reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data

Post on 25-Feb-2016

22 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data. 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference. Leta F. Huntsinger Rick Donnelly. Introduction. Passively collected mobile phone data has shown promise as a low cost option for obtaining travel data: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data

14th TRB Planning Applications Conference

Leta F. HuntsingerRick Donnelly

2

Introduction Passively collected mobile phone data has

shown promise as a low cost option for obtaining travel data: Speed data (Using Cell Phone Technology to

Collect Travel Data, Kyle Ward) Trip tables (Origin Destination Study using Cellular

Technology for Mobile, Al, Kevin Harrison) Freight Data (Freight Data Collection Technique

and Algorithm using Cellular Phone and GIS Data, Ming-Heng Wang, et. al.)

other Comparison of passively collected data

against traditionally collected survey data

3

Challenges Household surveys

behaviorally rich, but small sample size at TAZ to TAZ level

Small TAZ to TAZ observations limit our understanding of flows at the sub-district level

Many small MPOs cannot afford household surveys Trip distribution parameters are the most

challenging to transfer Passively collected data

Large sample size, but lacks behavioral richness

4

Data – Air Sage

5

Triangle Regional Model

6

Process

Disagg to TAZ

Apply factors to AirSage

matrix

Add IE, EI, and EE trips to AirSage

matrix

Develop AM factors from

TRM data

Apply AM factors to AirSage matrix

Convert AirSage

person trips to vehicle

trips

AM peak hour

assignment of AirSage

AM peak hour

assignment of TRM

Summarize MOEs and compare

7

Results – travel time comparisons

1 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103 109 115 1210.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Trip Length Distribution (CongTT mins)

TRM Percent AirSage Percent Average Trip Length (TT)TRM 14.42Air Sage 15.51

TRM – slightly higher % of shorter trips

8

Results – district to district flows

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12123456789101112

District Map

District Trip Table Color Coded by Absolute and Relative Error

9

Results – Assignment MOEs

Functional Classification 23 – 26 are rural facilities

10

Results – Assignment MOEs

11

Results – Assignment MOEs

12

Results – Assignment MOEs

13

Findings and Recommendations Early data set – includes Sprint data only Great source of validation data Low cost option Lacks behavioral richness of household survey Larger sample than household survey Continuing improvements are needed Useful to validate an estimated trip table Add to toolbox

14

Acknowledgements Co-author – Rick Donnelly Kyle Ward, CAMPO Air Sage

15

top related