renewable energies for the developing world. integrating ... papers/renewable energies.pdf · while...
Post on 23-May-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Research Papers N° 15
European Post Graduate School of International & Development Studies
Renewable Energies for the Developing World: Integrating Sustainable with Economic &
Social Development
Daniela Stoycheva
2010
1
Table of Contents
Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................. 3
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 4
2. The energy access challenge for the developing world .............................................................................. 5
3. The Energy-poverty-environment nexus ................................................................................................... 9
4. Barriers to expanding energy access ....................................................................................................... 19
5. Powering poverty reduction - the role of renewables for poverty reduction and reaching the MDGs.. 20
5.1 Why renewables?.............................................................................................................................. 20
5.2 The sustainable energy challenge from a developing country perspective – obstacles to
producing renewable energy in the developing countries ........................................................................... 24
5.3 Green innovations as small-scale solutions ...................................................................................... 25
6. Case studies: Brazil and Uganda. Opportunities for South-South cooperation and learning ............... 28
6.1 Brazil................................................................................................................................................. 29
6.2 Uganda .............................................................................................................................................. 37
7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................ 42
References: ....................................................................................................................................................... 44
Annex I ............................................................................................................................................................. 50
Annex II ........................................................................................................................................................... 51
2
Abbreviations
BRICs Brazil, Russia, India and China
ERT Energy for Rural Transformation Project
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GHG greenhouse gas emissions
GIZ Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
IEA International Energy Agency
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
LDCs Least Developed Countries
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas
MDGs Millennium Development Goals
MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development of Uganda
NGO Non-governmental organization
OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
PV photovoltaic systems
RETs Renewable Energy Technologies
toe tons of oil-equivalent
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization
3
Abstract
This work aims at examining the repercussions following from the lack of access to energy in the
developing countries and at raising awareness about energy poverty and the interrelated, more general,
poverty. It aims as well at analysing the energy-poverty-environment nexus in the developing world,
in other words, how low access of energy has a negative impact on poverty and other development
objectives, as well as on the environment, and how, on the other hand, climate change and high
poverty levels perpetuate the inability to obtain better and wider energy services. Providing safe,
clean, reliable and affordable energy to those who currently have low access is regarded as critical for
advancing development objectives. The dissertation investigates in how far the development and
environmental agenda have intertwined in the last years and suggests renewable energies as a means
for addressing the aforementioned challenges. Aiming at plausibility, the work analyses the viability
of expanding energy access and of increasing renewable energy production in the developing
countries. In relation to that, it considers political, institutional and economic obstacles in those
countries. The work regards renewables as an opportunity to reach multiple goals – increasing energy
access by using local available resources, advancing development goals related to poverty, education
and health, and last but not least, addressing climate change issues. Small-scale, decentralized energy
innovations are identified as cost-effective solutions, especially targeting remote, dispersed and very
poor communities. Two case studies – Brazil and Uganda – show in practice the issues discussed,
outlining the current energy mix in these countries and the programs and ambitions each of them has
for increasing energy access, and in particular renewable energy production. The broader aim of the
work is to raise awareness of the existing problems, but also alternative solutions, among the
development community, the general public, decision-makers and businesses.
Key words: Energy access, developing countries, renewable energies, obstacles, environment
4
1. Introduction
According to projections by the World Energy Outlook, even in 2030 disparities in per-capita energy
consumption around the world will remain stark. More than 1.4 billion people in the developing world
still lack access to energy today. Not only will developing countries need a higher supply of energy,
but also the mix of energy sources would need to be changed. This work will explore the questions
‘Why a change of the current energy situation is essential for the development of the poor countries?’
and ‘What role do energy services play in improving the life of the poor and making a progress in
virtually all foundational areas of development as outlined in the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs)?’ The current low use of energy and lack of access to modern energy sources amongst the
poor reinforce the problems that the MDGs aim to alleviate, such as high poverty, low educational
levels, bad health conditions and gender inequality. By answering the questions above, the paper will
aim at supporting the wider inclusion of energy concerns in the international development agenda.
The work will also argue that renewable energies would play a key role in improving both the access
to energy, and the efficiency and sustainability of energy services in the developing countries. It will
aim at addressing the question ‘Why developing countries should rely on renewable energy more?’
and by doing this at raising awareness about the benefits of renewable energies for the poor. The
exceptional renewable energy potential in those countries, the possibility for providing decentralized
off-grid supply, the positive impact on people’s health and the opportunity to apply leapfrogging
approaches and create sustainable economies from the outset, are all good reasons for the greater use
of renewables in the developing countries’ energy mix. In addition, the dissertation addresses the two-
fold energy challenge that confronts developing and emerging economies: expanding access to energy
while simultaneously participating in the global transition to clean, low-carbon energy systems. The
barriers to both the expansion of energy access in the developing world in general, and the wider use
of renewables in particular, are also discussed.
Finally, Brazil as an emerging economy and Uganda as a predominantly poor country are in focus in
this work, making an attempt to demonstrate the statements made throughout the work and to identify
the opportunities for renewable energy growth in the two countries.
The research for this work is based on data from the International Energy Agency for various energy-
related matters, and on reports, reviews, expert papers, etc. from the United Nations, the World Bank
and several other organisations on poverty and the poverty-energy mutual influence. For the largest
part of the findings about the two case studies as well as when describing some ‘green’ innovations,
the method of interviewing has been used. Unlike the broader part of the literature which analyses the
5
interdependence between environment protection and poverty reduction, this work discusses mainly
the relation between energy and poverty reduction with a special focus on renewable energy. Thus,
this is a new prism through which to regard an old problem.
2. The energy access challenge for the developing world
Energy provides services that are essential to meet human needs. It is central to and can dramatically
affect virtually all aspects of human life, such as access to water, agricultural productivity, health care,
education, job creation, climate change, and environmental sustainability. The term ‘energy services’
refers to the benefits derived from the use of energy supplies. UN defines energy services as including
"lighting, heating, cooking, motive power, mechanical power, transport and telecommunications”
(UN-Energy, 2005, p.1). Thus business, industry, commerce and public services are also highly
dependent on energy delivery. Energy is therefore central to socio-economic development as a whole.
According to the International Energy Agency, primary demand for energy in respect to GDP has
grown steadily over the years from 1971 to 2007 in both OECD and non-OECD countries as Figure 1
shows (International Energy Agency, 2009, p.59). Projections by the Agency for the period 2007 to
2030 speak of another increase in demand with 1.5% per year from the value in 2007 (Table 1).
Figure 1: Primary energy demand and GDP, 1971-2007
6
Table 1: World primary energy demand by fuel in the Reference Scenario (Mtoe)
Dramatic growth rates in consumption and demand have to be met by corresponding growth in energy
supplies. This is where the countries from the developing world face a serious challenge. Current
levels of energy services in these countries fail to support the socio-economic development of the
poor. Today, more than 1.4 billion people in the developing world do not have access to energy (Table
2). Today more than 1.4 billion people live in darkness. By comparison, in industrialised countries the
number of people without electricity is around 3 million, which compared to the population as a whole
turns out to be insignificant as almost 100% have electricity access. Even more striking are the
numbers with regards to the poorest countries alone. The electrification rate in Sub-Saharan Africa is
about 30% and in rural areas of the region it is just above 14% (Table 2). At the same time 80% of the
population in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia live in rural areas (UK Parliamentary Office of
Science and Technology, 2002, p.1). In 2005, average per capita energy consumption in the OECD
countries was more than four times the average per capita energy consumption across all non-OECD
countries, and nearly seven times the average per capita energy consumption in Africa (International
Energy Agency, 2007, p.48). Finally, intra-country disparities should also be considered as well. The
energy consumption patterns of elites in many developing countries are similar to those of the general
population in developed countries, whereas the rural poor account for the vast majority (nearly 90 %)
of all households without access to electricity. These facts clearly demonstrate the inequitable access
to energy services worldwide and the strong disparities that persist. At the same time, the majority of
the global population lives in the developing world.
7
Table 2: Electricity access in 2009 – Regional aggregates
Source: IEA, World Energy Outlook
A further issue to be discussed is the quality of energy that poor people have access to. Energy
services can be generated from a variety of primary energy sources – oil, gas, coal, renewables, or
nuclear sources. This paper will make a distinction between three different forms of energy -
‘traditional’ fuels, ‘modern’ fuels, and electricity. Traditional fuels refer to fuelwood, charcoal, local
coal and kerosene in urban areas, mostly of the developing countries, and fuelwood, crop residues and
dung in the rural areas (UN-Energy, 2005, p.1). By contrast, modern fuels include natural gas,
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and modern biomass fuels such as ethanol, biodiesel and methanol.
Electricity is generated from both depletable energy resources (coal, natural gas, petroleum fuels), as
well as renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydropower, biomass, geothermal energy)1. “Fuels
used traditionally by the poor provide few and low quality energy services – such as basic heating for
cooking and limited quality lighting” (UN-Energy, 2005, p.2). An estimated 2.5 to 3 billion people
rely on biomass and transitional fuels, such as coal and kerosene for cooking and heating (UN
Secretary-General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change, 2010, p.14). Modern forms of energy
and electricity are essential for the development of industry, business and commerce, and for services
of life-saving importance such as adequate healthcare, education, communications, and transport.
Access to the latter forms of energy is even lower than access to traditional fuels, which exacerbates
the problem of creating adequate living conditions for the poor. Electricity is a luxury good for the
1 However in contrast to the source, which regards geothermal energy among the depletable energy resources, I have included it in the renewable ones
8
poor. Furthermore, not only the accessibility and affordability of energy services have to be taken into
account, but also the fact that the poor have a limited choice and they tend to depend on one type of
fuel only, due to lack of secondary options. In contrast to wealthier people, who rely on “energy
mixing for best utility, and will often mix biomass, electricity and liquid and gaseous fuels in various
combinations and end uses”(Intermediate Technology Development Group, 2004, p.6), poor people
usually have only one energy source available to them. This, combined with the fact that the
technologies available to them are typically inefficient or low quality, results in the poor paying much
more per unit of useful energy service than the rich. Poor urban and rural households have
unpredictable and small incomes, which only allow them to buy small amounts of fuelwood, charcoal,
or kerosene leading to an increased price of energy. In addition, a higher share of the household's
income is spent on energy than in a wealthy household. Providing clean modern energy services to
poor communities will require the expansion of choice of energy options, including conventional and
non-conventional sources.
Other concerns over traditional biomass fuels are, on the one hand, their very low efficiency, and on
the other, their adverse environmental impact. Fuelwood gathering leads to land degradation and
exacerbates deforestation, especially because, due to their low energy efficiency, a larger quantity of
traditional fuels is needed. The use of traditional biomass fuels evokes, furthermore, economic, social
and health problems. Biomass combustion often causes suffocation and health-detrimental indoor air
pollution. “Worldwide almost two million deaths annually from pneumonia, chronic lung disease, and
lung cancer are associated with exposure to indoor air pollution resulting from cooking with biomass
and coal” (UNDP and WHO, 2009, p.2). In addition to this, it is misleading to think that traditional fuels
such as wood, crop residues, or dung, are for free, as they come at a high cost in time and in labour.
Fundamentally, in the developing world, women are the key energy providers and resource managers
for the household, particularly in poor households. In energy-deficient areas, it can take up to 5 hours
per day (UN-Energy, 2005, p.3) to source fuelwood, often exposing women and young girls to
significant physical insecurity. Women and children engaged in providing energy sources for the
household are thus prevented from participating in economic and social activities and attending
school, respectively. Therefore, the lack of proper access to energy is reinforcing existing gender
inequalities.
The projections that the World Energy Outlook makes are that even in 2030, disparities in per-capita
energy consumption will remain stark, ranging from 7 toe (tons of oil-equivalent) in Russia to 0.5 toe
in Sub-Saharan Africa (World Energy Outlook website, 2012). In the context described above, not
9
only will developing countries need a higher supply of energy, but also the mix of energy sources
available to them will have to be improved.
