactors for
post-combustion carbon
dioxide capture: a
comparative study of
wetting resistance on long
time scales
Paper CNRS Industrial &
Engineering Chemistry
research (2011) 50,
13, 8237-8244
Planned
Prediction of performance
for the scale up of hollow
fiber membrane modules
Paper CNRS – IFPEN
- TNO
Chemical Engineering
& Processing: Process
Intensification
(Accepted)
2011.09 Flue-gas Cooling in Post-
combustion Capture Plants
Paper SINTEF/NTNU Chemical Engineering
Research and Design
Planned
Comparison of amine based
CO2 capture technologies in
Power plants on European
Benchmarking Task Force
methodology. Part A:
Thermodynamic
assessment.
Paper TNO/
Politecnico de
Milano
To be determined
Planned
Comparison of amine based
CO2 capture technologies in
Power plants on European
Benchmarking Task Force
methodology. Part B:
Economic assessment.
Paper TNO/
Politecnico de
Milano
To be determined
Planned
Design of Phase change
solvent systems for CO2
absorption
Paper TNO To be determined
Table 2
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 15/16
5 Website and contact details The project website for the CESAR project is operational and accessible in two layers: one for
the general public and one for project partners. The website link is: www.co2cesar.eu. The
public website provides general information on the project and contains a page with news items
about the project. Furthermore, the general presentation of the project can be found on the
website and also the project information that has been identified as public in the Description of
Work.
Figure 1 - Public website CESAR project (www.CO2CESAR.eu)
A project logo is created including the colour scheme for the website and the templates used in
the project. See Figure 1.
Figure 2 - CESAR logo
Final report – Publishable summary - CESAR 213569 16/16
The partner restricted website is accessible after login and serves as a communication platform
and for the exchange of documents and/or data.
After login on the public website, the beneficiaries have access to a partner restricted portal as:
Communication platform and exchange of documents/data.
5.1.1 Project partners
No Beneficiary name Beneficiary
short name Country Contact person e-mail
1 The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
TNO Netherlands Peter van Os peter.vanos@tno.nl
2 Alstom Power Sweden AB
ALSTOM Sweden Ann-Charlotte Larsson
ann-charlotte.larsson@power.alstom.com
3 BASF SE BASF Germany Susanna Voges Susanna.Voges@basf.com
4 Dong Energy Generation DONG Denmark Jacob Nygaard Knudsen
jackn@dongenergy.dk
5 Doosan Babcock Energy DOOSAN United Kingdom Stuart Bowden stuart.bowden@doosan.com
6 Electrabel Group ELB Belgium Coralie Goffin coralie.goffin@laborelec.com
7 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
CNRS France Eric Favre eric.favre@ensic.inpl-nancy.fr
8 E-ON-UK E-ON United Kingdom Nick Booth nick.booth@eon.com
9 GDF Suez GDF France Samuel Saysset samuel.saysset@gdfsuez.com
10 IFPEN IFPEN France Paul Broutin paul.broutin@ifpen.fr
11 The Norwegian University of Science and Technology
NTNU Norway Hallvard Svendsen
hallvard.svendsen@chemeng.ntnu.no
12 Polymem PLM France Olivier Lorain o.lorain@polymem.fr
13 Public Power Corporation PPC Greece Charalampos Papapavlou
c.papapavlou@dei.com.gr
14 RWE Power RWE Germany Knut Stahl knut.stahl@rwe.com
15 Siemens Power Generation
SIEMENS Germany Ruediger Schneider
ruediger.schneider@siemens.com
16 Stiftelsen SINTEF SINTEF Norway Hanne Kvamsdal Hanne.Kvamsdal@sintef.no
17 StatoilHydro ASA STATOIL Norway Nina Aas NAA@statoil.com
18 USTUTT Germany
19 Vattenfall A/S Nordic Generation
VTF-n Denmark Ole Biede ole.biede@vattenfall.com
20 E-ON Engineering EON-Eng Germany Bernd Schallert bernd.schallert@eon.com
21 RWE n-Power RWE-NP United Kingdom Richard Mather richard.mather@rwenpower.com
22 Vattenfall R&D VTF-rd Sweden Jonas Alin Jonas.Alin@vattenfall.com
23 Technische Universitaet Kaiserslautern
UNIKL Germany Hans Hasse hans.hasse@mv.uni-kl.de
top related