reassignment committee meeting august 14, 2012

Student Reassignment Committee

Meeting Tuesday, August 14, 2012

6:00 p.m.

Scenario Recommendations

District Reassignment Committee 

Meeting

3

AGENDASTUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING

Media Center, Nash Central High SchoolTuesday, August 14, 2012 - 6:00 pm

Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward Sr.

Roll Call………..…………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant

Approval of Minutes from the June 25, 2012 and July 17, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Recommendations …….………………………………Mike Miller, OREd Report to School Board 8/27/2012…Regular Committee update 9/24/2012…Full Committee presentation to the School Board Questions?

Next Meeting9/10/2012 

Committee voice vote 6:00 pm

Communications

Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools

5

TIME-LINE

Jan-Aug 2012

Committee Deliberations/

Monthly Reports to the School

Board

Aug - 2012Committee

Recommendations Presented to

the School Board

Aug – Dec 2012

Public Input/ Community Engagement

Board of Education Approval

August 2013Implementatio

n

6

PROCESS IS EVERYTHING

Board of Education

Community Feedback Committee

Committee Chairs

Public Engagement

Technical Support

OREDStaff

7

Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite

attendance areas.

Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified

“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.

Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest

school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.

School Board Priorities

8

Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site,

consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.

Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high

schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.

Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that

anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.

Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and

economic populations at each middle and high school.

School Board Priorities

9

IPSAC – TimelineFebruary 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process

March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data 

April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision

May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

June 25 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

July 17 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.)

August 14 – Scenario Recommendations

TransparentLines of CommunicationsCommittee Meetings

Open to the publicWebsite

Information posted immediately after each meetingE-mail/ Phone Line

An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.

A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.

COMMUNICATIONS

11

Mike Miller, OREd

Scenario Recommendations

Committee Requests (deadline: 8/8/12)MS 04, Rev. 2HS 02, Rev. 2/MS 04, Rev. 3/ES 02, Rev. 1

IPSAC – Status

12

All requests submitted/processed according to scenario review rules (Scenario Tools – June 27, 2012)

Requests may be applicable to specific scenarios

Requests will be considered individually after general scenario recommendations

13

Committee Requests

Committee Request – MS 04, Rev. 2

14

Request processed by OREdJuly 11, 2012

Committee Request – HS 02, Rev. 2MS 04, Rev. 3ES 02, Rev. 1

15

Request processed by OREdJuly 19, 2012

16

Scenario Overview

Addresses utilization concerns

Impacts large number of children

Impacts balance metrics

Does not improve feeder pattern

17

Proximity + Utilization

ES 01, Rev. 1

MS 01, Rev. 1

HS 01, Rev. 1

Considers reassignment impact

Considers balance metrics

Considers feeder patterns

Considers utilization

18

Impact + Metrics

ES 02

MS 03, Rev. 1MS 04, Rev. 1MS 05, Rev. 1

HS 02, Rev. 1

19

Impact + Metrics

HS 02, Rev. 1 *

MS 04, Rev. 1 *

MS 03, Rev. 1 *

ES 02 * * Recommendation will consider Committee requests as applicable.

20

Impact + Metrics

HS 02, Rev. 1 *

MS 05, Rev. 1 *

MS 03, Rev. 1 *(OR)

MS 04, Rev. 1 *

ES 02 * * Recommendation will consider Committee requests as applicable.

MS 04, Rev. 2 ?HS 02, Rev. 2/MS 04, Rev. 3/ES 02, Rev. 1

?

21

Consider Committee Requests

February 13 (4:00)

March 26 (6:00)

April 30 (6:00)

May 29 (6:00)

June 12 (6:00)

June 25 (4:00)

July 17 (6:00)

August 14 (6:00)

Monday, Sept. 10 (6:00)

MEETING SCHEDULE

QUESTIONS