3. The Energy-poverty-environment nexus
Persistent patterns of production and consumption, particularly of non-renewable energy sources, have
been the main cause of climate change. Developing and developed countries alike are accountable for
the heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere. Developing country emissions are rising steadily, especially
with the fast economic growth of the BRICs and South Africa. Nevertheless, developed country
emissions are overwhelmingly responsible for the current levels of global warming.
It is, however, developing countries that bear most of the burden. Poor countries have less capacity to
adapt to climate change and consequently are on average more vulnerable than developed countries.
There are several factors that explain this. Firstly, poor countries rely largely on sectors that are highly
susceptible to changes in temperature – agriculture, fisheries, fuelwood gathering for energy, among
others. Higher or lower temperatures, precipitation, and climatic extremes will add to the stress on
agricultural resources in many developing country regions and reduce the quality of land areas for
agricultural production. Thus, ecosystem degradation represents a considerable threat to poor,
especially rural, people’s survival. Secondly, the budget of poor households is very restricted and their
savings negligible, which makes them incapable of adapting quickly to changing circumstances and to
the loss of sources of food and living. They also need to devote a higher proportion of their available
resources to coping with adverse and unexpected climatic conditions. Dwellings of poor families are
also unstable and less resistant to crises. Thirdly, the limited human, institutional, and financial
capacity in less developed societies to anticipate and respond to the direct and indirect effects of
climate change makes the society as a whole more vulnerable. Developing countries do not have
mechanisms for predicting and preventing emergencies such as floods or typhoons and they also lack
the equipment and machinery to deal with the aftermath. Extreme weather events, which would cause
limited damage and few casualties in a developed country often cause extensive damage and
substantial loss of life in developing countries.
Global warming threatens as well to cause intensified water scarcity. Many regions already suffer
from water shortages. The war in Darfur is a case in point, recognised as the first conflict that is
derived by man-made global warming and in particular by the lack of water resources. Eighty per cent
of major armed conflicts in 2007 occurred in drylands (United Nations, 2011). A study titled ‘The
Forgotten Billion’ conducted by the UNCCD (United Nations Conference on Combatting
10
Desertification) and the UN Development Programme in 2010 examined the spread of poverty across
different ecosystems, as one moves from areas with more natural resource endowments to those with
less. The study found out that poverty increases with aridity. To deal with the additional stress caused
by climate variability, the poor may be forced to migrate, which is always an important coping
strategy for them. This could even lead to mass migration, as well as potential conflicts and political
instability.
It is also interesting to note that vulnerability varies among the poor. Some groups of poor people and
some developing regions are more strongly exposed to the impacts of climate change than others.
Groups that hold less financial, social, and political means find it harder to secure livelihood
alternatives. Women and children are at the bottom of the development ladder. Women in particular
are often constrained by social and cultural structures that place them in inferior social positions,
limiting their access to income, education, job opportunities and participation in the society. Climate
change is expected to exacerbate current gender inequalities.
Impacts of climate change, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity also vary across different geographical
developing state regions. As examples I have chosen Africa and Latin America to illustrate how
global warming affects the life of people there, particularly amongst low-income households.
Research undertaken by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows what the
likely regional impacts of climate change are, of which some are already happening.
In Africa, increases in droughts, floods, and other extreme events would add to the strain on water
resources, food security, human health, and infrastructure, thereby constraining development.
Between 1970 and 1999 Africa had the second highest number of people affected by natural disasters,
largely due to the frequent occurrence and the long-term effects of droughts and the importance of the
agricultural sector (African Development Bank et al., 2003, p.6). Expected effects in the region are
changes in the rainfall and intensified land use, which would exacerbate the desertification process. In
addition, grain yields are expected to decrease, which would diminish food security, and the sea level
is projected to rise, which would affect coastal settlements through flooding and coastal erosion,
especially along the eastern Southern African coast. “More than one quarter of the population lives
within 100 kilometres of the coast and most of Africa’s largest cities are along coasts vulnerable to
sea level rise, coastal erosion, and extreme events”(African Development Bank et al., 2003, p.8).
Major rivers are also highly sensitive to climate variations. People’s adaptive capacity towards such
natural disasters is low due to low GDP per capita, widespread poverty, inequitable land distribution,
and low education levels. Furthermore, social safety nets are practically absent. Individual coping
strategies are also already strained, which further deepens poverty.
11
In Latin America, a rise in the sea level would adversely affect coastal human settlements as well as
productive activities. Other global warming driven consequences, projected by the IPCC for the
region, are the loss and retreat of glaciers, floods and droughts, which would lead to poorer water
quality in some areas, and increases in the intensity of tropical cyclones. Nevertheless, vulnerability in
Latin America is lower and adaptability higher than in Africa as the majority of people in Africa live
below the absolute poverty line ($1.25/day according to World Bank estimations (The World Bank,
2009)), whereas in Latin America the median poverty line ($2/day in 2005 prices) more commonly
applies and Latin American countries fall under the category of middle-income states. Needless to say,
the capacity to cope with climate variability and extreme weather events is in itself highly dependent
on the level of economic development of a country. Social indicators, such as adult literacy, life
expectancy, and access to safe water also perform better in Latin America than in Africa. However,
other factors such as high infant mortality, low secondary school enrolment, and high income
inequality contribute to limiting adaptive capacity.
These two examples show that climate change needs to be recognized as a major concern with respect
to food security, water resources, natural resources productivity and biodiversity, desertification,
human health and mortality. Climate change is therefore a serious threat to poverty eradication. It can
hamper economic growth and the achievement of practically all Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs). Except for the direct impact of natural disasters on poverty, climate irregularities have an
indirect link to education. Loss of social, natural, physical, human, or financial capital may prevent
parents from sending their children to school and may occupy children’s time with other tasks.
Environmental issues are thus directly linked to existing poverty, aggravating it even further and
placing additional strains on the livelihoods and coping capabilities of the poor. This problem must be
addressed in order to enhance their adaptive capacity. Climate change adaptation, the responses to
climatic conditions that reduce vulnerability, should therefore be an integral and urgent part of overall
poverty reduction strategies. Current development strategies tend to overlook risks related to climate
change. Actions should be integrated into national policies for poverty eradication and sustainable
development, including, as this paper will make clear, the expansion of renewable energy use in
developing countries.
Energy is another component that has a direct effect on poverty levels. For a very long time the two
issues were not officially seen as interlinked by the most important global guidelines that steer
development and environment. Neither the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of
1992 (better known as the Agenda 21 or the Rio Earth Summit), nor the MDGs of the year 2000 have
explicitly outlined the necessity to adopt an integrative approach towards the two. The Johannesburg
12
Plan of Implementation, adopted at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in 2002,
revises the Rio Declaration and suggests a link. “In Chapter II, on poverty eradication, governments
agreed to improve access to reliable and affordable energy services for sustainable development, so
as to facilitate the achievement of the MDGs” (Flavin, C. & Aeck, M. H., 2008, p.6). This included also
actions to increase the use of renewables. In the May 2008 EU Council Conclusions on MDGs, the
EU commits itself to a more comprehensive poverty reduction platform that will fund cross-cutting
development issues, including also climate change and energy security (Hadfield, A. & Youngs, R.,
2008). Energy has been discussed as a key issue to development also in the most recent Green paper
on EU development policy of the European Commission (2010). At the Rio+20 United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development, which will take a look at the achievements over the 20 years
since the signing of the Rio Declaration and the challenges that still lie ahead, “green economy in the
context of sustainable development and poverty eradication” (Sustainable Energy for All, 2012) will
be one of the two focal themes. It remains to be seen what the outcomes of the debates on the
coupling of the two issues will be.
Despite these international agreements, decision-makers do not yet sufficiently appreciate the
underlying significance of energy foundations for reaching social ends. Therefore, answering the
question why energy is so crucial for poverty reduction deserves a special attention. Energy is central
to practically all aspects of sustainable development. What people need is not energy per se, but the
services that it provides. There are two-way linkages between energy and poverty, women, health,
education, population growth, urbanisation, and lifestyles. “These global issues determine energy
consumption, and energy systems influence the issues” (UNDP, 2000, p.40). International Energy
Agency (IEA) studies point to energy use as a contributing factor to development, rather than simply
an outcome (Flavin, C. & Aeck, M. H., 2008, p.10).
For the world’s poorest people, a lack of access to modern energy services dramatically affects health,
limits opportunities, widens the gap between them and the wealthy, and increases their vulnerability.
A few graphs below serve to illustrate the direct link between energy access and other social and
economic factors. Graph 1 shows that low access to modern energy aggravates poverty levels. In Sub-
Saharan Africa in places where less than 10% of the people have access to modern fuels, the
proportion of the population that lives on less than $1 a day may reach more than 60%. Taking a look
at the education enrolment ratio (Graph 2), it is also noticeable that the percentage of those enrolled at
primary, secondary school or university increases proportionally with the increase of the access to
modern fuels. The two factors are corresponding almost 1:1, i.e. in regions where access to modern
13
fuels is 90% or more (like in East Asia and the Pacific), the education enrolment ratio is also around
90%.
Graph 1: Graph 2:
Finally, Graph 3 shows how child and maternal mortality rates exacerbate with the lack of access to
electricity.
Graph 3: Graph 4:
Note: SSA –Sub-Saharan Africa
EAP – East Asia & the Pacific
LAC – Latin America & the Caribbean
Source: UNDP, adapted from UNDP and WHO(2009), pp.38-39
14
The graphs, and in particular Graph 4, also illustrate that countries that develop do so in tandem with
improvements in energy access. Graph 4 shows the positive correlation between modern fuel access
and the level of UNDP Human Development Index (HDI), which is composed of human development
indicators that reflect achievements in life expectancy, being knowledgeable, and enjoying a decent
standard of living/income (measured in purchasing power parity terms) (UN-Energy, 2005, p.5). Thus,
while access to modern energy services alone is not sufficient to eradicate extreme poverty, it is a
necessary condition for improving economic and social opportunities for poor men and women.
The graphs just discussed lay a good foundation to demonstrate the importance of energy for the
MDGs. This paper does not have as a purpose to put a stress on the MDGs, therefore I will not discuss
each and every one of them, but will rather concentrate on the energy-poverty nexus, the energy-
women linkages, and energy for education. I will furthermore regard the interrelatedness of energy
with population growth and with urbanisation, as these two issues are central to sustainable
development.
One very good definition of ‘poverty’ is the following:
“Poverty refers to an individual’s (or family’s) lack of access—associated primarily
with inadequate income—to basic human needs such as food, shelter, fuel, clothing,
safe water, sanitation, health care, and education. Poverty is manifested as the
inability to achieve a minimum standard of what is needed for material well-being.”
(UNDP, 2000, p.43).
Upon this background, energy services that address poverty are those that can provide people, in the
first place, cooked food, clean drinking water, comfortable living temperature, lighting, and as next
the possibility for health care, education, transport and communications. The main restrictions for
poor households derive from the type and quality of energy that they can afford using. It appears that
the energy consumption patterns of poor people tend to add to their misery and aggravate their
poverty. Thus, “cost-effective improvements” in energy efficiency will have a considerable effect on
poverty reduction. It is, therefore, very important to consider the costs at which modern energy will be
delivered to poor households. Access relates to more than availability, it also captures factors such as
affordability and relevance. For the poor people, this implies that the price of modern energy should
be comparable to what they are willing to pay for traditional fuels in order to be compatible with their
income levels. Time freed up for activities other than collecting fuelwood is an essential gain only if
the possibilities are indeed in place for those other activities to be exercised and if this adds up to the
family income rather than reduce it. This is one of the directions in the two-way energy-poverty nexus
which explains why poverty enhances the lack of proper access to energy.
15
The other direction of the linkage refers to the fact that poor energy intensifies poor living conditions.
Access to modern fuels and electricity will free up people’s resources and time for more productive
uses that can improve human welfare. Lighting, for instance, would extend the workday and provide
an environment for learning activities. Communications like radio, television, or even Internet would
also increase access to knowledge. Another very important utility function of modern energy services,
is that they are a necessary tool for improved economic activity and growth. Modern energy is
indispensable to modern irrigation technologies which would expand agricultural productivity. Bigger
harvests would also require technologies and machines for their collection. Both of these will be
factors for an increased labour productivity and more job creation. Therefore, poverty-reduction
strategies should concentrate on improving energy access and quality. Even in a growing economy,
energy poverty slows down the absorption of economic growth. A World Bank study indicates that
countries with underperforming energy systems may lose up to 1-2 per cent of growth potential
annually as a result of electric power outages, over-investment in backup electricity generators, energy
subsidies and losses, and inefficient use of scarce energy resources (OECD/IEA, 2010, p.35).
