rick banting, cet electrical mechanical specialist ... · copper and copper-zinc mines 2 1% nickel...

Post on 19-Aug-2020

1 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Pedestrian Vehicle Interaction Symposium

November 13, 2014

Rick Banting, CET Electrical Mechanical Specialist Workplace Safety North

Pedestrian - Vehicle Interaction

• Agenda

– Introduction & Welcome

• WSN

• What is Pedestrian-Vehicle interaction?

• The combustion engine revolution

• Mine vehicle injuries

• Why interaction?

• Where are we?

– Guest Presentations

• Tools, Practices to help prevent loss

2

Pedestrian Vehicle Interaction Symposium

• Exits

• Washrooms

• Stretching

3

• Pedestrian Vehicle Interaction?

4

Artist Unknown: thanks to Air Operated Equipment, Montreal ,Quebec

• Or this?

5

Artist Unknown: thanks to Air Operated Equipment, Montreal ,Quebec

• Or this?

• Undesirable

contact

6

Artist Unknown: thanks to Air Operated Equipment, Montreal ,Quebec

Pedestrian - Vehicle Interaction

• Un

7

Introduction of engine to underground

• Underground prime movers as early as 1939

• Resistance

• Widely introduced in 1960’s

• Tended to replace rail & pneumatic driven equipment – Flexibility

– Capacity

– Reliability

• Self propelled equipment designed now for virtually every key operation in the mining cycle – Personal carriers

– Drilling & loading explosives

– Excavating & hauling

– Ground support & materials

8

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Lost

-tim

e In

jury

Rat

e p

er 1

00

FTE

wo

rker

s Ontario Mining Industry and Mining

Transportation Related LTI Rates 2004 – 2013*

Mining LTI Rate

Transportation Related LTI Rate

Source: WSIB, EIW, as of September 30, 2014 * Mining includes Rate Groups 110, 113, 119

● 2013 Mining Lost time Injury Rate: 0.82 per 100 FTE workers ● 2013 Transportation Related Injury Rate: 0.06 per 100 FTE workers ● Transportation Related LTIs 8% of Industry LTIs - 2013

Ontario Mining Industry LTI Rate Decrease – 56% (2004-2013)

Transportation Related LTI Rate Decrease – 45% (2004-2013)

Ontario Mining Industry

8

19

14

1

41

6

15

5 4 3 3 1 1 0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Falls of ground,rockbursts

Powered haulage/transportation off

site

Falling, rolling orsliding rock or

material of anykind

Runs of material Slips and falls ofperson

Machinery Unconsciousness

Nu

mb

er o

f R

epo

rted

Inju

ries

Incident Classification

Fatal and Critical Injuries 2009 - Aug. 31, 2014

Critical Injuries

Fatal Injuries

Sources: Ontario Ministry of Labour, MIS, ICE, 2009 - Aug. 31, 2014 as of Sept.15, 2014. WSN, Mining Sector Fatality Database, as of Sept.15, 2014.

Top 7 incident categories

Ontario Mining Industry - Transportation Related Injuries Lost-time Injuries: 2004-2013

Based on WSIB, EIW, Claim Cost Schema, September 2014 Snapshot * Mining includes Rate Groups 110, 113, 119

Age of Worker Total %

15-24 13 8% 25-34 42 25% 35-44 51 31%

45-54 44 27% 55-64 15 9%

65+ 1 1% Total 166 100%

Business Classification Unit

Age of Worker

Business Classification Unit Total %

Gold Mine Operations 20 12%

Copper and Copper-Zinc Mines 2 1%

Nickel Mine Operations 65 39%

Other Metal Mines 8 5%

Peat Operations 3 2%

Salt Mines 13 8%

Other Non-Metal Mines 3 2%

Contract Drilling, Oil and Gas 1 1%

Other Services Incidental to Crude 1 1%

Gold Mines, Contracting 9 5%

Nickel Mines, Contracting 11 7%

Other Mines, Contracting 11 7%

Other Services Incidental to Mining 19 11%

Total 166 100%

Ontario Mining Industry - Transportation Related Injuries Lost-time Injuries: 2004-2013

Based on WSIB, EIW, Claim Cost Schema, September 2014 Snapshot * Mining includes Rate Groups 110, 113, 119

Incident Type Total %

Highway Incident 29 17%

Non-highway Incident 120 72% Pedestrian Struck by Vehicle, Mobile Equipment 12 7%

Railway Incident 4 2%

Aircraft Incident 1 1%

Total 166 100%

Non-highway Incident Type Total %

Non-highway Collision between Vehicles or Mobile Equipment 3 3%

Vehicle, Mobile Equip. Struck Stationary Object 20 17%

Fall From Moving Vehicle, Mobile Equipment 8 7%

Fell From and Struck by Vehicle, Mobile Equipment 3 3%

Overturned 13 11%

Loss of Control 5 4%

Struck by Shifting Load 2 2%

Sudden Start or Stop-N.E.C 16 13%

Non-Collision Incident, N.E.C. 38 32%

Non-highway Incident, N.E.C. 12 10% Total 120 100%

Incident Type Non-highway incidents

Ontario Mining Industry - Transportation Related Injuries Lost-time Injuries: 2004-2013

Based on WSIB, EIW, Claim Cost Schema, September 2014 Snapshot * Mining includes Rate Groups 110, 113, 119

Part of Body Injured

Top 10 – Nature of Injury

Part of Body Injured Total %

Head & Neck 25 15% Shoulder 10 6% Back & Spine 61 37% Wrists, Hands, Fingers 6 4% Arms, Elbows, Forearms 1 1% Trunk, Chest, Abdomen 15 9% Legs, Knees, Ankles, Feet 28 17% Multiple Parts 20 12% Total 166 100%

Nature Total %

Sprains, Strains, Tears 78 47%

Fractures 30 18%

Bruises, Contusions 11 7%

Dorsopathies 9 5%

Sprains And Bruises 7 4%

Nonspecific Injuries and Disorders 6 4%

Concussions 5 3%

Dislocations 3 2%

Amputations 3 2%

Fractures and Other Injuries 3 2% Total 155 93%

Pedestrian - Vehicle Interaction

• Humans

– Distracted

– Longer shifts

– Recipe for collision

– Exposure to highway travel

– Poorly trained

– An abundance of procedures

– Operator sight lines

14

• Click

15

• Click

16

Smarter Cars

• Security

– Doors, glass

• Efficiency

– Exhaust oxygen, temperatures, throttle position

• Comfort & convenience

– Air temperature, suspension, lighting, parking, seats

• Safety

– Braking, Air bags, tire pressure

• Maintenance

– Ignition, fuel

17

The LHD, the Mining Workhorse

18

Perception

19

Risk Assessment

• Part of your management of change

– new vehicles

– changes to vehicles

20

Where are we!

21

Introduction of Diesel Powered equipment

No pedestrians, One vehicle per level

An assembly of attached sensors, cameras

Total immersion of operators

top related