sacs compliance - new interpretations led to new tool
Post on 24-Feb-2016
30 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
SACS Compliance -New Interpretations Led to New Tool
Ms. Patricia Ramsey, University of Central FloridaDr. Tace Crouse, University of Central Florida
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 1
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 2
Background
Decennial and Fifth-Year SACS Reviews
Revisions in standards
Revision in CR 2.8
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 3
SACS revised CR 2.8
The number of full-time faculty members is adequate to support the mission of the institution and to ensure the quality and integrity of each of its academic programs.
…it includes the number of full-time faculty, disaggregation by academic program and mode of delivery, and location of full-time faculty…
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 4
Definitions – past and present Full-time faculty members
Adequate number
Academic Program
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 5
Old versus New
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 6
Early Years: Microsoft Access Report
SAIR 2012 7
Next: on-line delivery -PORTAL
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 8
All users view the same version Available when the user is ready
to view – no lost .pdfs Various tabs for term vs. annual User can filter to meet their needs
Redesign! New definitions!
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 9
1) Report by Location 2) Make Web a new location 3) Pull out GEP Foundation
Courses 4) Organize data by Program not
Dept Each course has a CIP – set up a
mapping table to assign each CIP to a program offered
Departments had never seen SCH data organized
in this manner before!!
Collect and Code Current Data
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 10
SAS Enterprise Guide:
Pull off courses from Master Schedule, identify CIP code and all instructors. Identify instructors as Full-Time Faculty, Adjunct, GTA Sum Student Credit Hours for each course section by each instructor type
Data cleanup!
Build History and Code ‘Program/Discipline’
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 11
Add current year to prior years so history is available in portal
Code course CIPS to ‘Program CIPS’ for report display
Pull web courses out in unique location, Flag low percentages for review.
Web report: New and Improved
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 12
Add current year to prior years so history is available in portal
Choice of Display
What courses are Foundation?Areas of Concern
Detail to support explanation
Web report: New and Improved
SAIR 2012 13
Web report: SCH by Instructor Type
SAIR 2012 14
Red values in Full-Time Faculty % SCH are below the threshold and need explanation
Web report: Summarized ‘Areas of concern’
SAIR 2012 15
Dept. can focus attention on these areas for detailed review
Web report: Detail provided
SAIR 2012 16
Microsoft Excel Pivot Tables
SAIR 2012 17
To respond to requirements of the mid-cycle report, departments were provided with a pivot table so they could drill down to the detail.
Microsoft Excel Pivot Tables
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 18
By reviewing the detail, they can provide an explanation and if appropriate, a course of action
2 large sections were taught by PT Faculty at this location. Do they have special skills that make them the best choice?
Feedback from colleges
Small number of CIP assignments needed adjustments
Special categories ≠ programs
Quality and integrity of programs can be maintained with varying numbers of FT faculty
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 19
YOUR Comments and Questions
9/24/2012 SAIR 2012 20
CONTACT INFORMATION
UCF Office of Institutional Research Web:www.iroffice.ucf.edu Phone: (407) 823-5061
Ms. Patricia Ramsey: Patricia.Ramsey@ucf.edu
Dr. Tace Crouse Tace.Crouse@ucf.edu
4 SAIR 2012 21
top related