It is said that poverty has a woman’s face. Energy services can to a great extent improve the position
of women in society. When regarding the nature of linkages between energy and women, the position
of women in families and communities needs to be given special attention. Women’s work and output
is undervalued and women are underpaid relative to men for the same tasks. Women’s activities which
enable the household’s survival remain largely invisible and unacknowledged as they do not form part
of the economic output. Women are more vulnerable than men to environmental degradation, because
it often has a direct impact on their workload. They are also more likely to be directly affected by
increases in fuel prices and by scarcity. Often the only asset that women can turn to in difficult times
is their own labour. Thus, aside from the overwhelming importance of energy, in general, and modern
energy, in particular, the role of human energy and especially of women’s energy must be recognised.
Human energy conservation must be central to any energy strategy. In addition, the tendency for
women and men to use different energy services should be recognized in the design of policies and
programmes. In many developing countries, energy policy is designed in such a way that energy
resources are not equally available to all. “Industrial, commercial, urban, and male users receive
priority service and attention in energy policies. At the bottom of the list are agricultural, domestic,
rural, and female users” (UNDP, 2000, pp.47-8), and women in rural areas fall within all four of the
latter categories.
Given that most activities performed by women in developing countries, in both rural and urban areas,
are small-scale activities, as for instance agricultural and household activities, or tailoring, food
16
processing and producing, a small development in technology and energy supply could greatly
enhance their productivity. What is more, women in households with electricity are more likely to
have access to information about gender issues from radio and television than women in households
without electricity. Finally, energy provides many opportunities for skill-building among women,
which would give them access to work other than their traditional household duties. I believe that
microfinance could play a crucial role therein. On the one hand, microfinance projects can be
designed so as to involve women from the local community in income-generating and socialising
activities which would improve their position in society and would allow them to purchase better
types of energy. On the other, microfinance can be used as a tool to relieve women’s burden in
collecting fuelwood. For instance, a project which would involve a few single men in collecting the
fuelwood for several households in return for some money, or cooked food for example, would reduce
the physical effort on women and give them time for income-creating occupations or for studying.
Another important relation to consider is that between energy and population growth, also in a direct
link with gender issues. The geographic distribution of population growth is uneven with “90 per cent
of the growth taking place in developing countries” (UNDP, 2000, p.51). In addition, the biggest
share of the population already lives in the developing part of the world. Increase in population will
dictate the need for even more energy, which will strain the resources available. What is more, it will
exacerbate even more the serious disparities existing between industrialised and developing countries.
Renewable energies are likely to be part of the solution as, on the one hand they represent an
alternative form of energy, and on the other, renewable energy sources are abundant in the South. The
nexus energy-population has a further side to consider – energy consumption can transform
demographic patterns. Rural societies see high fertility as a means of survival as every new member of
the family can be employed in the household – for instance in fuelwood gathering or agricultural
activities. Higher level of education would help to change the mind-set of people who are used to
relying only on tradition. More energy-efficient technologies would free up time for women to attend
school or to get involved in other socioeconomic activities, which would reduce the rate of early-
marriages and early child-births. In short, energy services promote the socioeconomic preconditions
for fertility decline. Increased energy access will also improve the conditions in which children are
born and raised, and will reduce infant mortality.
So far, this work has mostly addressed rural poverty. However, urbanisation influences profoundly the
context and processes of sustainable development and requires specifically designed measures to
address it. Urbanisation is a phenomenon that more and more affects the developing world and may
turn into a serious challenge for the citizens. “Of the 1.23 billion urban residents added to the world
17
population since 1970, 84 per cent have been in less developed regions. The global population is
growing by 2.5 per cent a year, 3.5 per cent a year in less developed regions” (UNDP, 2000, p.54).
Latin America is the most urbanised region in the developing world; however Africa, despite being
the least urbanised region, is currently experiencing the highest urban growth rate. Asia, on the other
hand, contains the biggest number of people in the world and half of the world’s megacities.
Cities are the engines of economic growth and centres of employment and opportunity. Nevertheless,
poverty and disparities between classes are part of the city environment too. As they attract a large
number of people, especially in the last decades, cities are not always able to accommodate all of
them, and provide them with the jobs and infrastructure that they necessitate. On the positive side,
cities provide greater accessibility to education, services, and training, they increase the access of
residents to information and communications, and particularly benefit the women, whose interests and
demands are more easily articulated and negotiated in this dynamic social environment. On the
negative side, cities are the origins of many global environmental problems related to air and water
pollution. The type and scale of urban development will largely affect future energy consumption. In
contrast to rural societies, urban societies rely primarily on fossil fuels and electricity. As developing
countries urbanise, energy demand will increase because of, on the one hand, manufacturing and
industry in the cities which require much more energy than traditional agriculture, and on the other,
increased use of transport for the delivery of traditional bulky fuels, food and other materials to the
city. Nevertheless, “because of their concentrated form and efficiencies of scale, cities offer major
opportunities to reduce energy demand and minimise pressures on surrounding land and natural
resources” (UNDP, 2000, p.54). Energy can serve as a means for sustainable development if it is used
more efficiently and if more environmental-friendly sources are utilised, above all renewable energies.
Developing countries facing urbanisation and rapid city growth can use this opportunity to construct
sustainable cities from the outset and avoid mistakes made in some developed countries. Here, best
practices from the North, as well as South-South cooperation between developing countries, can play
a major role. This moment also provides a unique opportunity to implement leapfrogging approaches
by making use of more renewables in the energy mix of the cities. Developing countries can create
sustainable cities by taking account of two key activities in city areas – transportation and
construction. Lower-income people in the urban areas of poor countries cannot afford possessing their
own motor vehicle. This problem may be transformed into an advantage for building a green city. A
more energy-efficient transport strategy would be one that allows for the wider use of bicycles and
public transportation, especially underground, as well as for walking. Repercussions of unsustainable
transport seen in industrialised countries could thus be avoided. In addition, commuting at big
18
distances should also be averted by creating such employment possibilities as not to necessitate a lot
of travel.
In the construction area, materials such as timber, soil, sand, and stone are often used in the housing in
poorer countries. They require little energy in their manufacture and processing, and their durability
can be improved at low energy costs through appropriate construction methods and techniques. Know-
how and machinery from the developed countries could play an important role therein. Lastly, the
growth of urbanisation and the migration of people from rural to urban areas can be reduced by
creating more favourable living conditions in the rural zones. This will diminish the pressure
(environmental, economic and social) on cities.
Finally, the impact of poverty on the environment should be considered as well. The way poor people
use the environment in order to supply their households with energy has a harmful impact on the
quality of the environment. The fact that poor people do not have access to any other forms of energy
but the traditional ones leads to overexploitation of resources. Biomass is often harvested in an
unsustainable manner, contributing to environmental degradation. “Deforestation, forest degradation,
floods, landslides, topsoil erosion and low land productivity are the most visible manifestations of
unsustainable biomass harvesting” (UNDP, 2011b, p.17). According to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), fuelwood collection accounts for 6 per cent
of annual global deforestation. The extensive use of the soil for agriculture and animal-breeding
because of the lack of any other income-generating opportunities also puts pressure on local
ecosystems. Environmental damage occurs in urban areas likewise, especially in urban slums where
the poor settle. Due to outdated technology used in the industry, old automobiles, etc. serious air and
water pollution is caused. The extraction of commercial fuels like coal and oil is often also highly
damaging to the ecosystem. At the same time, lifting people out of poverty will require ensuring that
more people have better access to energy. In addition, as this paper has discussed, the number of the
population is growing and the share of people living in cities as well. All those factors taken together
will lead to a huge increase in energy consumption with an associated impact on greenhouse gas
emissions and the global environment. Therefore, I see renewable energies as an important part of the
solution to the discussed problems and raised challenges. The most effective way to achieve
sustainable development is to “mainstream climate change in development. A strategic approach
which “climate proofs” development - combining mitigation, adaptation and disaster risk reduction
and prevention activities is crucial” (European Commission, 2010, p.16). Finally, the need to avoid
any potential conflicts between the objectives of economic development, poverty reduction and
environmental policy, will rely on efficiency in energy production, transmission, distribution and
19
consumption, and on environmentally sound energy systems, particularly new and renewable sources
of energy.
4. Barriers to expanding energy access
Analysing the challenges in front of increasing access to modern energy is essential in order to design
appropriate policies and construct relevant technologies which to address the existing energy
inequality around the world. The main barriers to providing modern, reliable and accessible energy in
the developing world, primarily in rural areas, are predominantly structural in nature: difficulties of
extending the grid, the remoteness of many areas, the incompatibility of high or volatile energy costs
with the limited economic capacity of the poor, and the limited fiscal capacity of governments to
subsidize the costs of energy.
Grid extension is indeed a necessity in the developing world, particularly in urban, peri-urban and
rural areas with high population densities, where it is often the least-cost option. Electricity and fossil
fuels rely on highly capital-intensive distribution networks, such as grids, pipelines and transport to
deliver centrally produced supplies. However, a singular focus on grid extension is not a viable option
for very remote areas, with disperse and small populations. For electricity providers grid-extension to
such areas is not economically profitable and as a result, they are reluctant to invest there. Due to low
potential electricity demand and economic development in these areas, grid extension is often not a
cost competitive option. A study of the World Bank on rural electrification programs placed the
average cost of grid extension per km at between $8,000 and $10,000, rising to around $22,000 in
difficult terrains (Alliance for Rural Electrification, 2011, p.1). Poor regulatory and investment
climate in many countries, and insufficient public investment act as further disincentives to broader
investments in rural electrification and particularly in larger-scale infrastructure and capital
equipment. Existing energy and supporting infrastructure like roads and telecommunications is often
of such poor quality that it adds significantly to the costs and difficulties of expanding access.
Even when grid lines extend close to non-electrified communities, many families cannot afford
connection costs, unless they are heavily subsidized. “Furthermore, the unsuitability of electricity for
cooking and heating in developing countries (particularly in rural areas) means that this approach
does not address the energy need which most affects people’s lives, in particular those of women and
girls”(UNDP, 2011b, p.16). The poorest families typically dedicate 80% of total household energy
expenditure to fuels for cooking and heating, and only 20% for fuels and batteries to produce light,
according to Modi et al. (as cited in UNDP, 2011b, p.16). Most rural poor also find it difficult to
20
obtain the credit necessary to pay high up-front costs for energy services. Additionally, the income
cycles of poor people living in rural areas are agriculture dependent and thus irregular. They have
therefore limited purchasing power and opportunity to shift to modern energy services. The economic
burden posed by unpredictable and small incomes on both urban and rural poor leads to their
incapacity to adhere to long-term commitments and limits the sustainability of energy access. For
these people, decentralized renewable energy technologies (RETs) are potentially the most suitable
and environmentally friendly alternatives. The Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change
(AGECC) contends that achieving universal access by 2030 will need the combination of both
centralized and decentralized energy technologies and systems for electricity provision (UNDP,
2011b, p.16).
Significant gaps in local knowledge and capacity including lack of consumer awareness, technical
skills and capabilities of the local workforce to use and maintain complex machinery and devices
further contextualize the scale and scope of the challenge. Accordingly, the provision of modern
energy services to poor communities will require the expansion of social choice of energy options of
both conventional and non-conventional sources.
5. Powering poverty reduction - the role of renewables for poverty reduction and reaching
the MDGs
5.1 Why renewables?
In the absence of economies of scale in rural areas economic efficiency arguments about large
connection grids are not applicable. A wider use of Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) for
energy production in the developing countries is a viable and desirable alternative due to a number of
reasons. First of all, the exceptional renewable energy potential in those countries supplies them with
local, relatively secure resources. Secondly, the urgency of concerns over climate change and
environmental degradation together with the prospects of wider electrification in developing countries
necessitates changing the dynamics and putting increasingly focus on low-carbon energy mixes.
