selection and assessment

Post on 24-Dec-2014

1.342 Views

Category:

Technology

5 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

ERE Webinar from 7/23/08, presented by Wendell Williams.

TRANSCRIPT

Assessment !Everything you ever wanted to know but were afraid to ask

Dr. Wendell WilliamsManaging Director

ScientificSelection.com, LLC770-792-6857

Who am I

• 10 years Executive Management• 10 years VP Positions Training• 20 years Consulting• BSIM, MBA, MS, Ph.D. • American Psychological Association• Society for Industrial and Organizational

Psychology• Association of Test Publishers

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

What is Assessment?

• A scary place?• A special program?• A certain kind of test?• Only big organizations? • Unfairly screen-out people?• A blight on humanity?

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Assessments

Any method used to evaluate whether a person has skills to perform a job

Applications: – Hiring– Promotion – Job preview– Training needs

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Not New!BCE • Aaron suggests assessment process to Moses• Chinese assess for bureaucrats and courtiers• Plato outlines management assessment processCE• c. 1800 Surgeons and Cadets • c. 1850 Government clerks • c. 1900 Streetcar operators and salesmen• c. WWI and WWII officer candidates

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Driving Test = Assessment

– Written exam– Eye test – Driving Skills

• Parking• Traffic• Signals • Simulators

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

“Trendy”

Assessments tend to rise and fall with trends in the labor market

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Biggest Obstacle

Human nature encouragespeople to make sweeping judgments about skillsbased on small snippetsof information (Halo and Horns effect)

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Rolling the Dice

Information snippets such as interviews generally screen-out blatantly unqualified candidates; but, the odds of hiring or promoting the wrong person are no better than chance.

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

ROI Often Ignored

The financial impact of interview/resume assessment can be considerable:– 20% of base salary for unskilled– 30% of base salary for skilled and semi-skilled– 50% of base salary for professional and

managerial

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

ROI comes from…

• More productivity• Less training• Faster learning• Lower turnover• Less training• Fewer mistakes• Motivated employees

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Professional Assessment Results

A professionally developed multi-trait, multi-method assessment process usually cuts training, doubles employee productivity and reduces turnover by half.

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Screen In

Screen Out

What Does Assessment ‘Assess’?

Job Performance = How + What• How= having the right KSA’s for the job• What = clear expectations, results, products

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Tennis Example

What = Win majority of setsHow = Hard serve, accuracy, endurance, agility,

forehand return, backhand return, game strategy

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Assessments

Assessments evaluate the candidate’s job “how’s”…

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Typical Assessment Areas

1) Cognitive: thinking, learning, problem solving, planning, technical

2) Interpersonal: interacting, behaving, persuading, presenting

3) Motivational: likes and dislikes

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Common Assessment Tools

• Handwriting• Age• Education• Projective test• Interview• Grade point avg. • Recommendation

• Personality test• Motivation test• Reference check• Biographical data• Situational int.• Behavioral int. • Mental ability• Simulation

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Common Assessment Tools (some good…some not so much)

Off the Wall• Handwriting• Astrology• Pseudo –psych tests

Usually Unrelated• Age • Education• Self assessment• Grade point avg.• Recommendations

Little data –big assumptions • General Interview • Personality test • Motivation test • Reference check

Hard to fake - Job related• Biographical data• Situational int.• Behavioral int. • Mental ability• Simulation

Assessments = Common Sense

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Hard to Fake + Job Related• Demonstrate Skills

– Problem solving tests– Scheduling exercises– In-baskets– Participation in simulations

• Give concrete examples– Situational Interviews– Behavioral Interviews

• Self-descriptions– Self-descriptions– Standard interviews

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Job Attitudes

Candidate Iceberg

Interviews/ impressions

Job Skills

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Look Under the Water Line

Attitudes

Interests

Motivations

Details

Spelling

Communication

Problem Solving

Learning

Self Descriptions Can be Faked

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Demonstrations = Hard to FakeWhat You See is What You Get

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Workshops?

Professional Assessment Guidelines

• Clearly identify what to evaluate

• ONLY use assessments developed to predict performance

• Make sure assessments are accurate and trustworthy

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Example

If a critical element is: • Learning• Problem Solving • Coaching• Persuasion• Planning• Enthusiasm• Mixed elements

Then evaluate (assess) for: • Learning ability• Solving problems• Ability to coach• Persuasiveness• Planning skills• Motivation• Multi-trait/Multi-

method

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Getting Started

• Clearly define “performance”• Identify “hows” (job requirement and

business necessity)• Choose proven professional tools• Confirm that “hows” differentiate between

high and low performance • Use a MTMM approach

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

STOP!

Assessment tests and training tests are NOT the same: training tests evaluate interpersonal differences regardless of performance. Hiring tests evaluate performance regardless of interpersonal differences

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Assessments Evaluate “Hows” “Hows” Lead to Performance

Test Score

Performance

+

-

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Summary

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Professional Assessments

Fairly and accurately evaluate whether a person has skills to perform a job

Applications: – Hiring– Promotion – Job preview– Training needs

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Not NewBCE • Aaron suggests assessment process to Moses• Chinese assess for bureaucrats and courtiers• Plato outlines management assessment processCE• c. 1800 Surgeons and Cadets • c. 1850 Government clerks • c. 1900 Streetcar operators and salesmen• c. WWI and WWII officer candidates

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Require Discipline

Human nature encouragespeople to make sweeping judgments about skillsbased on small snippetsof information (Halo and Horns effect)

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Impressive ROI

Differences between high and low performance are estimated to be:– 20% of base salary for unskilled– 30% of base salary for skilled and semi-skilled– 50% of base salary for professional and

managerial

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Multi-trait/Multi Method

• Evaluate critical job activities• Hard to fake• Level the playing field• Fair to all applicants• Based on job requirements and business

necessity• Scores relate to job performance• Pay for themselves in one or two hires

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Don’t Stand Alone

Even the best assessments cannot compensate for:– Bad managers (the greatest source of job

dissatisfaction) – Frustrating working conditions– Low pay or benefits– Poor executive leadership– Lack of training

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

Q & A

Copyright 2008, ScientificSelection.com 770-792-6857

top related