rapid post-earthquake building monitoring

Rapid Post-Earthquake

Building Monitoring

Bob NigborNEES@UCLA

Engineering Post-Earthquake Reconnaissance

EERI “Learning From Earthquakes” Program

In 1973, EERI formally initiated the Learning from Earthquakes (LFE) Program. This program, funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation, sends out multi-disciplinary teams of researchers (e.g., earth scientists, engineers, social scientists) into the field to investigate and to learn from the damaging effects of earthquakes and tsunamis. The reconnaissance team makes a rapid, general damage survey of the affected area, documents initial important observations from the tsunami and/or earthquake, and assesses the need for follow-up areas of research.

Rapid Aftershock Monitoring of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Santiago, Chile by NEES@UCLA

following the February 27, 2010 Mw=8.8 Earthquake

Project Collaborators and Contributors:John Wallace, PI (UCLA)Bob Nigbor co-PI (UCLA)Anne Lemnitzer (Cal State Fullerton)Alberto Salamanca (NEES@UCLA)Derek Skolnik (Kinemetrics)Leonardo Massone (Univ. of Chile, Santiago)Juan Carlos de la Llerra (Catholic University of Chile, Santiago)+ the EERI Reconnaissance Team

Preparation of Instrumentation provided by NEES@UCLA

Instrumentation Two 24-channel systems:

› 4 Q330s› Ethernet LAN› GPS timing› Netbook running Rockhound, continuous and

triggered recording› Accelerometers› Displacement sensors (LVDTs)› Battery power

Packing› Generic suitcases› Letters with lots of logos & stamps

Instrumented BuildingsLocated in Santiago, Chile

Buildings selected based on:- Access and permission- Typical design layouts representative for Chile and the US- Local collaborator for building selection: Juan Carlos de la Llerra

Ambient Vibration2 Aftershocks

Ambient Vibration30 Aftershocks

Ambient Vibration4 Aftershocks

Building B:

-10 story RC residential building- Structural system: Shear Walls- Post Earthquake damage: I. Shear wall failure, II. Column buckling, III. Extensive non-

structural failure, IV. slab bending &

concrete spalling

Repetitive Damage at the -1 level (Parking level):Wall-Slab intersections

Observed Damage in the 10 story shear wall building:

1st floor shear wall damage

Column buckling at first floor

Story Accelerations

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

EW Acceleration

Roo

f (cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

9th

(cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

2nd

(cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

Grn

d (c

m/s

2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

NS Acceleration

Roo

f (cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

9th

(cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

2nd

(cm

/s2 )

40 60 80 100 120

-20

0

20

Grn

d (c

m/s

2 )

Roof

9th

2nd

-1 st

Story Displacements

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

EW Displacement

Roo

f (m

m)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

9th

(mm

)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

2nd

(mm

)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

Grn

d (m

m)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

NS Displacement

Roo

f (m

m)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

9th

(mm

)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

2nd

(mm

)

40 60 80 100 120

-2

0

2

Grn

d (m

m)

Roof

9th

2nd

-1 st

Particle Motion

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

EW (mm)

NS

(mm

)

Roof9th2ndGround

Shear and Flexure Deformations

Figure 4: Shear-flexure interaction for a wall subject to lateral loading. (adapted from Massone and Wallace, 2004)

Shear and flexure deformations

The rotation for flexure was taken at the base of the wall (so the top displacement is multiplied by the wall height), which is the  largest value expected for flexure. If we assume that the flexure  corresponds to a rotation at wall mid-height, the flexural component should be multiplied by 0.5.

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2W

all t

op D

isp

(mm

)

Time (s)

shearflexure

Some Lessons Learned Getting equipment in (luggage vs shipping, invitation

letters, label equipment as non permanent) Local collaboration is critical (building access,

installation, translations) GPS antenna location is critical Ethernet cables have variable quality, bring

your own plenum-rated & shielded Trigger and recording needs optimization,

consider continuous recording for few-day installations

Local student operation is possible but requires training & Skype

NeedsNeeds Reduced cabling or wireless Simpler systems (Black Box) that can

accompany the recon engineers and be deployed by non-experts