Falling costs and increasing investment in clean energy in recent years is yet another stimulus
(especially in the context of low-income consumers). Small-scale renewable energy technologies are
thus likely to be more cost-competitive than conventional options and a more viable alternative for
decentralized off-grid supply. Using clean energy, furthermore, can have a positive impact on people’s
health. Every year, 1.6 million people according to the World Health Report 2002 (as cited in
Intermediate Technology Development Group, 2004, p.3), mainly women and children, die from
respiratory illnesses caused by the burning of biomass and fuel. Finally, developing countries could
21
make use of the renewable energies opportunity to apply leapfrogging approaches in creating
sustainable economies, urban and rural areas and consumption practices right from the outset.
Abundance in renewables in developing countries, such as various types of biomass, geothermal
sources, wind, water, and especially sunshine, which is considered to be practically unlimited in the
long-term, means that energy can be provided at relatively low cost, making it accessible to a bigger
number of people. As a result, this will not only reduce the number of the extreme poor, but will also
create a more secure climate and prevent further wars over scarce (oil) resources. Many developing
countries are dependent on volatile oil prices, making their populations highly vulnerable. Despite that
it is not a realistic scenario to believe that such countries would give up on their oil resources, the use
of renewable energy would provide them with wider diversification giving them an additional, very
important development advantage. For those countries which are importers of fuels, renewable
energies could reduce the demand for imports, carrying along additional benefits, such as freeing
scarce resources for domestic investment and reducing the country’s long-term exposure to financial
and humanitarian crises.
In addition, the rich renewable energy potential in developing countries could prompt positive
economic spillovers generated by renewable energy development. This would not only promote
industrial development, but can also create employment. According to a World Bank discussion paper
of April 2011(p.2):
“the growth of renewable energies capacity in developing countries has been
remarkable, and associated services and equipment manufacturing industries have
already started to boom. For instance, Brazil, China, and India today are among the
top 10 countries in the world in the volume of new financing attracted for investments
in sustainable energy (with a combined US$44.2 billion in 2009, representing 37 per
cent of global financial investment in clean energy). In 2009 the RE industry in these
three countries created almost 1 million jobs […] Upper and lower middle-income
countries are also quickly progressing in the development of their renewable energy
markets.”
Increased investment and attention to renewable energies has been observed worldwide:
“During the five-year period from the end of 2004 through 2009, global renewable
energy capacity grew at the rates of 10 to 60 per cent annually for many technologies.
Investments in renewable energy increased by 63 per cent in the first quarter of 2010
compared with the same period in 2009. More than 100 countries had policy targets
or promotion policies related to renewable energy in 2010, compared to 55 in early
2005.” (UNDP, 2011b, p.16)
Projections by the IEA for the time frame from 2007 until 2030 also show that the use of renewables
will grow significantly (by 10.5 per cent for hydro, biomass and waste, and other renewables),
22
especially in comparison with that of other sources, and particularly oil (only by 0.9 per cent, see
Table 1 above). The rising demand and supply has started bringing down the costs of renewable
energy services. Nevertheless, high upfront costs would still be the principal challenge in using more
broadly RETs in developing countries. Low operation and maintenance costs of renewable energy
power systems, on the other hand, have the potential to offset the initial capital costs (Alliance for
Rural Electrification, 2011, p.1).
The flexibility that renewable energy services offer can be used as an advantage in their favour as
well. Renewables can provide enough sustainable, reliable, clean electricity to support the creation of
local business in large population areas, whilst also being able to reach the most far away and
dispersed rural areas. Renewables allow to be utilised in off-grid and mini-grid power systems which
can sustainably meet the energy needs of rural communities at an affordable price. Possible renewable
energy sources are, for instance, micro-hydro, wind, solar PV or bio-diesel. The Alliance for Rural
Electrification shares from experience that “many projects have demonstrated that decentralised
renewables are a more reliable electricity resource than grid connectivity due to the overstretched
and unreliable capacity of central systems” (Alliance for Rural Electrification, 2011, p.1). Despite the
fact that diesel-powered generators can also be used for decentralised rural electrification, “renewable
energy has distinct advantages over diesel as it has much lower running costs, uses local energy
sources, does not run out, is much cleaner and does not contribute to global warming” (Intermediate
Technology Development Group, 2004, p.7). It has to be recognised, however, that in some cases as
with battery-based solutions such as solar PV, their use is limited to low-power applications. This
paper will outline below how small-scale green innovations can help address some of the most
pressing energy needs of remote areas and poor people.
Increasingly, the energy-poverty nexus is nuanced by the pull and push effect of climate variability
and change, as discussed earlier. Weather-related impacts potentially will distort and influence the
consistency of energy access. Both the availability of traditional biomass sources and their role as a
back-up to more modern energy sources are likely to change. As stated in the ‘Sustainable Energy for
All’ initiative of the UN Secretary General launched in 2012, “urgent concerns over climate change
and environmental degradation have underscored the importance of using sustainable forms of
energy for the long-term viability of the planet”(Sustainable Energy for All Website, 2012). In
addition, the fact that more and more households in the developing countries will have to be
electrified and the projections that overall energy use will continue to grow strongly, doubling or even
tripling by 2050 (The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World, 2008, p.12), make it inevitable
to use more widely cleaner energy options in the energy mix. In fact, “in many cases, adverse
23
environmental impacts begin well upstream of the point of energy end-use: the extraction of
commercial fuels like coal and oil is often highly damaging to local ecosystems and is an immediate
cause of land and water pollution” (The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World, 2008, p.24).
Traditional fuels have as well certain adverse impacts on environment as discussed earlier in this
paper.
Economic and social development should be decoupled from greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). As
stated still in Agenda 21 of the first Rio conference, ‘sustainable development’ is about the integration
across the economic, social, and environmental strands of development. Decarbonising the electricity
sector (the second-largest source of GHG emissions, according to IEA) would lay the foundations for
more competitive industries and future economic growth. It would also give the unique opportunity to
developing states for leapfrogging.
The affluence on renewable energy sources gives a comparative advantage to developing countries
and offers them a chance for a technological leapfrogging instead of following the course of
developed countries by using expensive and polluting fossil fuels. Historically, humanity’s use of
energy has been marked by four broad trends (The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World,
2008, p.5): (1) rising consumption and a transition from traditional sources of energy to commercial
forms of energy; (2) steady improvement in the power and efficiency of energy technologies; (3) a
tendency (at least for most of the 20th century) toward fuel diversification and de-carbonization; and
(4) more attention to and work towards pollution control and lower emissions. A big number of the
developing countries have not yet been through these cycles, which presents them with the chance to
skip some of them and leapfrog directly to the use of lower-carbon and more efficient energies. The
big renewable resource potential could also give a stronger political clout for these countries in world
negotiations, if wisely used.
Many countries rich in resources have in fact already realised their importance and are including them
in national energy strategies. Morocco, for instance, is expanding its wind farm and solar power
generation capacity and plans to obtain 42% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2020 (Arab
Water Academy, 2012). Even oil rich countries are diversifying their energy sources. The United Arab
Emirates have launched a solar park that will be worth 1,000 megawatts by 2030. Solar, wind,
hydropower, biofuels play an important role also in the national programmes of Brazil and Uganda –
the two countries which will be closely regarded in this paper. In a long-term perspective, developing
countries could even start generating export revenue from green electricity. In the development of
large-scale renewable energy projects, developing countries will initially need the technological and
know-how assistance from more developed states in the global transition to clean, low-carbon energy
24
systems. South-South cooperation is another viable option that reflects similar conditions and
experiences, which would probably better address poor people’s needs than practices from the North.
Finally, locally produced appropriate renewable energy technologies, using local resources, managed
within the communities themselves can empower communities to develop in a sustainable manner.
5.2 The sustainable energy challenge from a developing country perspective – obstacles
to producing renewable energy in the developing countries
A realistic consideration of the scenario of expanding energy access in the developing world by means
of more renewable energy production requires that the challenges to that are taken account of. Despite
the many benefits of renewable energies outlined so far, developing countries are facing a number of
obstacles to the realization of the increase in energy production by using RETs.
Most RETs are not yet sufficiently competitive and hence continue to rely on various forms of
backing. Provision of on-grid renewable energy to rural communities would necessitate suitable
government policies and public support, as well as international investment to cover the high upfront
costs. The World Bank has concluded that incentives will usually be required to motivate the private
sector to invest in providing services to the often remote and underdeveloped areas where the poor
reside (The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World, 2008, p.39). Markets left on their own are not
likely to choose the cleanest and most efficient technologies most of the time (especially when
environmental and other externalities are not reflected in market prices).
Securing financing for more risky projects in the developing world is not an easy task. Governments
in developing countries are often in an acute lack of financial resources. Moreover, where access to
energy is lacking, other urgent human and societal needs are often unmet too, meaning that energy
needs must compete with other policy priorities. In nations where a significant portion of the
population still lacks access to basic energy services, concerns about long-term environmental
sustainability often are overshadowed by more immediate concerns about energy access and
affordability; therefore more easily available forms of energy delivery might be chosen over RETs.
Another related challenge is that the governments of many of the developing countries of which we
are speaking, are not accountable to the people and public policies are not strong enough. This means
that even in the presence of obvious benefits for the poor people and for the environment of the use of
RETs, this may not be a stimulus strong enough for governments to invest in renewable energy
projects. In resource-dependent economies, rich in oil or gas resources, the personal profit from these
25
resources for the governing elites of many of these countries would outweigh the advantages of
renewable energies.
Developing countries lack furthermore stable regulatory and administrative conditions. Without stable
and predictable rules in relation to, for instance, taxes, company law, and foreign investment, that
enable and encourage private companies, even with appropriate financial instruments in place,
investment will not take place. Legal provisions allowing open competition on electricity markets for
customer supply are also necessary.
Inadequate technical knowledge, education and training is another problem in many parts of the
developing world. As a whole, information and education about renewables is low. Governments, for
instance, still do not believe in renewable energy technologies, banks do not understand the financial
structures of renewable energy projects and do not lend to them; even local people sometimes
consider these technologies as second class ones (Rolland, 2010). Without well-trained workforce,
from electrical engineers to project managers to craftsmen, renewable energy will not be able meet its
potential. Many developing countries that are making use of their renewables are still largely
dependent on foreign experts.
Fortunately, people need only a relatively modest amount of electricity to be able to read at night,
pump a minimal amount of drinking water and listen to radio broadcasts. Mini-grids which provide
decentralized, local, off-grid utility provision are an ideal intermediary solution, especially for small
towns or large villages where enough electricity can be generated to power household use, as well as
local businesses. Another viable option to address the existing challenges, especially in the short-term,
is by means of small-scale renewable energy technologies. Delivering only as much energy as to
address people’s most pressing needs, they are likely to be the most cost-competitive with
conventional alternatives. This paper will present as follows two brand-new green innovations which
can serve as small-scale solutions.
5.3 Green innovations as small-scale solutions
There is growing evidence that investment in small and medium-scale renewable energy systems may
have more impact on improving energy services for the majority of developing countries’ population.
The figure below shows that from large to small-scale energy initiatives the level of investment is
decreasing while proportionally to that the impact on the population is increasing.
26
Figure 2: Energy Pyramid in Africa
Source: Overview of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, UNIDO (http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/82359_Module1.pdf)
Furthermore, renewable energy technology need not solely comprise the hi-tech solutions of
industrialised countries. In providing energy to the poor, the ‘suitability of technology’ factor, in
particular the affordability to the end-user and the viability of the delivery mechanism should be
considered. In that note must be taken of the limitations of commercialized models. In many cases, in
this model, the private sector markets the product in a competitive market environment and often only
a limited number of people can afford the systems at full cost. Hence, this model may not be designed
to reach the poorest people as the final product may not be affordable to them. In developing energy
markets for poor communities, the challenge is how to support viable private sector involvement
while ensuring that benefits of the commercial energy services reach poor households and that these
services and products can be maintained.
