rodriguez_et_al_swot_igarss2011.ppt

1-1

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

INTERFEROMETRIC PROCESSING OF FRESH WATER BODIES FOR SWOT

INTERFEROMETRIC PROCESSING OF FRESH WATER BODIES FOR SWOT

Ernesto Rodríguez, JPL/CalTech

Delwyn Moller, Remote Sensing Solution

Xiaoqing Wu, JPL/CalTech

Kostas Andreadis, JPL/CalTech

1-2

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Study AreaStudy Area

• ~1000 km reach of the Ohio River basin

• Drains an area of ~220,000 km2

• Topography from National Elevation Dataset (30 m)

• River vector maps from HydroSHEDS

• Channel width and depth from developed power-law relationships

• Explicitly modeled rivers with mean widths at least 50 m

1-3

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Hydrodynamic ModelingHydrodynamic Modeling• LISFLOOD-FP raster-based model• 1-D solver for channel flow• 2-D flood spreading model for floodplain flow• Kinematic, Diffusive and Inertial formulations• Requires information on topography, channel

characteristics and boundary inflows• Needed to coarsen spatial resolution to 100 m

SWOT Hydrology Virtual Mission Meeting, Paris, 22 Sep 2010

• Simulation period of 1 month

• Boundary inflows from USGS gauge measurements

1-4

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Data from the SWOT Land SimulatorData from the SWOT Land Simulator

Along-Track

Ran

ge

The SWOT simulator produces data with the correct signal to noise ratio, layover and geometric decorrelation scattering properties. Notice for SWOT the land SNR is low, while surface water stands out.

1-5

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Challenges for near-nadir interferometry over land

Challenges for near-nadir interferometry over land

• Topographic layover and low land SNR makes conventional phase unwrapping approaches unfeasible• Notice that fringes are well defined over the water, since the water is flat and quite bright at nadir incidence.• The signal from topography may contaminate the signal over the water (see next slide)

1-6

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Radar Layover and its Effect on Interferometry

Radar Layover and its Effect on Interferometry

€

δΦ=arg 1+PLand

PWater

γ Land

γWater

exp i ΦLand − ΦWater( )[ ] ⎡

⎣ ⎢

⎤

⎦ ⎥

Brightness Ratio (land darker than water)

Correlation Ratio (land less correlated than water)

Volumetric Layover (trees)

Surface Layover

Points on dashed line arrive at the same time

1-7

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

NASA SWOT Land Processing Approach

NASA SWOT Land Processing Approach

• Processing approach relies on having a fair estimate of topography and water body elevation– Estimate can be derived from a priori data or

previous SWOT passes (to account for dynamics)

• A priori information is used to generate reference interferograms for phase flattening and estimation of layover (to avoid averaging in land)

1-8

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Interferogram after phase flattening with reference interferogram

Interferogram after phase flattening with reference interferogram

Noisy interferogram Noisy interferogram after flattening with reference

1-9

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Layover region identificationLayover region identification

Noisy interferogram Noisy interferogram after flattening with reference

1-10

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Land Processing Flow to GeolocationLand Processing Flow to Geolocation

1-11

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Layover maskAll pixels with any layover are red

Layover maskAll pixels with any layover are red

Mid-Swath Near-Swath

1-12

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

What if we accept pixels whose expected error is < 5 cm?

What if we accept pixels whose expected error is < 5 cm?

1-13

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

From raw heights to hydrologic variables

From raw heights to hydrologic variables

Discharge

Width Flow Depth(height from bottom)

Slope

Manning’s equation

1-14

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Water ClassificationWater Classification

1-15

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

River Channel MaskRiver Channel Mask

. Pavelsky and L. Smith, “Rivwidth: A software tool for the calculation of river widths from remotely sensed imagery,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 70, 2008.

1-16

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Center Line MaskCenter Line Mask

1-17

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Get Center LineGet Center Line

. Pavelsky and L. Smith, “Rivwidth: A software tool for the calculation of river widths from remotely sensed imagery,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 70, 2008.

1-18

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Project to Local CoordinatesProject to Local Coordinates

s

c

• Spline interpolate center line to constant separation points downstream• Use spline to obtain local tangent plane coordinate system at each point

• For each point:-Use KDTree algorithm to find closest centerline point- Project point into local coordinate system to get along and across-track distance

1-19

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Measured Noisy ElevationMeasured Noisy Elevation

1-20

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Unsmoothed Elevation ErrorsUnsmoothed Elevation Errors

1-21

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Height Error vs Downstream DistanceHeight Error vs Downstream Distance

1-22

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Height Error vs Downstream Distancewith Downstream Averaging

Height Error vs Downstream Distancewith Downstream Averaging

1-23

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Measurement ErrorsDownstream Averaging: 200 m

Measurement ErrorsDownstream Averaging: 200 m

1-24

SWOTSWOT

IGARSSJuly 27, 2011

Measurement ErrorsDownstream Averaging: 1 km

Measurement ErrorsDownstream Averaging: 1 km