reforming water governance: principles enabling practice

Post on 24-Feb-2016

39 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Reforming Water Governance: Principles Enabling Practice. Dr Mark Smith Head IUCN Water Programme Gland, Switzerland 5th GEF-IW Conference Cairns, Australia October 2009. Session plan. Welcome & objectives RULE Case: Pangani basin, Tanzania - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Reforming Water Governance: Principles Enabling Practice

Dr Mark SmithHead

IUCN Water ProgrammeGland, Switzerland

5th GEF-IW ConferenceCairns, Australia

October 2009

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Session plan

1. Welcome & objectives

2. RULE Case: Pangani basin, Tanzania

3. NEGOTIATE Case: national dialogues, Mekong basin

4. SHARE Case: eg. Tigris-Euphrates

5. Breakout groups: key questions (30 mins)

6. Feedback & synthesis

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Simple Objectives

• Identify strategies, skills and tools needed for effective water reforms

• Prioritisation of needs

• Better able to identify key entry points for building national and transboundary water governance capacity

Water Governance Capacity: a Framework for Reforms

Dr Mark SmithHead

IUCN Water ProgrammeGland, Switzerland

5th GEF-IW ConferenceCairns, Australia

October 2009

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Why reform water governance?

• sustainable water management in place of bad water management

• development benefits– MDG 7– empowerment – equity– environmental justice

• transboundary cooperation

• conceptual framework and guidance tools

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Water Governance Capacity

“Water Governance Capacity is a nation’s level of competence to implement

effective water management through policies, laws, institutions,

regulations and compliance mechanisms”

→ Without clear policy… it is difficult to establish coherent laws→ Without clear laws… it is difficult for institutions to know how to operate→ Without effective institutions… implementation and enforcement will be lax

A country needs balanced, coordinated Water Governance Capacity

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Theoretical roadmap for WGC

Policy Law Institutions Implementation

set priorities

institutionalframework

roles & responsibilities

cost recovery &financing

internationalcooperation

transparency &accountability

basic principles allocation rules& mechanisms

pollution control

principles of:social equitysustainability

customary law

synchronisation

institutionalauthority

conservation

compliance &enforcement

contracts capacity

regulations

transparency,certainty &

accountability

incentives

representation

informationmanagement

compliance

enforcement &penalties

Int RBOs

water board

WUAs

Ministry

utilities

courts

ombudsman

corruptioncommission

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Tailoring to context

Authoritative

Policy → Design → Plan → Law → National Water Authority

Pluralistic-Liberal

Policy → Negotiations → A Deal → Law → Basin Authority

Decentralised-Communitarian

Policy → Joint Action → Learning by Doing → (Customary) Law → Microwatershed Council

Roadmap, architecture, entry points and ambition depend on what exists and what is possible

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Undertaking reform: linking to realities

1. Assess what’s in place2. Assess what’s needed in context

Policy Law Institutions Implementation

What are realities?

What are capacities?

What existing laws?

What will work?

What will fit politic

al structures?

How to coordinate WGC?

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Guidance and cases

Reforming water governance

Multi-stakeholder processes & consensus building

Transboundary agreements& institutions

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE

Session plan

1. Welcome & objectives

2. RULE Case: Pangani basin, Tanzania

3. NEGOTIATE Case: national dialogues, Mekong basin

4. SHARE Case: eg. Tigris-Euphrates

5. Breakout groups: key questions (30 mins)

6. Feedback & synthesis

top related