In addition, technology should be reliable, meet the needs of end-users and be easy to be operated by
them. At the same time products should not be designed ‘for the poor’ with lower quality just to make
it cheaper, as this drives customers away. New renewable energy technologies must prove robust,
particularly in remote locations where servicing facilities may not be readily available and
maintenance would be difficult. Good practices indicate that poor people are willing to pay a bit more
for products with better quality (for instance the StoveTec experience with improved cooking stoves
showed that users want attractive and convenient stoves, and are willing to pay for them as long as
27
they meet their needs (UNDP, 2011b, p.47). In short, different energy options should be offered to
lower income, far away communities than those offered in industrialised countries.
A good example of this is Soccket, a brand new innovative solution to the problems of providing
energy to poor households in remote areas, which is still in its testing phase in several developing
countries. Soccket is a soccer ball with integrated inside a small generator of kinetic (motion) energy.
This small generator is essentially a magnet inside a metal coil that goes back and forth when the ball
is kicked during normal game play, harnessing thus kinetic energy (Uncharted Play Website, 2012).
The generated energy is stored in a capacitor and is connected to an outlet to which one can plug in
small electrical appliances such as a LED lamp or a mobile phone. For example, 30 minutes of play
would generate enough energy to power a LED light for 3 hours. This simple ball is made of foam, so
it cannot deflate, and is robust and durable enough so as to last up to 3 years in play on the rough
terrain of developing countries.
This new energy-generating device is an affordable, decentralized off-grid solution which can be
applicable to the needs of many rural communities which do not need the constant supply of energy,
but need to have at their disposal small generators for occurring needs. In addition, it can also be used
in areas with unstable on-grid electricity supply as a small-scale solution for the baseline services, thus
saving the on-grid energy for more energy-consuming needs. The cost of the ball should be 10US$
once launched on the market (Uncharted Play Website, 2012), making it an affordable solution for the
poor. The social benefits of Soccket are, first, that by connecting a LED lamp to it, it extends the
daylight which can be used for the education of children as LED lamps would produce the same
amount of light as a kerosene lamp, allowing for a few students to do their homework at the same time
(Cohen, 2012). The huge benefit of the soccer ball over kerosene lamps however is that it would
prevent respiratory problems which result from the fact that poor people are constantly exposed to the
smokes of kerosene lamps. According to statistics, living with the fumes from one kerosene lamp is
equal to smoking 40 cigarettes a day (Uncharted Play Website, 2012).
Another important benefit of the product is that it is aligned with consumers’ behaviour. Football is a
universal game which does not require special training or a change in local people’s habits, making it
easy to use the Soccket. This innovation has also the important function of empowering local people
as it allows them to be the main actors in creating energy for themselves and in solving their own
problems in a participating and fun-creating way. Gender issues are however where problems might
occur, as the football game should not perpetuate existing inequalities between women and men in
energy access. From the outset girls should be equally included in both creating the energy, i.e.
playing, and using it. The organization Uncharted Play, which promotes Soccket, is starting the
28
development of a project in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil under the name ‘Sharing the power’, which aims at
addressing this issue and promoting shared ownership over electricity (Cohen, 2012).
Another innovation that responds many of the reviewed above considerations is a medical solar
suitcase. Designed as assistance to poor, remote communities, the suitcase is a mobile, decentralized
form of energy as essentially it is a portable, robust, complete solar electric kit packed with solar
panels, a charge controller, batteries, medical LED lights, phone chargers, headlamps, and a fetal
monitor (We Care Solar Website, 2012). The “Solar Suitcase” is critical for saving women and
children’s lives in many low resource areas without reliable electricity where hospitals are lacking
proper conditions. In addition to being resistant, the portable suitcase displays low maintenance as
there are no fuses to replace, and no regular battery maintenance is required, battery replacement is
estimated to occur once every 2 years. The suitcase is furthermore affordable and available to local
communities as it is simple to use and easy to deploy, which makes it effective for medical settings. In
terms of its simplicity, the system is plug-and-play and can be installed without need for an
experienced solar technician - one switch turns on the system, another turns on lights and charges
devices (We Care Solar Website, 2012). The suitcase is a cost-effective solution for off-grid medical
clinics equipping them with solar power for medical and surgical lighting, walkie-talkies and essential
medical devices such as a blood bank refrigerator. The “Solar Suitcase” was originally designed to
support timely and efficiently emergency obstetric care, but can be used in a range of medical and
humanitarian settings. The product was first designed in 2009 for a major municipal hospital in
Northern Nigeria and has currently been provided to clinics in 17 countries in Africa, Central
America, Asia and in Haiti (We Care Solar Website, 2012). The solar suitcase empowers local
healthcare workers allowing them to perform their profession and provide a good, often live-saving,
care to their patients. Healthcare workers using the “Solar Suitcase” have reported greater facility and
ease in conducting procedures, especially night-time ones.
6. Case studies: Brazil and Uganda. Opportunities for South-South cooperation and
learning
The two case studies that follow have been chosen to illustrate the arguments made so far in this work.
Purposefully the countries have been selected to differ from each other in terms of development,
economic growth, geography and resources. All these factors influence the quantity and quality of
energy services available and above all the access to energy. The energy mix in the two countries is
discussed with a manifest focus on the share of renewable energies and the importance that they have
29
in energy policies. As it will become noticeable the poverty-energy nexus is stronger in Uganda where
the poverty is also more widespread than in Brazil, a middle-income country and an emerging
economy. The barriers to expanding renewable energy production and access in both countries are
also examined. Finally, some conclusions are drawn.
6.1 Brazil
Brazil is a special case in terms of renewable energies. The country’s unique geographical resources
make it stand out in worldwide statistics on the use of renewable energies as part of the country’s
energy mix. Essentially, the country has the potential and does use almost all obtainable forms of
renewable energies. According to Brazil's Energy Research Company, EPE (Empresa de Pesquisa
Energética) Brazil’s renewable sources accounted for 44.8% of its energy demands in 2010 (Machado,
2011). At the same time, the world average is still around 13%, and Europe’s long-term goal is to
reach 20% green energy by 2020. In that respect, Brazil is already quite advanced. Furthermore, in
terms of electricity Brazil already meets 83% of its needs from renewable means and has been
recognised as "one of the lowest carbon electricity matrices in the world" (Yapp, 2011). The Pew
Environment Group's 2010 report ‘Who is Winning the Clean Energy Race?’ places Brazil at sixth
position among G-20 members for investments in clean energy and second only to China among
emerging economies. Brazil is also among the top 10 countries in terms of the amount of GDP
invested in clean energy. The South American state is also one of the very few countries in the world
where renewable energy projects are competitive with more mature energy generation sources such as
gas-fired power plants.
Three types of renewable energies are mainly used to produce electricity in Brazil: hydro power,
biomass and wind power (see Chart 1). Contrary to what one would generally expect, despite the
affluent Sun resources, solar energy is still in its infancy. The reason behind is the higher final price
for this type of energy in comparison to other forms of green energy. An interesting project currently
taking place in preparation for the 2014 World Cup is refitting stadiums with solar cells to generate
power (GTZ, n.d.). In the near future, it is expected that solar power projects will as well become
commercially viable in Brazil, once the technology develops and prices fall.
30
Chart 1: Electricity supply by source in Brazil - 2010
For the time being, however, hydropower is the main energy source which has been rising steadily
since the 1970s. In the electricity sector about 74% (in year 2010) of the electricity supply is produced
from hydropower. Exactly due to the presence of large hydropower plants, Brazil has one of the
cleanest energy matrices in the world. The most recent hydropower project will have a significant
potential; according to Brazil's Energy Research Company, the plant will be capable of supplying
enough power to 18 million homes housing 60 million people, though in reality much of its output is
likely to go towards the industry. The Belo Monte dam, to be built on the River Xingu in the state of
Pará, Amazon, is due to start generating power in January 2015 and to function with its full potential
by January 2019 (Yapp, 2011). The project is as well part of the government's Accelerated Growth
Programme, which aims to improve infrastructure through projects that also generate jobs and
development.
Hydropower has become, however, highly controversial in the last years and has faced a lot of public
resistance. Despite producing a green form of energy, hydro dams use enormous water resources for
which vast areas need to be restructured to build reservoirs, causing substantial environmental
problems. As a lot of the hydroelectric plants are constructed in the Amazon region, conflicts arise in
addition because of the displacement of indigenous population. Various human rights groups have
protested against the Brazilian government for not protecting local people’s rights in its decision to
build the Belo Monte dam (Frayssinet, 2011). Dry seasons may also lead to unstable or even
insufficient energy supply. It is claimed that even Belo Monte, despite being the world's third biggest
such plant, will achieve less than 30% of its capacity during the dry season.
31
As hydropower is losing public support, another green source is gaining momentum in Brazil – the
wind energy. Currently, wind energy is only about 1% (end of 2011), but according to a wind project
manager from the Brazilian energy company “LEME Engenharia” (Plaisant, 2011), there are several
good reasons why wind power is rising. To begin with, the country offers first-class wind sites with
some of the strongest and most consistent winds in the world and 9,650 km of Atlantic coastline.
Three are the main wind regions in Brazil: the Northeast with the states of Ceará, Rio Grande do
Norte, etc., Bahia in the North and the South state of Rio Grande do Sul. Another big advantage of the
country in comparison to, for instance, many wind-rich European countries, is the abundance of space.
This facilitates the building of wind farms and does not drive public protest, such as the one observed
in Europe, as wind farms are not built close to where people live and therefore do not cause noise
disturbances. What is more, agriculture is often compatible with wind farms, so areas used for farming
can remain as such. Other benefits of the wind energy are its low final price (Brazilian wind energy is
one of the cheapest in the world) and the fact that this type of energy source is relatively fast to
construct. Compared to other alternatives such as gas-fired, biomass, hydro plants, a wind farm takes
just a few years to build. In addition, since there is not (yet) public resistance to that energy source,
licensing is easier than for other energy generation types.
Projections by the Renewable Energy World Magazine report as well that the proportion of Brazil's
electricity supply from hydropower is expected to fall from 75 per cent of the total as it is currently, to
some 67 per cent in 2020 (Yapp, 2011). Meanwhile, wind power would make a huge leap and would
supply 7% by 2020, according to the plans, which together with other sources, such as biomass and
small-scale hydropower would maintain the overall contribution of renewables to electricity at 83 per
cent. Therefore, the nation's vast and almost entirely untapped wind potential is beginning to be
explored and to attract Brazilian as well as international investors.
Finally, a few per cents of Brazilian electricity supply are derived from biomass, mainly sugar cane.
Bio resources are very widespread on the market for fuels. According to the Pew Environment
Group's 2010 report ‘Who is Winning the Clean Energy Race?’ which analyses G-20 countries’
investments in clean energy, Brazil has currently the second largest national biofuel market and is first
in terms of resources readily available for further expansion. The country is an important oil
and gas producer in the region and the oil industry is in a rise due to the vast offshore fields
discovered deep under the ocean, but it is also the world's second largest ethanol fuel producer. That is
why ethanol is a key element in meeting Brazil's energy needs. The proportion of total national energy
consumption accounted for by oil and its derivatives is predicted to fall from 38.1% in 2010 to 31.9 %
in 2020, according to Brazil's Energy Research Company, EPE (Yapp, 2011). Despite the fact that
32
nation's fleet of vehicles is increasing, the number of the flexible-fuel vehicles that are able to run on
gasoline, ethanol or any mixture of the two is rising as well. Thus, since "ethanol is more
competitive… consumers with flexi-cars prefer to use ethanol", says Mauricio Tolmasquim, the
president of EPE. He suggests that Brazil will not have to follow the trend that nearly all oil producer
countries follow, namely that they are big carbon emitters. Mr Tolmasquim predicts that Brazil will be
"the first oil exporter country in the world that will have a very renewable energy matrix itself" and
that it will be "a strategic partner for the western countries that need a lot of oil. It is a democratic
country with a good regulatory framework…and it will be very important in terms of stabilising the
supply of oil" (Yapp, 2011).
Together with this champion’s results in the proportion of green energy, it has to be recognised that
Brazil is as well the 10th largest energy consumer in the world and the largest in South America.
Furthermore, demand for energy is expected to increase at a rising pace by around 60 per cent in the
next decade (Yapp, 2011) due to several reasons. The economic boom of this emerging economy will
necessitate more energy for both the industry and the increasing middle class. Millions of people will
be spending more on consumer goods for their homes and cars. Ahead of the biggest world sports
events – the Football World Cup and the Olympic Games, a lot of the existing infrastructure will have
to be improved and new one built. On the other hand, this offers a unique possibility to build right
from the outset green sustainable buildings. Last but by no means least, the country has a positive
growth rate of more than 1% per year and the population is expected to reach 205 million in 2020. All
those factors taken together show why Brazil would need large amounts of energy in a very short
term. To meet this challenge, it will need to increase its energy supplies. The Brazilian Ministry of
Mines and Energy has committed to invest in renewable energy projects more than half of the finance
allotted to energy for the next decade. However, the increase in energy production will demand
favourable climate for renewable energy companies from within the country and from abroad. The
interviewed for this paper project manager of “LEME Engenharia” shared several big barriers to the
fast growth of renewable energy in Brazil, and more specifically wind energy, which, as already
stated, is projected to take higher and higher portions in the clean mix.
On the first place, Brazil’s bureaucracy is quite cumbersome. Often too many licenses are required
and a big amount of paperwork needs to be done. Obscurity about landowners increases the difficulty
for companies as they need to sign a contract with landowners in order to construct wind farms on
their land. In the Northeast of Brazil often several private persons would claim to be the proprietors of
the land as this is not well documented. Brazilian market is in addition very protective and nearly all
materials need to be locally produced and not imported. Foreign suppliers are eligible for funding
33
from BNDES, the Brazilian state development bank, as long as they commit that at least 60 per cent of
the equipment, such as generators and others, will be manufactured in Brazil. This may act as a
disincentive or an obstacle for a lot of international companies to operate on the market. In terms of
development of the country however, in the opinion of the author, it has to be recognised that this
policy helps in creating more jobs and increasing local production and economic growth.
Additional work for the companies derives from grid connection problems. Wind farms are
constructed not very close to places with available transmission lines, so renewable energy companies
have to construct a transmission line as well, which could be up to several kilometres long and which
adds to the costs. In the opinion of the interviewee, the Brazilian ‘energy auctions system’ needs a
revision as well as currently it is profiting neither investors, nor the final consumer. According to this
system, auctions for renewable energy projects are made once or twice a year on which always the
most financially efficient projects are selected. Despite the fact that this may bring cheaper energy to
the final consumer, at the same time it leaves some regions without electricity at all as delivering
energy to those regions would be more costly and companies are not willing to engage there. In the
case of wind projects, only the three regions mentioned above, with the most constant and strongest
wind, receive the chance to be supplied with wind energy. Wind energy generation in less windy sites
would be more expensive to the producer, which would raise the final price and would lower
significantly the chances of the project to be selected during the energy auction. Stronger state support
for unexplored renewable sources, such as solar power, would also be a way to increase the use of
renewables in the energy matrix.
Finally, cultural differences in working methods matter as well. The slow working rhythm in Brazil
could sometimes be discouraging.
It is interesting and indispensable to explore in the end if these big amounts of renewable energy in
Brazil are accessible to the poor people. Fortunately, most poor people in Brazil live near the big
cities, which are connected to the national grid. Approximately twenty million Brazilians, however,
who live in remote communities, do not have access to reliable electrical power. The majority of them
reside in Brazil’s Northeast and the remainder dwell all over the country - even in the well-developed
states on the South and Southeast. These communities rely on small diesel generators to supply power
for basic public services such as water pumping, communications, lighting for schools, and vaccine
storage for health clinics, as well as for small businesses. Important challenges remain, primarily due
to the great levels of inequality and disparity in Brazilian society and among geographic
regions. Nevertheless, effort has been invested in attempts to improve this situation. Many of the wind
projects competing at auction are located in Brazil's poverty-stricken Northeast region, in states such
34
as Bahia, Ceará and Rio Grande do Norte. "Wind is transforming areas in the northeast that were
importing energy from the south" (Yapp, 2011), states Pedro Perrelli, executive director of
the Brazilian Wind Energy Association (ABE Eolica). In his opinion, those regions have the potential
to even become energy exporters in the future.
The interviewed wind project manager sees however the effect of renewable energies (more
specifically wind power) on reducing poverty at the moment as limited. He agrees that problems such
as social exclusion, social inequalities, and poverty can be reduced by means of more renewable
energies; however certain changes need to be made to the current state of affairs. One such change is
in the auctions system, as already mentioned, where the state should take account of the socially
unequal regions and stimulate production and supply of renewable energy there. Another important
issue is to create opportunities for small businesses and local producers to take advantage of the
production and access to renewable energy. Several small businesses have benefitted from the large-
scale wind projects, such as restaurants, hotels, as well as local labour force employed for the
maintenance of the wind farms. Nonetheless, material and human resources are usually coming from
big international – European or American, or Brazilian companies.
In that respect, I consider that energy producing companies themselves can be of great help to the
local community if they exercise certain corporate social responsibility and invest some of their profits
in local small-scale projects. Indeed, some companies have assumed certain responsibility to the
disadvantaged groups. GDF Suez, the mother company of “LEME Engenharia”, has a special
programme called ‘Energy Assistance’, dedicated to benefitting communities which do not enjoy
basic energy services. Projects primarily take place in Africa, but some of its projects have been
accomplished also in Brazil and they include: Revamping of industrial electrical installation in
Valente, Bahia, Revamping of LV installation for training centre in Rio, New transformer and
revamping of LV installation in centre for elderly people in Belo Horizonte.
According to a Trade Guide to Renewable Energy in Brazil, produced by USAID and the global non-
profit organization that addresses rural development, Winrock International, the “Government of
Brazil considers universal access to safe, affordable energy a central component in its fight against
inequality and rural poverty”(Winrock International et al., 2002, p.V). In line with that, the Brazilian
government has initiated various projects with the goal of providing electricity to disadvantaged
groups. PRODEEM – the Programme for Energy Development of States and Municipalities - was
initiated in 1994 and is still in force (Galdino & Lima, 2002). The Programme aims to take electricity
to agricultural communities using renewable sources. Since poor rural communities are far away from
conventional electric systems the cost of transmission and distribution lines extension is high, due to
35
several factors: large distances, vegetation, rivers, etc. In addition, the expected energy consumption is
very low. The purpose of PRODEEM is to compensate for the non-viability of these areas by using
mainly photovoltaic systems (PV). Three types of stand-alone systems have been considered: PV
electric energy generation systems, PV water pumping systems and PV public lighting systems. The
government procures the necessary equipment and distributes it to the states and municipalities chosen
for projects. The projects focus on community development (schools, community centres, health
facilities) rather than household electrification. The systems have been installed throughout all 26
Brazilian Federal States, but especially in the less-developed Northeast and North (Amazon) regions
of the country. According to CEPEL – a Brazilian Electric Power Research Centre - this programme
can be considered as a useful experience to be shared with other international institutions running
similar PV programs around the developing world (Galdino & Lima, 2002).
Another project - ‘Ribeirinhas’ - aims to study the technical, economic, social and environmental
viability of providing energy to small, rural communities particularly in the Amazon region, using
microsystems that provide renewable energy in a sustainable manner (Eletrobras, 2007). Due to their
remoteness, particular type of soil, vegetation and rain regime, riverside communities do not allow the
grid extension to them. A big part of the Amazonian population lives in dispersed communities of
only about 20 houses built along the river. These riverside communities are extremely far away from
big production centres, they use the river as a means of transport and live exclusively on fish and
agriculture, and product exchange between communities. Because of these very specific conditions,
they require particular methods of energy provision and renewable energies existing in Amazonia
were thus considered as the most appropriate means. In the initial phase of the project different
alternative technologies for energy supply have been studied, taking into consideration the viability
and sustainability of each of them. These have been: hydrokinetic systems, hydroelectric micro
stations, biomass, and photovoltaic systems.
‘Luz para Todos’ (Light for Everyone) is another programme that deserves attention. Despite that it
does not use renewables only it demonstrates the ambition of the government of Brazil to provide the
poor with electricity. As of today, the programme has been going on for 8 years and has reached 14.3
million Brazilians. It has provided access to energy for free for 2.8 million households in rural
communities (Ministry of Mines and Energy, Brazil, 2011). The main objective has been to allow the
population in rural regions to use electricity in a productive way, turning it thus into a social and
economic vector reducing poverty and hunger. The programme has allowed for many families that
have migrated to the city to go back to agriculture. Thanks to it, many households were able to afford
goods that they previously could not, such as TV sets and refrigerators. Although the initial goal of
36
supplying with electricity 10 million Brazilians was reached in 2009, the programme goes on and has
as its current objective to reach until 2014 the indigenous people and the most remote places. The
programme has so far invested 19 billion Brazilian reals and has created 426 thousand job places.
Finally, the programme ‘Luz no Campo’ (Light in the Countryside) is the largest rural electrification
program undertaken in Brazil (World Resources Institute 1, n.d.). ‘Luz no Campo’ intended to
electrify one million rural homes in a three year period between 1999 and 2002. Following the
programme, rural consumers were expected to pay the full costs of the connection spread over a
number of years. The ‘Light in the Countryside’ programme was ended in 2004 and its goals were
incorporated in the ‘Light for Everyone’ initiative.
In the opinion of the author, Brazil can use its potential as a booming economy and the fact that the
number of rich people is growing to establish a certain solidarity mechanism. Such a mechanism
would charge at a higher price the consumption of electricity over certain KW used and would utilize
this additional money for the provision of electricity to very poor or remotely located people. Such a
policy would also stimulate the more economical use of energy among the wealthy.
As an emerging economy with one of the world’s highest GDPs, Brazil is definitely gaining more
leverage in negotiations and has a key role to play in addressing global challenges such as the
economic crisis, but also climate change and the achievement of the MDGs. Brazil has the potential to
become a leading actor in South-South cooperation sharing its experience and best practices in the
field of renewable energies with other countries from the South. The country is already active in
South-South learning contributing to other developing countries with its own good practices in social
policies. The country has already signed an India-Brazil-South Africa Declaration on Clean Energy.
The wind energy expert interviewed believes that the implementation of the large scale power plants
can be repeated also in Brazil’s neighbouring countries. “The India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA)
trilateral development initiative began in 2003 to promote South-South initiatives on development,
trade/investment, information exchange and cooperation in areas including agriculture, energy,
health, and climate change” (World Resources Institute 2, n.d.). On the second IBSA summit held in
2007 the three countries reached an agreement to promote clean energy technologies and renewable
energies, and to pool resources to ensure a secure supply of safe, sustainable and non-polluting energy
to meet global demand, particularly in developing countries. At the current state of affairs however,
triangular cooperation with a more advanced in technology country, as for example Germany, Canada
or the USA, is probably a more viable alternative. Brazil is still lagging behind on know-how and
capacity-building is still often coming from the outside, for instance from the EU.
37
6.2 Uganda
Uganda has one of the lowest per capita electricity consumption rates in the world, only about
75KWh/year. The goal of Uganda’s National Energy Policy from September 2002 is to meet the
energy needs of Uganda’s population for social and economic development in an environmentally
sustainable manner (MEMD, 2011, p.84). Adding to that, the Renewable Energy Policy for Uganda
approved by the Cabinet in March 2007 aims at diversifying supply sources and technologies in the
country and has as its goal the increase in the use of modern renewable energy from the current 4% to
61% of the total energy consumption by the year 2017 (MEMD, 2007, p.7). Members of the
Parliament have made access to energy the ‘9th Millennium Development Goal’ for the country, and
established a new national Energy Fund. More than US$150 million have been invested in renewable
energy as a result, representing more than 2% of the national budget (Climate Parliament, n.d.).
Although over 90% of the final energy demand in Uganda is biomass, it is used only as a traditional
source of energy for heating and lighting. Another main source of energy in Uganda is hydro power
plants along the Nile which provide electricity through the national grid. Nevertheless, they are an
insecure source of energy as the water level has decreased in the past years and therefore currently
they produce less than their full capacity. Despite the fact that Uganda is very rich in renewable
energy resources, such as small hydro, solar, wind and geothermal sources, they remain largely
untapped. Currently, solar energy is mainly used in so-called ‘solar home systems’, which however
have a capacity of only about 1MW. Other forms of modern energy sources used in the country are
the imported oil, and thermal diesel power plants.
The reason behind the Ugandan government’s decision to invest in renewable energies is, on the one
hand, the recognition that a number of renewable energy technologies have become commercially
viable, and on the other, the major challenges that the country is facing in meeting people’s energy
needs, especially of the poor (MEMD, 2007, p.12). The emergency installation of thermal diesel
generation because of droughts and the fall of Lake Victoria water level, and the escalating oil prices
have resulted in increased prices for the final consumer. Renewable energies, especially small scale
ones such as mini/micro/pico hydros, PV systems, wind power and biomass could be an alternative
solution for the provision of electricity to rural areas where currently the electrification rate lies at
only 3%. Locally produced bio-fuels would reduce the burden on the economy caused by imported
fuels. Last but not least, the Government’s commitment under the Kyoto protocol to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to the fight against climate change prompts it to increase the
level of renewable energies in the energy mix. In particular, the Government “would want to provide
38
the necessary framework for private sector investors in renewable energy projects to benefit from the
available facilities in emissions trading” (MEMD, 2007, p.12). Thus, renewable energies become a
priority for the Government, to be used as alternatives, or definitely in the beginning as supplements
to the conventional sources. Such a diversification of energy supply sources and mechanisms would
be of strategic importance as it promotes energy security and independence. It would enable,
furthermore, renewable energy technologies to be incorporated as part of the national energy
conservation programme. For instance, widespread installation of compact fluorescent lighting and
solar water heating in residential, industrial and commercial buildings can create significant energy
savings, and therefore encourage optimal utilization of energy resources (MEMD, 2007, p.13).
It is important to analyse the government’s policy objectives and actions towards its long-term goal of
increasing the level of modern renewable energy and of access to energy by the poor. In its Energy
and Mineral Sector Performance Report 2008/9-2010/11, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Development (MEMD) of Uganda states that it “has contributed to poverty reduction efforts through
increasing access to modern energy sources, oil and gas products and exploitation of the mineral
resources for wealth creation and improved standard of living” (MEMD, 2011, p.252). In addition,
the report declares that the increase in energy supply has boosted the investment opportunities in the
country and has offered new possibilities for job creation and income generation. Among the policy
objectives outlined in the government’s Renewable Energy Policy for Uganda (MEMD, 2007, p.17)
are: mainstreaming poverty eradication, equitable distribution and gender issues in renewable energy
strategies; improving the legal, institutional and financing framework to promote renewable energy
investments; raising public awareness and attracting investments in renewable energy sources and
technologies; and promoting research and development, international cooperation, and technology
transfer. The strategies to achieve these policy objectives have been translated into policy actions in
the form of specific programmes such as, for instance, the large hydropower and small power
generation programme. Within the small power schemes, basic studies of the various resources and
sites will be carried out followed by promotion and tendering to the private sector, followed by their
development. This will cover mini hydropower schemes, biomass cogeneration, wind power, peat,
geothermal and solar thermal electric. A special programme is dedicated to rural and urban poor
electricity access as this type of target groups requires special packages to make connections and
services affordable. The idea of the programme is to enhance community schemes, where the cost of
connection is subsidized. It will also support the development of independent grids supplied by micro
and pico hydros and biomass gasifiers to be managed by communities, and solar PV systems in
dispersed remote settlements. Another focus of the programme is electrification for productive uses
39
and key social services, some of the existing examples being the opening of a hairdresser’s in a place
where access to electricity has been provided.
Another notable programme, with which the government aims to extend the grid to rural areas
unattractive for private investors, is the Energy for Rural Transformation Project (ERT). Four main
actions are aimed at within the framework of ERT, two of them being related to renewable energy:
grid extension, independent grids, solar PV systems, and renewable energy generation projects
(MEMD, 2011, pp. 85-87).
In a personal interview with an energy adviser from GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale
Zusammenarbeit) (Kondev, 2011) working on renewable energy projects in Uganda, he talked about
some of the projects on which GIZ is working in cooperation with Uganda’s Rural Electrification
Agency (REA). GIZ is actively involved in projects of the type ‘small power schemes’ mentioned
above. The organisation explores the hydro potential of different water sources, so as to define
whether the construction of a hydro power plant would be viable in those areas. In addition, it delivers
technology and is doing planning. The subsequent phase of the projects is institutionalisation by
tendering to companies which would invest in the development of hydro power plants for rural
electrification. The overall objectives of the organisation’s Promotion of Renewable Energy and
Energy Efficiency Programme (PREEEP) is improvement of the access to modern energy services and
efficient use of energy by households and the private sector, especially in Northern Uganda. GIZ’s
focus is on the development of mini-grid based renewable energy which is better suited to the
conditions of rural Uganda, namely the remoteness of many areas and the small number of people
living there. However, the organisation has encountered a lot of obstacles at utility level. GIZ is thus
trying to find private sector investors who to manage the mini-grid, for instance to collect bills or to
perform maintenance. So far, GIZ has created one mini-grid based hydro power plant and a few other
projects of pico or mini hydro power plants are about to be launched. The construction of the plants is
carried out by the government of Uganda with German cooperation (represented by the GIZ), whereas
the operation of the systems is left to the local community. In certain cases villages are also taking
part in the construction of the power plants with the so-called ‘in-kind contribution’. The whole
process starts with mobilisation of people who to be investors in the projects, who become responsible
for the exploitation, construction and development. This practice is in line with experience from other
energy projects around the world which shows that a community-based approach in which local
communities are involved while designing and installing the product often better ensures longevity
and feasibility of the rural energy services. The active participation of local communities is very
important for their acceptance of and knowledge about the product, and finally its active use. Handing
40
over the energy device/installation to the community only upon its completion risks the alienation of
the community from the product or the inefficient use of it.
A few working places have been created in the course of the GIZ projects related to the exploitation of
the projects – for instance security and collection of bills. Capacity-building also takes place as people
are trained how to operate the grid in case of a break-down. Most of the materials however are
imported from abroad – European or Chinese companies, and only few of them, as for instance the
columns, are produced in Uganda.
Another project of GIZ, a very innovative one, still in a test phase, is the so-called ‘pre-paid
metering’. This service is planned to work in the same way as basically the pre-paid phone cards work
– households could pre-pay certain amount of electricity and use it as long as it is exhausted. In view
of a problem discussed earlier in this work – the fact that poor people usually do not dispose of
constant revenues and find it hard to make savings and long-term planning, the author of this work
sees a great potential in this project. As many of the people who live in rural areas such as farmers,
fishermen or herders do not need constant electricity supply, this innovation represents a good
opportunity for them to pay only for the time they actually consume electricity. Another plus is the
fact that poor households would be able to see the advantage of the access to electricity and would
probably be more willing to further invest in that. According to the energy advisor interviewed
(Kondev, 2011), currently there are places with access to the network, but where the people cannot
afford connecting to it. In faraway regions the final price of electricity ends up being $2 per KW,
whereas normally it is 14 cents per KW. For a country with widespread poverty and a big number of
people living on less than $1.25 a day, the ‘pre-paid metering’ might be one of the very few options
for getting electricity access. Nevertheless, in the opinion of the author of this work, certain challenges
should be considered as well, as for instance the risk of unsustainability. As access to electricity can
allow for certain development, for instance education, free time and social participation for women,
health improvement, or electricity-driven job-creation in the local community, such a pre-paid service
could disrupt this development when the poor people would lack budget to pay further for it.
Another viable alternative of supplying poor households living in remote areas with energy, described
by the interviewed expert, is through micro-financing. For instance, by making use of micro-financing
someone in the village buys a solar panel and uses it to provide services to the rest of the village, such
as charging their cell phones. People would then pay to him for the energy services. This example
shows how by means of renewable energies the rural population can be supplied with energy without
the need for large state or business investments for grid extension and construction.
41
Despite all, both the energy advisor interviewed and the Energy and Mineral Sector Performance
Report 2008/9-2010/11 share that financing of renewable energy projects for rural electrification has
turned out to be a challenge. Although the government has provided one of the best frameworks for
renewable energies in Africa, private sector interest in grid extension to rural areas has not been
sufficient. The quite high interest rates of about 15-16% are also unattractive to the private sector, and
for micro-financing for households the interest rates go up to 40%. Public financing had therefore to
be availed. In addition to appropriations from the Government of Uganda, donor support to the Rural
Electrification Fund (REF) from donors such as GIZ, the World Bank and others, is one of the very
important sources of funding. Feed-in-tariffs have also been introduced not long ago; however the
government has not had enough finances to put that policy in practice. In addition, most renewable
energy technologies have much higher upfront investment costs, compared to other conventional
energy options. Affordability of consumers is thus not very big, especially in rural areas and the
financing mechanisms to address that are scarce. For foreign investors administrative and licensing
problems are also an impediment. Together with that, legal and institutional frameworks to support
new renewable energy investments are still inadequate. Uganda lacks, in addition, sufficient technical
and institutional capacity, and training, research and development in the renewable energy sector.
Finally, there is limited awareness and information of the availability, benefits and opportunities of
renewable energy within the public domain. A drawback of the current government’s policies and
projects that the interviewee also notes is that the attention is on big industries and big hydropower
plants, whereas less is being done for the remote poor areas. A lot of investments have been put in
diesel plants in order to create constant electricity supply for the businesses, which has reduced the
means available for renewable energy. All these considerations will inevitably act as barriers to the
increased production and use of renewable energy in the African state.
As in the case of Brazil, South-South cooperation is a plausible scenario, however in the case of
Uganda, the country would be a beneficiary rather than a contributor. Some projects for solar-water
heaters have been going on with Mexico, and the possibilities for wind energy have been explored,
where the country could profit from the Kenyan rich experience. China has been also quite active in
trying to enter the energy market in Uganda, and there are two power plants from Sri Lanka.
Despite the many positive sides renewable energies have and the fact that the Ugandan government is
persuaded in them, at this point in time renewable energy seems rather unaffordable for a big part of
the population in Uganda and especially rural areas which are the main target groups of increased
energy access. Even though they are the focus in many governmental programmes, real actions have
so far concentrated on assuring constant electricity supply to the industry and on large grids for more
42
populated areas. Nevertheless, the paces made by the government, international organisations and
local people towards broader energy access and wider use of renewable should not be neglected and
should be regarded as a good starting point.
These two case studies show a contrast in terms of both the access to energy and the chances of
increasing that access by raising the proportion of renewable energy. Brazil is much more advanced in
the energy production and the use of RETs for energy, and has a substantially smaller percentage of
the population without energy access. Its example will be difficult to emulate, however, due to the
uniqueness of the country in terms of geography and resources available, and due to the fact that the
use of renewables for energy is not a new phenomenon for Brazil – hydropower has been produced for
decades already. Uganda, despite being also rich in renewable energy resources, has not so far made
such an efficient use of them. Nevertheless, what is noticeable is that both countries have incentives
for using RETs and have made steps towards that, including specially designated programmes for
delivering renewable energy to the poor. Many challenges still lie ahead of both, and especially in
front of Uganda, in which, due to the nature of the problems and the similarities between developing
countries, South-South cooperation and learning could potentially play a key role. In that Brazil would
most probably be on the side of a know-how provider, whereas Uganda would be a beneficiary.
7. Conclusion
It has been estimated that the amount of electricity required to make it possible for people to read at
night, pump a minimal amount of drinking water and listen to radio broadcasts amounts to just
50 kWh per person per year. Poor people in developing countries, especially in rural areas, differ in
the ends for which they use energy and in their payment cycles from people in developed countries. In
other words, the level of energy consumption necessary and affordable to them is far below that of the
average citizen in an industrialized country. In the absence of economies of scale in rural and remote
areas, energy production and access could and should not be defined by macro considerations alone.
To greatly improve the quality of life for many poor households, reduce poverty, increase the level of
education and healthcare in developing countries, small amounts of energy would initially be
sufficient.
Renewable energies seem to be the most appropriate option to address the current issues of lack of
access to energy and the shortages and inequalities that this creates. Many of the technologies
necessary for generating renewable energy (wind, hydro, solar power and biofuels, among others) are
already available. However the challenges lie in how to further improve these techniques and adapt
43
them to specific local and cultural needs of developing countries, and how to deliver the energy at
affordable to them prices. This work has suggested several options for increasing energy production
and access in developing countries by means of renewable energies. Depending on the potential and
needs of the country, and in particular of the poor people, there could be large-scale projects such as
wind energy farms in Brazil, or small-scale technologies for rural and remote areas, such as the soccer
ball ‘Soccket’, or the solar medical suitcase.
Taking a realistic look one should recognize that existing limitations such as financing, red-tape, or
lack of public awareness, do not allow at the current stage for the use of only or predominantly
renewable energies in many of the developing countries. Non-conventional sources of energy have to
complement conventional ones; decentralized solutions need to be offered along centralized ones.
With view of the impacts of the climate change, the low energy access and the energy-poverty-
environment nexus, the long-term goal has to be however an increased use of renewable energies in
the energy mix of developing countries.
44
References:
African Development Bank et al. (2003). Poverty and Climate Change: Reducing the Vulnerability of
the Poor through Adaptation. Report. African Development Bank.
Alliance for Rural Electrification (ARE) (2011). Best Practices of the Alliance for Rural
Electrification. What Renewable Energy Can Achieve in Developing Countries. Brussels: ARE.
<http://www.ruralelec.org/fileadmin/DATA/Documents/06_Publications/Misc/ARE_Best_Practice_2
011.pdf> (accessed 15 May 2012)
Arab Water Academy (AWA) (2012, January 31). Renewable Energy in Bridging the Water Gap in
the Arab Region. REVE (Regulación Eólica con Vehículos Eléctricos). Retrieved from:
http://www.evwind.es/noticias.php?id_not=16308 (accessed 27 May 2012)
Azuela, G. E. & Barroso, L.A. (2011, April). Design and Performance of Policy Instruments to
Promote the Development of Renewable Energy: Emerging Experience in Selected Developing
Countries. Energy and Mining Sector Board Discussion Paper No. 22. Washington, DC: The World
Bank.
<http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTENERGY2/Resources/DiscPaper22.pdf> (accessed 27 May
2012)
Climate Parliament (n.d.). How Can We Trigger a Surge of Investment in Renewable Energy?
Climate Parliament Programme. London: Climate Parliament.
Cohen, A. (2012). Personal interview with Abigail Cohen, VP of Social Development at Uncharted
Play, on 16 March 2012.
Eletrobras (2007). Projeto Ribeirinhas. Eletrobras. Retrieved from:
http://www.eletrobras.gov.br/EM_Programas_Ribeirinhas/objetivo.asp (accessed 28 May 2012)
European Commission (2010). Green paper: EU development policy in support of inclusive growth
45
and sustainable development. Increasing the impact of EU development policy. Green paper. Brussels:
European Commission.
<http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/GREEN_PAPER_COM_2010_629_POLITIQUE
_DEVELOPPEMENT_EN.pdf> (Accessed 20 April 2011)
Flavin, C. & Aeck, M. H. (2008). Energy for Development: The Potential Role of Renewable Energy
in Meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Paper prepared for the REN21 Network. Washington,
DC: Worldwatch Institute.
< http://www.worldwatch.org/system/files/ren21-1.pdf> (accessed 25 May 2012)
Frayssinet, F. (2011, October 26). Brazil: Boycott of Dam Hearing Shows 'Radical' Foreign Policy
Shift. Inter Press Service (IPS). Retrieved from: http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=105616
(accessed 28 May 2012)
Galdino, M. A. & Lima, J. H.G. (2002, January 6-11). World Climate & Energy Event. The Brazilian
PRODEEM Programme for Rural Electrification Using Photovoltaics (pp. 77-84). Rio de Janeiro:
CEPEL - Electric Power Research Center.
< http://www.rio02.com/proceedings/pdf/077_Galdino.pdf> (accessed 28 May 2012)
GTZ. (n.d.). Brazil: Solar industry. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH
(GTZ). Retrieved from: http://www.gtz.de/en/presse/33248.htm (accessed 25 May 2012)
Hadfield, A. & Youngs, R. (2008, October). Development, Security and Energy: Improving
Coherence. Policy Brief. Bonn: EADI
International Energy Agency (2007). Key world energy statistics 2007. Paris: IEA
International Energy Agency (2009). World energy outlook 2009. Paris: IEA
46
Intermediate Technology Development Group (ITDG) (2004). Powering Poverty Reduction. ITDG
Position Paper for Renewables 2004, Bonn.
<http://practicalaction.org/docs/advocacy/powering_poverty_reduction%20.pdf> (accessed 25 May
2012)
Kondev, B. (2011). Personal interview with Bozhil Kondev, Energy Advisor at GIZ (German Agency
for International Cooperation), on 01 December 2011.
Machado, O. (2011, June 06). Matriz Energética Terá Aumento de Participação das Renováveis Nesta
Década. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Retrieved from:
http://www.epe.gov.br/imprensa/PressReleases/20110606_1.pdf (accessed 28 May 2012)
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development of Uganda (MEMD) (2007). The Renewable Energy
Policy of Uganda. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development of Uganda.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development of Uganda (MEMD) (2011). Energy and Mineral
Sector Performance Report 2008/9-2010/11. Report. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development of
Uganda.
Ministry of Mines and Energy, Brazil (2011, November 11). Luz Para Todos Completa Oito Anos
com 14 Milhões de Brasileiros Atendidos. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved from:
http://www.mme.gov.br/mme/noticias/destaque_foto/destaque_352.html (accessed 28 May 2012)
OECD/IEA (2010, September). Energy Poverty: How to Make Modern Energy Acces Universal?
Special Early Excerpt of the Wolrd Energy Outlook 2010. Paris: OECD/IEA.
OECD/IEA (2012). World Energy Outlook. Retrieved from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/
47
Plaisant, J. (2011). Personal interview with Jan Plaisant, Product Manager Wind Energy Projects at
LEME Engenharia Ltda, on 04 November 2011.
Perch, L. (2011). Personal interview with Leisa Perch, Policy Specialist/Team Leader – Rural and
Sustainable Development at UNDP International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), on 16
November 2011.
Rolland, S. (2010, September). Energy Access: an Overall Progress Hiding Immense Disparities and
Despair. MDG Review Report. Brussels: Alliance for Rural Electrification (ARE)
< http://www.mdg-review.org/PDFs/AREOct10.pdf> (accessed 27 May 2012)
Sustainable Energy for All (2012). Sustainable Energy for All Website, United Nations Foundation.
Retrieved from: http://sustainableenergyforall.org (accessed 25 May 2012)
The Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS) (2008). Sustainable Energy for the
Developing Countries. Report. Trieste: TWAS.
<http://twas.ictp.it/publications/twas-reports/SustainEnergyReport.pdf> (accessed 27 May 2012)
The Secretary-General’s High-level Group on Sustainable Energy for All (2012). Sustainable Energy
for All: A Framework for Action. New York: United Nations
<http://www.sustainableenergyforall.org/images/content/SE_for_All_-
_Framework_for_Action_FINAL.pdf> (accessed 15 May 2012)
The World Bank.(2009, August 29) Overview: Understanding, Measuring and Overcoming Poverty.
Retrieved from: http://www.worldbank.org/
UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2002, December). Access to Energy in
Developing Countries. Postnote, Issue N 191
United Nations (2011, September 20). UN General Assembly high-level meeting on the theme
"Addressing desertification, land degradation and drought in the context of sustainable development
48
and poverty eradication". UN Web Services Section, Department of Public Information. Retrieved
from http://www.un.org/en/ga/desertification2011/ (accessed 25 May 2012)
UN-Energy (2005, June). The Energy Challenge for Achieving the Millennium Development Goals,
UN-Energy Paper. UN-Energy Knowledge Network.
<http://www.un-energy.org/sites/default/files/share/une/un-enrg_paper.pdf> (accessed 25 May 2012)
UN Secretary-General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change (2010, April). Energy for a
Sustainable Future. Summary Report and Recommendations. New York: UN.
Uncharted Play (2012). ‘The Soccket’, Uncharted Play Website, Retrieved from:
http://www.unchartedplay.com/ (accessed 27 May 2012)
UNDP (2000). World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability. New York:
UNDP
<http://www.undp.org/content/dam/aplaws/publication/en/publications/environment-energy/www-ee-
library/sustainable-energy/world-energy-assessment-energy-and-the-challenge-of-
sustainability/World%20Energy%20Assessment-2000.pdf> (accessed 15 May 2012)
UNDP (2011a). Scaling Up Decentralized Energy Services in Nepal. New York, NY, UNDP,
<http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Poverty%20Reduction/Participatory%20Local%20D
evelopment/Nepal_REDP_web.pdf> (accessed 15 May 2012).
UNDP (2011b). Towards an ‘Energy Plus’ Approach for the Poor. A review of good practices and
lessons learned from Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok, UNDP Asia-Pacific, Environment and Energy.
<http://web.undp.org/asia/pdf/EnergyPlus.pdf> (accessed 15 May 2012)
UNDP and WHO(2009). The Energy Access Situation in Developing Countries: A Review Focusing
on the Least Developed Countries and Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: United Nations Development
Programme.
49
< http://content.undp.org/go/cms-service/stream/asset/?asset_id=2205620> (accessed 25 May 2012)
We Care Solar (2012). ‘The Solar Suitcase’, We Care Solar Website. Retrieved from
http://wecaresolar.org/solutions/solar-suitcase/ (accessed 22 April 2012)
Winrock International et al. (2002, October). Trade Guide on Renewable Energy in Brazil. Trade
Guide. Winrock International Brazil.
World Resources Institute 1 (n.d.). India-Brazil-South Africa Declaration on Clean Energy. World
Resources Institute. Retrieved from: http://projects.wri.org/sd-pams-database/brazil/india-brazil-
south-africa-declaration-clean-energy (accessed 28 May 2012)
World Resources Institute 2 (n.d.). Luz no Campo - Light in the Countryside Rural Electrification
Program. World Resources Institute. Retrieved from: http://projects.wri.org/sd-pams-
database/brazil/luz-no-campo-light-countryside-rural-electrification-program (accessed 28 May 2012)
Yapp, R. (2011, September 28). Brazil Soars in Clean Energy Rankings. Renewable Energy
World.Com. Retrieved from:
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/09/brazil-sets-the-pace-in-clean-energy
(accessed 28 May 2012)
50
Annex I
Interview questions for the two case studies – Brazil and Uganda
1) What has recently been done to provide more and better energy services to the developing
countries?
2) What are the barriers – e.g. political, economic, technological, institutional – that obstruct the
expansion of renewable energies in the developing world or that you have encountered when
trying to supply developing countries with renewable energies ?
2) What in your opinion can be improved? And can something be improved (if for instance the
regime is not cooperative, that might be difficult to change)?
3) Do you see some negative sides in providing the developing countries with renewable
energies? Are they accessible?
4) Do you think that problems such as social exclusion and social inequalities can be reduced by
means of more renewable energies?
5) Would you be ready to supply certain remote villages/places, or to make the prices of the
energy accessible to the poor as part of your projects? Or if more projects are guaranteed to
you by the EC, for instance?
6) Do you see any signs of South-South cooperation, can some lessons drawn from your work be
used in other developing countries?
51
Annex II
Interview questions for ‘Soccket’ at Uncharted Play
1) Why is ‘Soccket’ an innovative solution to the problem of providing energy to poor
households in developing countries?
2) What are the advantages/benefits of this alternative form of energy?
3) Is ‘Soccket’ available and affordable to the poor people in developing countries?
4) How can local structures and people help popularize the product?
5) Is the product going to equally benefit boys and girls?
6) What are the positive externalities of the use of ‘Soccket’?
top related